The Current Landscape of Ventricular Tachycardia Trials: A Systematic Review of Registered Studies.

BACKGROUND: Although there are evolving techniques and technologies for treating ventricular tachycardia (VT), the current landscape of clinical trials for managing VT remains understudied. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to provide a systematic characterisation of the interventional management of VT through an analysis of the ClinicalTrials.gov, clinicaltrialsregister.eu, anzctr.org.au and chictr.org.cn databases. METHODS: We queried all phase II to IV interventional trials registered up to November 2023 that enrolled patients with VT. Published, completed but unpublished, terminated, or ongoing trials were included for final analysis. RESULTS: Of the 698 registered studies, 135 were related to VT, with 123 trials included in the final analysis. Among these trials, 25 (20%) have been published, enrolling a median of 35 patients (interquartile range [IQR] 20-132) over a median of 43 months (IQR 19-62). Out of the published trials, 14 (56%) were randomised, and 12 (48%) focused on catheter ablation. Twenty-two (18%) have been completed but remain unpublished, even after a median of 36 months (IQR 15-60). Furthermore, 27 (22%) trials were terminated or withdrawn, with the most common cause being poor enrolment. Currently, 49 (40%) trials are ongoing and novel non-ablative technologies, such as radioablation and autonomic modulation, account for 35% and 8% of ongoing trials, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis revealed that many registered trials remain unpublished or incomplete, and randomised controlled trial evidence is limited to only a few studies. Furthermore, many ongoing trials are focused on non-catheter ablation-based strategies. Therefore, larger pragmatic trials are needed to create stronger evidence in the future.

Correlation of spatial patterns of endocardial pace mapping to underlying scar topography in patients with scar-related ventricular tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Endocardial pace mapping (PM) can identify conducting channels for ventricular tachycardia (VT) circuits in patients with structural heart disease (SHD). Recent findings show the temporal and spatial pattern of PM may aid identification of the surface harboring VT isthmii. The specific correlation of PM patterns to scar topography has not been examined. OBJECTIVE: To correlate the pattern of endocardial PMs to underlying scar topography in SHD patients with VT. METHODS: Data from patients undergoing VT ablation from August 2018 to February 2022 were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty-three patients with SHD-related VT (mean age 65 ± 14 years) with 83 endocardial PM correlation maps were analysed. Two main correlation patterns were identified, an "abrupt-change correlation pattern (AC-pattern)" and "centrifugal-attenuation correlation pattern (CA-pattern)." AC-pattern had lower scar ratio (unipolar/bipolar % scar area; 1.1 vs. 1.5, p < .001), had longer maximal stimulus-QRS intervals (97.5 vs. 68 ms, p = .002), and higher likelihood of endocardial dominant scar (11/21 [52%] vs. 3/38 [8%], p < .001) than CA-pattern seen on intracardiac echocardiography (ICE). In contrast, CA-pattern was more likely to have epicardial dominant scar or mid-intramural scar on ICE (epicardial dominant scar; CA-pattern: 12/38 [32%] vs. AC-pattern: 1/21 [5%], p = .02, mid-intramural scar; CA-pattern: 15/38 [39%] vs. AC-pattern: 1/21 [5%], p = .005). CONCLUSIONS: The spatial pattern of endocardial PM in SHD-related VT directly correlates with scar topography. AC-pattern is associated with endocardial dominant scar on ICE with lower scar ratio and longer stimulus-QRS intervals, whereas CA-pattern is strongly associated with epicardial dominant or mid-intramural scar with higher scar ratio and shorter stimulus-QRS intervals.

Emergency out-of-hours catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmia storm: a UK and Australian experience.

AIMS: There are limited data on emergency catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) storm. We describe the feasibility and safety of performing emergency CA in an out-of-hours setting for VA storm refractory to medical therapy at 2 tertiary hospitals. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-five consecutive patients underwent out-of-hours (5pm-8am [weekday] or Friday 5pm-Monday 8am [weekend]) CA for VA storm refractory to anti-arrhythmic drugs and sedation. Baseline and procedural characteristics along with outcomes were compared to 91 consecutive patients undergoing weekday daytime-hours (8am-5pm) CA for VA storm. More patients undergoing out-of-hours CA had a left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35% (68% vs. 42%, P = 0.022), chronic kidney disease (60% vs. 20%, P < 0.001), and presented following a resuscitated out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (56% vs. 5%, P < 0.001), compared to the daytime-hours group. During median follow-up (377 [interquartile range 138-826] days), both groups experienced similar survival free from recurrent VA and VA storm. Survival free from cardiac transplant and/or mortality was lower in the out-of-hours group (44% vs. 81%, P = 0.007), but out-of-hours CA was not independently associated with increased cardiac transplant and/or mortality (hazard ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 0.61-2.96, P = 0.47). Of the 11 patients in the out-of-hours group who survived follow-up, VA-free survival was 91% and VA storm-free survival was 100% at 1-year after CA. CONCLUSION: Out-of-hours CA may occasionally be required to control VA storm and can be safe and efficacious in this scenario. During follow-up, cardiac transplant and/or mortality is common but undergoing out-of-hours CA was not predictive of this composite endpoint.

Correlation of exit sites of inducible ventricular tachycardia post-ST elevation myocardial infarction on electrophysiology study, with region of infarct.

BACKGROUND: Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) is the most common cause of sudden cardiac death post-ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Ventricular tachycardia (VT) may be inducible in electrophysiology studies (EPS) early (<40 days) post-STEMI. Whether it originates from the infarct site remains unknown. We examined the correlation between inducible VT and infarct location post-STEMI. AIMS: To investigate the correlation between inducible VT and infarct location post-STEMI. METHODS: We retrospectively analysed 46 patients from 2005 to 2017 with STEMI who underwent early programmed ventricular stimulation through EPS (>48 h post-STEMI and <40 days from admission). Gated heart pool scans were used to visualise infarct scar regions, and VT exit sites were derived from induction 12-lead electrocardiography. Patients were followed up for primary outcomes of recurrent VA and all-cause mortality. RESULTS: Forty-six patients were included for analysis, with 50 uniquely induced VT exit sites. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 30 ± 8.7% and 22% had impaired right ventricular ejection fraction. Mean time from presentation to EPS was 16 ± 31.3 days. Of the induced VT, 44 (88%) were from within scar and scar-border regions, whereas 6 (12%) of the induced VT were found to be remote to imaging-derived scar. Over a median follow-up period of 75 months, 6 (13%) patients died, and 7 (15%) patients had recurrent VA. No deaths occurred in patients with remote VT. CONCLUSION: The majority of early inducible post-infarct VT arises from acute myocardial scar; however, a small portion arises from sites remote from scars with a possible focal aetiology.

A Prospective, Multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Catheter Ablation Versus Antiarrhythmic Drugs in Patients With Structural Heart Disease Related Ventricular Tachycardia: The CAAD-VT Trial Protocol.

IMPORTANCE: Randomised trials have shown that catheter ablation (CA) is superior to medical therapy for ventricular tachycardia (VT) largely in patients with ischaemic heart disease. Whether this translates to patients with all forms and stages of structural heart disease (SHD-e.g., non-ischaemic heart disease) is unclear. This trial will help clarify whether catheter ablation offers superior outcomes compared to medical therapy for VT in all patients with SHD. OBJECTIVE: To determine in patients with SHD and spontaneous or inducible VT, if catheter ablation is more efficacious than medical therapy in control of VT during follow-up. DESIGN: Randomised controlled trial including 162 patients, with an allocation ratio of 1:1, stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and geographical region of site, with a median follow-up of 18-months and a minimum follow-up of 1 year. SETTING: Multicentre study performed in centres across Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Structural heart disease patients with sustained VT or inducible VT (n=162). INTERVENTION: Early treatment, within 30 days of randomisation, with catheter ablation (intervention) or initial treatment with antiarrhythmic drugs only (control). MAIN OUTCOMES, MEASURES, AND RESULTS: Primary endpoint will be a composite of recurrent VT, VT storm (≥3 VT episodes in 24 hrs or incessant VT), or death. Secondary outcomes will include each of the individual primary endpoints, VT burden (number of VT episodes in the 6 months preceding intervention compared to the 6 months after intervention), cardiovascular hospitalisation, mortality (including all-cause mortality, cardiac death, and non-cardiac death) and LVEF (assessed by transthoracic echocardiography from baseline to 6-, 12-, 24- and 36-months post intervention). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The Catheter Ablation versus Anti-arrhythmic Drugs for Ventricular Tachycardia (CAAD-VT) trial will help determine whether catheter ablation is superior to antiarrhythmic drug therapy alone, in patients with SHD-related VT. TRIAL REGISTRY: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) TRIAL REGISTRATION ID: ACTRN12620000045910 TRIAL REGISTRATION URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=377617&isReview=true.

Influence of respiration and tissue contact on ventricular substrate identification during high density mapping: Results from an ovine infarct model.

INTRODUCTION: Multielectrode mapping (MEM) and automated point collection are important enhancements to substrate mapping in ventricular tachycardia ablation. The effects of tissue contact and respiration on electrogram voltage with differing depolarization wavefronts with MEM catheters are unclear. METHODS: Bipolar and unipolar voltages were collected from control (n = 5) and infarcted (n = 7) animals with a multispline MEM catheter. Electro-anatomic maps were created in sinus rhythm, and right and left ventricular pacing. Analysis was performed across three collections: standard settings (SS), respiratory-phase gating (RG), and electrode-tissue proximity (TP). Comparison was made to scar detected by cardiac MRI (cMRI). RESULTS: Compared to SS and RG acquisition, median bipolar and unipolar voltages were higher using TP, regardless of the depolarization wavefront. In infarct animals, bipolar voltages were 30.7%-50.5% higher for bipolar and 8.7%-13.8% higher on unipolar voltages with TP, compared to SS. The effect of RG on bipolar and unipolar voltages was minimal. Percentage of local abnormal ventricular activities was not impacted by acquisition settings or wavefront direction in infarct animals. Compared with cMRI defined scar, all three acquisition settings overestimated scar area using standard voltage-based cutoffs. RG improved the low voltage area concordance with MRI by 1.6%-5.1% whereas TP improved by 5.9%-8.4%. CONCLUSIONS: High density voltage mapping with a MEM catheter is influenced by point collection settings. Tissue contact filters reduced low voltage areas and improved agreement with cMRI fibrosis in infarcted ovine hearts. These findings have critical implications for optimizing filter settings for high density substrate mapping in the left ventricle.

Clinical, electroanatomic and electrophysiologic characterization and outcomes of catheter ablation for ventricular tachycardia following valvular intervention.

INTRODUCTION: Ventricular tachycardia (VT) can occur following valvular interventions. There are limited data describing substrate and ablation approaches in such patients. We sought to describe the clinical, electrophysiologic, electroanatomic features and catheter ablation outcomes of patients with VT following aortic and/or mitral valve intervention. METHODS: Over 12-years, consecutive patients with aortic valve replacement (AVR) and/or mitral valve replacement (MVR) or repair, undergoing VT ablation, were identified from two centers. Clinical and procedural parameters and outcomes are described. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (age 66 ± 14years, 78% male, left ventricular ejection fraction 37 ± 16%), with prior AVR (mechanical n = 6, bioprosthetic n = 2, transcatheter n = 1), MVR (mechanical n = 5, bioprosthetic n = 1), mitral valve repair (n = 6) and both mechanical AVR and MVR (n = 2), underwent VT ablation. Sixteen had concurrent ischemic cardiomyopathy, 10 with prior bypass surgery. Left ventricular access was obtained in 21/23 (91%) patients (transseptal n = 14, retrograde aortic n = 5, transapical n = 2), with perivalvular scar identified in 17/21 (81%). Re-entrant VT isthmi involved the perivalvular regions in 12/23 (52%) patients, and regions remote from the valve in the remainder; 9% had nonscar-related VT. Intramural substrate was ablated from adjacent chambers in 5/23 (22%) patients and with half-normal saline irrigation in 8/23 (35%) patients. There were no instances of catheter entrapment. Following final ablation, VA-free survival was 78% at 13-months. CONCLUSION: Only half of VT circuits following valvular interventions involve the valve regions themselves, while the remainder involves unrelated regions. Catheter ablation is safe and efficacious at treating VT following valvular intervention, but novel strategies may be required.

Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Tachycardia in Ischaemic Versus Non-Ischaemic Cardiomyopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: There are differences in substrate and ablation approaches for ventricular tachycardia (VT) in ischaemic (ICM) and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). OBJECTIVE: To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing clinical and procedural characteristics/outcomes of VT ablation in ICM versus NICM. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for comparative studies reporting outcomes of VT ablation in patients with ICM and NICM. Primary outcomes were acute procedural success, VT recurrence and long-term mortality. Meta-analyses were performed using random-effects modelling. RESULTS: Thirty-one (31) studies (7,473 patients; 4,418 ICM and 3,055 NICM) were included. Patients with ICM were significantly older (67.0 vs 55.3 yrs), more commonly male (89% vs 79%), had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (29% vs 38%) were less likely to undergo epicardial access (11% vs 36%) and were more likely to require haemodynamic support during ablation (relative risk [RR] 1.30; 95% CI 1.01-1.69). Acute procedural success (i.e. non-inducibility of VT) was higher in the ICM cohort (RR 1.10, 95% CI 1.05-1.15). Recurrence of VT at follow-up was significantly lower in the ICM cohort (RR 0.77; 95% CI 0.70-0.84). Peri-procedural mortality, incidence of procedural complications and long-term mortality were not significantly different between the cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: NICM and ICM patients undergoing VT ablation are fundamentally different in their clinical characteristics, ablation approaches, acute procedural outcomes and likelihood of VA recurrence. VT ablation in NICM has a lower likelihood of procedural success with increased risk of VA recurrence, consistent with known challenging arrhythmia substrate.

Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) Position Statement on the Follow-Up of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices 2022.

Recognising the need for a national approach for the recommended best practice for the follow-up of implanted cardiac rhythm devices to ensure patient safety, this document has been produced by the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ). It draws on accepted practice standards and guidelines of international electrophysiology bodies. It lays out methodology, frequency, and content of follow-up, including remote monitoring; personnel, including physician, allied health, nursing and industry; paediatric and adult congenital heart patients; and special considerations including magnetic resonance imaging scanning, perioperative management, and hazard alerts.

The Role of Contemporary Wearable and Handheld Devices in the Diagnosis and Management of Cardiac Arrhythmias.

Cardiac arrhythmias are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and economic burden on the health care system. Detection and surveillance of cardiac arrhythmias using medical grade non-invasive methods (electrocardiogram, Holter monitoring) is the accepted standard of care. Whilst their accuracy is excellent, significant limitations remain in terms of accessibility, ease of use, cost, and a suboptimal diagnostic yield (up to ∼50%) which is critically dependent on the duration of monitoring. Contemporary wearable and handheld devices that utilise photoplethysmography and the electrocardiogram present a novel opportunity for remote screening and diagnosis of arrhythmias. They have significant advantages in terms of accessibility and availability with the potential of enhancing the diagnostic yield of episodic arrhythmias. However, there is limited data on the accuracy and diagnostic utility of these devices and their role in therapeutic decision making in clinical practice remains unclear. Evidence is mounting that they may be useful in screening for atrial fibrillation, and anecdotally, for the diagnosis of other brady and tachyarrhythmias. Recently, there has been an explosion of patient uptake of such devices for self-monitoring of arrhythmias. Frequently, the clinician is presented such information for review and comment, which may influence clinical decisions about treatment. Further studies are needed before incorporation of such technologies in routine clinical practice, given the lack of systematic data on their accuracy and utility. Moreover, challenges with regulation of quality standards and privacy remain. This state-of-the-art review summarises the role of novel ambulatory, commercially available, heart rhythm monitors in the diagnosis and management of cardiac arrhythmias and their expanding role in the diagnostic and therapeutic paradigm in cardiology.

Rapid Access Arrhythmia Clinics (RAACs) Versus Usual Care: Improving Efficiency and Safety of Arrhythmia Management.

BACKGROUND: Rapid access cardiology services have been proposed for assessment of acute cardiac conditions via an outpatient model-of-care that potentially could reduce hospitalisations. We describe a new Rapid Access Arrhythmia Clinic (RAAC) and compare major safety endpoints to usual care. METHODS: We matched 312 adult patients with suspected arrhythmia in RAAC to historical age and sex-matched controls discharged from hospital within Western Sydney Local Health District with suspected arrhythmia. The primary endpoint was a composite of time to first unplanned cardiovascular hospitalisation or cardiac death over 12 months. RESULTS: The average age of RAAC patients was 52.2±18.8 years and 51.6±18.8 years for controls, and 48.4% were female in both groups. Mean time from referral to first attended RAAC appointment was 10.5 days. Most were referred from emergency (177, 56.7%) and cardiologists at time of discharge (65, 20.8%). The most common reason for referral was palpitations (180, 57.7%). In total, 155 (49.7%) had a documented arrhythmia, with the most common being atrial fibrillation/flutter (88, 28.2%). The primary endpoint occurred in 35 (11.2%) patients in the RAAC pathway (97.1[95% CI 70-131.3] per 1,000 person-years), compared to 72 (23.1%) patients for usual care controls (229.5[95% CI 180.2-288.1] per 1,000 person-years). Using a propensity score analysis, RAAC pathway significantly reduced the primary endpoint by 59% compared to usual care (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.62; p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: RAACs for the early investigation and management of suspected arrhythmia is superior to usual care in terms of reduction in unplanned cardiovascular hospitalisation and death.

Ventricular Tachycardia Storm Ablation With Pre-Emptive Circulatory Support by Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Australian Experience.

BACKGROUND: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) can provide circulatory support in high-risk patients undergoing drug refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation procedures. We report experience using VA-ECMO in a pre-emptive approach for high-risk patients with VT storm and previously ineffective ablation procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four (4) patients with drug refractory ventricular tachycardia (mean age 61±3 years; left ventricular ejection fraction 21±5%) presenting for VT ablation had pre-emptive VA-ECMO. All patients during current admission had VT storm. Pre-ablation, 22 total monomorphic VTs (cycle length 402±69 ms) were induced or spontaneously observed (median of 4, IQR25-75% 1-6). At the end of the procedure, 86% of all inducible VTs were rendered non-inducible. Median hospitalisation following VA-ECMO supported ablation was 5 days (IQR25-75% 3-12). During follow-up (median 138 days [IQR25-75% 57-277]), VT recurred in one patient as an isolated episode reverted by anti-tachycardia pacing. There was a 99% reduction in VT burden post ablation. One (1) patient died of cardiogenic shock within 24 hours whilst still on VA-ECMO, all other patients were successfully weaned off support and discharged. Two (2) patients underwent cardiac transplantation at 199 and 512 days post ablation following implantation of ventricular assist devices for worsening heart failure. CONCLUSIONS: The pre-emptive use of VA-ECMO for high-risk patients undergoing catheter ablation for VT storm was found to be effective in maintaining haemodynamic status, and allowing successful mapping and catheter ablation for VT.

Prognostic significance of extensive versus limited induction protocol during catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Testing for inducible ventricular tachycardia (VT) pre- and postablation forms the cornerstone of contemporary scar-related VT ablation procedures. There is significant heterogeneity in reported VT induction protocols. We examined the utility of an extensive induction protocol (up to 4 extra-stimuli [ES] ± burst ventricular pacing) compared to the current guideline-recommended protocol (up to 3ES, defined as limited induction protocol) in patients with scar-related VT. METHODS AND RESULTS: Sixty-two patients (age: 64 ± 14 years; left ventricular ejection fraction: 37 ± 13%, ischemic cardiomyopathy: 31, nonischemic cardiomyopathy: 31) with at least one inducible VT were included. An extensive testing protocol induced 11%-17% more VTs, compared to the limited induction protocol before, and after the final ablation. VT recurred in 48% of patients during a mean follow up of 566 ± 428 days. Patients who were noninducible for any VT using the limited induction protocol had worse ventricular arrhythmia (VA)-free survival (12 months, 43% vs. 82%; p = .03) and worse survival free of VA, transplantation and mortality (12 months 46% vs. 82%; p = .02), compared to patients who were noninducible for any VT using the extensive induction protocol. CONCLUSIONS: Between 11% and 17% of inducible VTs may be missed if 4ES and burst pacing are not performed in induction protocols before and after ablation. Noninducibility for any VT after an extensive induction protocol after the final ablation portends more favorable prognostic outcomes when compared with the current guideline-recommended induction protocol of up to 3ES. This data suggests that the adoption of an extensive induction protocol is of prognostic benefit after VT ablation.

Catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmia guided by a high-density grid catheter.

INTRODUCTION: Minimal data exist on the Advisor HD Grid (HDG) catheter and the Precision electroanatomic mapping (EAM) system for ventricular arrhythmia (VA) procedures. Using the HDG catheter, the EAM uses the high-density (HD) wave mapping and best duplicate software to compare the maximum peak-to-peak bipolar voltages within a small zone independent of wavefront direction and catheter orientation. This study aimed to summarize the procedural experience for VAs using the HDG catheter. METHODS: Clinical and procedural characteristics of VA ablation procedures were retrospectively reviewed that used the HDG catheter and the Precision EAM over a 12-month period. RESULTS: A total of 22 patients, 18 with sustained ventricular tachycardia and 4 with premature ventricular contractions were included. Clinically indicated left and/or right ventricular (LV, RV, respectively), and aortic maps were created. LV substrate maps (n = 13) used a median 1700 points (interquartile range [IQR]25%-75% , 1427-2412) out of a median 18 573 (IQR25%-75% , 15 713-41 067) total points collected. RV substrate maps (n = 11) used a median 1435 points (IQR25%-75% , 1114-1871) out of a median 16 005 (IQR25%-75% , 11 063-21 405) total points collected. Total point utilization, used vs collected, was 9%. Mean mapping time was 43 ± 17 minutes (substrate, 34 ± 18 minutes; activation/pace mapping, 9 ± 13 minutes). Acute success was achieved in 56 (86%) and short-term success achieved in 16 patients (73%) at a median follow-up of 145 days (IQR25%-75% , 62-273 days). There were no procedural complications. CONCLUSION: HD wave mapping using the novel HDG catheter integrated with the Precision EAM is safe and feasible in VA procedures in the LV, RV, and aorta. Mapping times are consistent with other multielectrode mapping catheters.

