Macular neovascularization lesion type and vision outcomes in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: post hoc analysis of HARBOR.

PURPOSE: To characterize relationships between Consensus on Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Nomenclature (CONAN) Study Group classifications of macular neovascularization (MNV) and visual responses to ranibizumab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis of the phase 3 HARBOR trial of ranibizumab in nAMD. Analyses included ranibizumab-treated eyes with baseline multimodal imaging data; baseline MNV; subretinal and/or intraretinal fluid at screening, baseline, or week 1; and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images through month 24 (n = 700). Mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) over time and mean BCVA change at months 12 and 24 were compared between eyes with type 1, type 2/mixed type 1 and 2 (type 2/M), and any type 3 MNV at baseline. RESULTS: At baseline, 263 (37.6%), 287 (41.0%), and 150 (21.4%) eyes had type 1, type 2/M, and any type 3 lesions, respectively. Type 1 eyes had the best mean BCVA at baseline (59.0 [95% CI: 57.7-60.3] letters) and month 24 (67.7 [65.8-69.6] letters), whereas type 2/M eyes had the worst (50.0 [48.6-51.4] letters and 60.8 [58.7-62.9] letters, respectively). Mean BCVA gains at month 24 were most pronounced for type 2/M eyes (10.8 [8.9-12.7] letters) and similar for type 1 (8.7 [6.9-10.5] letters) and any type 3 eyes (8.3 [6.3-10.3] letters). CONCLUSION: Differences in BCVA outcomes between CONAN lesion type subgroups support the use of an anatomic classification system to characterize MNV and prognosticate visual responses to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for nAMD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00891735. Date of registration: April 29, 2009.

Simulating an Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Switch in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A HARBOR Subanalysis.

PURPOSE: A simulated switching study assessed the effects of continuing the same anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment among patients who typically are considered for a therapy switch. Post hoc analysis of data from HARBOR was undertaken. Patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration who demonstrated a suboptimal response after 3 or 6 months of ranibizumab treatment were identified as switching candidates. Rather than switching, however, patients continued on ranibizumab treatment, and visual and anatomic outcomes from the point of the hypothetical switch were examined. DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of the phase 3 HARBOR clinical trial. PARTICIPANTS: Patients were included in 3- and 6-month switcher analyses if they received 3 of 3 initial monthly ranibizumab doses and 5 of 6 initial monthly ranibizumab doses, respectively, and met all the following: 5-letter or fewer gain from baseline, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 20/40 or worse, and intraretinal or subretinal fluid with central foveal thickness (CFT) equal to or greater than central subfield thickness. METHODS: Patient data were examined at months 3 and 6 to identify those who met predetermined switching criteria. Best-corrected visual acuity and CFT were examined from the point at which switching criteria were met through months 6, 12, 18, and 24 of HARBOR and compared with those who did not meet the criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcome measures included mean BCVA and CFT change over time from the point (month 3 or 6) at which switching criteria were met. RESULTS: By months 3 and 6, only 44 of 1059 patients (4.2%) and 37 of 769 patients (4.8%), respectively, met the inclusion criteria for hypothetical switching. Patients who met switching criteria at month 3 gained, on average, 5.3 letters from months 3 to 12 and 2.7 letters from months 3 to 24. Month 6 switchers gained, on average, 1.6 letters from months 6 to 12 and 1.8 letters from months 6 to 24. Both groups experienced significant CFT reductions over 24 months. CONCLUSIONS: Month 3 hypothetical switchers achieved vision and anatomic improvement while continuing their original ranibizumab treatment. Month 6 switcher outcomes replicated those commonly reported in published anti-VEGF switching studies: stable vision or nominal improvements in vision with continued substantial anatomic improvement.

Ultra-Response to Ranibizumab: Improvement by 4 or More Steps in Diabetic Retinopathy Severity in Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network Protocol S.

PURPOSE: To quantify and evaluate patients with diabetic retinopathy (DR) who had at least a 4-step improvement on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) in response to treatment with ranibizumab in the Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network (DRCR.net) Protocol S study, and factors predictive of such improvements. DESIGN: Post hoc retrospective analysis of 2-year outcomes in the phase 3 Protocol S study. PARTICIPANTS: Patients randomized to treatment with ranibizumab 0.5 mg with sufficient baseline DRSS severity (≥47) to allow for an at least 4-step improvement (n = 181). METHODS: Study eyes received a ranibizumab 0.5 mg injection at baseline and every 4 weeks for 12 weeks, with subsequent as-needed injections. Fundus photographs graded at baseline and years 1 and 2 using DRSS were used for this analysis. The data source is DRCR.net, but analyses, content, and conclusions of this report are solely the responsibility of the authors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Proportion of eyes achieving at least a 4-step DRSS improvement (DR ultra-response) at years 1 and 2; treatment course for eyes achieving ultra-response; mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in eyes with and without ultra-response; factors associated with ultra-response (identified by univariate and multivariable analyses). RESULTS: Approximately 30% of ranibizumab-treated eyes achieved DR ultra-response at year 1 (43/148; 29.1%) and year 2 (38/136; 27.9%); 74% of eyes with ultra-response at year 1 maintained their response at year 2. At year 2, patients with DR ultra-response had gained more than 5 additional ETDRS letters compared with those without DR ultra-response. Multivariable analyses identified presence of vitreous hemorrhage at baseline, increasing age, absence of epiretinal membrane, and glycated hemoglobin below 9 as predictive of DR ultra-response. Mean number of injections received was similar for eyes with versus without DR ultra-response to ranibizumab (mean, 7.4 vs. 7.6 in year 1; mean, 4.2 vs. 3.9 in year 2). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 30% of eyes with a DRSS score of at least 47 receiving ranibizumab 0.5 mg per study protocol experienced at least a 4-step DR severity improvement on the DRSS, accompanied by meaningful improvements in BCVA.