RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The accurate diagnosis of individual interstitial lung diseases (ILD) is often challenging, but is a critical determinant of appropriate management. If a diagnosis cannot be made after multidisciplinary team discussion (MDTD), surgical lung biopsy is the current recommended tissue sampling technique according to the most recent guidelines. Transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) has been proposed as an alternative to surgical lung biopsy. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre, international study analysed the impact of TBLC on the diagnostic assessment of 128 patients with suspected idiopathic interstitial pneumonia by a central MDTD board (two clinicians, two radiologists, two pathologists). The level of confidence for the first-choice diagnoses were evaluated in four steps, as follows: 1) clinicoradiological data alone; 2) addition of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) findings; 3) addition of TBLC interpretation; and 4) surgical lung biopsy findings (if available). We evaluated the contribution of TBLC to the formulation of a confident first-choice MDTD diagnosis. RESULTS: TBLC led to a significant increase in the percentage of cases with confident diagnoses or provisional diagnoses with high confidence (likelihood ≥70%) from 60.2% to 81.2%. In 32 out of 52 patients nondiagnostic after BAL, TBLC provided a diagnosis with a likelihood ≥70%. The percentage of confident diagnoses (likelihood ≥90%) increased from 22.7% after BAL to 53.9% after TBLC. Pneumothoraces occurred in 16.4% of patients, and moderate or severe bleeding in 15.7% of patients. No deaths were observed within 30â days. INTERPRETATION: TBLC increases diagnostic confidence in the majority of ILD patients with an uncertain noninvasive diagnosis, with manageable side-effects. These data support the integration of TBLC into the diagnostic algorithm for ILD.
Asunto(s)
Broncoscopía , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Biopsia , Humanos , Pulmón , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The disposable bronchoscope is an excellent alternative to face the problem of SARS-CoV-2 and other cross infections, but the bronchoscopist's perception of its quality has not been evaluated. METHODS: To evaluate the quality of the Ambu-aScope4 disposable bronchoscope, we carried out a cross-sectional study in 21 Spanish pulmonology services. We use a standardized questionnaire completed by the bronchoscopists at the end of each bronchoscopy. The variables were described with absolute and relative frequencies, measures of central tendency and dispersion depending on their nature. The existence of learning curves was evaluated by CUSUM analysis. RESULTS: The most frequent indications in 300 included bronchoscopies was bronchial aspiration in 69.3% and the median duration of these was 9.1 min. The route of entry was nasal in 47.2% and oral in 34.1%. The average score for ease of use, image, and aspiration quality was 80/100. All the planned techniques were performed in 94.9% and the bronchoscopist was satisfied in 96.6% of the bronchoscopies. They highlighted the portability and immediacy of the aScope4TM to start the procedure in 99.3%, the possibility of taking and storing images in 99.3%. The CUSUM analysis showed average scores > 70/100 from the first procedure and from the 9th procedure more than 80% of the scores exceeded the 80/100 score. CONCLUSIONS: The aScope4™ scored well for ease of use, imaging, and aspiration. We found a learning curve with excellent scores from the 9th procedure. Bronchoscopists highlighted its portability, immediacy of use and the possibility of taking and storing images.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Broncoscopios , Broncoscopía/instrumentación , Equipos Desechables , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Neumólogos , Competencia Clínica , Estudios Transversales , Diseño de Equipo , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Curva de Aprendizaje , Estudios Prospectivos , EspañaRESUMEN
Our aim was to study the asthma control achieved in patients with uncontrolled asthma who had received appropriate treatment according to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) 2010 (valid at the time the study was designed), and to analyse the factors associated with a lack of asthma control.This was a multicentre study in routine clinical practice performed in patients with uncontrolled asthma according to GINA 2010. At visit 1, we recorded demographics, asthma characteristics and spirometry. We assessed asthma control using GINA 2010 criteria and the Asthma Control Test (ACT). Treatment was optimised according to GINA 2010. At visit 2, 3â months later, we reassessed spirometry, asthma control and factors associated with failure to achieve control.We recruited 1299 patients with uncontrolled asthma (mean age 46.5±17.3â years, 60.7% women, 25.8% obese). The mean percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s was 76.4±12.8% and the mean post-bronchodilator increase was 14.9±6.8%. We observed poor agreement between ACT and GINA 2010 when evaluating asthma control (kappaâ =â -0.151). At visit 2, asthma in 71.2% of patients was still not fully controlled. Patients whose asthma remained uncontrolled were older, had a higher body mass index, greater disease severity, longer disease evolution and worse lung function.After treatment optimisation, most patients did not achieve optimal control according to GINA 2010. Risk factors for failure to achieve asthma control were time of disease evolution, severity, age, weight and lung function impairment (excluded in the GINA 2014).
