[Promoting Hospital Safety Culture: The Perspective of Safety Leadership].

Cultures of safety share a strong commitment to the goal of achieving zero harm and to continuously implementing the improvements and innovations necessary to achieve this goal. However, in some healthcare organizations today, safety is often undervalued and considered only after the occurrence of safety incidents, with no sense of commitment and no goal of zero harm. This article first briefly introduces the origin and definition of safety culture, the composition of safety culture, and the safety culture pyramid. Secondly, the definition, importance, and impact of hospital safety culture as well as the assessment tools for hospital safety culture are discussed. Finally, many practical leadership guidelines used in other countries to promote hospital safety culture are introduced as references for domestic healthcare organizations. Because patient safety is a dynamic and complex phenomenon, research and surveys of hospital safety culture conducted every two to three years are recommended to ensure best practices in patient safety. Achieving continuous improvement in patient safety and hospital safety culture requires leadership at all levels. In tandem, a total safety culture must be instilled throughout the health system. Commitment from leadership and management is critical to establishing and maintaining a safe, people-centered environment.

Acculturation, Work-Related Stressors, and Respective Coping Strategies among Male Indonesian Migrant Workers in the Manufacturing Industry in Taiwan: A Post-COVID Investigation.

Globalization has prompted cross-cultural migration in search of employment opportunities, and poor adaptation during acculturation is widely known to cause additional psychosocial stress. Hence, the objective of this study was to investigate migrant workers' perceptions of acculturation, identify work-related stressors, and understand the respective coping strategies among male Indonesians in the manufacturing industry, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic. Fifteen workers were recruited and interviewed on their acculturation experiences. We found that the workers were susceptible to forced adaptation to stressful conditions relating to work organization, economic distress, interaction with the manpower agencies, language barriers, and so on. During the pandemic, workers experienced overload, economic hardship, suspended home visits, isolation, discrimination, and fear of cluster infection in the crowded dormitory. We also found that workers were able to adopt coping strategies by capitalizing on resources at the individual, institutional, and governmental policy levels to actively solve problems, increase emotional support, and fortify self-appraisals. The identified coping strategies could inform policy development to assist with positive adaptation and promote the well-being of the migrant worker population.