Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 43
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Respiration ; 102(6): 426-438, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37231952

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This study was carried out to compare characteristics and outcomes in patients with acute respiratory failure related to COVID-19 during first, second, and third waves. METHODS: We included consecutive adults admitted to the intensive care unit between March 2020 and July 2021. We compared three groups defined by the epidemic intake phase: waves 1 (W1), 2 (W2), and 3 (W3). RESULTS: We included 289 patients. Two hundred and eight (72%) patients were men with a median age of 63 years (IQR: 54-72), of whom 68 (23.6%) died in hospital. High-flow nasal oxygen (HFNO) was inversely associated with the need for invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) in multivariate analysis (p = 0.003) but not dexamethasone (p = 0.25). The day-90 mortality rate did not vary from W1 (27.4%) to W2 (23.9%) and W3 (22%), p = 0.67. By multivariate analysis, older age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.94/year, p < 0.001), immunodeficiency (OR: 0.33, p = 0.04), acute kidney injury (OR: 0.26, p < 0.001), and invasive MV (OR: 0.13, p < 0.001) were inversely associated with higher day-90 survival as opposed to the use of intermediate heparin thromboprophylaxis dose (OR: 3.21, p = 0.006). HFNO use and dexamethasone were not associated with higher day-90 survival (p = 0.24 and p = 0.56, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute respiratory failure due to COVID-19, survival did not change between first, second, and third waves while the use of invasive MV decreased. HFNO or intravenous steroids were not associated with better outcomes, whereas the use of intermediate dose of heparin for thromboprophylaxis was associated with higher day-90 survival. Larger multicentric studies are needed to confirm our findings.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Tromboembolia Venosa , Masculino , Adulto , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Femenino , SARS-CoV-2 , Anticoagulantes , Enfermedad Crítica , Heparina/efectos adversos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Oxígeno , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/inducido químicamente
2.
Neurocrit Care ; 30(2): 440-448, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30267280

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Early diagnostic orientation for differentiating pneumonia from pneumonitis at the early stage after aspiration would be valuable to avoid unnecessary antibiotic therapy. We assessed the accuracy of procalcitonin (PCT) in diagnosing aspiration pneumonia (AP) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients requiring mechanical ventilation after out-of-hospital coma. METHODS: Prospective observational 2-year cohort study in a medical-surgical ICU. PCT, C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell count (WBC) were measured at admission (H0) and 6 h (H), H12, H24, H48, H96, and H120 after inclusion. Lower respiratory tract microbiological investigations performed routinely in patients with aspiration syndrome were the reference standard for diagnosing AP. Performance of PCT, CRP, and WBC up to H48 in diagnosing AP was compared based on the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) and likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-) computed for the best cutoff values. RESULTS: Of 103 patients with coma, 45 (44%) had AP. Repeated PCT assays demonstrated a significant increase in patients with AP versus without AP from H0 to H120. Among the three biomarkers, PCT showed the earliest change. ROC-AUC values were poor for all three biomarkers. Best ROC-AUC values for diagnosing AP were for CRP at H24 [0.73 (95%CI 0.61-0.84)] and PCT at H48 [0.73 (95%CI 0.61-0.84)]. LR+ was best for PCT at H24 (3.5) and LR- for CRP and WBC at H24 (0.4 and 0.4, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Early and repeated assays of PCT, CRP, and WBC demonstrated significant increases in all three biomarkers in patients with versus without AP. All three biomarkers had poor diagnostic performance for ruling out AP. Whereas PCT had the fastest kinetics, PCT assays within 48 h after ICU admission do not help to diagnose AP in ICU patients with coma.


Asunto(s)
Coma/terapia , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Neurológico/normas , Neumonía por Aspiración/sangre , Neumonía por Aspiración/diagnóstico , Polipéptido alfa Relacionado con Calcitonina/sangre , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Coma/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neumonía por Aspiración/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
3.
Crit Care Med ; 45(12): 1965-1971, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28857855

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Family members of patients who die in the ICU often remain with unanswered questions and suffer from lack of closure. A letter of condolence may help bereaved relatives, but little is known about their experience of receiving such a letter. The objective of the study was to understand bereaved family members' experience of receiving a letter of condolence. DESIGN: Qualitative study using interviews with bereaved family members who received a letter of condolence and letters written by these family members to the ICU team. This study was designed to provide insight into the results of a larger randomized, controlled, multicenter study. SETTING: Twenty-two ICUs in France. SUBJECTS: Family members who lost a loved one in the ICU and who received a letter of condolence. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Thematic analysis was used and was based on 52 interviews and 26 letters. Six themes emerged: 1) a feeling of support, 2) humanization of the medical system, 3) an opportunity for reflection, 4) an opportunity to describe their loved one, 5) continuity and closure, and 6) doubts and ambivalence. Possible difficulties emerged, notably the re-experience of the trauma, highlighting the absence of further support. CONCLUSIONS: This study describes the benefits of receiving a letter of condolence; mainly, it humanizes the medical institution (feeling of support, confirmation of the role played by the relative, supplemental information). However, this study also shows a common ambivalence about the letter of condolence's benefit. Healthcare workers must strive to adapt bereavement follow-up to each individual situation.


Asunto(s)
Aflicción , Correspondencia como Asunto , Familia/psicología , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , Adaptación Psicológica , Adulto , Anciano , Actitud Frente a la Muerte , Actitud Frente a la Salud , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Investigación Cualitativa , Apoyo Social
5.
J Intensive Care Med ; 31(5): 338-43, 2016 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25979406

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Reversibility and impact of diaphragmatic dysfunction (DD) are unknown. The principal aim was to describe diaphragmatic function as assessed by ultrasonography during weaning trials. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study is a 6-month single-center prospective study. All patients under mechanical ventilation for more than 7 days and eligible for a spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) were enrolled prospectively. INTERVENTION: Two blinded ultrasonographers evaluated each hemidiaphragm during SBT. Prevalence of DD among weaning failure and death and interobserver reproducibility have been evaluated. RESULTS: The 34 included patients had a mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score version II of 55.7 ± 14 and a median intensive care unit (ICU) stay length of 17 days (13-30). Diaphragmatic dysfunction was found in 13 (38%) patients, on both sides in 8. Bilateral DD resolved before ICU discharge in 5 of the 7 reevaluated patients. No weaning failures were recorded. The ICU mortality was higher in patients with DD (37% vs 5%, P = .048). Mean interobserver agreement rate was 91%. Reproducibility was better with M-mode. CONCLUSION: The ICU-acquired DD usually improves before ICU discharge but might constitute a marker for greater disease severity. The present preliminary results require confirmation in a larger prospective multicenter study.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Diafragma/diagnóstico por imagen , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Ultrasonografía , Anciano , Diafragma/lesiones , Diafragma/fisiopatología , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo , Persona de Mediana Edad , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Desconexión del Ventilador
6.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 188(10): 1232-9, 2013 Nov 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24127770

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: When subclavian access is not possible, controversy exists between the internal jugular and femoral sites for the choice of central-venous access in intensive care unit patients. OBJECTIVES: To compare infection and colonization rates of short-term jugular and femoral catheters. METHODS: Using data from two multicenter studies, we compared femoral and internal jugular for the risks of catheter-related bloodstream infection, major catheter-related infection, and catheter-tip colonization. We also compared the rates of dressing disruption and skin colonization. We used marginal structural models with inverse probability of treatment weighting to adjust on indication bias. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We included 2,128 patients (2,527 catheters and 19,481 catheter-days). We found no difference in catheter-related bloodstream infection (internal jugular 1.0 vs. femoral 1.1 per 1,000 catheter-days; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63 [0.25-1.63]; P = 0.34), major catheter-related infection (internal jugular 1.8 vs. femoral 1.4 per 1,000 catheter-days; HR, 0.91 [0.38-2.18]; P = 0.34), and colonization (internal jugular 11.6 vs. femoral 12.9 per 1,000 catheter-days; HR, 0.80 [0.25-1.63]; P = 0.15). However, colonization was higher with femoral for female (HR, 0.39 [0.24-0.63]; P < 0.001) and, at the significance limit, catheter maintained for more than 4 days (HR, 0.73 [0.53-1.01]; P = 0.05). The absence of benefit of internal jugular before Day 5 was related to a higher skin colonization at the internal jugular site for catheters removed before Day 5. After the fourth day, dressing disruption became more frequent with femoral catheters and may explain the subsequent risk of catheter colonization. Differences in cutaneous and catheter colonization between internal jugular and femoral was suppressed by the use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressings. CONCLUSIONS: Femoral and internal jugular accesses lead to similar risks of catheter infection. Internal jugular might be preferred for female, nonchlorhexidine-impregnated dressings users, and when catheters are left in place more than 4 days. Both sites are acceptable when a subclavian approach is not feasible. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00417235 and NCT01189682).


