A Pilot Study of the Efficacy of Active Leptospermum Honey for the Treatment of Partial-Thickness Facial Burns.

OBJECTIVE: Research suggests that active Leptospermum honey (ALH) improves outcomes in patients with partial-thickness burns by enhancing healing and reepithelialization rates, as well as by protecting against antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. This study assessed the effectiveness of ALH gel on healing time, bacterial growth, patient satisfaction, and cost of treatment. DESIGN: Single-arm, prospective case series. SETTING AND PATIENTS: Seven patients (aged 7-64 years) with partial-thickness facial burns were recruited from a northeastern US burn center. INTERVENTION: All patients cleansed their wounds daily with soap and water, after which they applied ALH gel. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Three physicians independently rated healing using wound photography and daily tests for the presence of exudate. Wound cultures on days 1 and 7 (±2 days) assessed bacterial growth. Patients completed a satisfaction survey at the end of treatment, and cost of treatment was calculated. MAIN RESULTS: Healing time ranged from 3 to 14 days (mean, 8.1 days). Wound cultures revealed normal bacterial growth on days 1 and 7 for all patients. Patients rated ALH gel favorably, with the most common complaint of stickiness in 5 patients. One patient experienced transient burning on application that did not interrupt treatment. Average hospital-based cost of treatment was $26.15 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Healing time was congruent with or better than what would have been expected with standard treatment. Furthermore, despite no antibiotic treatment, wound culture results yielded no abnormal bacterial growth. Finally, patients overall reported satisfaction with treatment. The findings of this study suggest that ALH is a clinically and economically valuable treatment for partial-thickness facial burns.

Results of a protocol of transfusion threshold and surgical technique on transfusion requirements in burn patients.

INTRODUCTION: Blood loss and high rates of transfusion in burn centers remains an area of ongoing concern. Blood use brings the risk of infection, adverse reaction, and immunosuppression. METHODS: A protocol to reduce blood loss and blood use was implemented. Analysis included 3-year periods before and after institution of the protocol. All patients were transfused for a hemoglobin below 8.0 gm/dL. RESULTS: Operations per admission did not change during the two time periods (0.78 in each). Overall units transfused per operation decreased from 1.56+/-0.06 to 1.25+/-0.14 units after instituting the protocol (p<0.05). Also, units transfused per admission decreased from 1.21+/-0.15 to 0.96+/-0.06 units of blood (p<0.05). This was noticed particularly in burns of less than 20% surface area, declining from 386 to 46 units after protocol institution, from 0.37 to 0.04 units per admission, and from 0.79 to 0.08 units per operation in this group of smallest burns. There was no change noted in the larger burns. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that a defined protocol of hemostasis, technique, and transfusion trigger should be implemented in the process of burn excision and grafting. This will help especially those patients with the smallest burns, essentially eliminating transfusion need in that group.

Subcutaneous Injection of Percocet: A Case of Severe Soft Tissue Loss.

Prescription drug abuse ranks as the second most common class of illicit drug use in the United States, and one mechanism of opiate abuse involves intravenous injection of enteral narcotics such as oxycodone or hydrocodone. The authors describe a patient who sustained significant soft tissue necrosis after intravenously injecting a solution made from crushed enteral narcotics, with a focus on the operative course that resulted due to a delay in initial definitive treatment. The patient's wounds encompassed 8% total body surface area and covered 247 cm2. A 55-year-old female was admitted to the burn unit (West Penn Burn Center, Western Pennsylvania Hospital, Pittsburgh, PA) after she initially presented with infection and cellulitis to her bilateral upper extremities 3 weeks after intravenously injecting herself with crushed oxycodone/acetaminophen. She underwent numerous sequential operative repairs including initial debridement, placement of dermal replacement templates, and several split-thickness autografts and xenografts. Her total length of stay was 59 days, broken into an initial 47-day stay, and a subsequent 12-day readmission due to graft failure secondary to poor follow-up. As the number of prescription drug abusers rises, it is possible that an increase in attempts to intravenously abuse enteral narcotics may also rise. As such, burn centers should be prepared for the extent of potential limb necrosis and the operative treatment that may ensue.

The use of tourniquets in the excision of unexsanguinated extremity burn wounds.

PURPOSE: Tangential excision of burns is complicated by blood loss. Tourniquet use decreases blood loss, but adequacy of excision has been questioned. An attempt was made to assess the value of not exsanguinating the limb prior to tourniquet inflation to improve visualization of bleeding points and subsequent engraftment. METHODS: Eleven excisions of bilateral extremity wounds were performed. One limb was excised without the benefit of a tourniquet, the other with tourniquet but without exsanguination. Tangential excision was performed, hemostasis achieved, and blood loss quantified. Engraftment of skin was assessed at first dressing change and at initial follow-up after discharge. RESULTS: Area of burn was the same, 4.8% with tourniquet, 5.1% without (P=0.38). Overall blood loss was less with tourniquet control, 100-259 cm(3) (P=0.002); as was blood loss per area, 0.19-0.58 cc/cm(2) (P=0.04). Graft take was similar, 98.2% early and 98.1% later with tourniquet, with 98.2 and 96.8% take without (P>0.1). CONCLUSIONS: Tourniquet use in the unexsanquinated extremity reduced blood loss without affecting engraftment.