Asunto(s)
Agonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapéutico , Antiasmáticos/uso terapéutico , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/fisiopatología , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anciano , Estudios Transversales , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Volumen Espiratorio Forzado , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España , EspirometríaRESUMEN
We aimed to describe the differences and similarities between patients with chronic obstructive airway disease classified on the basis of classical diagnostic labels (asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), or asthma-COPD overlap (ACOS)) or according to the underlying inflammatory pattern (Th-2 signature, either Th-2-high or Th-2-low).We performed a cross-sectional study of patients aged ≥40â years and with a post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1â s to forced vital capacity ratio ≤0.7 with a previous diagnosis of asthma (non-smoking asthmatics (NSA)), COPD or ACOS, the latter including both smoking asthmatics (SA) and patients with eosinophilic COPD (COPD-e). Clinical, functional and inflammatory parameters (blood eosinophil count, IgE and exhaled nitric oxide fraction (FeNO)) were compared between groups. Th-2 signature was defined by a blood eosinophil count ≥300â cells·µL-1 and/or a sputum eosinophil count ≥3%.Overall, 292 patients were included in the study: 89 with COPD, 94 NSA and 109 with ACOS (44 SA and 65 with COPD-e). No differences in symptoms or exacerbation rate were found between the three groups. With regards the underlying inflammatory pattern, 94 patients (32.2%) were characterised as Th-2-high and 198 (67.8%) as Th-2-low. The Th-2 signature was found in 49% of NSA, 3.3% of patients with COPD, 30% of SA and 49.3% of patients with COPD-e. This classification yielded significant differences in demographic, functional and inflammatory characteristics.We conclude that a classification based upon the inflammatory profile, irrespective of the taxonomy, provides a more clear distinction of patients with chronic obstructive airway disease.
Asunto(s)
Asma/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/diagnóstico , Células Th2/citología , Anciano , Asma/complicaciones , Biomarcadores , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Óxido Nítrico/análisis , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/complicaciones , Pruebas de Función Respiratoria , Fumar/efectos adversos , España , Esputo/citología , SíndromeRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Measurement of the fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and eosinophils in induced sputum are noninvasive markers for assessing airway inflammation in asthma. The clinical usefulness of the correlation between raised FeNO and sputum eosinophilia is controversial. We aimed to examine dissociation between FeNO and sputum eosinophils in a clinical series of asthma patients and to determine whether dissociation between these noninvasive markers was associated with clinical and inflammatory differences in these patients. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A total of 110 patients with asthma were included in a cross-sectional study. All of them were on maintenance treatment for asthma. All patients underwent the following on the same day: FeNO, induced sputum, spirometry, serum total IgE levels and skin prick test. The level of asthma control was determined by the Asthma control Test Questionnaire. In 46 (41.8%) patients, a discrepancy between FeNO and sputum eosinophil count was observed, of those, 34 (73.9%) had a FeNO <50 ppb and high eosinophil count, and were characterized by having a predominance of nonallergic asthma with bronchial eosinophilic inflammatory phenotype. Also, 12 (26.1%) patients had FeNO ≥50 ppb and sputum eosinophilia within the normal reference values, and were characterized by having a predominance of atopy with a paucigranulocytic inflammatory phenotype. CONCLUSIONS: A high percentage of patients with dissociation between results of FeNO and sputum eosinophils was observed. These patients showed differential clinical and inflammatory features.
Asunto(s)
Asma/diagnóstico , Eosinófilos/citología , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Esputo/citología , Adulto , Asma/inmunología , Asma/metabolismo , Asma/fisiopatología , Pruebas Respiratorias , Espiración , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunoglobulina E/sangre , Recuento de Leucocitos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , EspirometríaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Exhaled breath temperature (EBT) has recently been proposed as a noninvasive marker of bronchial inflammation in patients with asthma. However, the usefulness of EBT in everyday clinical practice is not well established. Results to date are contradictory and are mainly derived from small, pediatric populations. A comparison of results is further complicated by the use of different equipment and measurements. OBJECTIVE: We performed a comprehensive study to determine whether EBT is related to asthma control, disease severity, bronchial obstruction, or bronchial inflammation. METHODS: Sixty-nine patients on maintenance treatment for asthma were included in a cross-sectional study. At the same visit, we measured the EBT plateau (EBTp) using an X-halo Breath Thermometer (Delmedica, Singapore), the fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), spirometry, and inflammatory cell count in induced sputum, and we administered the Asthma Control Test questionnaire. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between EBTp measurements and the level of asthma control, disease severity, bronchial obstruction, FeNO levels, or inflammatory asthma phenotypes. We found a significant difference between EBTp and gender. The EBTp was 34.07°C (SD 0.74) in women and 34.38°C (0.46) in men (p = 0.038). We also found a significant correlation between EBTp measurements and the induced sputum eosinophil count (R = -0.348, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study do not support the usefulness of the EBTp in asthma management in routine clinical practice. Further research using standardized methods is needed to determine the potential use of the EBTp measurement in asthma management.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Pruebas Respiratorias/métodos , Espiración/fisiología , Inflamación , Termogénesis/fisiología , Adulto , Anciano , Asma/diagnóstico , Asma/fisiopatología , Recuento de Células/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación/patología , Inflamación/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Óxido Nítrico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , España , Espirometría/métodos , Esputo , Estadística como Asunto , TemperaturaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) is required for evaluation in selected patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). The diagnostic yield of histopathologic assessment is variable and is influenced by factors such as the size of samples and the presence of crush artefacts left by conventional biopsy forceps. We compared the diagnostic yield and safety of TBLB with cryoprobe sampling versus conventional forceps sampling. METHODS: This randomized clinical trial analysed data for 77 patients undergoing TBLB for evaluation of ILD; patients were assigned to either a conventional-forceps group or a cryoprobe group. Two pathologists assessed the tissue samples and agreed on histopathologic diagnoses. We also compared the duration of procedures, complications and sample-quality variables. RESULTS: The most frequent diagnosis observed in the cryoprobe group was non-specific interstitial pneumonia. Histopathologic diagnoses were identified in more cases in the cryoprobe group (74.4%) than in the conventional-forceps group (34.1%) (P < 0.001), and the diagnostic yield was higher in the cryoprobe group (51.3% vs 29.1% in the conventional forceps group; P = 0.038). A larger mean area of tissue was harvested by cryoprobe (14.7 ± 11 mm(2) ) than by conventional forceps (3.3 ± 4.1 mm(2)) (P < 0.001). More grade 2 bleeding (not statistically significant) occurred in the cryoprobe group (56.4%) than in the conventional-forceps group (34.2%). No differences in other complications were observed. CONCLUSIONS: TBLB by cryoprobe is safe and potentially useful in the diagnosis of ILD. Larger multisite randomized trials are required to confirm the potential benefits of this procedure. Clinical trial registration at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01064609.
Asunto(s)
Biopsia/métodos , Broncoscopía/instrumentación , Criopreservación/instrumentación , Técnicas Histológicas/instrumentación , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/patología , Anciano , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Biopsia/instrumentación , Broncoscopía/efectos adversos , Broncoscopía/métodos , Criopreservación/métodos , Femenino , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Hemorragia/etiología , Técnicas Histológicas/métodos , Humanos , Incidencia , Pulmón/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Instrumentos QuirúrgicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bronchial thermoplasty is a procedure that consists of the delivery of controlled radiofrequency-generated heat via a catheter inserted into the bronchial tree of the lungs through a flexible bronchoscope. It has been suggested that bronchial thermoplasty works by reducing airway smooth muscle, thereby reducing the ability of the smooth muscle to bronchoconstrict. This treatment could then reduce asthma symptoms and exacerbations, resulting in improved asthma control and quality of life. OBJECTIVES: To determine the efficacy and safety of bronchial thermoplasty in adults with bronchial asthma. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register of Trials (CAGR) up to January 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled clinical trials that compared bronchial thermoplasty versus any active control in adults with moderate or severe persistent asthma. Our primary outcomes were quality of life, asthma exacerbations and adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. MAIN RESULTS: We included three trials (429 participants) with differences regarding their design (two trials compared bronchial thermoplasty vs medical management and the other compared bronchial thermoplasty vs a sham intervention) and participant characteristics; one of the studies included participants with more symptomatic asthma compared with the others.The pooled analysis showed improvement in quality of life at 12 months in participants who received bronchial thermoplasty that did not reach the threshold for clinical significance (3 trials, 429 participants; mean difference (MD) in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ) scores 0.28, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.07 to 0.50; moderate-quality evidence). Measures of symptom control showed no significant differences (3 trials, 429 participants; MD in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) scores -0.15, 95% CI -0.40 to 0.10; moderate-quality evidence). The risk of bias for these outcomes was high because two of the studies did not have a sham intervention for the control group.The results from two trials showed a lower rate of exacerbation after 12 months of treatment for participants who underwent bronchial thermoplasty. The trial with sham intervention showed a significant reduction in the proportion of participants visiting the emergency department for respiratory symptoms, from 15.3% on sham treatment to 8.4% over 12 months following thermoplasty. The trials showed no significant improvement in pulmonary function parameters (with the exception of a greater increase in morning peak expiratory flow (PEF) in one trial). Treated participants who underwent bronchial thermoplasty had a greater risk of hospitalisation for respiratory adverse events during the treatment period (3 trials, 429 participants; risk ratio 3.50, 95% CI 1.26 to 9.68; high-quality evidence), which represents an absolute increase from 2% to 8% (95% CI 3% to 23%) over the treatment period. This means that six of 100 participants treated with thermoplasty (95% CI 1 to 21) would require an additional hospitalisation over the treatment period. No significant difference in the risk of hospitalisation was noted at the end of the treatment period.Bronchial thermoplasty was associated with an increase in respiratory adverse events, mainly during the treatment period. Most of these events were mild or moderate, appeared in the 24-hour post-treatment period, and were resolved within a week. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Bronchial thermoplasty for patients with moderate to severe asthma provides a modest clinical benefit in quality of life and lower rates of asthma exacerbation, but no significant difference in asthma control scores. The quality of life findings are at risk of bias, as the main benefits were seen in the two studies that did not include a sham treatment arm. This procedure increases the risk of adverse events during treatment but has a reasonable safety profile after completion of the bronchoscopies. The overall quality of evidence regarding this procedure is moderate. For clinical practice, it would be advisable to collect data from patients systematically in independent clinical registries. Further research should provide better understanding of the mechanisms of action of bronchial thermoplasty, as well as its effect in different asthma phenotypes or in patients with worse lung function.
Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Bronquios/cirugía , Tratamiento de Radiofrecuencia Pulsada/métodos , Adulto , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Hipertrofia/terapia , Músculo Liso/patología , Tratamiento de Radiofrecuencia Pulsada/efectos adversos , Calidad de Vida , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Diagnosing COVID-19 and treating its complications remains a challenge. This review reflects the perspective of some of the Dragon (IMI 2-call 21, #101005122) research consortium collaborators on the utility of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in COVID-19. BAL has been proposed as a potentially useful diagnostic tool to increase COVID-19 diagnosis sensitivity. In both critically ill and non-critically ill COVID-19 patients, BAL has a relevant role in detecting other infections or supporting alternative diagnoses and can change management decisions in up to two-thirds of patients. BAL is used to guide steroid and immunosuppressive treatment and to narrow or discontinue antibiotic treatment, reducing the use of unnecessary broad antibiotics. Moreover, cellular analysis and novel multi-omics techniques on BAL are of critical importance for understanding the microenvironment and interaction between epithelial cells and immunity, revealing novel potential prognostic and therapeutic targets. The BAL technique has been described as safe for both patients and healthcare workers in more than a thousand procedures reported to date in the literature. Based on these preliminary studies, we recognize that BAL is a feasible procedure in COVID-19 known or suspected cases, useful to properly guide patient management, and has great potential for research.
RESUMEN
Purpose: To use minimally-invasive transcatheter electrical impedance spectroscopy measurements for tissue differentiation among healthy lung tissue and pathologic lung tissue from patients with different respiratory diseases (neoplasm, fibrosis, pneumonia and emphysema) to complement the diagnosis at real time during bronchoscopic procedures. Methods: Multi-frequency bioimpedance measurements were performed in 102 patients. The two most discriminative frequencies for impedance modulus (|Z|), phase angle (PA), resistance (R) and reactance (Xc) were selected based on the maximum mean pair-wise Euclidean distances between paired groups. One-way ANOVA for parametric variables and Kruskal-Wallis for non-parametric data tests have been performed with post-hoc tests. Discriminant analysis has also been performed to find a linear combination of features to separate among tissue groups. Results: We found statistically significant differences for all the parameters between: neoplasm and pneumonia (p < 0.05); neoplasm and healthy lung tissue (p < 0.001); neoplasm and emphysema (p < 0.001); fibrosis and healthy lung tissue (p ≤ 0.001) and pneumonia and healthy lung tissue (p < 0.01). For fibrosis and emphysema (p < 0.05) only in |Z|, R and Xc; and between pneumonia and emphysema (p < 0.05) only in |Z| and R. No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) are found between neoplasm and fibrosis; fibrosis and pneumonia; and between healthy lung tissue and emphysema. Conclusion: The application of minimally-invasive electrical impedance spectroscopy measurements in lung tissue have proven to be useful for tissue differentiation between those pathologies that leads increased tissue and inflammatory cells and those ones that contain more air and destruction of alveolar septa, which could help clinicians to improve diagnosis.
RESUMEN
The use of electrical impedance spectroscopy for lung tissue differentiation is an opportunity for the improvement of clinical diagnosis. The aim of this work is to distinguish among different lung tissue states by evaluating the differences among impedance spectrum parameters between two separate frequencies (15 kHz and 307 kHz) in the beta dispersion region. In previous studies we have used single frequency measurements for tissue differentiation. Differences (P < 0.05) are found between those tissues that undergo an increase in tissue density (neoplasm and fibrosis) and those tissues that lead to tissue destruction (emphysema). Electrical impedance spectroscopy shows its utility for lung tissue differentiation for diagnosis improvement among pathologies with different tissue structure. Further studies are necessary for the differentiation among those tissue states that are more similar to each other.Clinical Relevance- Expand the diagnostic tools currently available in bronchoscopy by using minimally-invasive bioimpedance measurements to differentiate between lung patterns.