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/etiología , Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Anciano , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efectos adversos , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Femenino , Vena Femoral , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Venas Yugulares , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Puntaje de Propensión , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores de Riesgo , Método Simple Ciego , Piel/microbiología , Factores de Tiempo
7.
Neurocrit Care ; 20(3): 494-501, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24566980

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Stroke due to occlusion of the artery of Percheron (AOP), an uncommon anatomic variant supplying the bilateral medial thalami, may raise diagnostic challenges and cause life-threatening symptoms. Our objective here was to detail the features and outcomes in three patients who required intensive care unit (ICU) admission and to review the relevant literature. METHODS: Description of three cases and literature review based on a 1973-2013 PubMed search. RESULTS: Three patients were admitted to our ICU with sudden-onset coma and respiratory and cardiovascular dysfunctions requiring endotracheal mechanical ventilation. Focal neurological deficits, ophthalmological signs (abnormal light reflexes and/or ocular motility and/or ptosis), and neuropsychological abnormalities were variably combined. Initial CT scan was normal. Cerebral MRI demonstrated bilateral paramedian thalamic infarction, with extension to the cerebral peduncles in two patients. Consciousness improved rapidly and time to extubation was 1-4 days. All three patients were discharged alive from the hospital and two had good 1-year functional outcomes. Similar clinical features and outcomes were recorded in the 117 patients identified in the literature, of whom ten required ICU admission. CONCLUSIONS: Bilateral paramedian thalamic stroke due to AOP occlusion can be life threatening. The early diagnosis relies on MRI with magnetic resonance angiography. Recovery of consciousness is usually rapid and mortality is low, warranting full-code ICU management.


Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas/complicaciones , Infarto Cerebral/etiología , Coma/etiología , Núcleo Talámico Mediodorsal/patología , Arteria Cerebral Posterior/patología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/patología , Infarto Cerebral/patología , Círculo Arterial Cerebral/patología , Coma/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Núcleo Talámico Mediodorsal/irrigación sanguínea
8.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 186(12): 1272-8, 2012 Dec 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23043083

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Most vascular catheter-related infections (CRIs) occur extraluminally in patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Chlorhexidine-impregnated and strongly adherent dressings may decrease catheter colonization and CRI rates. OBJECTIVES: To determine if chlorhexidine-impregnated and strongly adherent dressings decrease catheter colonization and CRI rates. METHODS: In a 2:1:1 assessor-masked randomized trial in patients with vascular catheters inserted for an expected duration of 48 hours or more in 12 French ICUs, we compared chlorhexidine dressings, highly adhesive dressings, and standard dressings from May 2010 to July 2011. Coprimary endpoints were major CRI with or without catheter-related bloodstream infection (CR-BSI) with chlorhexidine versus nonchlorhexidine dressings and catheter colonization rate with highly adhesive nonchlorhexidine versus standard nonchlorhexidine dressings. Catheter-colonization, CR-BSIs, and skin reactions were secondary endpoints. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 1,879 patients (4,163 catheters and 34,339 catheter-days) were evaluated. With chlorhexidine dressings, the major-CRI rate was 67% lower (0.7 per 1,000 vs. 2.1 per 1,000 catheter-days; hazard ratio [HR], 0.328; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.174-0.619; P = 0.0006) and the CR-BSI rate 60% lower (0.5 per 1,000 vs. 1.3 per 1,000 catheter-days; HR, 0.402; 95% CI, 0.186-0.868; P = 0.02) than with nonchlorhexidine dressings; decreases were noted in catheter colonization and skin colonization rates at catheter removal. The contact dermatitis rate was 1.1% with and 0.29% without chlorhexidine. Highly adhesive dressings decreased the detachment rate to 64.3% versus 71.9% (P < 0.0001) and the number of dressings per catheter to two (one to four) versus three (one to five) (P < 0.0001) but increased skin colonization (P < 0.0001) and catheter colonization (HR, 1.650; 95% CI, 1.21-2.26; P = 0.0016) without influencing CRI or CR-BSI rates. CONCLUSIONS: A large randomized trial demonstrated that chlorhexidine-gel-impregnated dressings decreased the CRI rate in patients in the ICU with intravascular catheters. Highly adhesive dressings decreased dressing detachment but increased skin and catheter colonization. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT 01189682).


Asunto(s)
Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/efectos adversos , Clorhexidina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica , Adhesivos/administración & dosificación , Adhesivos/efectos adversos , Adhesivos/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antiinfecciosos Locales/administración & dosificación , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/microbiología , Catéteres Venosos Centrales/microbiología , Clorhexidina/administración & dosificación , Clorhexidina/efectos adversos , Dermatitis por Contacto/etiología , Femenino , Francia , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Apósitos Oclusivos , Piel/microbiología , Estadísticas no Paramétricas
9.
JAMA ; 310(17): 1809-17, 2013 Nov 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24108515

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Evidence supporting the choice of intravenous colloid vs crystalloid solutions for management of hypovolemic shock remains unclear. OBJECTIVE: To test whether use of colloids compared with crystalloids for fluid resuscitation alters mortality in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with hypovolemic shock. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A multicenter, randomized clinical trial stratified by case mix (sepsis, trauma, or hypovolemic shock without sepsis or trauma). Therapy in the Colloids Versus Crystalloids for the Resuscitation of the Critically Ill (CRISTAL) trial was open label but outcome assessment was blinded to treatment assignment. Recruitment began in February 2003 and ended in August 2012 of 2857 sequential ICU patients treated at 57 ICUs in France, Belgium, North Africa, and Canada; follow-up ended in November 2012. INTERVENTIONS: Colloids (n = 1414; gelatins, dextrans, hydroxyethyl starches, or 4% or 20% of albumin) or crystalloids (n = 1443; isotonic or hypertonic saline or Ringer lactate solution) for all fluid interventions other than fluid maintenance throughout the ICU stay. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was death within 28 days. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality; and days alive and not receiving renal replacement therapy, mechanical ventilation, or vasopressor therapy. RESULTS: Within 28 days, there were 359 deaths (25.4%) in colloids group vs 390 deaths (27.0%) in crystalloids group (relative risk [RR], 0.96 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.04]; P = .26). Within 90 days, there were 434 deaths (30.7%) in colloids group vs 493 deaths (34.2%) in crystalloids group (RR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.86 to 0.99]; P = .03). Renal replacement therapy was used in 156 (11.0%) in colloids group vs 181 (12.5%) in crystalloids group (RR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.83 to 1.03]; P = .19). There were more days alive without mechanical ventilation in the colloids group vs the crystalloids group by 7 days (mean: 2.1 vs 1.8 days, respectively; mean difference, 0.30 [95% CI, 0.09 to 0.48] days; P = .01) and by 28 days (mean: 14.6 vs 13.5 days; mean difference, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.14 to 2.06] days; P = .01) and alive without vasopressor therapy by 7 days (mean: 5.0 vs 4.7 days; mean difference, 0.30 [95% CI, -0.03 to 0.50] days; P = .04) and by 28 days (mean: 16.2 vs 15.2 days; mean difference, 1.04 [95% CI, -0.04 to 2.10] days; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among ICU patients with hypovolemia, the use of colloids vs crystalloids did not result in a significant difference in 28-day mortality. Although 90-day mortality was lower among patients receiving colloids, this finding should be considered exploratory and requires further study before reaching conclusions about efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00318942.


Asunto(s)
Coloides/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Soluciones Isotónicas/uso terapéutico , Choque/terapia , Anciano , Soluciones Cristaloides , Femenino , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico
10.
BMJ Open ; 13(3): e066496, 2023 03 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36898751

