Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 44(6): 869-874, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34078819

RESUMEN

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for healthcare workers is one of the effective strategies for preventing nosocomial outbreaks of influenza. However, PEP adherence in healthcare workers is rarely analysed, and no strategies have been established to improve adherence to PEP for healthcare workers. We aimed to retrospectively analyse adherence to PEP and the factors associated with non-adherence in healthcare workers. A survey of 221 healthcare workers who were eligible for PEP at Tokushima University Hospital in the 2016/2017 season was conducted. Once-daily oseltamivir (75 mg for 10 d) was used as the PEP regimen. Of the 221 healthcare workers, 175 received PEP and were surveyed for adherence using a questionnaire. Of the 130 healthcare workers who responded to the questionnaire, 121 (93.1%) had been vaccinated. In this survey, 82 healthcare workers (63.1%) did not fully complete PEP. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that physicians (odds ratio: 4.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.08-10.25) and non-vaccination (odds ratio: 9.60, 95% CI: 1.12-82.25) were the factors for non-adherence to PEP. Of the 47 healthcare workers who responded to the item regarding reasons for non-adherence, 36 (76.6%) reported forgetting to take oseltamivir or discontinuing it due to a misguided self-decision that continuation of PEP was unnecessary, and 5 (10.6%) reported discontinuing treatment due to adverse effects. In conclusion, healthcare workers, particularly physicians, had low PEP adherence owing to forgetting or stopping to take oseltamivir due to a misguided self-decision. To obtain the maximum preventive effect of PEP, medication education should be provided to endorse PEP compliance.


Asunto(s)
Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Personal de Salud , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Oseltamivir/uso terapéutico , Profilaxis Posexposición/estadística & datos numéricos , Personal de Salud/psicología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/psicología , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos
2.
Biol Pharm Bull ; 44(4): 478-484, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33790099

RESUMEN

Patients who undergo multiple-day chemotherapy sessions experience hard-to-treat nausea and vomiting. Currently, there is no effective standard treatment for this condition. This study compared the preventive effect of first-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine 3 receptor antagonists (5-HT3 RAs) and second-generation 5-HT3 RAs palonosetron in multiple-day chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. The design of this study was a retrospective case-control study of patients who received a five-day cisplatin-based chemotherapy and were treated with aprepitant, dexamethasone, granisetron, and ramosetron or palonosetron. The patients were divided into two groups: patients given granisetron and ramosetron (the first-generation group), and those given palonosetron (palonosetron group). The percentage of patients with a complete response or total control was assessed. They were divided into three phases: 0-216 h (overall phase), 0-120 h (remedial phase), and 120-216 h (after phase). The remedial phase was further divided into 0-24 h (early phase) and 24-120 h (later phase). Moreover, the nutritional status of each patient was assessed by noting the patients' total calorie-intake per day and total parenteral nutrition. First-generation 5-HT3 RAs and palonosetron were used for treatment in 18 and 28 patients, respectively. The complete response rate and caloric oral intake of the later phase were higher in the palonosetron group than in the first-generation group. We conclude that palonosetron treatment was more effective than first-generation 5-HT3 RAs in controlling multiple-day chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.


Asunto(s)
Antieméticos/administración & dosificación , Bencimidazoles/administración & dosificación , Granisetrón/administración & dosificación , Náusea/tratamiento farmacológico , Palonosetrón/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas del Receptor de Serotonina 5-HT3/administración & dosificación , Vómitos/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Bleomicina/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Etopósido/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Náusea/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias de Células Germinales y Embrionarias/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Platino/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Testiculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Vómitos/inducido químicamente
3.
Biomed Pharmacother ; 167: 115504, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37722188

RESUMEN

Aortic dissection is an adverse event of angiogenesis inhibitors; however, the association between the drugs and aortic dissection is unclear. Therefore, we investigated if and how angiogenesis inhibitors increase the onset of aortic dissection using pharmacologically-induced aortic dissection-prone model (LAB) mice, cultured endothelial cells, and real-world databases, which is a novel integrated research approach. Disproportionality analysis was performed and calculated using the reporting odds ratio as a risk signal using a worldwide database of spontaneous adverse events to estimate the risk of adverse events. Angiogenesis inhibitors, but not other hypertension-inducing drugs, showed significant risk signals for aortic aneurysms and dissection. A retrospective cohort analysis using JMDC, a medical receipt database in Japan, showed that the history of atherosclerosis and dyslipidemia, but not hypertension, were significantly associated with the onset of aortic dissection during angiogenesis inhibitor medication administration. For in vivo studies, sunitinib (100 mg/kg/day) was administered to LAB mice. Sunitinib increased systolic blood pressure (182 mmHg vs. 288 mmHg with sunitinib; p<0.01) and the incidence of aortic dissection (40% vs. 59% with sunitinib; p = 0.34) in mice. In vivo and in vitro studies revealed that sunitinib increased endothelin-1 expression and induced endothelial cell damage evaluated by intracellular- and vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 expressions. The increased risk of developing aortic dissection with angiogenesis inhibitors is associated with the development of drug-specific hypertension via endothelial cell damage and endothelin-1 expression. Our findings are invaluable in establishing safer anticancer therapies and strategies to prevent the development of vascular toxicity in high-risk patients.

