RESUMEN
AIMS: Sweet's syndrome is an acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis first described in 1964 by Robert Douglas Sweet. The pathophysiological mechanism is not fully established; however, several cases of Sweet's syndrome have been reported following drug administration. METHODS: To investigate the existence of pharmacovigilance signals between drugs and the occurrence of Sweet's syndrome, we performed a case/non-case study on reports of 'acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis' registered in the French pharmacovigilance database. Reporting odds ratio (ROR) with its 95% confidence interval were calculated. RESULTS: Amongthe 994 789 reports recorded in the database, 136 were Sweet's syndrome, of which 50.7% were men and the median age was 59 years (range 15-91). A total of 224 drugs were mentioned as suspects: 21.0% were antibacterials, 19.2% were antineoplastics and 12.1% were immunosuppressants. Median time to onset from drug initiation to the development of Sweet's syndrome was 15 days (range 1-1095). The highest RORs were observed with bortezomib (74.04 [40.8-134.2]), azacitidine (72.14 [29.4-176.9]), perfilgrastim (67.05 [21.2-211.6]), azathioprine (55.46 [34.8-88.4]) and bendamustine (35.84 [11.4-112.8]). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacovigilance signals have been observed between the occurrence of Sweet's syndrome and colony-stimulating factors, immunosuppressants, antineoplastics and antibiotics. Clinicians should be aware of the potential associations with these drugs and should be encouraged to report any case of drug-induced Sweet's syndrome.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Human immunoglobulins are used for treating diverse inflammatory and autoimmune disorders. Eczema is an adverse event reported but poorly described. OBJECTIVES: To describe the clinical presentation, severity, outcome, and therapeutic management of immunoglobulin-associated eczema. METHODS: This retrospective and descriptive study included a query of the French national pharmacovigilance database, together with a national call for cases among dermatologists. RESULTS: We included 322 patients. Eczema occurred preferentially in men (78.9%) and in patients treated for neurological pathologies (76%). The clinical presentation consisted mainly of dyshidrosis (32.7%) and dry palmoplantar eczema (32.6%); 5% of cases exhibited erythroderma. Sixty-two percent of the eczema flares occurred after the first immunoglobulin course. Eczema was observed with 13 intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin types and recurred in 84% of patients who maintained the same treatment and in 68% who switched the immunoglobulin type. After immunoglobulin discontinuation, 30% of patients still had persistent eczema. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective study, with possible missing data or memory bias. CONCLUSION: Immunoglobulin-associated eczema occurred with all immunoglobulin types, preferentially in patients with neurologic diseases who required prolonged immunoglobulin treatment. Recurrence was frequent, even after switching the immunoglobulin type, which can lead to a challenging therapeutic situation when immunoglobulin maintenance is required.
Asunto(s)
Eccema Dishidrótico , Eccema , Masculino , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Eccema/tratamiento farmacológico , Eccema/inducido químicamente , Inmunoglobulinas/efectos adversos , Eccema Dishidrótico/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intravenosa , Inmunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efectos adversosRESUMEN
AIM: We aimed to investigate French pharmacovigilance data. The objective was to characterize psoriatic conditions that occurred after beta-blocker (BB) exposure and bring to light a possible pharmacovigilance signal. METHODS: Spontaneous reports of psoriatic conditions recorded in the French National Pharmacovigilance Database (FPVD) between 1985 and 2019 were extracted. We performed a retrospective, descriptive analysis of reports linked to BB exposure. Association between psoriasis risk and BB exposure was assessed using a case/noncase study. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-five reports of psoriatic conditions after BB exposure were recorded in the FPVD during the study period. Both cardioselective and noncardioselective, topical and systemic BBs are involved. Therapeutic indication of BB was mainly hypertension. Mean time to onset was 5 months and outcome was favourable in 68% after BB discontinuation. These features were concordant with those of literature reports. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was 8.95 (95% confidence interval 7.75-10.33). CONCLUSION: We highlighted a statistically significant disproportionality which constitutes a pharmacovigilance signal. Psoriasis risk with BBs is a class effect. Increasing surveillance during the first year of BB exposure is needed.
Asunto(s)
Farmacovigilancia , Psoriasis , Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/efectos adversos , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Humanos , Psoriasis/inducido químicamente , Psoriasis/tratamiento farmacológico , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Pembrolizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to the programmed cell-death protein-1 (PD-1) on immune T-cells, thus blocking PD-1 activity. Pembrolizumab is indicated for the treatment of advanced melanoma, metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer, and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. However, it is associated with immune-related adverse events. METHODS: We investigated the association between pembrolizumab and immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM). We analyzed reports in the World Health Organization's global individual case safety report database, Vigibase, up to January 2020 with the MedDRA lower level term "IMNM." The association between exposure to pembrolizumab and occurrence of the adverse event was estimated by disproportionality analysis. The reporting odds ratio (ROR) was calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We analyzed the criteria of diagnosis of the adverse reaction. RESULTS: Five-hundred sixty-seven notifications were identified as IMNM of which 14 with pembrolizumab. The ROR was 17.59 (95% CI: 9.4-32.9). CONCLUSION: The diagnosis of IMNM does not always take into account recent criteria for the diagnosis of this pathology. This study highlights the existence of a signal, as well as the need for collaboration between oncologists and neurologists for these neurological pathologies.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Enfermedades Musculares , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas/patología , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Enfermedades Musculares/inducido químicamenteRESUMEN
AIMS: Amoxicillin (AMX)-induced crystal nephropathy (AICN) is a rarely reported adverse drug reaction (ADR) but its increase has been recently reported in the Paris area. Our aim was to investigate the incidence, characteristics and outcome of AICN in France. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of all AICN cases reported to the French National Pharmacovigilance Database and the Marketing Authorization Holders Pharmacovigilance Database. AICN notification rate was compared to intravenous AMX and AMX-clavulanate sales. RESULTS: In total, 101 AICN cases were included. Intravenous AMX/AMX-clavulanate was prescribed as surgical prophylaxis (32 surgical patients) or to treat infection (69 medical patients). AKI KDIGO stage 3 was observed in 70 patients and 24/70 patients required renal replacement therapy and/or intensive care unit admission. The annual notification rate of AICN was increased by a factor of 13 since 2010 (6 [0;7] and 77 [24;111] cases per 100 000 patient-years of exposure, before and after 2010 respectively; P < .001). In surgical patients, the increase in AICN has been reported since 2010 and was mainly related to inadequate AMX administration. In medical patients, the increase in AICN was observed since 2014. After 2014, medical patients were older (67 [42;77] vs 74 years [64;84] respectively; P < .05) and were treated more frequently for endocarditis (0/20 vs 15/49 respectively; P < .01). A contributing factor was observed or suspected in 62 patients. CONCLUSION: AICN is a severe ADR that dramatically increased in France since 2010. Assessment of AICN contributing factors and AMX drug monitoring in patients receiving high dose of AMX could reduce the risk of AICN.
Asunto(s)
Amoxicilina , Farmacovigilancia , Amoxicilina/efectos adversos , Combinación Amoxicilina-Clavulanato de Potasio , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Eosinophilic pneumonia (EP) is a rare but serious adverse drug reaction (ADR) induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). METHODS: We describe the second published case of EP induced by oral diclofenac. We also reviewed the literature as well as French pharmacovigilance database. Case presentation A 63 year-old woman with polyarthralgia had taken diclofenac for three days for analgesic purposes. Progressively, the patient presented weakness, dyspnea and fever. Computed tomography (CT) scan revealed bilateral interstitial infiltration. Broncho-alveolar lavage (BAL) showed an elevated level of eosinophils. After ruling out all other possible etiologies, drug-induced EP was diagnosed and treatment by corticosteroid was initiated. The patient recovered in three months. RESULTS: In the French pharmacovigilance database, six cases of EP were recorded (3 with naproxen, 2 with ibuprofen, 1 with piroxicam). In the literature, twenty-six cases of EP with NSAIDs were published. The most commonly involved drug was naproxen (n=8), followed by fenbufen (n=4), ibuprofen (n=3) and diclofenac (n=2). A high level of eosinophils was systematically observed in the blood cell count or BAL. Corticosteroid therapy was started in eleven cases. All patients recovered. CONCLUSION: Complete history taking and examination should be done to rule out other etiological diagnoses. BAL is sufficient to diagnose EP. Corticosteroid therapy should be indicated for more severe or refractory cases. This adverse drug reaction is underestimated, healthcare professionals should be informed.
Asunto(s)
Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Artralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Diclofenaco/efectos adversos , Eosinofilia Pulmonar/inducido químicamente , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Diclofenaco/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Farmacovigilancia , Prevalencia , Eosinofilia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Eosinofilia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for the occurrence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) based on geriatric evaluation. DESIGN: Longitudinal prospective study from May 2010 to November 2011. SETTING: Dedicated acute geriatric care unit specializing in the management of patients with dementia syndrome (Alzheimer disease or related syndromes) at the University Hospital of Reims, France. PARTICIPANTS: Older patients with dementia syndrome (Alzheimer disease or related syndromes). MEASUREMENTS: Sociodemographic variables and comprehensive geriatric assessment were recorded. Occurrence of ADRs was noted. Risk factors for ADR were identified by multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: During the study period, 293 patients were included; average age was 82 ± 8 years; the majority were women (61.4%). Average Mini-Mental State Examination score was 13 ± 8; average activities of daily living (ADL) score was 3.6 ± 2.1. Independent risk factors for occurrence of at least one ADR were polypharmacy (≥5 drugs/day) (OR: 4.0, 95% CI: 1.1-14.1) and dependence on at least 1 ADL (OR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.1-6.5). CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for ADRs were polypharmacy and dependence on at least one ADL. Our findings underline the importance of taking into consideration the characteristics of the patients when prescribing drugs in this specific population. Prescriptions should be re-evaluated at each follow-up.
Asunto(s)
Actividades Cotidianas , Demencia/epidemiología , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Polifarmacia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Evaluación Geriátrica , Humanos , Masculino , Pruebas de Estado Mental y Demencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
AIM: To describe the adverse drug reactions (ADR) and the drugs involved in pediatrics. METHODS: An observational study on all ADR notifications recorded in the French pharmacovigilance database by the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne between 1 January 1985 and 31 December 2014 involving children from 0 to 17 years inclusive was performed. For all notifications, we studied the patient and the ADR characteristics. RESULTS: During the study period, 632 notifications were collected. The most frequently reported ATC (anatomical, therapeutic and chemical) classes were vaccines (15.9%), antineoplastics (12%) and antibiotics (11.1%). Forty-six percent of the notifications were serious. For serious ADRs, the most involved drugs were paracetamol, asparaginase and ibuprofen. Skin reactions were the most often reported ADRs. The most common lowest level terms (LLT) were urticaria (4.9%), hypersensitivity (4.1%), fever (2.9%) and vomiting (2.8%). CONCLUSION: ADR reporting to the pharmacovigilance system, in particular pediatric ADRs, should be encouraged. Information on the use of medicinal products, especially on self-medication use, need to be improve.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , FarmacovigilanciaRESUMEN
AIM: To describe the serious adverse drug reactions (ADR) in elderly subjects aged over 65 years and assess their preventability. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne (northeast of France) between January and May 2013. Patients aged over 65 years who presented a serious ADR notified to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center were included in the study. RESULTS: Over the study period, 100 subjects were included in the study. The sex ratio was 0.96. Twenty seven percent of serious ADR were preventable. Off-label use accounted for 20% and non-compliance for 5%. Bleeding events were the most common serious ADR (36%). The drugs most frequently involved in serious ADR were antithrombotic agents (31.4%). CONCLUSION: More than a quarter of serious ADR were preventable. Off-label use and non-compliance are the main causes identified in the occurrence of preventable serious ADR.
Asunto(s)
Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/epidemiología , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Sobredosis de Droga , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/prevención & control , Femenino , Hemorragia/inducido químicamente , Hemorragia/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Uso Fuera de lo Indicado , FarmacovigilanciaRESUMEN
AIM: To describe the serious adverse drug reactions (ADR) in elderly subjects aged over 65 years and assess their preventability. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center of Champagne-Ardenne (northeast of France) between January and May 2013. Patients aged over 65 years who presented a serious ADR notified to the Regional Pharmacovigilance Center were included in the study. RESULTS: Over the study period, 100 subjects were included in the study. The sex ratio was 0.96. Twenty seven percent of serious ADR were preventable. Off-label use accounted for 20% and non-compliance for 5%. Bleeding events were the most common serious ADR (36%). The drugs most frequently involved in serious ADR were antithrombotic agents (31.4%). CONCLUSION: More than a quarter of serious ADR were preventable. Off-label use and non-compliance are the main causes identified in the occurrence of preventable serious ADR.
RESUMEN
Methylphenidate (MPH) is a piperidine similar to amphetamines, and is indicated for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Studies concerning stuttering occurring with MPH are contradictory. We investigated the association between MPH and stuttering. We analysed reports in the World Health Organization global individual case safety reports database, Vigibase, up to 31 December 2018, with the MedDRA preferred term "dysphemia" and the lower level terms "stutter" and "stuttering". The association between exposure to MPH and occurrence of the adverse drug reaction was estimated by disproportionality analysis. Reporting odds ratios (RORs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). In total, 2975 cases of dysphemia were reported, of which 46 reports were associated with MPH. For the Preferred Term "dysphemia", the ROR was 7.3 (95% CI: 5.4-9.8). With the Lower Level Term "stuttering", 584 cases were registered in the database of which 17 involved MPH. The ROR was 13.9 (95% CI: 8.6-22.5). This study found a signal for stuttering with MPH.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/efectos adversos , Metilfenidato/efectos adversos , Tartamudeo/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Farmacovigilancia , Tartamudeo/inducido químicamente , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to identify a notoriety bias in a database of spontaneous reports and its consequences on the calculation of the reporting odds ratio (ROR). METHODS: We used the case/noncase methodology to calculate the ROR for bisphosphonates and osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in the French national pharmacovigilance database (from 1985 to 2013). To evaluate notoriety bias, drug-related risk factors for ONJ [as specified in the summary of product characteristics (SPC) of bisphosphonates] were systematically scanned for notifications of reports of ONJ occurring under bisphosphonate therapy. When a risk factor was present, the ONJ was considered as not due to bisphosphonates, and a second ROR was calculated under the hypothesis of maximum bias. RESULTS: In total, 148 cases of ONJ were reported (143 with bisphosphonates and five without). The raw ROR was 3448 (95% confidence interval 1413-8417). After analysis of the reports, only 86 had no mention of a risk factor for ONJ. The ROR under the maximum bias hypothesis was 87 (95% confidence interval 63-121). Among ONJ where chemotherapy was being administered simultaneously to bisphosphonates, 27 reports did not consider the chemotherapy to be implicated, despite seven of these occurring in cases where ONJ was mentioned in the summary of product characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The existence of a notoriety bias has an impact on measures of disproportionality. The detection of pharmacovigilance signals might be delayed. It is advisable to list all drugs being taken when an adverse drug reaction occurs, and not only those known to be associated with the observed reaction.
Asunto(s)
Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos , Osteonecrosis de los Maxilares Asociada a Difosfonatos/epidemiología , Farmacovigilancia , Sesgo , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales/normas , Bases de Datos Factuales/estadística & datos numéricos , Difosfonatos/efectos adversos , Francia/epidemiología , Humanos , Enfermedades Maxilomandibulares/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Maxilomandibulares/epidemiología , Enfermedades Maxilomandibulares/etiología , Oportunidad Relativa , Osteonecrosis/inducido químicamente , Osteonecrosis/epidemiología , Osteonecrosis/etiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (IMNM) is a form of statin myopathy characterized by the presence of antibodies against 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (anti HMGCR). OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the different statins and the risk of IMNM. METHODS: A two-time approach was used. First, we performed a descriptive analysis of the French national pharmacovigilance database (FNPV) for the period from 1985 to december2020. To identify relevant cases, we used Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) preferred terms (PTs) related to IMNM. We performed a quantitative and qualitative review of individual case safety reports (ICSRs) recorded in the french vigilance spontaneous reporting system. In a second time, we performed a comparative analysis with the World Health Organization global individual case safety reports database (Vigibase). The association between IMNM and statins exposure was assessed by calculating the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and its 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: After analysis, a total of 25 ICSRs were related to IMNM in the FNPV. The suspected statins were atorvastatin (n=21), simvastatin (n=2), pravastatin (n=1) and rosuvastatin (n=1). In Vigibase, 567 notifications were identified. A significant ROR value was found for atorvastatin, pitavastatin, simvastatin, pravastatin and rosuvastatin. CONCLUSION: Atorvastatin presents the highest risk of IMNM. Our data suggest that the occurrence of IMNM is a class effect.
RESUMEN
Anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis is an auto-immune neurological disorder characterized by the presence in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of antibodies against the GluN1 subunit of NMDA receptors in the brain. The etiology of the disease remains largely unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the possible existence of pharmacovigilance signals relating to a link between vaccination and the occurrence of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. We performed a case/non-case study using data from the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database (VigiBase) up to 31 December 2021. All individual case study reports (ICSRs) linked to a vaccine and coded with the MedDRA Lower Level Term (LLT) "anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis" were analysed. We calculated the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and 95% Confidence Interval (CI) for each type of vaccine. A total of 29,758,737 ICSRs were registered in VigiBase, of which 70 were coded under the selected LLT, and 29/70 (41.4%) involved a vaccine. Of these cases, 53.8% involved children aged younger than 15 years. The median time to onset of anti-NMDAR encephalitis after vaccination was 4 days (range 0-730). The highest RORs were observed for the diphtheria/polio/tetanus/pertussis vaccine [54.72 (95% CI 26.2-114.3)], yellow fever vaccine [50.02 (95% CI 15.7-159)] and human papillomavirus vaccine [32.89 (15.8-68.7)]. All cases were coded as serious; 13 patients did not recover, or were left with permanent sequelae. Nine patients recovered without sequelae or are on the path to recovery, and one patient died. In summary, pharmacovigilance signals were observed for anti-NMDAR encephalitis and vaccination. Clinicians need to be aware of this potential risk, and encourage to report any case of anti-NMDAR encephalitis occurring after vaccination.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Since the expiry of the patents on originator anti-TNF agents in Europe, France has authorized the sale of biosimilars. The penetration rate of anti-TNF agents and their biosimilars, and the cost savings driven by the introduction of biosimilars appears to vary widely. This study aimed to describe the market share of anti-TNFs and their biosimilars, and the cost savings generated by the introduction of biosimilars in French hospitals 5 years ago. METHODS: The pharmaceutical component of the French national uniform hospital discharge data set database (PMSI) was used to study sales of infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab originators and biosimilars, and to estimate cost savings generated by the introduction of biosimilars onto the market, using the historical tariffs of the originators. RESULTS: The penetration rate of anti-TNF biosimilars in France in 76% for infliximab, 74% for etanercept and 77% for adalimumab. In 2020, Inflectra® (41%) was the Remicade® biosimilar with the highest sales volume, while Erelzi® (57%) and Amgevita® (64%) were the most widely sold biosimilars of Enbrel® and Humira® respectively. In terms of cost savings since the launch of biosimilars, overall, for all biosimilars taken together, over the 5-year period, a total of 824 million Euro was saved, in relation to the historical tariffs of the originators. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows firstly that the penetration rate of anti-TNF biosimilars in France 5 years after their launch is close to 80%. Secondly, we show that the cost savings generated by the use of biosimilars to anti-TNF agents exceed 820 million Euro over 5 years.
Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Hospitales , Humanos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis TumoralRESUMEN
Background: Amoxicillin crystalluria (AC), potentially responsible for acute kidney injury (AKI), is reported more and more frequently in patients treated with high doses of intravenous amoxicillin (HDIVA). The main objective of this study was to evaluate AC incidence in these patients. The secondary objectives were to identify factors associated with AC and to evaluate its impact on the risk of AKI. Methods: This multicentre, observational, cohort study was conducted between Mar 18, 2014 and Aug 16, 2019 in Dijon, Nancy, and Reims University Hospitals as well as Châlon-sur-Saône, Charleville-Mézières, and Troyes general hospitals in France. Adult patients (≥18 years) treated with HDIVA and having been tested for AC at least once during treatment were included. Clinical, biological, and therapeutic characteristics of the patients were collected. A univariable mixed logistic regression model assessed the factors associated with AC. A multivariable Cox model with AC as a time-dependent variable assessed the prognostic factors for AKI. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT02853292. Findings: Of the 112 included patients, 27 (24.1%, 95% CI [16.2-32.0]) developed at least one episode of AC within a mean of 5.1 days. The factors associated with its occurrence were the concomitant use of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (OR=4.6, 95% CI [2.2-9.3], p<0.0001) and the decrease of urinary pH (OR=2.1 for one pH point decrease, 95% CI [1.2-3.7], p=0.009). 20 patients (17.9%) presented with AKI, within a mean time of 10.9 days. The main factor associated with the occurrence of AKI was the occurrence of AC (aHR=7.4, 95% CI [2.5-22.2], p=0.0003). Interpretation: AC occurred in a quarter of patients treated with HDIVA and was highly prognostic of AKI. Funding: None.