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Corticosteroids affect variably survival in sepsis trials, suggesting heterogeneity in patients' response to corticosteroids. The RECORDS (Rapid rEcognition of COrticosteRoiD resistant or sensitive Sepsis) trial aimed at defining endotypes associated with adults with sepsis responsiveness to corticosteroids. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: RECORDS, a multicentre, placebo-controlled, biomarker-guided, adaptive Bayesian design basket trial, will randomly assign to a biomarker stratum 1800 adults with community-acquired pneumonia, vasopressor-dependent sepsis, septic shock or acute respiratory distress syndrome. In each stratum, patients will be randomly assigned to receive a 7-day course of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone or their placebos. Patients with COVID-19 will be treated with a 10-day standard course of dexamethasone and randomised to fludrocortisone or its placebo. Primary outcome will be 90-day death or persistent organ dysfunction. Large simulation study will be performed across a range of plausible scenarios to foresee power to detect a 5%-10% absolute difference with corticosteroids. We will assess subset-by-treatment interaction by estimating in a Bayesian framework two quantities: (1) measure of influence, relying on the value of the estimation of corticosteroids' effect in each subset, and (2) measure of interaction. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee (Comité de Protection des Personnes, Dijon, France), on 6 April 2020. Trial results will be disseminated at scientific conferences and results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Registry (NCT04280497).


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Sepsis , Adulto , Humanos , Fludrocortisona/uso terapéutico , Teorema de Bayes , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Sepsis/tratamiento farmacológico , Biomarcadores , Resultado del Tratamiento , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Estudios Multicéntricos como Asunto
12.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 14930, 2022 Sep 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36056117

RESUMEN

Natraemia is often abnormal in critically ill patients and may change rapidly during renal replacement therapy (RRT). This database study in a single intensive care unit (ICU) evaluated natraemia before and after the first RRT session for acute kidney injury. Of 252 patients who required RRT in 2018-2020, 215 were included. Prevalences were 53.9% for hyponatraemia (≤ 135 mmol/L) and 3.7% for hypernatraemia (> 145 mmol/L). Dialysate sodium was ≥ 145 mmol/L in 83% of patients. Median dialysis sodium gradient was 12 mmol/L, with a value above 16 mmol/L in 25% of patients. Median natraemia increased from 135 before to 140 mmol/L after RRT, the median hourly increase being faster than recommended, at 1.0 mmol/L [0.2-1.7]. By multivariate analysis, the only variable significantly associated with the RRT-induced natraemia change was the dialysis sodium gradient [odds ratio, 1.66; 95% confidence interval 1.39-2.10]. Pearson's correlation coefficient between the gradient and the natraemia change was 0.57. When performing RRT in ICU patients, in addition to the haemodynamic considerations put forward in recommendations, the dialysis sodium gradient deserves careful attention in order to control natraemia variations. Studies to devise a formula for predicting natraemia variations might prove helpful to confirm our results.


Asunto(s)
Lesión Renal Aguda , Enfermedad Crítica , Lesión Renal Aguda/epidemiología , Lesión Renal Aguda/terapia , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Soluciones para Diálisis , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal/métodos , Sodio
13.
Ann Intensive Care ; 12(1): 10, 2022 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35133543

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the association between ventilator type and hospital mortality in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) related to COVID-19 (SARS-CoV2 infection), a single-center prospective observational study in France. RESULTS: We prospectively included consecutive adults admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) of a university-affiliated tertiary hospital for ARDS related to proven COVID-19, between March 2020 and July 2021. All patients were intubated. We compared two patient groups defined by whether an ICU ventilator or a less sophisticated ventilator such as a sophisticated turbine-based transport ventilator was used. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were plotted. Cox multivariate regression was performed to identify associations between patient characteristics and hospital mortality. We included 189 patients (140 [74.1%] men) with a median age of 65 years [IQR, 55-73], of whom 61 (32.3%) died before hospital discharge. By multivariate analysis, factors associated with in-hospital mortality were age ≥ 70 years (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.24-3.59; P = 0.006), immunodeficiency (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.16-5.09; P = 0.02) and serum creatinine ≥ 100 µmol/L (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.77-5.10; P < 0.001) but not ventilator type. As compared to conventional ICU (equipped with ICU and anesthesiology ventilators), management in transient ICU (equipped with non-ICU turbine-based ventilators) was associated neither with a longer duration of invasive mechanical ventilation (18 [IQR, 11-32] vs. 21 [13-37] days, respectively; P = 0.39) nor with a longer ICU stay (24 [IQR, 14-40] vs. 27 [15-44] days, respectively; P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: In ventilated patients with ARDS due to COVID-19, management in transient ICU equipped with non-ICU sophisticated turbine-based ventilators was not associated with worse outcomes compared to standard ICU, equipped with ICU ventilators. Although our study design is not powered to demonstrate any difference in outcome, our results after adjustment do not suggest any signal of harm when using these transport type ventilators as an alternative to ICU ventilators during COVID-19 surge.

14.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 181(2): 134-42, 2010 Jan 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19875690

RESUMEN

RATIONALE: Although intensive care units (ICUs) were created for patients with life-threatening illnesses, the ICU environment generates a high risk of iatrogenic events. Identifying medical errors (MEs) that serve as indicators for iatrogenic risk is crucial for purposes of reporting and prevention. OBJECTIVES: We describe the selection of indicator MEs, the incidence of such MEs, and their relationship with mortality. METHODS: We selected indicator MEs using Delphi techniques. An observational prospective multicenter cohort study of these MEs was conducted from March 27 to April 3, 2006, in 70 ICUs; 16 (23%) centers were audited. Harm from MEs was collected using specific scales. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Fourteen types of MEs were selected as indicators; 1,192 MEs were reported for 1,369 patients, and 367 (26.8%) patients experienced at least 1 ME (2.1/1,000 patient-days). The most common MEs were insulin administration errors (185.9/1,000 d of insulin treatment). Of the 1,192 medical errors, 183 (15.4%) in 128 (9.3%) patients were adverse events that were followed by one or more clinical consequences (n = 163) or that required one or more procedures or treatments (n = 58). By multivariable analysis, having two or more adverse events was an independent risk factor for ICU mortality (odds ratio, 3.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-7.36; P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: The impact of medical errors on mortality indicates an urgent need to develop prevention programs. We have planned a study to assess a program based on our results.


Asunto(s)
Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Errores Médicos/efectos adversos , Errores Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Técnica Delphi , Femenino , Francia , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Incidencia , Insulina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Auditoría Médica , Errores Médicos/mortalidad , Errores de Medicación/efectos adversos , Errores de Medicación/mortalidad , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Estudios Prospectivos , Indicadores de Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Administración de la Seguridad
15.
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open ; 2(2): e12425, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33969343

RESUMEN

We describe a case report of hypermucoviscous Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP) promptly diagnosed by blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) culture with positive string test. The patient, without medical history, developed in a few hours multiple localizations, typical of hypervirulent KP. Combination of multiple typical localizations (eye, CSF, pulmonary, hepatic) and string test enabled rapid diagnosis of hypermcoviscous and hypervirulent KP.

16.
Crit Care Med ; 38(12): 2295-303, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20890201

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Few outcome data are available about convulsive status epilepticus managed in the intensive care unit. We studied 90-day functional outcomes and their determinants in patients with convulsive status epilepticus. DESIGN: Two hundred forty-eight convulsive status epilepticus patients admitted to 18 intensive care units in 2005-2007 were included in a prospective observational cohort study. The main outcome measure was a Glasgow Outcome Scale score of 5 (good recovery) on day 90. MAIN RESULTS: Convulsive status epilepticus occurred out of hospital in 177 (67%) patients, and all but 15 patients were still seizing at medical team arrival. The median time from convulsive status epilepticus onset to anticonvulsant drug initiation was 40 mins (interquartile range, 5-80). Total seizure duration was 85 mins (interquartile range, 46.5-180). Convulsive status epilepticus was refractory in 49 (20%) patients. The most common causes of convulsive status epilepticus were anticonvulsive agent withdrawal (36.4%) in patients with previous epilepsy and stroke (27.7%) in inaugural convulsive status epilepticus. Mechanical ventilation was needed in 210 (85%) patients. On day 90, 42 (18.8%) patients were dead, 87 (38.8%) had marked functional impairments (Glasgow Outcome Scale score, 2-4), and 95 (42.4%) had a good recovery (Glasgow Outcome Scale score, 5). Factors showing independent positive associations with poor outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale score, <5) were older age (odds ratio, 1.04/year; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.05; p=.0005), cerebral insult (odds ratio, 2.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-5.26; p=.007), longer seizure duration (odds ratio, 1.72/120 min; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-2.86; p=.03), on-scene focal neurologic signs (odds ratio, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-4.16; p=.04), and refractory convulsive status epilepticus (odds ratio, 2.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-7.14; p=.045). CONCLUSIONS: Ninety days after intensive care unit admission for convulsive status epilepticus, half the survivors had severe functional impairments. Longer seizure duration, cerebral insult, and refractory convulsive status epilepticus were strongly associated with poor outcomes, suggesting a role for early neuroprotective strategies.


Asunto(s)
Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Estado Epiléptico/diagnóstico , Estado Epiléptico/terapia , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Prospectivos , Recuperación de la Función , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Medición de Riesgo , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Estado Epiléptico/mortalidad , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Neurocrit Care ; 12(3): 400-2, 2010 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20052624

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Alcoholic hand rubs (AHRs) have been proven effective in preventing nosocomial infections, and healthcare authorities include AHRs use among quality-of-care criteria. Since the onset of the influenza A (H1N1) pandemic, AHRs have gained considerable popularity among the general public. METHODS: We report a case of intentional AHRs self-poisoning inducing rapid coma with hyperlactatemia, and a full recovery. The relevant literature was reviewed. To our knowledge, this is the third reported case of intentional AHRs poisoning. 3 patients presented with a picture of acute alcohol intoxication, of variable severity depending on the amount ingested and speed of ingestion. RESULTS: The blood alcohol level was 414 mg/dl and tests for other drugs were performed 30 min after admission. The blood lactate level increased briefly to 4.8 mmol/l, without renal or hepatic function disturbances. She regained consciousness after 6 h then achieved a full recovery allowing extubation and readmission to the psychiatric ward after 24 h. She reported gulping down the entire contents of the Aniosgel bottle. CONCLUSION: Whereas overdrinking in social settings (wine and liquor) leads to a gradual increase in blood alcohol levels, AHRs poisoning is usually characterized by a sudden massive alcohol load. The unusual nature of the alcohol source may lead to diagnostic wanderings. AHRs are currently available in bottles that facilitate the ingestion of large amounts. Unit-dose packaging or dispensing might decrease the risk of AHRs poisoning.


Asunto(s)
Intoxicación Alcohólica/etiología , Coma/inducido químicamente , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Brotes de Enfermedades , Desinfectantes/envenenamiento , Sobredosis de Droga/etiología , Etanol/envenenamiento , Desinfección de las Manos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Intento de Suicidio , Adulto , Intoxicación Alcohólica/sangre , Coma/sangre , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Sobredosis de Droga/sangre , Etanol/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Gripe Humana/transmisión , Ácido Láctico/sangre , Examen Neurológico/efectos de los fármacos
18.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(19): e19906, 2020 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32384433

RESUMEN

Septic shock is associated with a strong inflammatory response that induces vasodilation and vascular hyporeactivity. We investigated the role for tryptophan-pathway catabolites of proinflammatory cytokines in septic shock.We prospectively included 30 patients with very recent-onset septic shock and 30 healthy volunteers. The following were assayed once in the controls and on days 1, 2, 3, 7, and 14 in each patient: plasma free and total tryptophan, platelet and plasma serotonin, total blood serotonin, urinary serotonin, plasma and urinary 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid, plasma kynurenine, monoamine oxidase activity, and total indole amine 2,3-dioxygenase activity. Organ-system failure and mortality were recorded.Compared with the healthy controls, the patients with septic shock had 2-fold to 3-fold lower total tryptophan levels throughout the 14-day study period. Platelet serotonin was substantially lower, while monoamine oxidase activity and 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid were markedly higher in the patients than in the controls, consistent with the known conversion of tryptophan to serotonin, which is then promptly and largely degraded to 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid. Plasma kynurenine was moderately increased and indole amine 2,3-dioxygenase activity markedly increased in the patients versus the volunteers, reflecting conversion of tryptophan to kynurenine. Changes over time in tryptophan metabolites were not associated with survival in the patients but were associated with the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score and hemodynamic variables including hypotension and norepinephrine requirements.Our results demonstrate major tryptophan pathway alterations in septic shock. Marked alterations were found compared with healthy volunteers, and tryptophan metabolite levels were associated with organ failure and hemodynamic alterations. Tryptophan metabolite levels were not associated with surviving septic shock, although this result might be ascribable to the small sample size.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; No: NCT00684736; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.


