RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Biologic therapies in the context of IBD and pregnancy lead to improved maternal and fetal outcomes. Placental transfer results in detectable drug concentrations in infants. Rotavirus infection results in diarrheal related hospitalizations, however, the live oral vaccine is not currently recommended in biologic exposed infants. AIMS: To assess the effect of maternal biologic therapies on the infant immune system and safety of live rotavirus vaccination in biologic-exposed infants. METHODS: Biologic-exposed infants underwent standardized clinical assessments, drug concentration, and immune function testing (complete blood count, differential, immunoglobulin levels, extended B-cell and T-cell subset enumeration, Recent Thymic Emigrants, regulatory T-cell numbers, mitogen stimulation assays, and review of T-cell Receptor Excision Circles in the newborn screen). Rotavirus vaccine-specific adverse effects following immunizations up to 42 days post the last dose of the vaccine series were recorded. RESULTS: There were 57 infants born to 52 mothers with IBD exposed to infliximab (n=21), adalimumab (n=19), vedolizumab (n=10), and ustekinumab (n=7) in the third trimester. Median 39 (IQR 38-39) weeks at delivery. Immunologic assessments validated for age were normal in all infants despite median infliximab concentrations of 6.1 ug/mL (range 0.4-28.8), adalimumab 1.7 ug/mL (range 0.7-7.9), ustekinumab 0.6 ug/mL (range 0-1.1) and undetectable for vedolizumab at 10.7 weeks (IQR 9.4-12.4) of age. The live oral rotavirus vaccine series was provided to 50 infants with the first dose given at a median of 13 weeks of age. No adverse effects following immunization were reported. CONCLUSION: Immune function testing was normal and administration of live rotavirus vaccination appeared low-risk in biologic-exposed infants irrespective of circulating drug levels.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for patients undergoing cancer treatment carries a risk of severe immune-related adverse events (IRAEs). Questions remain about whether seasonal influenza vaccination might increase the risk of developing IRAEs among these patients given that vaccines are immunomodulatory. Previous vaccine safety studies on patients with cancer prescribed ICI therapy have demonstrated conflicting results. METHODS: Using health administrative data from Ontario, Canada among adults diagnosed with cancer who had been prescribed ICI therapy and who had received an influenza vaccine from 2012 to 2019, we conducted a self-controlled case series study. The pre-vaccination control period started 42-days post-ICI initiation until 14-days prior to vaccination, the risk period was 1-42 days post-vaccination, and the post-vaccination control period was after the risk period until ICI discontinuation or a maximum period of two years. Emergency department (ED) visit(s) and/or hospitalization for any cause after ICI initiation was used to identify severe IRAEs. We fitted a fixed-effects Poisson regression model accounting for seasonality and calendar time to estimate relative incidence of IRAEs between risk and control periods. RESULTS: We identified 1133 records of cancer patients who received influenza vaccination while prescribed ICI therapy. Most were aged ≥ 66 years (73 %), were male (63 %), had lung cancer (54 %), and had received ICI therapy with a programmed cell death protein 1(PD-1) inhibitor (91 %). A quarter (26 %) experienced an ED visit and/or hospitalization during the observation period. Rates of ED visits and/or hospitalizations in the risk vs. control periods were similar, with an incidence rate ratio of 1.04 (95 % CI: 0.75-1.45). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. CONCLUSION: Seasonal influenza vaccination was not associated with an increased incidence of ED visit or hospitalization among adults with cancer treated with ICI therapy and our results support further evidence of vaccine safety.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neoplasias , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Gripe Humana/etiología , Estaciones del Año , Proyectos de Investigación , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Ontario/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
Bordetella pertussis, which causes a respiratory disease known as pertussis ("whooping cough") remains an important global challenge, with the incidence in pertussis cases increasing in recent years. Newborns and infants are at increased risk for severe morbidity and mortality from this bacterium. Vaccination in pregnancy has become an important strategy to both passively transfer immunity as well as prevent infection in pregnant persons, who are a major source of newborn infection, thus attempting to decrease the impact of this serious disease. It is considered safe for the pregnant person, the developing fetus, and the infant, and during the first 3 months of life it has been shown to be highly effective in preventing pertussis. There are a variety of strategies, recommendations, and adherence rates associated with pertussis vaccination in pregnancy around the world. We summarize the 2021 Global Pertussis Initiative Annual Meeting that reviewed the current global status of pertussis vaccination in pregnancy and remaining medical and scientific questions, with a focus on vaccination challenges and strategies for obstetric and gynecologic healthcare providers.
Asunto(s)
Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo , Vacunación , Tos Ferina , Femenino , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Embarazo , Bordetella pertussis/inmunología , Consenso , Salud Global , Vacuna contra la Tos Ferina/administración & dosificación , Complicaciones Infecciosas del Embarazo/prevención & control , Tos Ferina/prevención & controlRESUMEN
This study examined short-to-medium term safety of COVID-19 vaccines among adults aged ≥65 years using the Canadian National Vaccine Safety Network active safety surveillance data. Both vaccinated and unvaccinated older adult participants recruited from seven provinces and territories were included in the analysis. Safety was assessed at 7 days after COVID-19 vaccination (dose 1, 2 and 3), and 7 months after dose 1. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association between BNT162b2/mRNA-1273 COVID-19 vaccines and two short-term health events: 1) health event preventing daily activities and/or required medical consultation, 2) serious health events resulting in an emergency department visit and/or hospitalization within 7 days following each dose. We also assessed the rates of serious health events for the period between dose 1 and 2, and 7-months following dose 1. Between December 2020 and February 2022, a total of 173,038, 104,452, and 13,970 older adults completed dose 1, dose 2, and dose 3 surveys, respectively. The control survey was completed by 2,955 unvaccinated older adults. Health events occurred more frequently among recipients after dose 2 homologous mRNA-1273 (adjusted odds ratio [95 % confidence interval]: 2.91 [2.24-3.79]) and dose two heterologous (BNT162b2 followed by mRNA-1273): 1.50 [1.12-2.02] compared to unvaccinated counterparts. There was no difference in event rates after any dose of BNT162b2 and unvaccinated participants. The rates of serious health events following COVID-19 vaccination were very low (≤0.3 %) across all vaccine products and doses, and were not higher compared to unvaccinated controls, and were not associated with an emergency department visit or hospitalization within 7 days following vaccination. Reported symptoms were self-limited and rarely required medical assessment. Our findings further strengthen the current evidence that mRNA COVID-19 vaccines are safe and can be used to inform older adults about expected adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination.
Asunto(s)
Vacuna nCoV-2019 mRNA-1273 , Vacuna BNT162 , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Canadá , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Vacuna BNT162/administración & dosificación , Vacuna BNT162/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Anciano de 80 o más Años , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
This scoping review examines the role of digital solutions in active, participant-centered surveillance of adverse events following initial release of COVID-19 vaccines. The goals of this paper were to examine the existing literature surrounding digital solutions and technology used for active, participant centered, AEFI surveillance of novel COVID-19 vaccines approved by WHO. This paper also aimed to identify gaps in literature surrounding digital, active, participant centered AEFI surveillance systems and to identify and describe the core components of active, participant centered, digital surveillance systems being used for post-market AEFI surveillance of WHO approved COVID-19 vaccines, with a focus on the digital solutions and technology being used, the type of AEFI detected, and the populations under surveillance. The findings highlight the need for customized surveillance systems based on local contexts and the lessons learned to improve future vaccine monitoring and pandemic preparedness.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Canadá/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Inmunización/efectos adversos , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Organización Mundial de la SaludRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COVID-19 vaccination has been associated with anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity reactions. Infectious disease physicians and allergists in the Canadian Special Immunization Clinic (SIC) Network developed guidance for evaluating patients with adverse events following immunization (AEFI) including suspected hypersensitivity. This study evaluated management and adverse event recurrence following subsequent COVID-19 vaccinations. METHODS: Individuals aged 12 years and older enrolled at participating SICs before February 28, 2023 who were referred for suspected or diagnosed hypersensitivity reaction following COVID-19 vaccination, or for prevaccination assessment of suspected allergy to a COVID-19 vaccine component were included. De-identified clinical assessments and revaccination data, captured in a centralized database, were analyzed. The Brighton Collaboration case definition (BCCD) for anaphylaxis (2023 version) was applied. RESULTS: The analysis included 206 participants from 13 sites: 26 participants referred for pre-vaccination assessment and 180 participants referred for adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination (15/180 [8.3%] with BCCD confirmed anaphylaxis, 84 [46.7%] with immediate hypersensitivity symptoms not meeting BCCD, 33 [18.3%] with other diagnosed hypersensitivity reactions, and 48 [26.7%] participants with a final diagnosis of non-hypersensitivity AEFI). Among participants referred for AEFIs following COVID-19 vaccination, 166/180 (92.2%) were recommended for COVID-19 revaccination after risk assessment, of whom 158/166 (95.2%) were revaccinated (all with a COVID-19 mRNA vaccine). After revaccination, 1/15 (6.7%) participants with prior anaphylaxis, 1/77 (1.3%) with immediate hypersensitivity not meeting criteria for anaphylaxis and 1/24 (4.2%) with other physician diagnosed hypersensitivity developed recurrent AEFI symptoms that met the BCCD for anaphylaxis. All 26 participants referred pre-vaccination, including 9 (34.6%) with history of polyethylene glycol-asparaginase reactions, were vaccinated without occurrence of immediate hypersensitivity symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: Most individuals in this national cohort who experienced a hypersensitivity event following COVID-19 vaccination and were referred for specialist review were revaccinated without AEFI recurrence, suggesting that specialist evaluation can facilitate safe revaccination.