Providing Behavioral Health Care in PACE - A Review of Federal and State Manual Regulations.

OBJECTIVES: Present analysis of the federal and state regulations that guide The Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) operations and core clinical features for direction on behavioral health (BH). DESIGN: Review and synthesize the federal (Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [CMS]) and all publicly available state manuals according to the BH-Serious Illness Care (SIC) model domains. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The 155 PACE organizations operating in 32 states and the District of Columbia. METHODS: A multipronged search was conducted to identify official state and federal manuals guiding the implementation and functions of PACE organizations. The CMS PACE website was used to identify the federal PACE manual. State-level manuals for 32 states with PACE programs were identified through several sources, including official PACE websites, contacts through official websites, the National PACE Association (NPA), and public and academic search engines. The manuals were searched according to the BH-SIC model domains that pertain to integrating BH care with complex care individuals. RESULTS: According to the CMS Manual, the interdisciplinary team is responsible for holistic care of PACE enrollees, but a BH specialist is not a required member. The CMS Manual includes information on BH clinical functions, BH workforce, and structures for outcome measurement, quality, and accountability. Eight of 32 PACE-participating states offer publicly available state PACE manuals; of which 3 offer information on BH clinical functions. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Regarding BH, federal and state manual regulations establish limited guidance for comprehensive care service delivery at PACE organizations. The absence of clear directives weakens BH care delivery due to a limiting the ability to develop quality measures and accountability structures. This hinders incentivization and accountability to truly all-inclusive care. Clearer guidelines and regulatory parameters regarding BH care at federal and state levels may enable more PACE organizations to meet rising BH demands of aging communities.

Behavioral health integration in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE): A scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The Program of All-inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) is a community-based care model that delivers collaborative care via an interdisciplinary team to meet the medical and social needs of older adults eligible for nursing home placement. Fifty-nine percent of PACE participants are reported to have at least one psychiatric disorder. PACE organizations (POs) function through an interdisciplinary model of care, but a behavioral health (BH) provider is not a mandated role on the interdisciplinary team. Published literature regarding how POs integrate and provide BH services is limited; however, the National PACE Association (NPA) and select POs have made significant contributions to behavioral health integration (BHI) efforts in PACE. METHODS: PubMED, EMBASE, and PsycINFO were searched for articles published between January 2000 and June 2022; hand-searching was also conducted. Research articles and items involving BH components or programming in POs were included. Evidence of BH programming and initiatives at the organization and national level was summarized. RESULTS: This review reported on nine primary items addressing BH in POs from 2004 to 2022. It found evidence of successful BH initiatives in PACE and identified a gap of published information given an evident need for BH services in the PACE participant population. Findings also indicate the NPA works to advance BH integration in POs with a dedicated workgroup that has produced the NPA BH Toolkit, BH training webinar series, and a site coaching program. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of PACE-specific BH delivery guidelines and guidance from the federal or state level for PACE programs, BH service inclusion has been developed unevenly across POs. Assessing the landscape of BH inclusion across POs is a step toward evidence-based and standardized inclusion of BH within the all-inclusive care model.

Effect of external urinary collection device implementation on female surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention reports that catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) are the most common hospital-acquired infection. Female external urinary collection devices (EUCDs) may be an alternative to indwelling urethral catheters (IUCs), thereby decreasing CAUTIs. However, no study has demonstrated that EUCDs can help reduce CAUTIs in female surgical patients. We sought to compare CAUTI rate and the median number of days an IUC was used before and after availability of this female EUCD for surgical patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of adult female surgical patients admitted to a single academic institution who received an IUC and/or EUCD was performed. Patients who received an IUC three months before (PRE) EUCD availability (08/2017-10/2017) were compared to patients receiving an IUC and/or EUCD 12 months after (POST) (11/2017-11/2018). RESULTS: From 906 surgical patients receiving an IUC/EUCD, 127 received an EUCD in the POST cohort. Compared to the PRE, the POST had a higher rate of CAUTIs (infections per 1000 catheter days, 11.2 vs. 4.6, p = 0.017) and overall UTI rate (infections per 1000 catheter days, 5.4 vs. 4.8, p = 0.036), whereas IUC days were similar between cohorts (median, two vs. two days, p = 0.18). The POST cohort rate of EUCD UTI was 4.6 infections per 1000 device days. CONCLUSION: While EUCDs appear to be a promising alternative to IUCs for female surgical patients, this study found increased CAUTIs after introduction of an EUCD. Further research is needed to clarify if female EUCDs are effective in decreasing CAUTI prior to widespread adoption.

A single institution pre-/post-comparison after introduction of an external urinary collection device for female medical patients.

Background: External urinary collection devices (EUCDs) may serve as an alternative to indwelling urinary catheters (IUCs) and decrease the rate of catheter associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs). PureWick® is a novel female EUCD; however, no study has definitively proven benefit regarding reduction of CAUTIs. Aim: We sought to compare the CAUTI rate and IUC days before and after availability of the PureWick® EUCD at a single institution. We provide a descriptive analysis of female medical patients receiving an EUCD. Methods: A retrospective review of adult female patients admitted to a single institution on a medical service who received an IUC and/or an EUCD was performed. Patients who received an IUC in the 3 months before EUCD availability (PRE) were compared to patients who received an IUC and/or EUCD in the 12 months after (POST). Results: Out of 848 female patients, 292 received an EUCD in the POST cohort and overall, 656 received an IUC (259 (100%) PRE vs. 397 (67.4%) POST). Compared to the PRE cohort, the POST cohort had a higher number of IUC days (median, 3 vs 2 days, p = 0.001) and a higher rate of CAUTI (infections per 1000 catheter days, 9.3 vs 2.3, p = 0.001). The rate of UTI associated with EUCD use was 9.8 infections per 1000 device days. Discussion: While EUCDs might appear to be a promising alternative to IUCs for female patients, this single center pre-/post-analysis found that both the number of IUC days and the CAUTI rate increased after introduction of a female EUCD.