Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Pediatr Surg ; 54(10): 2149-2154, 2019 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30987759

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Many management options exist for the treatment of refractory rectal prolapse (RP) in children. Our goal was to characterize current practice patterns among active members of APSA. METHODS: A 23-item questionnaire assessed the management of full-thickness RP for healthy children who have failed medical management. The survey was approved by our IRB and by the APSA Outcomes committee. RESULTS: 236 surgeons participated. The respondents were geographically dispersed (44 states, 5 provinces). 32% of respondents had twenty or more years of clinical experience. 71% evaluated 1-5 RP patients in the last 2 years, while 5% evaluated >10. 71% performed 0-1 procedure (operation or local therapy [LT]) for RP over 2 years. 59% would treat a 2-year-old patient differently than a 6-year-old with the same presentation, and were more likely to offer up-front surgery to a 6-year-old (26% vs 15%, p = 0.04), less likely to continue medical management indefinitely (2% vs 7%, p=0.01), and more likely to perform resection with rectopexy (30% vs. 15%, p=0.01). 71% perform LT as an initial intervention: injection sclerotherapy (59%), anal encirclement (8%), and sclerotherapy + anal encirclement (5%). 70% consider LT a failure after 1-3 attempts. If LT fails, surgical management consists of transabdominal rectopexy (46%), perineal proctectomy or proctosigmoidectomy (22%), transabdominal sigmoidectomy + rectopexy (22%), and posterior sagittal rectopexy (9%). CONCLUSIONS: There is wide variability in the surgical management of pediatric rectal prolapse. This suggests a need for development of processes to identify best practices and optimize outcomes for this condition.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/métodos , Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Prolapso Rectal/cirugía , Canal Anal/cirugía , Niño , Preescolar , Competencia Clínica , Colon Sigmoide/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Perineo/cirugía , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/estadística & datos numéricos , Recto/cirugía , Escleroterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
2.
Dalton Trans ; (18): 3391-4, 2009 May 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19381401

RESUMEN

Oxidation of [Ru(NH(2)Q)(3)](2+) (NH(2)Q = 8-aminoquinoline) results in intermolecular coupling of 8-aminoquinoline ligands to yield an electroactive polymer. Oxidative polymerization is not observed for [Ru(bpy)(2)(NH(2)Q)](2+) (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine), where only one 8-aminoquinoline ligand is present.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA