Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo de estudio
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Hazard Mater ; 154(1-3): 469-75, 2008 Jun 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18063296

RESUMEN

In this study, respirable crystalline silica exposures to furnace relining workers of 7 exposure groups were assessed by conducting personal respirable dust samplings. All possible pollutant sources were identified for each exposure group through field observations, and bulk samples were randomly collected from each identified pollutant source. All collected samples were analyzed for their tridymite, cristobalite, and quartz contents by using the X-ray diffraction method. Results show that quartz was the only detectable crystalline silica content. We found that the resultant respirable quartz exposure levels presented in sequence for the 7 exposure groups (sand blasting>bottom ash cleaning>wall demolishing>relining>others>grid repairing>scaffold establishing) were different from that of the corresponding respirable dust exposure levels (bottom ash cleaning>wall demolishing>sand blasting>relining>grid repairing>scaffold establishing>others). 87.3-100% of workers' respirable quartz exposures of the 7 exposure groups exceeded the TLV-TWA (0.025 mg m(-3)) indicating appropriate control strategies should be taken immediately. By comparing the fractions of quartz contained in personal respirable dust samples with that contained in all possible pollutant sources for each exposure group, this study identified main pollutant sources for each exposure group as: bottom ash cleaning and scaffold establishing: bottom ash; sand blasting: blasting sand; wall demolishing: refractory cement+wall ash; wall relining: refractory brick; grid repairing: wall ash+refractory cement; grid repairing: wall ash+refractory cement; others: blasting sand+bottom ash. Finally, effective control strategies were proposed for exposure reduction by using above information together with our field observations.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Polvo/análisis , Incineración , Exposición por Inhalación/análisis , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Cuarzo/análisis , Dióxido de Silicio/análisis , Materiales de Construcción , Humanos , Exposición por Inhalación/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control
2.
J Occup Health ; 49(5): 411-7, 2007 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17951975

RESUMEN

This study set out to assess the respirable mass, surface area, and number concentrations of the alpha-quartz content particles (C(r-m), C(r-s) and C(r-n)) to which workers were exposed in six different exposure groups, the raw material handling (n=10), crushing (n=12), mixing (n=12), forming (n=10), furnace (n=10), and packaging (n=10), in a refractory material manufacturing plant. For C(r-m), the exposure values in sequence were found as: mixing (68.1 microg/m3)>packaging (55.9 microg/m3)>raw material handling (53.3 microg/m3)>furnace (31.0 microg/m3)>crushing (29.8 microg/m3)>forming (22.4 microg/m3). We also found that ~21.2-68.2% of the above Cr-m exceeded the current TLV-TWA for the alpha-quartz content (50 microg/m3) suggesting a need for initiating control strategies immediately. We further conducted particle size-segregating samplings in four workplaces: crushing (n=3), mixing (n=3), forming (n=3), and furnace (n=3). We found that all resultant particle size distributions shared a quite similar geometric standard deviation (sigma(g); =2.24-2.92), but the process area, associated with higher mechanical energy (i.e., crushing process), contained finer alpha-quartz content particles (mass median aerodynamic diameter; MMAD=3.22 microm) than those areas associated with lower mechanical energy (i.e., mixing, forming, and furnace; MMAD=6.17, 5.95, and 8.92 microm, respectively). These results gave a ratio of C(r-m) in the above four exposure groups (i.e., crushing: mixing: forming: furnace=1.00: 2.30: 0.753: 1.04) which was quite different from those of C(r-s) (1.00: 1.74: 0.654: 0.530) and C(r-n) (1.00: 1.27: 0.572: 0.202). Our results clearly indicate the importance of measuring particle size distributions for assessing workers' free silica exposures.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Exposición por Inhalación/análisis , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Material Particulado/análisis , Cuarzo/análisis , Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/toxicidad , Industria Procesadora y de Extracción , Humanos , Exposición por Inhalación/efectos adversos , Concentración Máxima Admisible , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Tamaño de la Partícula , Material Particulado/toxicidad , Cuarzo/toxicidad , Taiwán , Valores Limites del Umbral
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA