SPECT/CT Adds Distinct Lymph Node Basins and Influences Radiologic Findings and Surgical Approach for Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Planar lymphoscintigraphy (PL) has a lower detection rate of sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in head and neck melanoma compared with other sites. We assessed situations when single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) identified nodes not seen by PL. We also evaluated the impact of SPECT/CT on surgical approach and oncologic outcomes. METHODS: Patients who underwent SLN biopsy (SLNB) for head and neck melanoma with PL and SPECT/CT between November 2011 and December 2016 were included. Surgeons and radiologists completed a real-time survey inquiring about the utility of SPECT/CT. Patients were divided into two groups: patients with nodal basins identified by both PL and SPECT/CT ('PL + SPECT/CT'), and patients in whom SPECT/CT identified additional nodal basins not seen on PL ('SPECT/CT only'). Patient demographics and long-term outcomes including follow-up duration, recurrence, and survival are described. RESULTS: In the PL + SPECT/CT group, 73 (61.9%) patients were included and 45 (38.1%) patients were included in the SPECT/CT-only group. SPECT/CT added 51 basins to those seen on PL, primarily in the supraclavicular region (43.1%). Eighteen patients had positive node(s) in the PL + SPECT/CT group compared with two patients in the SPECT/CT-only group. Surgeons reported that 81% of the time, SPECT/CT influenced the location of incision for SLNB. CONCLUSIONS: SPECT/CT influences the location of incision and contributes most to identification of nodes in the supraclavicular region. It also detects additional SLN basins when compared with PL. Further studies are necessary to determine when these additional basins require sampling.

Utility of an Anterior Tibial Perforator for Skin Paddle Viability in Through-and-Through Defects of the Mandible.

Objective: The present report describes an alternative technique of using a flow- through, double-paddle, fibular, osteocutaneous free flap based on one perforator from the peroneal system and one perforator from the anterior tibial system for a through-and-through mandibular defect. Methods: The patient was a 65-year-old man who underwent a composite resection of the floor of the mouth, mandible, and chin pad due to recurrent oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma. The fibula was harvested with one posterior-lateral septal perforator from the peroneal system and with a second skin perforator from the anterior tibial system to perfuse a 15 × 14 cm skin island. The anterior tibial perforator was anastomosed to the distal end of the peroneal artery in a flow-through technique, and the area between the peroneal and tibial perforators was de-epithelialized to reconstruct separately the floor of mouth and cutaneous defects. Results: Good inflow and outflow of both skin islands were noted at the end of the procedure, and the patient recovered successfully without any fistulas or donor site morbidity. Conclusions: Perforators from the anterior tibial system should be considered for large, through-and-through mandibular defects when using 2 perforators from the peroneal system is not possible. In addition, we believe the flow-through technique can be useful in patients with vessel-depleted necks and provides a suitable match for vessel size between an anterior tibial perforator and the distal end of the peroneal system.

Designing a Fibular Flow-Through Flap with a Proximal Peroneal Perforator-Free Flap for Maxillary Reconstruction.

Reconstruction of a composite maxillary defect is frequently performed with a fibular osteocutaneous free flap to address both the bony and mucosal defect. If during the harvest of the fibula a distal skin perforator is not present due to vascular variations, reconstruction can potentially be done using the soleus muscle for filling of the palatal mucosal defect. An additional challenge arises when the accompanying skin paddle that has been harvested is not perfused, but the fibula remains viable. This case report describes salvage following loss of the skin paddle in an osteocutaneous fibular free flap by designing a fibular flow-through flap using a proximal peroneal perforator free flap. The use of this second free flap allows a skin paddle to be positioned on the distal fibular segment, provides a surgical backup, and limits the donor sites to the same extremity.

Is Routine Upper Gastrointestinal Contrast Study Necessary prior to Laparoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Placement in Children?

INTRODUCTION: Before gastrostomy tube (GT) placement, many pediatric surgeons request that children undergo a preoperative upper gastrointestinal contrast study (UGI) to evaluate for the presence of either gastroesophageal reflux (GER) or intestinal malrotation. We hypothesized that routine UGI is unnecessary before GT placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 500 consecutive children who had a GT placed in a single children's hospital from 2009 to 2012. RESULTS: There were 403 children who underwent UGI before planned GT placement; 196 of which were placed during the same hospitalization. Only 1/403 (0.25%) diagnosis of malrotation was identified on UGI, and treated with a Ladd procedure at the time of GT placement. There were 154 children who had evidence of reflux on UGI; 97 underwent an antireflux procedure in conjunction with GT placement. An additional 57 children with no evidence of reflux on UGI also underwent a concurrent antireflux procedure. Of these 160 children who underwent concurrent fundoplication, only 3 (2%) had a confirmatory pH probe study performed before GT placement. CONCLUSIONS: We found that in children undergoing routine preoperative UGI before GT placement (1) the risk of malrotation is less than 1%; (2) the decision to perform an antireflux procedure weakly correlates with the UGI findings of GER; and (3) one in five patients without radiographic GER still underwent concomitant fundoplication with or without confirmatory pH probe study. We conclude that the practice of routine UGI before laparoscopic gastrostomy placement in children is likely unnecessary.

Robot-assisted versus standard laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Over the years, there has been a continual shift toward more minimally invasive surgical techniques, such as the use of laparoscopy in colorectal surgery. Recently, there has been increasing adoption of robotic technology. Our study aims to compare and contrast robot-assisted and laparoscopic approaches to colorectal operations. METHODS: Forty patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic colorectal surgery performed by 2 surgeons at an academic center, regardless of indication, were included in this retrospective review. Patients undergoing open approaches were excluded. Study outcomes included operative time, estimated blood loss, length of stay, complications, and conversion rate to an open procedure. RESULTS: Twenty-five laparoscopic and fifteen robot-assisted colorectal surgeries were performed. The mean patient age was 61.1 ± 10.7 years in the laparoscopic group compared with 61.1 ± 8.5 years in the robotic group (P = .997). Patients had a similar body mass index and history of abdominal surgery. Mean blood loss was 163.3 ± 249.2 mL and 96.8 ± 157.7 mL, respectively (P = .385). Operative times were similar, with 190.8 ± 84.3 minutes in the laparoscopic group versus 258.4 ± 170.8 minutes in the robotic group (P = .183), as were lengths of hospital stay: 9.6 ± 7.3 and 6.5 ± 3.8 days, respectively (P = .091). In addition, there was no difference in the number of lymph nodes harvested between the laparoscopic group (14.0 ± 6.5) and robotic group (12.3 ± 4.2, P = .683). CONCLUSIONS: In our early experience, the robotic approach to colorectal surgery can be considered both safe and efficacious. Furthermore, it also preserves oncologically sufficient outcomes when performed for cancer operations.

Robotic versus laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

BACKGROUND: Robotic approaches have become increasingly used for colorectal surgery. The aim of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of robotic colorectal procedures in an adult population. STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review of articles in both PubMed and Embase comparing laparoscopic and robotic colorectal procedures was performed. Clinical trials and observational studies in an adult population were included. Approaches were evaluated in terms of operative time, length of stay, estimated blood loss, number of lymph nodes harvested, and perioperative complications. Mean net differences and odds ratios were calculated to examine treatment effect of each group. RESULTS: Two hundred eighteen articles were identified, and 17 met the inclusion criteria, representing 4,342 patients: 920 robotic and 3,422 in the laparoscopic group. Operative time for the robotic approach was 38.849 minutes longer (95% confidence interval: 17.944 to 59.755). The robotic group had lower estimated blood loss (14.17 mL; 95% confidence interval: -27.63 to -1.60), and patients were 1.78 times more likely to be converted to an open procedure (95% confidence interval: 1.24 to 2.55). There was no difference between groups with respect to number of lymph nodes harvested, length of stay, readmission rate, or perioperative complication rate. CONCLUSIONS: The robotic approach to colorectal surgery is as safe and efficacious as conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, it is associated with longer operative time and an increased rate of conversion to laparotomy. Further prospective randomized controlled trials are warranted to examine the cost-effectiveness of robotic colorectal surgery before it can be adopted as the new standard of care.