Sexual health in Belgian cervical cancer survivors: an exploratory qualitative study.

PURPOSE: To assess experiences of sexuality and of receiving sexual healthcare in cervical cancer (CC) survivors. METHODS: A qualitative phenomenological study using semistructured one-on-one interviews was conducted with 15 Belgian CC survivors recruited in 5 hospitals from August 2021 to February 2022. The interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. COREQ and SRQR reporting guidelines were applied. RESULTS: Most participants experienced an altered sexuality after CC treatment with often long-term loss/lack of sex drive, little/no spontaneity, limitation of positions to avoid dyspareunia, less intense orgasms, or no sexual activity at all. In some cases, emotional intimacy became more prominent. Physical (vaginal bleeding, vaginal dryness, dyspareunia, menopausal symptoms) and psychological consequences (guilt, changed self-image) were at the root of the altered sexuality. Treatment-induced menopause reduced sex drive. In premenopausal patients, treatment and/or treatment-induced menopause resulted in the sudden elimination of family planning. Most participants highlighted the need to discuss their altered sexual experience with their partner to grow together toward a new interpretation of sexuality. To facilitate this discussion, most of the participants emphasized the need for greater partner involvement by healthcare providers (HPs). The oncology nurse or sexologist was the preferred HP with whom to discuss sexual health. The preferred timing for information about the sexual consequences of treatment was at treatment completion or during early follow-up. CONCLUSION: Both treatment-induced physical and psychological experiences were prominent and altered sexuality. Overall, there was a need for HPs to adopt proactive patient-tailored approaches to discuss sexual health.

Morbidity following robot-assisted surgery in a gynecological oncology setting: A cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the study was to provide a comprehensive description of perioperative morbidity associated with robot-assisted surgery (RAS) in a gynecological oncology setting in order to improve the preoperative counseling of women and support shared decision-making. MATERIAL AND METHODS: All women scheduled for intended RAS between January 2015 and December 2022 were prospectively included in an electronic morbidity database for the analyses of perioperative complications. RESULTS: In total, 2225 women were included. Sixty-four patients (2.9%) experienced an intraoperative complication. Intraoperative complications were associated with a higher rate of conversion to laparotomy (15.6% vs. 1.8%, p < 0.001), a higher rate of major postoperative morbidity (9.3% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of reoperation (9.3% vs. 1.7%, p < 0.001), compared to cases without intraoperative complications. Thirty-day postoperative morbidity was evaluated according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center Surgical Secondary Events Grading System. Grade 3-5 events were considered major. A total of 57 patients (2.6%) experienced a major event after surgery, postoperative rupture of the vaginal vault being the most common complication requiring surgical intervention. Conversion to laparotomy occurred in 49 cases (2.2%) and was associated with higher intraoperative blood loss (300 mL vs. 25 mL, p < 0.001), a higher rate of postoperative major events (20.4% vs. 2.2%, p < 0.001), and a higher rate of reoperation (11.8% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates low rates of major perioperative morbidity and conversion to laparotomy after RAS performed by trained high-volume surgeons in a gynecological oncology setting.

