RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema is a rare and potentially life-threatening genetic disease that is associated with kallikrein-kinin system dysregulation. Garadacimab (CSL312), a novel, fully-human monoclonal antibody that inhibits activated factor XII (FXIIa), is being studied for the prevention of hereditary angioedema attacks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-monthly subcutaneous administrations of garadacimab as prophylaxis for hereditary angioedema. METHODS: VANGUARD was a pivotal, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial that recruited patients (aged ≥12 years) with type I or type II hereditary angioedema across seven countries (Canada, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Japan, the Netherlands, and the USA). Eligible patients were randomly assigned (3:2) to receive garadacimab or placebo for 6 months (182 days) by an interactive response technology (IRT) system. Randomisation was stratified by age (≤17 years vs >17 years) and baseline attack rate (1 to <3 attacks per month vs ≥3 attacks per month) for the adult group. The randomisation list and code were kept by the IRT provider during the study, with no access by site staff and funding representatives. All patients and investigational site staff, and representatives from the funder (or their delegates) with direct interaction with the study sites or patients, were masked to treatment assignment in a double-blind fashion. Randomly assigned patients received a 400-mg loading dose of subcutaneous garadacimab as two 200-mg injections or volume-matched placebo on day 1 of the treatment period, followed by five additional self-administered (or caregiver-administered) monthly doses of 200-mg subcutaneous garadacimab or volume-matched placebo. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed time-normalised number of hereditary angioedema attacks (number of hereditary angioedema attacks per month) during the 6-month treatment period (day 1 to day 182). Safety was evaluated in patients who received at least one dose of garadacimab or placebo. The study is registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register, 2020-000570-25 and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04656418. FINDINGS: Between Jan 27, 2021, and June 7, 2022, we screened 80 patients, 76 of whom were eligible to enter the run-in period of the study. Of 65 eligible patients with type I or type II hereditary angioedema, 39 were randomly assigned to garadacimab and 26 to placebo. One patient was randomly assigned in error and did not enter the treatment period (no dose of study drug received), resulting in 39 patients assigned to garadacimab and 25 patients assigned to placebo being included. 38 (59%) of 64 participants were female and 26 (41%) were male. 55 (86%) of 64 participants were White, six (9%) were Asian (Japanese), one (2%) was Black or African American, one (2%) was Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and one (2%) was listed as other. During the 6-month treatment period (day 1 to day 182), the mean number of investigator-confirmed hereditary angioedema attacks per month was significantly lower in the garadacimab group (0·27, 95% CI 0·05 to 0·49) than in the placebo group (2·01, 1·44 to 2·57; p<0·0001), corresponding to a percentage difference in means of -87% (95% CI -96 to -58; p<0·0001). The median number of hereditary angioedema attacks per month was 0 (IQR 0·00-0·31) for garadacimab and 1·35 (1·00-3·20) for placebo. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were upper-respiratory tract infections, nasopharyngitis, and headaches. FXIIa inhibition was not associated with an increased risk of bleeding or thromboembolic events. INTERPRETATION: Monthly garadacimab administration significantly reduced hereditary angioedema attacks in patients aged 12 years and older compared with placebo and had a favourable safety profile. Our results support the use of garadacimab as a potential prophylactic therapy for the treatment of hereditary angioedema in adolescents and adults. FUNDING: CSL Behring.
Asunto(s)
Angioedemas Hereditarios , Adulto , Adolescente , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Angioedemas Hereditarios/tratamiento farmacológico , Angioedemas Hereditarios/prevención & control , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anticuerpos Monoclonales , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic data on occupational anaphylaxis is scarce, and there is a need of more knowledge about work-related anaphylactic episodes. METHODS: Based on the data of the Anaphylaxis Registry, we identified cases related to occupational exposure and analyzed the elicitors, demographics, severity of clinical reaction and management. RESULTS: Since 2017, 5851 cases with an information about the occupational relation of the anaphylactic episode were registered whereby 225 (3.8%) were assigned to be caused by an occupational allergen. The vast majority of these occupational anaphylaxis cases were caused by insects (n = 186, 82.7%) followed by food (n = 27, 12.0%) and drugs (n = 8, 3.6%). Latex elicited occupational anaphylaxis in only two cases. Beekeepers, gardeners, farmers, and individuals working in professions associated with food handling, for example, employees in restaurants, bakery, pastry, and cooks were most frequently affected. The comparison of the occupational insect venom-induced anaphylaxis to a group of non-occupational insect anaphylaxis in adults (n = 1842) revealed a significant younger age in occupational anaphylaxis (46 vs. 53 years), a predominance of bee-induced cases (38% vs. 17%), and a higher rate of venom immunotherapy in a primary care setting (3.3% vs. 1.3%, p = .044). In the occupational- versus non-occupational adults with food-induced anaphylaxis atopic dermatitis as concomitant atopic disease was observed more frequently (n = 486; 20% vs. 10%), although this was not significant. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate the impact of venom allergy in work-related anaphylaxis. Foods and drugs are less frequently elicitors, and latex-induced occupational anaphylaxis was rare. More data are needed to determine risk factors associated with occupational anaphylaxis.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Venenos de Artrópodos , Adulto , Humanos , Abejas , Animales , Anafilaxia/etiología , Anafilaxia/inducido químicamente , Látex , Factores de Riesgo , Venenos de Artrópodos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos , Insectos , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMEN
Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating, inflammatory skin condition characterized by infiltrating immune cells. Available treatments are limited to improving the signs and symptoms. There is an unmet need to develop therapies that target disease-driving pathways upstream of mast cell activation to inhibit or delay the progression of CSU and associated comorbidities. Here, we aim to define disease modification due to a treatment intervention and criteria that disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) must meet in CSU. We have defined disease modification in CSU as a favorable treatment-induced change in the underlying pathophysiology and, therefore, the disease course, which is clinically beneficial and enduring. A DMT must fulfil the following criteria: (1) prevents or delays the progression of CSU, (2) induces long-term, therapy-free clinical remission, which is the sustained absence of CSU signs and symptoms without the need for treatment, and (3) affects the underlying mechanism of CSU, as demonstrated by an effect on disease-driving signals and/or a biomarker. DMTs in CSU should slow disease progression, achieve long-lasting disease remission, target disease-driving mechanisms, reduce mast cell-activating IgE autoantibodies, target cytokine profile polarization, and normalize the gut microbiome and barrier. Treating CSU at the immune system level could provide valuable alternatives to pharmacotherapy in CSU management. Specific DMTs in CSU are yet to be developed, but some show potential benefits, such as inhibitors of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase, IL-4 and IL-13. Future therapies could prevent CSU signs and symptoms, achieve long-term clinical benefits after discontinuing treatment, and prevent associated concomitant disorders.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis represents the most severe end of the spectrum of allergic reactions. Frequent elicitors of anaphylaxis are insects, foods, and drugs. This paper summarizes recent development with regard to emerging and novel elicitors of anaphylaxis. SUMMARY: Food allergens on the rise include pulses (like pea, chickpea), seeds (hemp, chia), nuts (cashew), pseudograins (buckwheat, quinoa), fruits, and microalgae. Novel foods are foods that were not consumed to any significant extent in the European Union before May 1997, which includes four edible insects (mealworm, migratory locust, house cricket, and buffalo worm). Recent investigations have pointed out the risk of anaphylaxis associated with the consumption of yellow mealworm for people allergic to shellfish and house dust mites. In Europe, fire ants (mostly Solenopsis invicta) and Vespa velutina nigrithorax represent invasive species, which account for increasing numbers of anaphylactic reactions. Also, several new drugs, especially biologicals, have been associated with anaphylaxis. KEY MESSAGES: Elicitors of anaphylaxis are changing as a result of (i) increase in demand for plant-based food, (ii) introduction of novel foods, (iii) spreading of allergens by climate changes and globalization, or (iv) due to exposure to newly developed drugs.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Anafilaxia/etiología , Anafilaxia/inmunología , Humanos , Animales , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/inmunología , Alérgenos/inmunologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Concerns regarding contact allergies and intolerance reactions to dental materials are widespread among patients. Development of novel dental materials and less frequent amalgam use may alter sensitization profiles in patients with possible contact allergy. OBJECTIVES: To analyse current sensitization patterns to dental materials in patients with suspected contact allergy. METHODS: This retrospective, multicentre analysis from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) selected participants from 169 834 people tested in 2005-2019 and registered with (i) an affected area of 'mouth' (and 'lips'/'perioral'), (ii) with the dental material in question belonging to one of three groups (dental filling materials, oral implants or dentures or equivalents) and (iii) with patch-testing done in parallel with the German baseline series, (dental) metal series and dental technician series. RESULTS: A total of 2730 of 169 834 tested patients met the inclusion criteria. The patients were predominantly women (81.2%) aged ≥ 40â years (92.8%). The sensitization rates with confirmed allergic contact stomatitis in women (n = 444) were highest for metals (nickel 28.6%, palladium 21.4%, amalgam 10.9%), (meth)acrylates [2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) 4.8%] and the substances propolis (6.8%) and 'balsam of Peru' (11.4%). The most relevant acrylates were HEMA, 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate, methyl methacrylate, ethylene glycol dimethacrylate and pentaerythritol triacrylate. Few men were diagnosed with allergic contact stomatitis (n = 68); sensitization rates in men were highest for propolis (14.9%) and amalgam (13.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Allergic contact stomatitis to dental materials is rare. Patch testing should not only focus on metals such as nickel, palladium, amalgam and gold, but also (meth)acrylates and the natural substances propolis and 'balsam of Peru'.
Asunto(s)
Amalgama Dental , Materiales Dentales , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Pruebas del Parche , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/inmunología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Materiales Dentales/efectos adversos , Amalgama Dental/efectos adversos , Anciano , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Niño , Metacrilatos/efectos adversos , Bálsamos/efectos adversos , Implantes Dentales/efectos adversos , Estomatitis/epidemiología , Estomatitis/inducido químicamente , Estomatitis/inmunología , Estomatitis/diagnóstico , Estomatitis/etiología , Própolis/efectos adversos , Dentaduras/efectos adversos , Alemania/epidemiología , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/inmunología , PreescolarRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are no diagnostic and/or prognostic markers of the treatment outcome in patients receiving allergen immunotherapy (AIT). Although numerous allergen epitopes are known, their value in this context has not been investigated. This paper deals with re-evaluation of sera from patients who underwent AIT against rBet v 1 for treatment of their soya allergy (BASALIT trial). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic and/or prognostic potential of allergen epitopes recognition by antibodies from patients with birch-related soya allergy before and after rBet v 1-immunotherapy. METHODS: PR-10 epitope-binding profiles from 34 patients were identified in silico using a statistical peptide phage display at start and at end of AIT. IgE- and IgG-binding to these peptide epitopes was measured in peptide microarrays. Clinical relevance of epitopes was evaluated by comparing these measurements to a number of treatment outcome measures recorded during double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge at start and end of AIT. RESULTS: We showed that IgG- and IgE-recognition of peptide epitopes after AIT were surrogate markers of 5 out of 12 analysed treatment outcome measures using this patient cohort. Seven epitopes were identified from multiple PR-10 allergen sequences. Twenty-six peptide epitopes were used for IgG and IgE measurements. IgE-binding to one of the epitopes was associated with stronger intensity of oral tingling/itching after ingesting soya at start of AIT. IgG recognizing two other epitopes at start of AIT could predict decreased Cor a 1-specific IgE concentration (p = .043) and decreased lip swelling intensity (p = .016) after AIT. Tolerance to increasing amounts of soy at food challenge correlated with IgG-binding to another epitope at start of AIT (p = .046). CONCLUSION: IgG- and IgE-binding to peptide epitopes in PR-10 is a potential indicator of the outcome and clinical course of AIT of soya-sensitized patients with rBet v 1.
Asunto(s)
Betula , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Alérgenos , Antígenos de Plantas , Biomarcadores , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Epítopos , Inmunoglobulina E , Inmunoglobulina G , Péptidos , Glycine max , Método Doble CiegoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Drugs are a frequent cause of severe anaphylactic reactions. Here, we analyze a large dataset on drug induced anaphylaxis regarding elicitors, risk factors, symptoms, and treatment. METHODS: Data from the European Anaphylaxis Registry (2007-2019) with 1815 reported cases of drug-induced anaphylaxis were studied accordingly. RESULTS: Drugs are the third most frequent cause of anaphylaxis reported in the Anaphylaxis Registry. Among the eliciting groups of drugs analgesics and antibiotics were far most often reported. Female and senior patients were more frequently affected, while the number of children with DIA was low. DIA patients had symptoms affecting the skin and mucous membranes (n = 1525, 84.02%), the respiratory (n = 1300, 71.63%), the cardiovascular (n = 1251, 68.93%) and the gastrointestinal system (n = 549, 30.25%). Drugs caused significant more severe reactions, occurred more often in medical facilities and led to increased hospitalization rates in comparison to food and insect venom induced anaphylaxis. Adrenaline was used more often in patients with DIA than in anaphylaxis due to other causes. Patients with skin symptoms received more antihistamines and corticosteroids in the acute treatment, while gastrointestinal symptoms led to less adrenaline use. CONCLUSION: The study contributes to a better understanding of DIA, with a large number of cases from Europe supporting previous data, e.g., analgesics and antibiotics being the most frequent culprits for DIA. Female gender and higher age are relevant risk factors and despite clear recommendations, the emergency treatment of DIA is not administered according to the guidelines.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas , Humanos , Femenino , Anafilaxia/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/diagnóstico , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Sistema de Registros , Fenotipo , Antibacterianos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Allergic diseases represent a broad spectrum of high-prevalence, chronic conditions that remain underdiagnosed and undertreated. The aims of this interdisciplinary, questionnaire-based, non-interventional study were to identify and analyze potential barriers to clinical allergological care in Germany. METHODS: All hospitals listed in the German hospital register involved in the treatment of allergological patients (n = 899) were invited to participate. The study yielded a response rate of 52.1% (n = 468). RESULTS: Overall, 88.5% of clinics agreed that allergological care in Germany needs improvement, especially in terms of reimbursement for diagnostics and therapy. More than 80% of participating clinics reported that the decreased availability of test substances and the time-intensity of allergological testing represent relevant barriers. For dermatology and pulmonology, the former is the strongest barrier, while for pediatric and ENT clinics, time-intensity is regarded as the strongest barrier. The availability of good therapy and appropriate guidelines present no barriers to allergological care. Regarding the use of digital healthcare concepts, a very large majority of clinics (n = 352; 91.4%) do not offer video consultations or the use of health applications in patient care. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we have identified several structural barriers to allergological care in Germany. Reimbursement and the use of digital healthcare concepts in German clinics providing allergological care need improvement. Based on the results of this study, there is an urgent need for researchers and policymakers to further investigate and support allergology departments in their clinical work and in their implementation of digital healthcare concepts.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , Niño , Alemania/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hair cosmetic products contain several, partly potent contact allergens, including excipients like preservatives. Hand dermatitis in hairdressers is common, scalp and face dermatitis in clients or self-users (summarised here as 'consumers') may be severe. OBJECTIVE: To compare frequencies of sensitization to hair cosmetic ingredients and other selected allergens between female patch tested patients working as hairdressers and consumers without professional background, respectively, who were tested for suspected allergic contact dermatitis to such products. METHODS: Patch test and clinical data collected by the IVDK (https://www.ivdk.org) between 01/2013 and 12/2020 were descriptively analysed, focusing on age-adjusted sensitization prevalences in the two subgroups. RESULTS: Amongst the 920 hairdressers (median age: 28 years, 84% hand dermatitis) and 2321 consumers (median age: 49 years, 71.8% head/face dermatitis), sensitization to p-phenylenediamine (age-standardised prevalence: 19.7% and 31.6%, respectively) and toluene-2,5-diamine (20 and 30.8%) were most common. Contact allergy to other oxidative hair dye ingredients was also more commonly diagnosed in consumers, whereas ammonium persulphate (14.4% vs. 2.3%) and glyceryl thioglycolate (3.9 vs. 1.2%) as well as most notably methylisothiazolinone (10.5% vs. 3.1%) were more frequent allergens in hairdressers. CONCLUSIONS: Hair dyes were the most frequent sensitizers both in hairdressers and in consumers; however, as indication for patch testing may differ, prevalences cannot directly be compared. The importance of hair dye allergy is evident, often with marked coupled reactivity. Workplace and product safety need to be further improved.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Tinturas para el Cabello , Preparaciones para el Cabello , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Preparaciones para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Tinturas para el Cabello/efectos adversos , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Pruebas del Parche , Vehículos Farmacéuticos , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiologíaRESUMEN
Allergology is a key part of dermatological care. This paper reviews current pathophysiological, diagnostic and therapeutic developments in immediate-type allergies. Type-2 inflammation is involved in several allergological diseases such as allergic rhinitis and asthma. Allergen immunotherapy as an important therapeutic procedure is regulated in Germany by an official legal directive (Therapieallergene-Verordnung). Therapeutically, several biologics are already available that target interleukin (IL)-4, -5, -13, -33, or TSLP (thymic stromal lymphopoietin). Collateral efficacy may result in simultaneous treatment of allergological comorbidities. In mast cell mediated diseases (urticaria, anaphylaxis), there is increasing understanding of mast cell activation pathways. Several mast cell receptors such as MRGPRX2 (mas-related G protein coupled receptor X2) and Siglec-8 (sialinic acid binding Ig like lectin-8) as well as intracellular signaling pathways have recently been identified. Clinical trials are underway with drugs acting on mast cell receptors and intracellular signaling, i.e., Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Further perspectives on biomarkers, novel therapeutics and unmet needs for future research activities are presented.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Asma , Humanos , Citocinas , Linfopoyetina del Estroma Tímico , Factores Biológicos , Proteínas del Tejido Nervioso , Receptores de Neuropéptido , Receptores Acoplados a Proteínas GRESUMEN
A vegan diet is increasingly en vogue, i.e., a diet based on plants, in which animal products are completely avoided, often for health and environmental reasons. The menu is supplemented with pulses (e.g., soy, lentils, peas), nuts (e.g., cashew, macadamia, almond, pecan, para, walnut) and seeds (e.g., chia, flaxseed) or pseudo-grains (quinoa, buckwheat). Indeed, the product range is expanding to include vegan foods such as milk alternatives (e.g., oat, almond, soy drinks) and cheese or meat substitutes (e.g., soy-based). Food allergies are also on the rise, with an increasing prevalence worldwide. It is worthy of note that the main allergens of anaphylactic reactions to food in adults are predominantly of plant origin, mainly pulses and nuts - the very foods that form the main source of protein in the vegan diet. In this context, allergies to storage proteins (e.g., Gly m 5 and Gly m 6 from soya beans) can lead to severe anaphylactic reactions, while highly processed substitute products containing plant protein isolates (e.g., pea flour) in concentrated form continue to be of particular concern and may therefore be allergologically problematic. In this article, we aim to provide an overview of allergens and emerging allergen sources in vegan foods and highlight the anaphylaxis risk of the vegan diet.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos , Animales , Anafilaxia/etiología , Anafilaxia/prevención & control , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Dieta Vegana/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/etiología , Hipersensibilidad a los Alimentos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Allergic medical care in Germany is organized on an interdisciplinary basis. An overview of the current care situation is necessary to manage and improve interdisciplinary cooperation. METHODS: Between January and February 2022, questionnaires were sent online and by mail to chief physicians of inpatient clinical departments to which most allergological diseases are assigned (dermatology, otorhinolaryngology [ENT], pulmonology, pediatrics, environmental/occupational medicine, gastroenterology; n = 899). RESULTS: The response rate was 52.1%. Allergology departments of dermatology, ENT and pulmonology were predominantly located in metropolitan areas (> 100,000 inhabitants), whereas responses of pediatric departments were mostly from smaller towns. 76.8% of the respondents reported existing interdisciplinary treatment plans with other specialties. Pediatric and pulmonology clinics stated disproportionately few interdisciplinary treatment concepts with dermatology and ENT clinics, especially in smaller cities with < 100,000 inhabitants. Diagnosis and therapy of allergic rhinitis were performed in particular by the departments of ENT, asthma mainly by the pulmonology departments. Care of other allergological diseases was most frequently reported by chief physicians of dermatology and pediatrics. CONCLUSIONS: In metropolitan areas, participating departments provide allergology care in a cooperative manner. A large spectrum of care is covered in cooperation with dermatological clinics. In more rural areas, cooperation is rarer; here, mainly pediatric departments provide allergological care, which may explain the more limited range of services compared to metropolitan areas.