4.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 11(9)2022 Aug 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36139925

RESUMEN

Evidence for the utility of pharmacist-driven antimicrobial stewardship programs remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the usefulness of our institutional pharmacist-driven prospective audit with intervention and feedback (PAF) on the treatment of patients with bloodstream infections (BSIs). The effect of pharmacist-driven PAF was estimated using an interrupted time series analysis with a quasi-experimental design. The proportion of de-escalation during BSI treatment increased by 44% after the implementation of pharmacist-driven PAF (95% CI: 30−58, p < 0.01). The number of days of therapy decreased by 16 per 100 patient days for carbapenem (95% CI: −28 to −3.5, p = 0.012) and by 15 per 100 patient days for tazobactam/piperacillin (95% CI: −26 to −4.9, p < 0.01). Moreover, the proportion of inappropriate treatment in empirical and definitive therapy was significantly reduced after the implementation of pharmacist-driven PAF. Although 30-day mortality did not change, compliance with evidenced-based bundles in the BSI of Staphylococcus aureus significantly increased (p < 0.01). In conclusion, our pharmacist-driven PAF increased the proportion of de-escalation and decreased the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics, as well as the proportion of inappropriate treatment in patients with BSI. This indicates that pharmacist-driven PAF is useful in improving the quality of antimicrobial treatment and reducing broad-spectrum antimicrobial use in the management of patients with BSI.

5.
FEBS J ; 288(14): 4249-4266, 2021 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33452755

RESUMEN

Viral infection is a significant burden to health care worldwide. Statins, 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, are widely used as cholesterol-lowering drugs. Recently, long-term statin therapy was shown to reduce the antiviral immune response; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms are unclear. Here, we found that simvastatin decreased polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid [poly(I:C)]-induced expression of antiviral interferon (IFN)-ß and IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lungs of mice with high-fat diet-induced hyperlipidemia. Macrophages were the dominant cell type in the BALF of poly(I:C)-treated mice. We examined the effects of simvastatin in primary lung macrophages and found that simvastatin suppressed poly(I:C)-induced expression of IFN-ß and ISGs. We examined the molecular mechanisms of statin-mediated inhibition of antiviral gene expression using murine macrophage-like cell line, J774.1/JA-4. Simvastatin and pitavastatin decreased poly(I:C)-induced expression of IFN-ß and ISGs. Moreover, they repressed poly(I:C)-induced phosphorylation of IFN regulatory factor (IRF) 3 and signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) 1, which is involved in Janus kinase (JAK)/STAT signaling. Mevalonate and geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP), but not cholesterol, counteracted the negative effect of statins on IFN-ß and ISG expression and phosphorylation of IRF3 and STAT1. The geranylgeranyltransferase inhibitor suppressed poly(I:C)-induced expression of IFN-ß and ISGs and phosphorylation of IRF3 and STAT1. These results suggest that statins suppressed the expression of IFN-ß and ISGs in poly(I:C)-treated hyperlipidemic mice and murine macrophages and that these effects occurred through the inhibition of IRF3 and JAK/STAT signaling in macrophages. Furthermore, GGPP recovered the statin-suppressed IRF3 and JAK/STAT signaling in poly(I:C)-treated macrophages.


Asunto(s)
Regulación de la Expresión Génica/efectos de los fármacos , Inhibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Reductasas/farmacología , Hiperlipidemias/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores Reguladores del Interferón/metabolismo , Interferón beta/metabolismo , Macrófagos/efectos de los fármacos , Poli I-C/toxicidad , Animales , Hiperlipidemias/inducido químicamente , Hiperlipidemias/metabolismo , Hiperlipidemias/patología , Inductores de Interferón/toxicidad , Factor 3 Regulador del Interferón/antagonistas & inhibidores , Factor 3 Regulador del Interferón/genética , Factor 3 Regulador del Interferón/metabolismo , Factores Reguladores del Interferón/genética , Interferón beta/genética , Quinasas Janus/antagonistas & inhibidores , Quinasas Janus/genética , Quinasas Janus/metabolismo , Pulmón/efectos de los fármacos , Pulmón/metabolismo , Pulmón/patología , Macrófagos/metabolismo , Macrófagos/patología , Masculino , Ratones , Ratones Endogámicos C57BL , Factor de Transcripción STAT3/antagonistas & inhibidores , Factor de Transcripción STAT3/genética , Factor de Transcripción STAT3/metabolismo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA