RESUMEN
AIM: The PICO (Smith & Nephew, UK) dressing is a single use negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) system that is designed to be used for up to 7 days for closed wounds. We aimed to assess its use for stoma closure wounds. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective analysis of stoma reversal wounds from April 2018 to June 2019. The wound was partially closed with an absorbable subcutaneous suture in a purse-string fashion. A 15 cm × 15 cm PICO dressing was applied directly over this wound. A control group who had received partial purse string closure with packing over the same time period was identified. Patients were contacted and information collected using a questionnaire. The primary outcome measure was the number of visits for dressing changes in the community. Further information was collected about length of stay, time to resolution of pain and return to work. RESULTS: On average, the patients with PICO dressings attended the community nurses 1.9 times. The patients in the PICO group stated it took 1-2 weeks to return to full work/daily activities. The control group averaged attending the community nurse 11.9 times, and 33% had not returned to work/daily activities in 1-2 weeks. CONCLUSION: Those who had a PICO dressing required fewer visits to the community nurse and the majority were able to return to work or resume usual activities within 1 to 2 weeks. This pilot study suggests that negative pressure dressings may be a useful aid for stoma closure site wounds.
Asunto(s)
Terapia de Presión Negativa para Heridas , Estomas Quirúrgicos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Humanos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Cicatrización de HeridasAsunto(s)
Colectomía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Perineo/cirugía , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Colectomía/métodos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Masculino , Prostatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/patología , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Recto/cirugía , Reoperación/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Muestreo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of popliteal aneurysms in men to enable the case for screening and elective surgery to be assessed. SETTING: Scott Research Unit, St Richards Hospital, Chichester. METHODS: The popliteal arteries of 1074 men aged between 65 and 80 were scanned with ultrasound, aneurysmal vessels >1.5 cm diameter were rescanned 5 years later to assess their rate of expansion. RESULTS: 11 of 1074 patients screened had a popliteal aneurysm between 15 and 26 mm, a prevalence of 1.0%. Five years later no increase in aneurysm size had occurred and no related complications were reported. CONCLUSION: In men the low prevalence and complication rate of popliteal aneurysms in conjunction with the effective treatment of acutely thrombosed aneurysms provides evidence for conservative management but against screening asymptomatic popliteal aneurysms.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma/epidemiología , Tamizaje Masivo , Arteria Poplítea , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagen , Aneurisma/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Humanos , Isquemia/etiología , Isquemia/prevención & control , Pierna/irrigación sanguínea , Masculino , Prevalencia , Trombosis/etiología , Trombosis/prevención & control , Ultrasonografía , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos VascularesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is relatively common in an age group in which other abdominal pathologies have an increasing incidence. The co-existence of an aneurysm with a second intra-abdominal pathology presents a difficult management problem for the surgeon. Synchronous aortic and gastrointestinal surgery is often avoided due to the perceived higher risk of infection of the vascular prosthesis. METHODS: Cases of synchronous AAA repair with a second gastrointestinal/biliary procedure were identified from the operative records of a single vascular surgeon working in a district general hospital. RESULTS: Eight cases were identified over a 10-year period, comprising 3 large bowel resections, 2 cholecystectomies and 3 upper gastrointestinal operations as the second synchronous procedure. No graft infections were recorded in this group and there was one death within 30 days. CONCLUSIONS: From our experience and a review of the available literature we conclude that synchronous aortic and gastrointestinal surgery should be considered when urgent surgery for both conditions is indicated.
Asunto(s)
Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/cirugía , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aneurisma de la Aorta Abdominal/complicaciones , Implantación de Prótesis Vascular/métodos , Femenino , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios ProspectivosAsunto(s)
Colectomía/métodos , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) has demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity for the structural imaging of anorectal pathology. This study prospectively assessed the impact of intra-operative EAUS on the surgical management of perianal disease. METHODS: EAUS was performed prior to and after examination under anaesthesia (EUA) in a consecutive series of patients with perianal disease. The impact of EAUS on the surgery performed was identified. RESULTS: Forty-three procedures have been performed in 38 patients (21 male, 17 female; mean age 42.7 years, range 6-76 years) over a three year period. Pathologies encountered were fistula-in-ano (42%), fissure-in-ano (26%), complicated perianal sepsis (16%) and carcinoma (5%). No specific abnormality was identified in 5 symptomatic patients (12%). Four patients with fissures had undergone previous sphincterotomy. In 22 cases (51.2%) the EAUS findings affected the surgical management (extent of muscle above a fistula 9 cases, extent of sphincterotomy 7 cases, site of sepsis identified 2 cases, exclusion of sepsis 2 cases, assessment of cancer resectability 1 case, biopsy of intersphincteric lesion 1 case). CONCLUSION: Intra-operative EAUS accurately identifies perianal disease and influences the surgical procedure performed. While not essential, it is a useful adjunct especially in recurrent perianal sepsis, undiagnosed anorectal pain and anal fissure.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades del Ano/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades del Ano/cirugía , Endosonografía , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Fístula Rectal/diagnóstico por imagen , Fístula Rectal/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anestesia , Niño , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios ProspectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To identify the preferred surgical management of the rectal stump after emergency subtotal colectomy (ESC) for acute severe colitis by assessing the morbidity associated with each option. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing ESC at a district general hospital between 1999 and 2004 were retrospectively audited for pathology, rectal stump complications and length of postoperative hospital stay (POS). RESULTS: Thirty-seven ESCs were performed, 34 were undertaken for disease refractory to medical treatment, 2 for toxic mega colon and 1 for perforation. Thirty-four cases were for ulcerative colitis, 2 Crohn's colitis and 1 infective colitis. Twenty-seven had an intraperitoneal and 10 a subcutaneously placed closed rectal stump. The median POS for patients with a subcutaneously placed stump was shorter than for those with an intraperitoneal stump, 8 and 15 days, respectively (P = 0.04). Two patients had leakage from an intraperitoneal stump, prolonging POS (33 and 193 days). Three of the subcutaneous stumps leaked causing wound infection but not prolonging the POS (6, 7 and 16 days). CONCLUSION: Avoiding a second stoma by closing the rectal stump after ESC has been confirmed as acceptable practice by studies over the last 15 years, reporting no overall increase in complications. The location of a closed rectal stump appears to influence the incidence of pelvic sepsis. The lowest pelvic sepsis rate is associated with subcutaneous placement; despite a higher wound infection rate this option appears to be associated with a lower total morbidity reflected in a shorter POS.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía , Colitis Ulcerosa/cirugía , Recto/cirugía , Urgencias Médicas , Humanos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Técnicas de Sutura , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Firstly, to determine the proportion of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients seen within an established two week rule (TWR) system and to observe other routes of referral for CRC patients. Secondly to determine if referral route affects the interval to, and cancer stage at, definitive treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: GP referrals of patients with CRC were divided into direct surgical outpatient referrals (group 1) and indirect referrals to accident and emergency and medical outpatients (group 2). Data were recorded on the time to definitive treatment and the location and stage of tumour. RESULTS: There were 78 patients in group 1. Thirty (20%) patients were referred by their GP under the TWR, 31 (21%) as urgent and 17 (12%) as nonurgent referrals, to surgical outpatients. There were 69 patients in group 2. Forty-two (29%) were referred initially to the accident and emergency department and 27 (18%) to general medical outpatients. Group 1 patients were treated within a median of 70.5 days and group 2 patients within 14 days of referral (P < 0.0005). Group 2 contained tumours of a significantly more advanced pathological stage (P = 0.015) and more proximal colonic cancers (P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Fifty-three percent of patients with CRC were referred directly to surgical outpatients, 20% under the TWR guidelines. Despite having this system in place direct referrals were slower to treatment but the tumours were still of a less advanced pathological stage. Compliance with the TWR should not be used as a means of assessing a colorectal unit's treatment of CRC.