Asunto(s)
Broncoscopía , Enfisema Pulmonar , Humanos , Espectroscopía Dieléctrica/métodos , Pulmón , Impedancia EléctricaRESUMEN
The COVID-19 pandemic has been a worldwide medical challenge. Despite rapid advancements, many questions regarding SARS-CoV-2 interaction with other pathologies and long-term consequences remained unanswered. Sarcoidosis is a multi-systemic granulomatous disease that develops in genetically predisposed individuals following their exposure to an environmental trigger. We present the case of a patient who was diagnosed with sarcoidosis following a SARS-CoV-2 infection.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is a technique classically used for the study of diffuse interstitial lung diseases (DILDs). Given the recent advances in the diagnosis of DILD by transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB), it is relevant to assess what BAL can contribute to TBCB. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective descriptive study that included patients with DILD who, between 2013 and 2017, underwent BAL and TBCB in the same bronchoscopy intervention. We evaluated the complementary information provided by BAL to TBCB that facilitated the diagnosis by a multidisciplinary committee. Epidemiological, clinical, and functional variables and high-resolution chest tomography findings were recorded, along with complications associated with the procedures. RESULTS: A total of 60 patients were included. TBCB, conditioned by the underlying radiologic pattern, provided diagnostic information in 75% of cases. BAL provided complementary information that supported the diagnosis and treatment in 22% of cases. Differential BAL findings were related to microbiology, cell count, and immunology. Regarding the safety of the procedure, 47% of the patients experienced complications, although none were serious. CONCLUSION: BAL findings contribute to TBCB findings in the diagnosis of DILDs, with no serious complications associated with their combined use.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales , Enfermedades Pulmonares , Biopsia , Lavado Broncoalveolar , Broncoscopía , Humanos , Pulmón , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Bronchial thermoplasty (BT) is a device-based treatment for subjects ≥18 years with severe asthma not well controlled with inhaled corticosteroids and long-acting beta-agonists. The Bronchial Thermoplasty Global Registry (BTGR) collected real-world data on subjects undergoing this procedure. DESIGN: The BTGR is an all-comer, prospective, open-label, multicentre study enrolling adult subjects indicated for and treated with BT. SETTING: Eighteen centres in Spain, Italy, Germany, the UK, the Netherlands, the Czech Republic, South Africa and Australia PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-seven subjects aged 18 years and older who were scheduled to undergo BT treatment for asthma. Subjects diagnosed with other medical conditions which, in the investigator's opinion, made them inappropriate for BT treatment were excluded. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline characteristics collected included demographics, Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ), Asthma Control Test (ACT), medication usage, forced expiratory volume in one second and forced vital capacity, medical history, comorbidities and 12-month baseline recall data (severe exacerbations (SE) and healthcare utilisation). SE incidence and healthcare utilisation were summarised at 1 and 2 years post-BT. RESULTS: Subjects' baseline characteristics were representative of persons with severe asthma. A comparison of the proportion of subjects experiencing events during the 12 months prior to BT to the 2-year follow-up showed a reduction in SE (90.3% vs 56.1%, p<0.0001), emergency room visits (53.8% vs 25.5%, p<0.0001) and hospitalisations (42.9% vs 23.5 %, p=0.0019). Reductions in asthma maintenance medication dosage were also observed. AQLQ and ACT scores improved from 3.26 and 11.18 at baseline to 4.39 and 15.54 at 2 years, respectively (p<0.0001 for both AQLQ and ACT). CONCLUSIONS: The BTGR demonstrates sustained improvement in clinical outcomes and reduction in asthma medication usage 2 years after BT in a real-world population. This is consistent with results from other BT randomised controlled trials and registries and further supports improvement in asthma control after BT. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02104856.
Asunto(s)
Asma , Termoplastia Bronquial , Adolescente , Adulto , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Asma/cirugía , Termoplastia Bronquial/métodos , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Sistema de Registros , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The diagnosis and staging of lung cancer are an important process that identifies treatment options and guides disease prognosis. Therefore, an accurate mediastinal lymph node (LN) staging is required not only to offer the appropriate treatment but also to avoid unnecessary invasive procedures. At present, endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-transbronchial needle aspiration is the preferred modality for sampling mediastinal lymph nodes because of its minimally invasive nature and high diagnostic yield. In this review, we discuss the utility of EBUS in mediastinal LN staging of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). RELEVANCE FOR PATIENTS: The use of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar LN pathology has become in an essential endoscopic technique and the first step for staging of lung cancer.
RESUMEN
Electrical Impedance Spectroscopy has already demonstrated the ability to distinguish different tissues types, or tumors from normal tissue, or tissues displaying diverse degrees of pathology. When applying the technique, however, the necessity to make contact with the tissue often constitutes a practical limitation. Electrical Impedance Imaging (EIT), or in a broader sense, regional impedance assessment, struggle to assess different tissue conditions out of measurements from the surface of the body. But sensitivity is very small even for tissue a few centimeters under the skin, and in-vivo measurements are often not viable.The lung offer a third approximation by introducing a catheter though a bronchoscope, which is a routine clinical procedure. Measurements have been obtained by using 3 or 4-electrode techniques and allow us to distinguish, at least, fibrotic, emphysema or neoplastic regions from normal parenchyma. New instrumental developments, clinical measurements and preliminary results are presented and discussed.
Asunto(s)
Espectroscopía Dieléctrica , Enfisema , Impedancia Eléctrica , Humanos , Pulmón/diagnóstico por imagen , TomografíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In recent years, transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) has come to be increasingly used in interventional pulmonology units as it obtains larger and better-quality samples than conventional transbronchial lung biopsy (TBLB) with forceps. No multicenter studies have been performed, however, that analyse and compare TBCB and TBLB safety and yield according to the interstitial lung disease (ILD) classification. OBJECTIVES: We compared the diagnostic yield and safety of TBCB with cryoprobe sampling versus conventional TBLB forceps sampling in the same patient. METHOD: Prospective multicenter clinical study of patients with ILD indicated for lung biopsy. Airway management with orotracheal tube, laryngeal mask and rigid bronchoscope was according to the protocol of each centre. All procedures were performed using fluoroscopy and an occlusion balloon. TBLB was followed by TBCB. Complications were recorded after both TBLB and TBCB. RESULTS: Included were 124 patients from 10 hospitals. Airway management was orotracheal intubation in 74% of cases. Diagnostic yield according to multidisciplinary committee results for TBCB was 47.6% and for TBLB was 19.4% (p<0.0001). Diagnostic yield was higher for TBCB compared to TBLB for two groups: idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) and ILD of known cause or association (OR 2.5; 95% CI: 1.4-4.2 and OR 5.8; 95% CI: 2.3-14.3, respectively). Grade 3 (moderate) bleeding after TBCB occurred in 6.5% of patients compared to 0.8% after conventional TBLB. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnostic yield for TBCB was higher than for TBLB, especially for two disease groups: IIPs and ILD of known cause or association. The increased risk of bleeding associated with TBCB confirms the need for safe airway management and prophylactic occlusion-balloon use. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT02464592.
Asunto(s)
Broncoscopía/instrumentación , Criocirugía/instrumentación , Fluoroscopía/instrumentación , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/epidemiología , Anciano , Biopsia/efectos adversos , Biopsia/instrumentación , Biopsia/métodos , Broncoscopía/efectos adversos , Broncoscopía/métodos , Broncoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Criocirugía/efectos adversos , Criocirugía/métodos , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/efectos adversos , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Humanos , Pulmón/patología , Enfermedades Pulmonares Intersticiales/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hemorragia Posoperatoria/etiología , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
The diagnosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a complex process that requires the multidisciplinary integration of clinical, radiological, and histological variables. Due to its diagnostic yield, surgical lung biopsy has been the recommended procedure for obtaining samples of lung parenchyma, when required. However, given the morbidity and mortality of this technique, alternative techniques which carry a lower risk have been explored. The most important of these is transbronchial cryobiopsy -transbronchial biopsy with a cryoprobe- which is useful for obtaining lung tissue with less comorbidity. Yield may be lower than surgical biopsy, but it is higher than with transbronchial biopsy with standard forceps. This option has been discussed in the recent clinical guidelines for the diagnosis of IPF, but the authors do not go so far as recommend it. The aim of this article, the result of a multidisciplinary discussion forum, is to review current evidence and make proposals for the use of transbronchial cryobiopsy in the diagnosis of IPF.