Asunto(s)
Atención a la Salud , Hospitales , Humanos , Niño , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Alemania/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Environmental monitoring involves the quantification of microscopic cells and particles such as algae, plant cells, pollen, or fungal spores. Traditional methods using conventional microscopy require expert knowledge, are time-intensive and not well-suited for automated high throughput. Multispectral imaging flow cytometry (MIFC) allows measurement of up to 5000 particles per second from a fluid suspension and can simultaneously capture up to 12 images of every single particle for brightfield and different spectral ranges, with up to 60x magnification. The high throughput of MIFC has high potential for increasing the amount and accuracy of environmental monitoring, such as for plant-pollinator interactions, fossil samples, air, water or food quality that currently rely on manual microscopic methods. Automated recognition of particles and cells is also possible, when MIFC is combined with deep-learning computational techniques. Furthermore, various fluorescence dyes can be used to stain specific parts of the cell to highlight physiological and chemical features including: vitality of pollen or algae, allergen content of individual pollen, surface chemical composition (carbohydrate coating) of cells, DNA- or enzyme-activity staining. Here, we outline the great potential for MIFC in environmental research for a variety of research fields and focal organisms. In addition, we provide best practice recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Monitoreo del Ambiente , Microscopía , Alérgenos , Citometría de Flujo/métodos , Coloración y EtiquetadoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Systemic allergic reactions to vaccines are very rare. In this study we assessed the management and outcome of suspected SARS-CoV-2 vaccine hypersensitivity. METHODS: Totally, 334 individuals underwent an allergy work up regarding SARS-CoV-2 vaccination (group A: 115 individuals suspected to be at increased risk for vaccine-related reactions before vaccination and group B: 219 patients with reactions after COVID vaccination). The large majority of the SPT/IDT with the vaccines were negative; however, we identified in 14.1% (n = 47) a possible sensitization to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and/or its ingredients defined as one positive skin test. Of the 219 individuals (group B) who experienced symptoms suspicious for a hypersensitivity reaction after vaccination, 214 were reported after the first vaccination with a mRNA vaccine (157 mRNA (Comirnaty®, 38 Spikevax®) and 18 with a vector vaccine (Vaxzevria®), 5 cases were after the second vaccination. RESULTS: The symptom profile in group B was as follows: skin symptoms occurred in 115 cases (n = 59 angioedema, n = 50 generalized urticaria and n = 23 erythema/flush. Seventy individuals had cardiovascular, 53 respiratory and 17 gastrointestinal symptoms. Of the overall 334 individuals, 78 patients tolerated (re)-vaccination (out of skin test positive/negative 7/19 from group A and 17/35 from group B). CONCLUSION: Proven IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines is extremely rare and not increased in comparison with reported hypersensitivity to other vaccines. The value of skin tests is unclear and nonspecific reactions, in particular when intradermal testing is applied, should be considered.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Hipersensibilidad , Humanos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Hipersensibilidad/epidemiología , Hipersensibilidad/etiología , Vacunación/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atopic eczema (AE) is known to be associated with depression and anxiety. We aimed at investigating the occurrence of selected psychological comorbidities in patients with AE under treatment in our university dermatological department. METHODS: Monocentric prospective examination of adult AE patients using PO-SCORAD (Patient-Oriented Severity Scoring of AD), EASI (Eczema Area and Severity Index), POEM (Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure), DLQI (Dermatologic Life Quality Index), LSNS-6 (Lubben Social Network Scale 6), CES-D (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale), HADS-D and -A (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), and GAD-7 (Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7) was carried out. We looked for correlations between AE severity and psychosocial comorbidities. Data were compared with age- and sex-matched controls from nonatopic subjects. STATISTICS: Mann-Whitney U test and Spearman's rank correlation were used. RESULTS: Eighty-four patients (44 women, median age 35.0 years, range: 19.4-92.8 years) were included. PO-SCORAD was 40.4 [23.4-55.4] (median [interquartile range]), EASI 9.3 [3.4-18.9], POEM 16 [8-24], and DLQI 10 [4-18]. Compared with 161 from the healthy LIFE-Adult cohort controls, our patients with AE had significantly higher scores for HADS, GAD-7, and CES-D (p < 0.001, respectively), but there was no increase in the LSNS score (18 vs. 19; p = 0.067). Within the group of AE patients, there was a significant correlation of the subjective skin severity and the depression and anxiety values: POEM significantly correlated with GAD-7, CES-D, and HADS-A and -D (p < 0.001). PO-SCORAD significantly correlated with GAD-7 and CES-D (p < 0.05). EASI correlated neither with HADS-A or -D nor with CES-D. Patients with suicidal thoughts, plans, or attempts in the last 12 months had significantly more severe AE than those without (POEM 25 [15.3-26] vs. 15 [7-23]; p = 0.013, and PO-SCORAD 51.6 [40.2-63] vs. 20.5 [20.7-52]; p = 0.014). CONCLUSION: Patients with AE being currently under treatment in our department had significantly increased scores indicating depression and anxiety. Suicidal tendency was increased in patients with severe AE. KEY MESSAGE: AE patients may develop depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation. Patient-oriented scores may help identifying high-risk patients.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Atópica , Eccema , Adulto , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Depresión/epidemiología , Dermatitis Atópica/complicaciones , Dermatitis Atópica/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Atópica/epidemiología , Eccema/complicaciones , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Ideación SuicidaRESUMEN
Here we present another family with CARD14-associated papulosquamous eruption, which is characterized by mutations in CARD14 and skin lesions resembling psoriasis and pityriasis rubra pilaris. We show beneficial therapeutic response to anti-IL17A treatment in one patient and performed immunomonitoring of our patient, exhibiting enhanced pSTAT3 levels in T cells before treatment, which normalized after treatment. Together, our data support the pathogenic role of IL-17A in this disease, which might have consequences for future treatment decisions in this rare condition.
Asunto(s)
Exantema , Pitiriasis Rubra Pilaris , Psoriasis , Proteínas Adaptadoras de Señalización CARD/genética , Guanilato Ciclasa/genética , Humanos , Interleucina-17/genética , Proteínas de la Membrana/genética , Mutación/genética , Pitiriasis Rubra Pilaris/tratamiento farmacológico , Pitiriasis Rubra Pilaris/genética , Psoriasis/genéticaRESUMEN
Diagnostics in type-1 allergy rely on medical history and clinical examination. Extent and severity of signs and symptoms can be documented by standardized scores and questionnaires. Both skin prick test and intradermal test are useful for search of immunoglobulin E-mediated sensitizations but the availability of commercially available diagnostic extracts has been markedly reduced during the last years. Investigation of total and of specific serum IgE is the most important in vitro diagnostic analyte in type-1 allergy. Identification of the individual molecules to which patients are sensitized, known as molecular or component-resolved diagnostics (CRD), has recently markedly improved management of type-1 allergy to pollen, food and hymenoptera venoms. Main features of CRD are increased analytic sensitivity, detection of cross-reactivity and determination of individual sensitization profiles which allow for risk assessment and facilitate decisions for or against allergen immunotherapy. Basophil activation test as well as determination of selected biomarkers (e.g. tryptase) may also be helpful in some cases. If any allergy test is positive, one will have to distinguish reactions, which are clinically relevant, from those, which are not. In vivo provocation tests (e.g. nasal provocation, oral drug or food challenge) may help to clarify the relevance of a sensitization.
Asunto(s)
Alérgenos , Hipersensibilidad , Desensibilización Inmunológica , Humanos , Hipersensibilidad/diagnóstico , Inmunoglobulina E , PolenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Venom-induced anaphylaxis (VIA) is a common, potentially life-threatening hypersensitivity reaction associated with (1) a specific symptom profile, 2) specific cofactors, and 3) specific management. Identifying the differences in phenotypes of anaphylaxis is crucial for future management guidelines and development of a personalized medicine approach. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the phenotype and risk factors of VIA. METHODS: Using data from the European Anaphylaxis Registry (12,874 cases), we identified 3,612 patients with VIA and analyzed their cases in comparison with sex- and age-matched anaphylaxis cases triggered by other elicitors (non-VIA cases [n = 3,605]). RESULTS: VIA more frequently involved more than 3 organ systems and was associated with cardiovascular symptoms. The absence of skin symptoms during anaphylaxis was correlated with baseline serum tryptase level and was associated with an increased risk of a severe reaction. Intramuscular or intravenous epinephrine was administered significantly less often in VIA, in particular, in patients without a history of anaphylaxis. A baseline serum tryptase level within the upper normal range (8-11.5 ng/mL) was more frequently associated with severe anaphylaxis. CONCLUSION: Using a large cohort of VIA cases, we have validated that patients with intermediate baseline serum tryptase levels (8-11 ng/mL) and without skin involvement have a higher risk of severe VIA. Patients receiving ß-blockers or angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors had a higher risk of developing severe cardiovascular symptoms (including cardiac arrest) in VIA and non-VIA cases. Patients experiencing VIA received epinephrine less frequently than did cases with non-VIA.
Asunto(s)
Anafilaxia/etiología , Anafilaxia/fisiopatología , Anafilaxia/terapia , Venenos de Artrópodos/efectos adversos , Mordeduras y Picaduras de Insectos/complicaciones , Adulto , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Europa (Continente) , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Fenotipo , Sistema de Registros , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
Numerous chronic inflammatory skin diseases are associated with the release of proinflammatory cytokines, which act via the intracellular JAK-STAT pathway. JAK inhibitors represent a promising, targeted therapeutic approach for cutaneous diseases. Impressive effects have been achieved with these agents in recent years. With the approval of the JAK-inhibitors Baricitinib, Upadacitinib and Abrocitinib, new systemic therapeutic agents are now available for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Other diseases in which the effectiveness of these small molecules could be shown are psoriasis, chilblain lupus, dermatomyositis, vitiligo and alopecia areata. As dermatologists, we are facing a whole series of new drug approvals. In this minireview we explain the active principles of JAK inhibitors and review study results in selected inflammatory skin diseases. Finally, possible side effects and initial as well as follow-up laboratory examinations for these drugs are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Alopecia Areata , Dermatología , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus , Vitíligo , Alopecia Areata/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inhibidores de las Cinasas Janus/efectos adversos , Quinasas JanusRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Hereditary angioedema (HAE) is associated with relevant disease-related burden. We aimed at investigating prevalence of depression and anxiety in patients with HAE in Leipzig, Germany. METHODS: Questionnaire-based evaluation of medical history, Angioedema Control Test (AECT), Angioedema Quality of Life Questionnaire (AE-QoL), Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale-7 (GAD-7), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients with HAE were included (31 females, mean age 49.6 ± 17.5 years). A mean diagnostic delay between first symptoms and correct diagnosis of 14.2 ± 14.5 years was detected. Patients aged <50 years (n = 18) had been diagnosed significantly earlier with HAE than older patients (p = <0.001). In 6 patients (16.2%), unnecessary medical interventions were performed and 14 patients (43.8%) reported at least 1 HAE-related death of a family member. Psychological stress was the most common triggering factor (96.2%). HADS scores revealed depression in 5/37 patients (13.5%) and anxiety in 16/37 (43.2%), GAD-7 score indicated anxiety in 9/36 (25%) participants. Patients receiving long-term prophylactic treatment (n = 17, 45.9%) showed significantly better disease control (AECT; p = <0.001) and quality of life (AE-QoL; p = <0.001) compared to those with on-demand treatment only. Patients with long-term prophylactic treatment showed significantly lower scores for anxiety and depression at GAD-7 (p = 0.011) and HADS (anxiety: p = 0.021; depression: p = 0.008). In 5 patients, treatment regime was changed as AECT score indicated insufficient disease control. Subsequently, we measured significant improvement of quality of life (AE-QoL, p = 0.04) and disease control (AECT; p = 0.032). CONCLUSION: Anxiety was a frequent burden in our study group and showed a significant association with low disease control. Our data indicate that prophylactic HAE treatment can improve psychosocial burden of HAE.