Observational BGOG Study of the Results of Robot-assisted Laparoscopy in 166 Patients with FIGO 2009 Stage IA1-IB1 Cervical Cancer.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Two recent studies (the Laparoscopic Approach to Cervical Cancer [LACC] trial and a cohort study based on the National Cancer Database) raise the question of whether minimally invasive surgery (conventional and robot-assisted laparoscopy) is inferior to open abdominal surgery in early-stage cervical cancer. In the laparotomy group of the LACC trial, the low rates of recurrence and death are notable. The present study wants to elucidate the current situation of patients with early-stage cervical cancer treated with robot-assisted laparoscopy in hospitals of the Belgium and Luxembourg Gynaecological Oncology Group (BGOG). DESIGN: This is a prospective follow-up study. SETTING: The combined data obtained from different BGOG hospitals were analyzed regarding patients similar to those included in the LACC trial in terms of cervical cancer recurrence and survival. PATIENTS: We included patients with stage IA1, IA2, or IB1 cervical cancer with a histologic subtype of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma. INTERVENTIONS: All patients were treated with robot-assisted laparoscopy. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The outcomes were disease-free and overall survival at 3 and 5 years after surgery. A total of 270 patients were included, and 166 were found suitable for analysis. The median age was 45 years. Most patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IB1 cervical cancer (84.9%) and squamous cell carcinoma as the histologic subtype (71.7%). The median follow-up time was 44 months, with a range of between 1 and 131 months. Twenty-one recurrences and 12 deaths were noted. Of the deaths, 8 were related to cervical cancer. Disease-free survival was 86% at 3 years (95% confidence interval [CI], 78.52-90.80) and 85% at 5 years (95% CI, 77.03-89.95). Overall survival was 96% at 3 years (95% CI, 90.11-98.22) and 91% at 5 years (95% CI, 82.54 95.17). CONCLUSION: The results of this BGOG study show disease-free and overall survival rates after robot-assisted laparoscopy in early-stage cervical cancer that are at least similar to previous reported recurrence and survival data. We expect that the results of the Robot-assisted Approach to Cervical Cancer trial will elucidate the place of robot-assisted laparoscopy in early-stage cervical cancer.

Robot-Assisted Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Carcinoma: The Belgian Experience.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to report the experience and oncological outcome of robot-assisted radical hysterectomies (RRHs) for cervical cancer performed in Belgium. METHODS: Patients undergoing RRH for cervical cancer (n = 109) were prospectively collected between July 2007 and April 2014 in the 5 Belgian centers performing RRH for cervical cancer. RESULTS: The median age of the patients was 46 years (range, 31-80 years). Histological types included squamous cell carcinoma in 61 patients, adenocarcinoma in 22 patients, adenosquamous in 8 patients, endometrioid carcinoma in 2 patients, and other types (n = 16). The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage distribution was IA (n = 9), stage IB1 (n = 71), stage IB2 (n = 4), stage II (n = 24), and unknown (n = 1). Twenty-four patients received adjuvant therapy, 17 patients underwent radiochemotherapy, and 7 underwent adjuvant radiation. Eighteen patients relapsed, and 5 died of disease. The median follow-up was 27.5 months (range, 3-82 months). The 2- and 5-year overall survivals were 96% and 89%, respectively. The 2- and 5-year disease-free survivals (DFSs) were 88% and 72%, respectively. The 2-year DFS per stage was 100% for IA, 88% for IB1, 100% for IB2, and 83% for II. The 5-year DFS per stage was 100% for stage IA and 75% for IB1. The complications were as expected for radical hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: This series confirms the feasibility and safety of RRH not only in cervical cancer stage IA to IB1, but also after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage IB2 to IIB.

New horizons in gynecological surgery: first-year experience with HUGO™ robotic-assisted surgery system at two tertiary referral robotic centers.

The HUGO™ robotic-assisted surgery system (RAS, Medtronic, CA) consists of a 3D open console, four independent carts, and an integrated laparoscopic and robotic tower. Approved in 2021, it represents a novel alternative platform for robotic procedures. The aim of our study is to report the first-year experience with this system for gynecological procedures at two tertiary referral robotic centers. We prospectively collected and retrospectively analyzed data from patients underwent gynecological robot-assisted surgery with the HUGO™ RAS, at San Paolo University Hospital (Milan, Italy), and Onze Lieve Vrouw (OLV) Hospital (Aalst, Belgium), March 2022-April 2023. Demographic characteristics, intraoperative settings, and perioperative outcomes were investigated. A total of 32 procedures were performed: 20 (62.5%) hysterectomies, 7 (21.9%) adnexal surgeries, and 5 (15.6%) pelvic floor reconstructive surgeries. In 2022 and 2023, 13 (40.6%) and 19 (59.4%) procedures were carried out, respectively. The median docking time was 8 min (IQR 5.8-11.5). The median console and skin-to-skin time was 52.5 min (IQR 33.8-94.2) and 108.5 min (IQR 81.5-157.2), respectively. No intraoperative complications occurred. Two conversions to laparoscopy managed without any additional complications were needed. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first global series of gynecological procedures performed with the HUGO™ RAS. Our preliminary findings showed the system's feasibility reporting promising results. The observed upward trend in the total number of procedures during the analyzed period is encouraging. Further studies are needed to assess a standardized method in the gynecological field with the novel platform.

Systematic review of same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Same-day discharge has been suggested to safe and acceptable following minimally invasive hysterectomy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the feasibility of same-day discharge following minimally invasive hysterectomy and to identify associated factors. SEARCH STRATEGY: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched using the terms "same day discharge", "minimally invasive surgery", and "hysterectomy" between October 1 and October 31, 2015. No language or publication date restrictions were included. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized controlled trials and observational studies evaluating same-day discharge before midnight on the day of minimally invasive hysterectomy were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Study characteristics, pre-operative selection criteria, and predictive factors for same-day discharge were analyzed. MAIN RESULTS: There were 15 observational studies with 11 992 patients included. Significant heterogeneity was observed in the studies, and publication and selection bias could have potentially affected the results. All the studies concluded that same-day discharge was feasible. However, some factors were associated with a decreased possibility of same-day discharge; these were older age, beginning surgery later than 1:00 pm and completing surgery later than 6:00 pm, longer duration of operation, and high estimated blood loss. CONCLUSIONS: Same-day discharge appears feasible for a majority of patients who undergo minimally invasive hysterectomies if adequate emphasis is placed on pre-surgical planning and careful patient selection.

[Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy in preoperative and peroperative assessment of stage I endometrial cancer]. / Laparoskopisk assisteret vaginal hysterektomi ved prae- og peroperativt vurderet stadium I-endometriecancer.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy (with and without pelvic lymphadenectomy) in the staging and treatment of stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective series of consecutive patients with primary operable endometrial cancer referred to Odense University Hospital between 01.01.2006 and 31.03.2007. All patients were evaluated and a laparoscopic treatment was planned when considered appropriate. RESULTS: 72 consecutive patients with primary operable endometrial cancer were included in the study. 35 patients (48%) were successfully treated with a laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy. 12 (34%) of them were also treated with a pelvic lymphadenectomy. The median number of lymph nodes removed was 15 (range 10-32). The median operating time was 80 minutes (60-180) without lymphadenectomy and 140 (105-200) minutes with lymphadenectomy. No intraoperative or serious postoperative complications were registered. 26 (74%) out of 35 patients treated by laparoscopy were discharged on the first or second postoperative day. CONCLUSION: We conclude that laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy is a safe and effective alternative to laparotomy in the staging and treatment of stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer.

Accuracy of preoperative tumor grade and intraoperative gross examination of myometrial invasion in patients with endometrial cancer.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Preoperative prediction of metastases to the regional lymph nodes in women with endometrioid endometrial cancer is a challenge. According to the Danish Gynaecological Cancer Society guidelines, a pelvic lymphadenectomy is warranted in all poorly differentiated tumors and all stage Ic disease. We have evaluated the accuracy of preoperative tumor grade and intraoperative gross examination of myometrial invasion, in predicting the need for a pelvic lymphadenectomy. METHODS: Preoperative tumor grade and intraoperative gross examination of myometrial invasion were prospectively registered in 72 women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer, operated between 1 September 2004 and 18 April 2006. The pre- and intraoperative findings were compared with the final pathology report. RESULTS: The preoperative prediction of grade (well, moderate or poorly differentiated) was correct in 96% (69/72) of the patients. Gross examination of myometrial invasion correctly differentiated between stage Ia, Ib, and Ic disease in 89% (64/72) of the patients. The combination of preoperative tumor grade and intraoperative gross examination of myometrial invasion, led to wrong clinical decisions in 11% (8/72) of the patients. Three 'unnecessary' lymphadenectomies were performed, and 5 patients were primary operated upon without 'warranted' lymphadenectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that preoperative tumor grade and intraoperative gross examination of the uterus provide useful information for pre-and intraoperative planning of pelvic lymphadenectomy. However, wrong decisions were made in 11% of the patients, and more reliable evaluation methods are needed.