Health Professionals' Perceptions of Disparities in Hypertension Control: A Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Health professionals' commitment is needed to address disparities in hypertension control by ancestry, but their perceptions regarding these disparities are understudied. METHODS: Cross-sectional mixed methods study in a universal healthcare setting in the Netherlands. Snowball sampling was used to include professionals practicing in a large multicity conglomerate including the capital city. Online surveys were collected, and survey participants were randomly selected for in-depth interviews. We used quantitative and qualitative methods to analyze health professionals' awareness, beliefs, and possible interventions regarding these disparities. RESULTS: We analyzed questionnaire data of 77 health professionals (medical doctors n = 70, nurses = 7), whereas 13 were interviewed. Most professionals were women (59%), general practitioners (81%); and White-European (77%), with 79% caring for patients of diverse ancestry. Disparities in hypertension control by ancestry were perceived to exist nationally (83% [95% CI, 75;91]), but less so in health professionals' own clinics (62% [52;73]), or among their own patients (56% [45;67]). Survey respondents emphasized patient rather than provider-level factors as mediators of poor hypertension control by ancestry. The collection of data on patients' ancestry, updating guidelines, and professional training were considered helpful to reduce disparities. Interviewees further emphasized patient-level factors, but also the need to better educate health professionals and increase their awareness. CONCLUSIONS: This explorative study finds that health professionals predominantly attribute disparities in hypertension control to patient-level factors. Awareness of disparities was lower for more proximate healthcare settings. These data emphasize the need to consider health professionals' perceptions when addressing disparities in hypertension control.

The Unmet Medical Needs of Current Injectable Antidiabetic Therapies in China: Patient and Health Care Professional Perspectives.

PURPOSE: Patients with diabetes and health care professionals (HCPs) play important roles in effective application of injectable antidiabetic therapies (IATs). However, their concerns and opinions on IATs are rarely investigated in China. This study aims to assess unmet medical needs of IATs regarding patient concerns, patient satisfaction, aspects that need improvement, and training burden from patient and HCP perspectives. METHODS: This cross-sectional survey was conducted in 12 representative Chinese cities from December 2018 to January 2019. Patients with adult type 2 diabetes who were receiving IAT currently and had received IAT continuously for at least 1 month before the survey, endocrinologists with ≥5 years of experience and prescribing IAT in the past 1 month, and nurses with ≥3 years of experience and providing IAT training in the past 1 month were eligible participants. The patient survey assessed concerns of initiating IAT, satisfaction with IAT, aspects of IAT that need improvement, and IAT training received. The HCP survey evaluated patient concern of initiating IAT, aspects of IAT that need improvement, experience of providing IAT training, and self-reported burden of training. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. FINDINGS: In total, 500 patients, 200 endocrinologists, and 100 nurses were surveyed. The mean (SD) age of patients was 55.1 (11.8) years, with a disease duration of 7.6 (6.4) years. Of all patients, 391 (78.2%) were insulin users and 109 (21.8%) were glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist users. Of the top 4 concerns about initiating IAT, both patients and endocrinologists reported inconvenience of daily injection (58.0% of patients and 68.5% of endocrinologists), worries about insulin dependence (42.6% of patients and 62.5% of endocrinologists), and fear of injection (37.0% of patients and 66.5% of endocrinologists). Medical expenses, convenience of drug portability and storage, and injection site reactions were the top 3 aspects that need improvement according to both patients and HCPs. High injection frequency was also one of the most urgent aspects for improvement (mean urgency score, 3.8 for physicians and 4.0 for nurses). A typical IAT training session took a mean (SD) of 14.1 (9.7) minutes. Both patients and HCPs considered injection operation after dose is set and symptoms and treatment for adverse effects as the 2 most time-consuming training contents. In addition, 97.1% of endocrinologists who provided training and 97.0% of nurses thought a more user-friendly IAT would reduce their training burden. IMPLICATIONS: Study results indicate that the IATs with more convenient drug portability and storage, fewer injection site reactions and adverse events, less injection frequency, more user-friendly design, and fewer steps for injection might help improve patient experience with self-injection and reduce HCPs' training burden.