Structural insights into two distinct binding modules for Lys63-linked polyubiquitin chains in RNF168.

The E3 ubiquitin (Ub) ligase RNF168 plays a critical role in the initiation of the DNA damage response to double-strand breaks (DSBs). The recruitment of RNF168 by ubiquitylated targets involves two distinct regions, Ub-dependent DSB recruitment module (UDM) 1 and UDM2. Here we report the crystal structures of the complex between UDM1 and Lys63-linked diUb (K63-Ub2) and that between the C-terminally truncated UDM2 (UDM2ΔC) and K63-Ub2. In both structures, UDM1 and UDM2ΔC fold as a single α-helix. Their simultaneous bindings to the distal and proximal Ub moieties provide specificity for Lys63-linked Ub chains. Structural and biochemical analyses of UDM1 elucidate an Ub-binding mechanism between UDM1 and polyubiquitylated targets. Mutations of Ub-interacting residues in UDM2 prevent the accumulation of RNF168 to DSB sites in U2OS cells, whereas those in UDM1 have little effect, suggesting that the interaction of UDM2 with ubiquitylated and polyubiquitylated targets mainly contributes to the RNF168 recruitment.

Structural basis for ubiquitin recognition by ubiquitin-binding zinc finger of FAAP20.

Several ubiquitin-binding zinc fingers (UBZs) have been reported to preferentially bind K63-linked ubiquitin chains. In particular, the UBZ domain of FAAP20 (FAAP20-UBZ), a member of the Fanconi anemia core complex, seems to recognize K63-linked ubiquitin chains, in order to recruit the complex to DNA interstrand crosslinks and mediate DNA repair. By contrast, it is reported that the attachment of a single ubiquitin to Rev1, a translesion DNA polymerase, increases binding of Rev1 to FAAP20. To clarify the specificity of FAAP20-UBZ, we determined the crystal structure of FAAP20-UBZ in complex with K63-linked diubiquitin at 1.9 Å resolution. In this structure, FAAP20-UBZ interacts only with one of the two ubiquitin moieties. Consistently, binding assays using surface plasmon resonance spectrometry showed that FAAP20-UBZ binds ubiquitin and M1-, K48- and K63-linked diubiquitin chains with similar affinities. Residues in the vicinity of Ala168 within the α-helix and the C-terminal Trp180 interact with the canonical Ile44-centered hydrophobic patch of ubiquitin. Asp164 within the α-helix and the C-terminal loop mediate a hydrogen bond network, which reinforces ubiquitin-binding of FAAP20-UBZ. Mutations of the ubiquitin-interacting residues disrupted binding to ubiquitin in vitro and abolished the accumulation of FAAP20 to DNA damage sites in vivo. Finally, structural comparison among FAAP20-UBZ, WRNIP1-UBZ and RAD18-UBZ revealed distinct modes of ubiquitin binding. UBZ family proteins could be divided into at least three classes, according to their ubiquitin-binding modes.