Trastuzumab deruxtecan versus trastuzumab emtansine in Asian patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer.

The global phase 3 DESTINY-Breast03 study (ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03529110) showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) over trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (mBC) previously treated with trastuzumab and a taxane. Here, we report a subgroup analysis of Asian patients enrolled in DESTINY-Breast03. In total, 309 patients (149 in the T-DXd arm and 160 in the T-DM1 arm) from Asian countries and regions were randomized. At data cutoff (July 25, 2022), the median duration of follow-up in the Asian subpopulation was 29.0 months with T-DXd and 26.0 months with T-DM1. The PFS (determined by blinded independent central review) hazard ratio was 0.30 (95% confidence interval 0.22-0.41) favoring T-DXd over T-DM1 (median PFS 25.1 vs. 5.4 months). Median OS was not reached in the T-DXd arm and was 37.7 months in the T-DM1 arm. The median treatment duration was 15.4 months with T-DXd and 5.5 months with T-DM1. The incidence of grade ≥3 drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events was similar between both treatment arms (49.0% vs. 46.5%) and was consistent with the overall DESTINY-Breast03 population. Adjudicated drug-related interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis occurred in 12.9% of patients treated with T-DXd and 2.5% treated with T-DM1, with a higher incidence in Japanese patients; none of these were grade ≥4 events. These efficacy and safety data reinforce the favorable benefit-risk profile of T-DXd in HER2-positive mBC, including in the Asian subgroup.

Spatial and single-cell explorations uncover prognostic significance and immunological functions of mitochondrial calcium uniporter in breast cancer.

The mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU) is a transmembrane protein facilitating the entry of calcium ions into mitochondria from the cell cytosol. Maintaining calcium balance is crucial for enhancing cellular energy supply and regulating cell death. The interplay of calcium balance through MCU and the sodium-calcium exchanger is known, but its regulation in the breast cancer tumor microenvironment remains elusive. Further investigations are warranted to explore MCU's potential in BRCA clinical pathology, tumor immune microenvironment, and precision oncology. Our study, employing a multi-omics approach, identifies MCU as an independent diagnostic biomarker for breast cancer (BRCA), correlated with advanced clinical status and poor overall survival. Utilizing public datasets from GEO and TCGA, we discern differentially expressed genes in BRCA and examine their associations with immune gene expression, overall survival, tumor stage, gene mutation status, and infiltrating immune cells. Spatial transcriptomics is employed to investigate MCU gene expression in various regions of BRCA, while spatial transcriptomics and single-cell RNA-sequencing methods explore the correlation between MCUs and immune cells. Our findings are validated through the analysis of 59 BRCA patient samples, utilizing immunohistochemistry and bioinformatics to examine the relationship between MCU expression, clinicopathological features, and prognosis. The study uncovers the expression of key gene regulators in BRCA associated with genetic variations, deletions, and the tumor microenvironment. Mutations in these regulators positively correlate with different immune cells in six immune datasets, playing a pivotal role in immune cell infiltration in BRCA. Notably, high MCU performance is linked to CD8 + T cells infiltration in BRCA. Furthermore, pharmacogenomic analysis of BRCA cell lines indicates that MCU inactivation is associated with increased sensitivity to specific small molecule drugs. Our findings suggest that MCU alterations may be linked to BRCA progression, unveiling new diagnostic and prognostic implications for MCU in BRCA. The study underscores MCU's role in the tumor immune microenvironment and cell cycle progression, positioning it as a potential tool for BRCA precision medicine and drug screening.

Neuropathic Pain Affects Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Survivors with Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy.

