Effects of the magnetic resonance contrast medium ferrioxamine methanesulfonate on systemic and renal hemodynamics in the anesthetized dog.

Ferrioxamine methanesulfonate (S-FDF) is a new magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent developed to improve magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen and pelvis. This stable complex of deferoxamine methanesulfonate and iron is excreted in the urine by glomerular filtration modified by active renal tubular resorption. This study examines the acute systemic and renal hemodynamic responses to this agent after intravenous administration either as an infusion of 25 mg/kg over 5 minutes or as a rapid bolus at a dose of 50 mg/kg. In eight anesthetized dogs, renal plasma flow (RPF) was measured with an electromagnetic flowmeter, and GFR was determined by the renal extraction of technetium-99m-DTPA. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse rate, and a lead II ECG were assessed. At a dose of 25 mg/kg over 5 minutes, MAP decreased significantly (control 146.0 +/- 6.5 mm Hg vs. 107 +/- 18 mm Hg at 2 minutes; P less than .05). In two of the eight animals, the MAP dropped below 60 mm Hg. Significant decreases in GFR and RPF also were noted. All four of the animals receiving the rapid injection of S-FDF experienced profound hypotension (MAP less than 50 mm Hg). The drop in heart rate from 152 +/- 11.6 bpm to 121 +/- 4.9 bpm was associated with a marked depression of the ST wave in the lead II ECG. Further animal studies are needed to assess the mechanism of toxicity and a potential synergism of action with pentobarbital anesthesia.

Renal handling and physiologic effects of the paramagnetic contrast medium Gd-DOTA.

Gadolinium DOTA (Gd-DOTA) is a magnetic resonance (MR) contrast agent similar to Gd-DTPA but with greater stability in vitro. The effects of a high intravenous dose (0.5 mmol/kg) of Gd-DOTA (1360 mOsm/kg) on renal excretory function and its general systemic effects are examined in this animal study. This dose was selected to accentuate and better define the qualitative nature of these effects. A decrease in arterial pressure of 8% (131.9 +/- 6.8 at 120 minutes versus a control of 142.8 +/- 3.7 mm Hg, mean +/- standard error of mean, no significant change in electrocardiogram (ECG) lead II, a 16% increase in renal blood flow (106.0 +/- 5.4 at 7.5 minutes versus 91.2 +/- 3.2 ml/min), and a decrease in arterial hematocrit of 9% (38.9 +/- 1.5 at 120 minutes versus 41.9% +/- 1.7%) were noted. In general, qualitatively similar effects have been noted as a nonspecific effect of other hyperosmolar solutions. The filtration fraction decreased (0.23 +/- 0.01 at 7.5 minutes versus 0.28 +/- 0.02) followed by a rapid return to baseline values. No significant change was noted in glomerular filtration rate throughout the experimental protocol. Urine flow increased nearly 1.5-fold and osmolal clearance (Cosm) increased approximately 1.5 times. A natriuresis occurred as the fractional excretion of sodium (FENa+) increased from a control value of 3.5 +/- 0.3 to 5.2 +/- 0.5 at 7.5 minutes. The systemic and renal physiologic effects of high-dose intravenous Gd-DOTA on the kidney reflects a nonspecific, osmotically induced alteration. These data suggest that the main systemic and renal physiologic actions of Gd-DOTA are a nonspecific response to agent osmolality that is similar qualitatively to conventional, water-soluble contrast media.

Extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy in patients with spinal cord dysfunction.

Patients with spinal cord dysfunction are at an increased risk for urolithiasis. A retrospective study was undertaken to determine the effectiveness of extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in this population. Thirteen kidneys received 19 treatments averaging 2,350 shocks per renal unit. All but one of the stones showed good fragmentation; however, none of the patients was stone-free at three months. Four of 9 patients with long-term follow-up were stone-free at five to fifteen months. Our poor stone-free rate is similar to that found in other studies of patients with spinal cord dysfunction. ESWL was well tolerated in this population, however, the clearance of stones is poor and delayed.

Testicular torsion or acute epididymitis? Diagnosis and treatment.

The differentiation between torsion and epididymitis can be extremely difficult because only 50% or less of cases involving testicular torsion exhibit the classically expected findings. Therefore a careful history and complete analysis of the physical and laboratory findings are warranted. When needed, the judicious use of collaborative tests will point the clinician toward the appropriate diagnosis.