Mechanical Fractionation of Adipose Tissue-A Scoping Review of Procedures to Obtain Stromal Vascular Fraction.

Clinical indications for adipose tissue therapy are expanding towards a regenerative-based approach. Adipose-derived stromal vascular fraction consists of extracellular matrix and all nonadipocyte cells such as connective tissue cells including fibroblasts, adipose-derived stromal cells (ASCs) and vascular cells. Tissue stromal vascular fraction (tSVF) is obtained by mechanical fractionation, forcing adipose tissue through a device with one or more small hole(s) or cutting blades between syringes. The aim of this scoping review was to assess the efficacy of mechanical fractionation procedures to obtain tSVF. In addition, we provide an overview of the clinical, that is, therapeutic, efficacy of tSVF isolated by mechanical fraction on skin rejuvenation, wound healing and osteoarthritis. Procedures to obtain tissue stromal vascular fraction using mechanical fractionation and their associated validation data were included for comparison. For clinical outcome comparison, both animal and human studies that reported results after tSVF injection were included. We categorized mechanical fractionation procedures into filtration (n = 4), centrifugation (n = 8), both filtration and centrifugation (n = 3) and other methods (n = 3). In total, 1465 patients and 410 animals were described in the included clinical studies. tSVF seems to have a more positive clinical outcome in diseases with a high proinflammatory character such as osteoarthritis or (disturbed) wound healing, in comparison with skin rejuvenation of aging skin. Isolation of tSVF is obtained by disruption of adipocytes and therefore volume is reduced. Procedures consisting of centrifugation prior to mechanical fractionation seem to be most effective in volume reduction and thus isolation of tSVF. tSVF injection seems to be especially beneficial in clinical applications such as osteoarthritis or wound healing. Clinical application of tSVF appeared to be independent of the preparation procedure, which indicates that current methods are highly versatile.

Volumetric Effect and Patient Satisfaction after Facial Fat Grafting.

BACKGROUND: Facial fat grafts decrease in volume after transplantation. This observation is based on overall facial three-dimensional analyses, because there is sparse information on volume changes in well-defined aesthetic areas. The authors aimed to assess the overall and, more specifically, the local volumetric effects of facial fat grafting and relate these effects to patient satisfaction up to 1 year after treatment. METHODS: All consecutive adult female patients who were scheduled for facial fat grafting without additional surgical procedures were asked to participate. All patients underwent the same fat grafting method. An algorithm-based personalized aesthetic template was applied to define specific aesthetic areas on the preoperative three-dimensional image. Objective outcome parameters [i.e., three-dimensional volume differences, patient satisfaction (FACE-Q questionnaire)] were measured at baseline and at 6 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months after fat grafting. RESULTS: Of 33 female patients who underwent a facial fat graft procedure, 23 patients had complete three-dimensional data and were eligible for analysis. The highest volume gain was observed 6 weeks after grafting and was followed by a gradual loss thereafter. Overall and in the zygomatic area, a substantial gain in volume was still present 1 year after grafting, whereas this effect was lost in the lip area. FACE-Q scales Satisfaction with Facial Appearance Overall and Satisfaction with Cheeks improved too, whereas scores for Lines: Lips returned to baseline levels. The improvement in FACE-Q scales was in agreement with the objective change in volume. CONCLUSION: Gain in overall and local volumetric effects is accompanied by comparable changes in patient satisfaction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, IV.

Three-dimensional facial volume analysis using algorithm-based personalized aesthetic templates.

Three-dimensional stereophotogrammetry is commonly used to assess volumetric changes after facial procedures. A lack of clear landmarks in aesthetic regions complicates the reproduction of selected areas in sequential images. A three-dimensional volumetric analysis was developed based on a personalized aesthetic template. The accuracy and reproducibility of this method were assessed. Six female volunteers were photographed using the 3dMDtrio system according to a clinical protocol, twice at baseline (T1) and twice after 1year (T2). A styrofoam head was used as control. A standardized aesthetic template was morphed over the baseline images of the volunteers using a coherent point drift algorithm. The resulting personalized template was projected over all sequential images to assess surface area differences, volume differences, and root mean square errors. In 12 well-defined aesthetic areas, mean average surface area and volume differences between the two T1 images ranged from -7.6mm2 to 10.1mm2 and -0.11cm3 to 0.13cm3, respectively. T1 root mean square errors ranged between 0.24mm and 0.62mm (standard deviation 0.18-0.73mm). Comparable differences were found between the T2 images. An increase in volume between T1 and T2 was only observed for volunteers who gained in body weight. Personalized aesthetic templates are an accurate and reproducible method to assess changes in aesthetic areas.

Volumetric Effect of Pregnancy on a Unilateral Facial Fat Graft.

Weight gain can affect the volume of a facial fat graft, resulting in unfavorable asymmetries. Weight gain during pregnancy is more complex and does not just entail an increase in adipose tissue. This case report objectifies whether pregnancy results in volume changes of a facial fat graft. A 24-year-old woman received a fat graft (7 ml) in the mandibular area to mask a volume deficiency. This deficiency occurred after a fibula reconstruction of a mandibular defect resulting from the removal of an ameloblastoma. The patient became pregnant 3 weeks after the fat graft procedure. Standardized 3-dimensional photographs (3dMD) were available preoperatively and at 7 weeks (first trimester), 6 months (second trimester), 9 months (third trimester), and 14 months (4 months after delivery) postoperatively. Three-dimensional analysis revealed that no substantial volume changes of the fat graft occurred during pregnancy other than the overall proportional gain in facial volume. Pregnancy apparently does not affect the volume of a small unilateral fat graft applied in the facial region.

Comparison of intraoperative procedures for isolation of clinical grade stromal vascular fraction for regenerative purposes: a systematic review.

Intraoperative application of the stromal vascular fraction (SVF) of adipose tissue requires a fast and efficient isolation procedure of adipose tissue. This review was performed to systematically assess and compare procedures currently used for the intraoperative isolation of cellular SVF (cSVF) and tissue SVF (tSVF) that still contain the extracellular matrix. Pubmed, EMBASE and the Cochrane central register of controlled trials databases were searched for studies that compare procedures for intraoperative isolation of SVF (searched 28 September 2016). Outcomes of interest were cell yield, viability of cells, composition of SVF, duration, cost and procedure characteristics. Procedures were subdivided into procedures resulting in a cSVF or tSVF. Thirteen out of 3038 studies, evaluating 18 intraoperative isolation procedures, were considered eligible. In general, cSVF and tSVF intraoperative isolation procedures had similar cell yield, cell viability and SVF composition compared to a nonintraoperative (i.e. culture laboratory-based collagenase protocol) control group within the same studies. The majority of intraoperative isolation procedures are less time consuming than nonintraoperative control groups, however. Intraoperative isolation procedures are less time-consuming than nonintraoperative control groups with similar cell yield, viability of cells and composition of SVF, and therefore more suitable for use in the clinic. Nevertheless, none of the intraoperative isolation procedures could be designated as the preferred procedure to isolate SVF. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

What is the current optimal fat grafting processing technique? A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: With the advents of new processing techniques and new graft survival theories in fat grafting, the question is: Which processing technique is of preference? This study systematically reviewed literature regarding current techniques for processing fat grafts. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cinahl, and Cochrane databases were searched until August 2015. Studies comparing different fat grafting processing techniques were included. Outcomes were viability of adipocytes, number of adipose-derived stromal/stem cells (ASC) and growth factors in vitro, volume and quality of the graft in animal studies, and satisfaction and volume retention in human studies. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included. Adipocyte viability and ASC numbers were the best using the gauze/towel technique (permeability principle) compared to centrifugation. With regard to centrifugation, the pellet contained more ASCs compared to the middle layer. The animal studies' and patients' satisfaction results were not distinctive. The only study assessing volume retention in humans showed that a wash filter device performed significantly better than centrifugation. CONCLUSION: In this study, processing techniques using permeability principles proved superior to centrifugation (reinforced gravity principle) regarding viability and ASC number. Due to the variety in study characteristics and reported outcome variables, however, none of the processing techniques in this study demonstrated clinical evidence of superiority.

Clarifying the relationships among the different features of the OMENS+ classification in craniofacial microsomia.

BACKGROUND: The OMENS+ classification is commonly used to describe the phenotypically diverse craniofacial features of craniofacial microsomia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate associations among the individual components of the OMENS+ criteria. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved retrospective chart review was performed for patients who presented with a diagnosis of unilateral or bilateral craniofacial microsomia to the craniofacial clinic from January of 1990 to December of 2012. Demographic, diagnosis, classification, treatment, and radiographic data were abstracted for all patients who met inclusion criteria. Associations and correlations were evaluated using the Spearman rank test and a logistic regression model. RESULTS: One hundred five patients (61 male and 44 female) with craniofacial microsomia met inclusion criteria. Eighty-one patients (77.1 percent) had unilateral microsomia and 24 (22.9 percent) had bilateral microsomia. Twenty-eight patients (26.7 percent) had macrostomia. Correlations were all significantly interrelated (p = 0.000 to p = 00.018) between the degree of orbital, mandibular, and soft-tissue deformities. Moreover, the severity of ear deformity and facial nerve involvement were also significantly correlated (p = 0.008). Between these two groupings, there was a significant correlation between soft-tissue deficiency and nerve involvement (p = 0.010). Macrostomia was associated with the individual components of the group orbit (p = 0.008), mandible (p = 0.000), and soft tissue (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The association between structures using the OMENS+ classification may be caused by their branchial arch origin. Structures mainly developed from the first branchial arch (orbit, mandible, and soft tissue) are associated in degree of severity, as are the structures mainly derived from the second branchial arch (facial nerve and ear). CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Risk, III.