BACKGROUND: Despite the significant impact of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy on the quality of life for breast cancer survivors, there is a notable lack of comprehensive research. Therefore, a crucial need exists for further systematic investigation and inquiry into this matter. AIMS: This study examined predictors of quality of life in breast cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. DESIGN: A cross-sectional, correlational design. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a medical center in northern Taiwan and a teaching hospital in northeastern Taiwan. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS: One hundred and thirty adult women with breast cancer, who have undergone chemotherapy and obtained a Total Neuropathy Scale-Clinical Version score>0, were enrolled. METHODS: Neuropathic pain, sleep disturbances, depression, and quality of life were evaluated using multiple regression analysis to identify quality of life predictors. Clinical importance was established using the minimally important difference of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast. RESULTS: The study indicated that improving depression (B = -10.87, p < .001) and neuropathic pain (B = -8.33, p = .004) may enhance the quality of life of breast cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Moreover, the individual's marital status and family history of breast cancer were identified as predictive factors. CONCLUSIONS: This study illuminates quality of life determinants for breast cancer survivors with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, advocating comprehensive care and addressing depression and neuropathic pain for better outcomes.

Analgesia-nociception index accurately predicts inadequate pectoralis muscle fascia block (PECS) in patients undergoing breast surgery: A prospective observational study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative opioid administration has been largely replaced by regional anesthesia techniques. We aimed to determine whether intraoperative Analgesia-Nociception Index (ANI) can aid in early evaluation of the effectiveness of regional blocks such as the pectoralis muscle fascia block (PECS, pectoserratus and interpectoral plane blocks) and predicting the need for analgesics postoperatively. METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled 30 women (age: 20-80 years) undergoing unilateral, non-intubated, breast tumor excision alone or in conjunction with sentinel lymph node biopsy. PECS block was performed following sedation. ANI readings were obtained at 1-min intervals, and polar coordinates were assigned to the distance from the nipple (0.5-cm intervals) and o'clock position (15-min intervals) for each reading. Pain scores were assessed using a numeric rating scale from 0 to 10, and analgesics were administered depending on pain score post-operatively. RESULTS: 8 (27%), 19 (63%), and 3 (10%) patients received morphine, tramadol, and no analgesics, respectively. In total, 954 ANI measurements were obtained. At the proposed cut-off of 50, the sensitivity and specificity of the ANI nadir for need of post-operative opioids were 0.875 and 0.932, respectively. Block effectiveness was most satisfactory in the upper lateral quadrant of the breast with nipple-areolar complex (NAC) sparing effect. Most average ANI measurements for the NAC were <50. No patient experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting, although one reported dizziness. CONCLUSIONS: The intraoperative ANI nadir <50 was strongly correlated with need for postoperative opioids. The ANI may aid in objectively evaluating the effectiveness of pectoralis muscle fascial blocks and predicting postoperative need for analgesics.

Genomic Alterations of Tumors in HER2-Low Breast Cancers.

The aim of this study was to elucidate molecular profiling in HER2-low tumors based on a promising dataset. A total of 615 consecutive HER2-negative breast cancer samples were assayed. The genomic mutations in the two groups with different HER2 expression levels (HER2-0 vs. HER2-low) were compared. The mutation types obtained via next-generation targeted sequencing were correlated with the clinicopathological features of the patients with HER2-0 and HER2-low breast cancer. The results showed that there was a significantly higher percentage of receptor-positive (ER/PR) tumors and more low-level Ki-67 tumors, but a lower incidence of stage I/II tumors in the HER2-low group compared to the HER2-0 group. There was a significantly higher frequency of 17.62% (65/369) for PIK3CA_SNA in the HER2-low group than in the HER2-0 group, which had a frequency of only 9.35% (23/246) (p = 0.006). When the called gene alterations in the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) group were compared with those in the luminal-like breast cancer group, there was a significantly high frequency of 28.17% (140/497) for ERBB2_SNA in a luminal-like group than in the TNBC group(16.95% (20/118)).We conclude that the early detection of PIK3CA mutations is likely to be important and might help therapeutic decision making in patients with HER2-low tumors.

Prevalence of BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 genomic alterations among 924 Taiwanese breast cancer assays with tumor-only targeted sequencing: extended data analysis from the VGH-TAYLOR study.

BACKGROUND: The homologous recombination (HR) repair pathway for DNA damage, particularly the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, has become a target for cancer therapy, with poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors showing significant outcomes in treating germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) mutated breast cancer. Recent studies suggest that some patients with somatic BRCA1/2 (sBRCA1/2) mutation or mutations in HR-related genes other than BRCA1/2 may benefit from PARP inhibitors as well, particularly those with PALB2 mutations. The current analysis aims to evaluate the prevalence of genetic alterations specific to BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 in a large cohort of Taiwanese breast cancer patients through tumor-targeted sequencing. METHODS: A total of 924 consecutive assays from 879 Taiwanese breast cancer patients underwent tumor-targeted sequencing (Thermo Fisher Oncomine Comprehensive Assay v3). We evaluated BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 mutational profiles, with variants annotated and curated by the ClinVAR, the Oncomine™ Knowledgebase Reporter, and the OncoKB™. We also conducted reflex germline testing using either whole exome sequencing (WES) or whole genome sequencing (WGS), which is ongoing. RESULTS: Among the 879 patients analyzed (924 assays), 130 had positive mutations in BRCA1 (3.1%), BRCA2 (8.6%), and PALB2 (5.2%), with a total of 14.8% having genetic alterations. Co-occurrence was noted between BRCA1/BRCA2, BRCA1/PALB2, and BRCA2/PALB2 mutations. In BRCA1-mutated samples, only p.K654fs was observed in three patients, while other variants were observed no more than twice. For BRCA2, p.N372H was the most common (26 patients), followed by p.S2186fs, p.V2466A, and p.X159_splice (5 times each). For PALB2, p.I887fs was the most common mutation (30 patients). This study identified 176 amino acid changes; 60.2% (106) were not documented in either ClinVAR or the Oncomine™ Knowledgebase Reporter. Using the OncoKB™ for annotation, 171 (97.2%) were found to have clinical implications. For the result of reflex germline testing, three variants (BRCA1 c.1969_1970del, BRCA1 c.3629_3630del, BRCA2 c.8755-1G > C) were annotated as Pathogenic/Likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants by ClinVar and as likely loss-of-function or likely oncogenic by OncoKB; while one variant (PALB2 c.448C > T) was not found in ClinVar but was annotated as likely loss-of-function or likely oncogenic by OncoKB. CONCLUSION: Our study depicted the mutational patterns of BRCA1, BRCA2, and PALB2 in Taiwanese breast cancer patients through tumor-only sequencing. This highlights the growing importance of BRCA1/2 and PALB2 alterations in breast cancer susceptibility risk and the treatment of index patients. We also emphasized the need to meticulously annotate variants in cancer-driver genes as well as actionable mutations across multiple databases.

Clinical outcomes and patient-reported outcomes after oncoplastic breast surgery in breast cancer patients: A matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the recommended treatment for breast cancer, the most common cancer in women in Taiwan and the leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Although breast-conserving surgery (BCS) has good prognosis, in some cases, BCS may cause more significant deformities and interfere with the patient's psychosocial well-being. Oncoplastic breast surgery (OBS) is the treatment option in these cases. This study aimed to determine the outcomes of OBS and BCS regardless of clinical and patient-reported esthetic outcomes. METHODS: Between 2015 and 2020, 50 patients who underwent OBS at our hospital after complete treatment were enrolled. With 1:2 matched ratios, 100 patients were enrolled in the BCS control group. Clinical outcomes were analyzed. The BREAST-Q questionnaire was then assessed 6 months after the completion of treatment for subjective patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Due to the matching process, no difference was noted between the two groups in terms of demographic data such as age, comorbidities, or tumor characteristics. There were no significant differences in the local recurrence rate, disease-free survival, overall survival, positive margin rate, rewide excision rate, conversion to mastectomy rate, or complication rate (major or minor) between both groups. However, the OBS group showed higher satisfaction with breasts in the BREAST-Q questionnaire ( p < 0.001). The mean follow-up time was 38.77 ± 14.70 months in the BCS group and 29.59 ± 14.06 months in the OBS group. CONCLUSION: OBS seems to be a safe and feasible surgery in breast cancer patients because clinical outcomes are compatible with BCS. Moreover, the OBS group had better patient-reported outcomes in terms of satisfaction.

Spatial and Single-Cell Investigations Illuminate Theragnostic value and Immune Landscape of Mitochondrial Dynamin-Like GTPase in Breast Cancer.

Background: As we delve into the intricate world of mitochondrial inner membrane proteins, particularly Optic Atrophy types 1 and 3 (OPA1/3), we uncover their pivotal role in maintaining mitochondrial dynamic equilibrium and fusion, crucial for cellular energy production and synthesis. Despite extensive scrutiny, the significance of OPA1/3 in breast cancer (BRCA) and its interplay with the immune microenvironment remain elusive. Materials and Methods: We meticulously sourced BRCA data from renowned repositories such as The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), and the Human Protein Atlas (HPA), leveraging cutting-edge techniques including single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq), spatial transcriptomics, and pharmacogenomics. Through multifaceted data analysis, we endeavored to unravel the intricate role and potential value of OPA1/3 in BRCA tumorigenesis and progression. Results: Our investigation reveals a conspicuous upregulation of OPA1/3 expression in BRCA, correlating with dismal prognoses. Kaplan-Meier plot analysis underscores that heightened OPA1/3 levels are associated with poor survival rates. Both clinical specimens and biobank biopsies corroborate the elevated expression of OPA1/3 in breast cancer patients. Moreover, scRNA-seq unveils a strong correlation between OPA1/3 and macrophage infiltration in the BRCA immune milieu, alongside its association with the cellular communication network involving CXCL, TGFb, VEGF, and IL16. Conclusion: In light of these findings, OPA1/3 emerges as a promising contender for therapeutic targeting and as a potential diagnostic, prognostic, and survival biomarker in BRCA. The implications of our study underscore the pressing need to explore these novel biomarkers to enhance patient outcomes.

Multi-omic profiling of breast tumor microenvironment uncovers a role of mitochondrial calcium gatekeepers.

In this study, we aimed to elucidate the role of mitochondrial calcium uptake 1/2 (MiCU1/2) in breast cancer (BRCA) by employing a comprehensive multi-omics approach. Unlike previous research, we utilized a novel web application tailored for whole tumor tissue, single-cell, and spatial transcriptomics analysis to investigate the association between MiCU1/2 and the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Our gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) provided insights into the primary biological effects of MiCU1/2, while our CRISPR-based drug screening repository identified potential effective drugs. Our study revealed that high MiCU1/2 expression serves as an independent diagnostic biomarker, correlating with advanced clinical status and indicating poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in BRCA patients. Additionally, spatial transcriptome analysis highlighted the heightened expression of MiCU1/2 in tumors and its relevance in surrounding immune cells. Furthermore, using the CIBERSORT algorithm, we discovered a positive correlation between MiCU1/2 levels and macrophage infiltration, underscoring their potential impact on immune infiltration. We also identified expression patterns of immune-related genes associated with responses against various immune cell types, including CXCL, MIF, GDF, SPP1, and IL16. Finally, our pharmacogenomic screening identified potential small molecule drugs capable of effectively targeting breast cancer cells with elevated MiCU1/2 expression. Overall, our study establishes MiCU1/2 as a promising novel biomarker for BRCA diagnosis and prognostic prediction, as well as a potential therapeutic target, highlighting the importance of exploring these pathways to advance patient care and outcomes in BRCA treatment.

Real-world experience with CDK4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive metastatic and recurrent breast cancer: findings from an Asian population.

PURPOSE: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy have demonstrated significant clinical benefits in progression-free and overall survival. This study investigates the outcomes associated with two kinds of CDK4/6i in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic and relapsed breast cancer to inform real-world evidence of treatment strategies. METHODS: This retrospective study included 340 Taiwanese patients with HR-positive advanced breast cancer from the Taipei Veterans General Hospital, between 2018 and 2023. We analyzed patient characteristics, treatment strategies and outcomes associated with two CDK4/6i. The efficacy of patients who experienced economic burden and interrupted CDK4/6i treatment after 2 years of National Health Insurance (NHI) reimbursement was also investigated. RESULTS: Patients receiving ribociclib and palbociclib showed no significant differences in age, histology, body mass index(BMI), or pathologic status. The distribution of disease status and endocrine therapy partners was comparable between the two groups. Dose reduction was similar, while patients with palbociclib tended to discontinue CDK4/6i usage, and those with ribociclib tended to switch to the other CDK4/6i or endocrine partners. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between the two CDK4/6i in the first-line setting. Adverse prognostic factors were increasing HER2 IHC score, higher Ki-67 levels, visceral and liver metastasis, prior chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy resistance, while higher BMI, bone-only metastasis, and letrozole treatment were associated with a lower risk of progression. The limited follow-up time in our study was insufficient to assess the outcomes of patients treated with interrupted CDK4/6i for up to two years under the NHI reimbursement policy. CONCLUSION: Treatment outcomes between the two types of CDK4/6i did not differ significantly, indicating the safety and efficacy of CDK4/6i for the Asian population. Ribociclib and palbociclib showed similar efficacy in PFS in the real-world setting.

Automatic segmentation of MRI in prospective breast volume evaluation: Comparison of different assessments for immediate breast reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of breast volume is essential in preoperative planning of immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) surgery to achieve satisfactory cosmetic outcome. This study introduced a breast volume measurement tool that can be used to perform automatic segmentation of magnetic resonance images (MRI) and calculation of breast volume. We compared the accuracy and reliability of this measurement method with four other conventional modalities. METHODS: Patients who were scheduled to undergo mastectomy with IBR between 2016 and 2021 were enrolled in the study. Five different breast volume assessments, including automatic segmentation of MRI, manual segmentation of MRI, 3D surface imaging, mammography, and the BREAST-V formula, were used to evaluate different breast volumes. The results were validated using water displacement volumes of the mastectomy specimens. RESULTS: In this pilot study, a total of 50 female patients met the inclusion criteria and contributed 54 breast specimens to the volumetric analysis. There was a strong linear association between the MRI and water displacement methods (automatic segmentation: r = 0.911, p < 0.001; manual segmentation: r = 0.924, p < 0.001), followed by 3D surface imaging (r = 0.858, p < 0.001), mammography (r = 0.841, p < 0.001), and Breast-V formula (r = 0.838, p < 0.001). Breast volumes measured using automatic and manual segmentation of MRI had lower mean relative errors (30.3% ± 22.0% and 28.9% ± 19.8, respectively) than 3D surface imaging (38.9% ± 31.2), Breast-V formula (44.8% ± 25.8), and mammography (60.3% ± 37.6). CONCLUSION: Breast volume assessment using the MRI methods had better accuracy and reliability than the other methods used in our study. Breast volume measurement using automatic segmentation of MRI could be more efficient compared to the conventional methods.

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy Alone vs Preceded by Bevacizumab, Etoposide, and Cisplatin for Untreated Brain Metastases From Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The incidence of brain metastasis is increasing in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Treatments to extend the control of brain metastasis are urgently required. Objective: To investigate whether the addition of an induction treatment of bevacizumab, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEEP) improves brain-specific progression-free survival (PFS) after whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label, randomized, multicenter clinical trial assessed patients with brain metastases from breast cancer (BMBC) in Taiwan from September 9, 2014, to December 24, 2018, with survival follow-up until December 31, 2021. Key inclusion criteria included metastatic brain tumors not suitable for focal treatment, WBRT naivety, age 20 to 75 years, and at least 1 measurable brain metastatic lesion. The primary end point was brain-specific PFS, with an expected hazard ratio of 0.60, a 2-sided α ≤ .20, and power of 0.8. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomly assigned at a ratio of 2:1 to the experimental arm, which involved 3 cycles of BEEP followed by WBRT, or the control arm, which involved WBRT alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was the determination of brain-specific PFS by local investigators according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, the initiation of other brain-directed treatment after WBRT, or death. Other key end points included brain-specific objective response rate after 8 weeks of BEEP treatment or WBRT and 8-month brain-specific PFS rate, PFS, and overall survival. Results: A total of 118 patients with BMBC were randomized, with the intention-to-treat cohort comprising 112 patients. The median age was 56 years (range, 34-71 years), and 61 patients (54.5%) had ERBB2 (formerly HER2 or HER2/neu)-positive disease. The median (range) brain-specific PFS was 8.1 (0.3-29.5) vs 6.5 (0.9-25.5) months in the experimental and control arms, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.44-1.13; P = .15; significant at predefined α ≤ .20). The brain-specific objective response rate at 2 months was not significantly different (BEEP treatment vs WBRT, 41.9% vs 52.6%), but the 8-month brain-specific PFS rate was significantly higher in the experimental group (48.7% vs 26.3%; P = .03). Adverse events were generally manageable with prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor treatment. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings show that induction BEEP before WBRT may improve the control of BMBC compared with using upfront WBRT, which could address an unmet need for an effective systemic treatment for intractable brain and extracranial metastases from metastatic breast cancer. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02185352.

Comparison of the efficacy, safety and quality of life of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide versus epirubicin-cyclophosphamide in patients with early stage HER2-negative breast cancer: A prospective, randomized, multicenter, Phase II study.

INTRODUCTION: This multicenter, phase II randomized, non-inferiority study reports from the first prospective two-armed randomized control trial that compared the efficacy, safety and quality-of-life of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD)-based and epirubicin-based as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage I-II Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with stage I/II HER2-negative breast cancer received PLD (37.5mg/m2, Q3W, 5 cycles, LC arm) plus cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2) or epirubicin (90mg/m2, Q3W, 4 cycles, EC arm) plus cyclophosphamide (600mg/m2). Randomization was stratified by lymph node, ER and PR status. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), safety profiles, and quality of life (QoL). QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-BR23 questionnaires. RESULTS: A total of 256 patients were assigned to LC (n=148) and EC (n=108). There was no difference in 5-year DFS and OS rate between two groups. LC-based adjuvant regimens had significantly less alopecia, less grade 3-4 hematologic adverse events (AEs). Significantly improved QoL was observed in the LC arm during and after treatment for symptoms including fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and systemic therapy side effects. CONCLUSION: Comparable efficacy and safety between adjuvant PLD and epirubicin for stage I-II HER2-negative breast cancer was observed. There was no difference in 5-year DFS and OS rate between the two treatment arms. However, less grade 3-4 AEs and a trend of favorable QoL symptom scales were observed in the LC arm, suggesting that PLD-containing regimen could become a new standard treatment for early stage HER2-negative breast cancer patients.

A phase 3 study (PATHWAY) of palbociclib plus tamoxifen in patients with HR-positive/HER2-negative advanced breast cancer.

Palbociclib combined with endocrine therapy is approved for treating patients with hormone-receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) advanced breast cancer; however, data on palbociclib combined with tamoxifen are limited. We investigated the efficacy and safety of palbociclib-tamoxifen in patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer. This double-blind phase 3 study included 184 women who were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive palbociclib-tamoxifen or placebo-tamoxifen. Pre/perimenopausal women also received goserelin. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and safety. Median PFS was 24.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 13.1-32.4) with palbociclib-tamoxifen and 11.1 months (95% CI, 7.4-14.6) with placebo-tamoxifen (hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.85; P = 0.002). Palbociclib-tamoxifen improved PFS in patients who were treated with first-line or second-line endocrine therapy and pre-, peri-, and postmenopausal patients. Though OS data are still immature (median not reached in both groups), an overall risk reduction of 27% (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.44-1.21) with palbociclib-tamoxifen was observed at the time of PFS analysis. The most common grade 3/4 adverse event with palbociclib-tamoxifen was neutropenia (89.0% [none were febrile] versus 1.1% with placebo-tamoxifen). There were no deaths owing to adverse events in either group. Among patients with HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer, palbociclib-tamoxifen resulted in significantly longer PFS than tamoxifen alone. Early OS data showed a trend favoring palbociclib-tamoxifen. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03423199. Study registration date: February 06, 2018.