Factors affecting adherence to recommendations on pre-operative cardiac testing: A cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Cardiac risk evaluation prior to noncardiac surgery is fundamental to tailor peri-operative management to patient's estimated risk. Data on the degree of adherence to guidelines in patients at cardiovascular risk in Europe and factors influencing adherence are underexplored. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this analysis was to describe the degree of adherence to [2014 European Society of Cardiology (ESC)/European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) guidelines] recommendations on rest echocardiography [transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)] and to stress imaging prior to noncardiac surgery in a large European sample and to assess factors potentially affecting adherence. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a multicentre, international, prospective cohort study (MET-REPAIR). SETTING: Twenty-five European centres of all levels of care that enrolled patients between 2017 and 2020. PATIENTS: With elevated cardiovascular risk undergoing in-hospital elective, noncardiac surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: (Non)adherence to each pre-operative TTE and stress imaging recommendations classified as guideline-adherent, overuse and underuse. We performed descriptive analysis. To explore the impact of patients' sex, age, geographical region, and hospital teaching status, we conducted multivariate multinominal regression analysis. RESULTS: Out of 15 983 patients, 15 529 were analysed (61% men, mean age 72 ±â€Š8 years). Overuse (conduction in spite of class III) and underuse (nonconduction in spite of class I recommendation) for pre-operative TTE amounted to 16.6% (2542/15 344) and 6.6% (1015/15 344), respectively. Stress imaging overuse and underuse amounted to 1.7% (241/14 202) and 0.4% (52/14 202) respectively. Male sex, some age categories and some geographical regions were significantly associated with TTE overuse. Male sex and some regions were also associated with TTE underuse. Age and regions were associated with overuse of stress imaging. Male sex, age, and some regions were associated with stress imaging underuse. CONCLUSION: Adherence to pre-operative stress imaging recommendation was high. In contrast, adherence to TTE recommendations was moderate. Both patients' and geographical factors affected adherence to joint ESC/ESA guidelines. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03016936.

Risk assessment for major adverse cardiovascular events after noncardiac surgery using self-reported functional capacity: international prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines endorse self-reported functional capacity for preoperative cardiovascular assessment, although evidence for its predictive value is inconsistent. We hypothesised that self-reported effort tolerance improves prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) after noncardiac surgery. METHODS: This is an international prospective cohort study (June 2017 to April 2020) in patients undergoing elective noncardiac surgery at elevated cardiovascular risk. Exposures were (i) questionnaire-estimated effort tolerance in metabolic equivalents (METs), (ii) number of floors climbed without resting, (iii) self-perceived cardiopulmonary fitness compared with peers, and (iv) level of regularly performed physical activity. The primary endpoint was in-hospital MACE consisting of cardiovascular mortality, non-fatal cardiac arrest, acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and congestive heart failure requiring transfer to a higher unit of care or resulting in a prolongation of stay on ICU/intermediate care (≥24 h). Mixed-effects logistic regression models were calculated. RESULTS: In this study, 274 (1.8%) of 15 406 patients experienced MACE. Loss of follow-up was 2%. All self-reported functional capacity measures were independently associated with MACE but did not improve discrimination (area under the curve of receiver operating characteristic [ROC AUC]) over an internal clinical risk model (ROC AUCbaseline 0.74 [0.71-0.77], ROC AUCbaseline+4METs 0.74 [0.71-0.77], ROC AUCbaseline+floors climbed 0.75 [0.71-0.78], AUCbaseline+fitnessvspeers 0.74 [0.71-0.77], and AUCbaseline+physical activity 0.75 [0.72-0.78]). CONCLUSIONS: Assessment of self-reported functional capacity expressed in METs or using the other measures assessed here did not improve prognostic accuracy compared with clinical risk factors. Caution is needed in the use of self-reported functional capacity to guide clinical decisions resulting from risk assessment in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03016936.

Can we gain an advantage by combining distal median, radial and ulnar nerve blocks with supraclavicular block? A randomized controlled study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the combined ultrasound-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCB) and distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blocks, with the supraclavicular block alone. METHOD: Sixty-two patients undergoing upper extremity surgery were randomized to supraclavicular only (Group S, n = 31) or supraclavicular + distal (Group SD, n = 31) group. Patients in Group S received 32 mL of 1.5 % lidocaine + epinephrine 5 µg/mL, while those in Group SD received 20 mL of 1.5 % lidocaine + epinephrine 5 µg/mL followed by distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blocks using equal volumes of 2 % lidocaine + 0.5 % levobupivacaine (4 mL/nerve). Sensory and motor blocks of the ulnar, median, radial and musculocutaneous nerves were assessed every 5 min starting at the 10th minute. The imaging, needling and performance times were recorded. Also, the onset and anesthesia-related times, need for analgesic and first analgesic times, were noted. RESULTS: In Group SD, the anesthesia onset [15 (10-25) vs. 20 (15-30) min, p < 0.001] and anesthesia related times [16.6 (10.7-28.2) vs. 22 (15.9-33.7) min, p < 0.001] were significantly shorter than those of Group S. Additionally, the analgesic requirement was lower in Group SD (56.7 vs. 88.5 %, p = 0.009), while among the patients who required analgesic, the first analgesic time was longer in Group SD in comparison to Group S [625 (347-1764) vs. 315 (233-746) min p < 0.001]. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of distal median, radial, and ulnar nerve blocks to SCB shortens anesthesia-related time and anesthesia onset time when compared with a SCB alone.

Ultrasound anatomy of the brachial plexus nerves in the neurovascular bundle at the axilla in patients undergoing upper-extremity block anesthesia.

PURPOSE: Familiarity with the localization of the nerves in the neurovascular bundle that constitutes the axillary segment of the brachial plexus (BP) is important when applying ultrasound (US)-guided block anesthesia. Therefore in this study we aimed to delineate the anatomy of the median, radial, and ulnar nerves of the BP at the axilla with US and electrical stimulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 60 patients who were scheduled to undergo upper-arm surgery with axillary block anesthesia. Prior to anesthesia, ulnar, radial, and median nerves were localized with US using a 12-h quadrant identification system that placed the axillary artery (AA) in the middle. The nerves were then functionally tested using a neurostimulator. RESULTS: The radial nerve was mainly located in the 4-6 o'clock arc (posterior and posteromedial to AA) in 50 (83 %) of patients. Ulnar nerve was mainly at the 12-3 o'clock arc (anteromedial to AA) in 51 (85 %) of patients. Ulnar nerve showed a second peak at 9-10 o'clock quadrant (anterolateral to AA) in 11 % (7) of patients. Median nerve location was most common in the 12 and 9 o'clock arc (anterior and anterolateral to AA) in 53 (88 %) of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound is a useful tool for depicting BP anatomy in the axillary fossa prior to block anesthesia. Median, ulnar, and radial nerves form a highly consistent triangular pattern around the axillary artery that is easily recognizable with US.