Asunto(s)
Choque Séptico/sangre , Choque Séptico/mortalidad , Triptófano/sangre , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Ácido Hidroxiindolacético/sangre , Indolamina-Pirrol 2,3,-Dioxigenasa/sangre , Quinurenina/sangre , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Monoaminooxidasa/sangre , Puntuaciones en la Disfunción de Órganos , Estudios Prospectivos , Serotonina/sangre , Tasa de Supervivencia
19.
Neurocrit Care ; 11(3): 338-44, 2009 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19588273

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether routine electroencephalography (EEG) detected electrical status epilepticus (ESE), masked by neuromuscular blockade, in comatose cardiac-arrest survivors receiving therapeutic hypothermia. DESIGN: Prospective 3-year study. SETTING: Medical ICU. PATIENTS: Fifty-one consecutive comatose cardiac-arrest patients treated between May 2005 and May 2008 using a standardized protocol of hypothermia with neuromuscular blockade. INTERVENTION: EEG was performed routinely as soon as possible after starting therapeutic hypothermia. EEG recordings were read by an independent neurophysiologist who was blinded to patient data. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Median body temperature at EEG recording was 33.0°C (range 32.4-33.8). ESE was found on 5 (10%) of the 51 EEG recordings: three patients had continuous rhythmic generalized spikes and two patients had continuous rhythmic focal spike-waves. Of the 17 (33%) patients who were discharged alive, 8 (8/51, 16%) had a CPC score of 1, 4 (8%) of 2, and 5 (10%) of 3. All patients with ESE died during their ICU stay. CONCLUSION: These preliminary results indicate that postanoxic status epilepticus can be masked by neuromuscular blockade during our protocol of therapeutic hypothermia. Routine EEG monitoring might be helpful in cardiac-arrest survivors receiving therapeutic hypothermia. Further studies including continuous EEG monitoring are needed to determine whether early diagnosis and treatment of ESE during therapeutic hypothermia improves the outcome.


Asunto(s)
Electroencefalografía , Hipotermia Inducida , Hipoxia Encefálica/complicaciones , Monitoreo Fisiológico/métodos , Estado Epiléptico/diagnóstico , Estado Epiléptico/etiología , Adulto , Anciano , Cuidados Críticos/métodos , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Paro Cardíaco/complicaciones , Humanos , Hipoxia Encefálica/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bloqueantes Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos
20.
Lancet ; 370(9588): 676-84, 2007 Aug 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17720019

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: International guidelines for management of septic shock recommend that dopamine or norepinephrine are preferable to epinephrine. However, no large comparative trial has yet been done. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of norepinephrine plus dobutamine (whenever needed) with those of epinephrine alone in septic shock. METHODS: This prospective, multicentre, randomised, double-blind study was done in 330 patients with septic shock admitted to one of 19 participating intensive care units in France. Participants were assigned to receive epinephrine (n=161) or norepinephrine plus dobutamine (n=169), which were titrated to maintain mean blood pressure at 70 mm Hg or more. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00148278. FINDINGS: There were no patients lost to follow-up; one patient withdrew consent after 3 days. At day 28, there were 64 (40%) deaths in the epinephrine group and 58 (34%) deaths in the norepinephrine plus dobutamine group (p=0.31; relative risk 0.86, 95% CI 0.65-1.14). There was no significant difference between the two groups in mortality rates at discharge from intensive care (75 [47%] deaths vs 75 [44%] deaths, p=0.69), at hospital discharge (84 [52%] vs 82 [49%], p=0.51), and by day 90 (84 [52%] vs 85 [50%], p=0.73), time to haemodynamic success (log-rank p=0.67), time to vasopressor withdrawal (log-rank p=0.09), and time course of SOFA score. Rates of serious adverse events were also similar. INTERPRETATION: There is no evidence for a difference in efficacy and safety between epinephrine alone and norepinephrine plus dobutamine for the management of septic shock.


Asunto(s)
Agonistas Adrenérgicos/uso terapéutico , Dobutamina/administración & dosificación , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Norepinefrina/administración & dosificación , Choque Séptico/tratamiento farmacológico , Vasoconstrictores/uso terapéutico , Agonistas Adrenérgicos/efectos adversos , Anciano , Dobutamina/efectos adversos , Método Doble Ciego , Quimioterapia Combinada , Epinefrina/efectos adversos , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Norepinefrina/efectos adversos , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Prospectivos , Vasoconstrictores/efectos adversos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA