Feasibility and safety of transradial coronary interventions using a 6.5-F sheathless guiding catheter in patients with small radial arteries.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the feasibility and the safety of using a 6.5-French sheathless guide catheter in patients with small radial arteries. BACKGROUND: The small size of radial arteries is a limitation of transradial coronary intervention. A new sheathless guiding catheter with a diameter almost 2-Fr smaller than conventional sheaths and a full-length hydrophilic coating has been introduced. METHODS: A total of 148 patients from three French hospitals were consecutively enrolled from March 2009 to February 2012. They underwent transradial approach (TRA) for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) using the 6.5-F ASAHI sheathless Eaucath guiding catheter system. RESULTS: Among the 148 patients enrolled, 95 were females (64%), and 183 lesions were treated. Procedural success rate was 100%. Thirteen patients (9%) underwent same-procedure multivessel interventions for the right and left coronary artery. Among the group of 46 patients undergoing bifurcation PCI, 35 (76%) bifurcated lesions were treated with a kissing balloon technique, one patient had a saphenous vein bypass graft lesion requiring filter wire placement prior to intervention, nine (6.1%) patients required rotational atherectomy, thrombus-aspiration catheters were used in 19 (12.8%) patients, fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided PCI in 10 (6.7%) patients, alcohol septal ablation in three (2%) patients. Ten (6.7%) cases of chronic total occlusion were successfully treated in nine (6.1%) patients using the hydrophilic catheter. No radial artery site complications was noted. CONCLUSION: The use of sheathless guiding catheters is a safe, effective method for PCI via TRA in small radial arteries without catheter-related complications.

Positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces arrhythmic events after elective generator change in patients with primary prevention CRT-D.

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) are effective therapies for heart failure (HF) patients with cardiac dyssynchrony. Patients receiving primary prevention CRT-defibrillator that positively remodel might no longer qualify for ICD indication due to CRT-induced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of CRT-D patients at the time of device replacement (DR). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients undergoing primary prevention CRT-D DR were prospectively included from November 2007 to March 2011 in 2 centers. CRT response was as defined as ≥1 NYHA class improvement and an increase in LVEF ≥10%. Before DR, all patients underwent echocardiography and device interrogation. Patients without theoretical ongoing ICD indication (TOII) at DR were defined as those with LVEF ≥40% without appropriate ICD therapy (appropriate therapy) during the first ICD service-life. A total of 107 consecutive patients were enrolled. Sixty-one patients (57%) were considered CRT responders after the index procedure. At the time of DR (56.4 ± 14.4 months from initial implant), 87% of CRT responders were free of appropriate therapy, compared with 70% of CRT nonresponders (P = 0.02). Thirty-nine patients (37%) did not meet the criteria for TOII. During follow-up (mean 26.4 ± 14.4 months after DR), 37 patients (95%) without TOII were free of appropriate therapy versus 49 of 68 patients (72%) with ongoing TOII (P = 0.007). By multivariable analysis, the only independent predictor of appropriate therapy after DR was TOII (hazard ratio = 6.43; P = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Absence of theoretical ICD indication occurs in more than one-third of CRT-D patients undergoing DR. In addition, appropriate therapy rate is relatively low (2.2% per year) in this subgroup of patients.