Position Statement on the Management of Cardiac Electrophysiology and Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Australia During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Living Document.

The COVID-19 pandemic poses a significant stress on health resources in Australia. The Heart Rhythm Council of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand aims to provide a framework for efficient resource utilisation balanced with competing risks when appropriately treating patients with cardiac arrhythmias. This document provides practical recommendations for the electrophysiology (EP) and cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) services in Australia. The document will be updated regularly as new evidence and knowledge is gained with time.

Ebstein's anomaly: an electrophysiological perspective.

Ebstein's anomaly of the tricuspid valve (EA) is an uncommon congenital cardiac malformation. It can present with atrioventricular tachycardia (AVRT), atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT), atrial arrhythmias, and rarely with ventricular tachycardia. The 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is critically important and often diagnostic even prior to an electrophysiology study (EPS). Due to its complex anatomy, it poses particular challenges for mapping and ablation, even for an experienced electrophysiologist. In this review, we aim to provide insight into the electrophysiological perspective of EA and an in-depth analysis of the various arrhythmias encountered in diverse clinical scenarios.

Comparison of the arrhythmogenic substrate for ventricular tachycardia in patients with ischemic vs non-ischemic cardiomyopathy - insights from high-density, multi-electrode catheter mapping.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the differences of arrhythmogenic substrate using high-density mapping in ventricular tachycardia (VT) patients with ischemic (ICM) vs non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). METHODS: Data from patients presenting for VT ablation from December 2016 to December 2020 at Westmead Hospital were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixty consecutive patients with structural heart disease (ICM 57%, NICM 43%, mean age 66 years) having catheter ablation of scar-related VT with pre-dominant left ventricular involvement were included. ICM was associated with larger proportion of dense scar area (bipolar; 19 [12-29]% vs 6 [3-10]%, P < 0.001, unipolar; 20 [12-32]% vs 11 [7-19]%, P = 0.01) compared with NICM. However, the scar ratio (unipolar dense scar [%]/bipolar dense scar [%]) was significantly higher in NICM patients (1.2 [0.8-1.7] vs 1.7 [1.3-2.3], P = 0.003). Larger scar area in ICM was paralleled by higher proportion of complex electrograms (6 [2-13] % vs 3 [1-5] %, P = 0.01), longer and wider voltage based conducting channels, higher incidence of late potential-based conducting channels, longer VT cycle-length (399 ± 80 ms vs 359 ± 68 ms, P = 0.04) and greater maximal stimulation-QRS interval among sites with good pace-map correlation (75 [51-99]ms vs 48 [31-73]ms, P = 0.02). Ventricular arrhythmia (VA) storm was more highly prevalent in ICM than NICM (50% vs 23%, P = 0.03). During the follow-up period, NICM had a significantly higher cumulative incidence for the VA recurrence than ICM (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: High-density multi-electrode catheter mapping of left ventricular arrhythmogenic substrate of NICM tends to show smaller dense scar area and higher scar ratio, compared with ICM, suggestive the extent of epicardial/intramural substrate, with paucity of substrate targets for ablation, which results in the worse outcomes with ablation.

Impact of sex on clinical, procedural characteristics and outcomes of catheter ablation for ventricular arrhythmias according to underlying heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Women are under-represented in many key studies and trials examining outcomes of catheter ablation (CA) for ventricular arrhythmias (VA). We compared characteristics between men and women undergoing their first catheter ablation for VA at a single centre over 10 years. METHODS: The clinical, procedural characteristics and outcomes of 287 consecutive patients (male = 182, female = 105), undergoing their first CA at our centre over 10 years were compared according to sex and underlying heart disease. RESULTS: In the ablation population, women were younger, had fewer co-morbidities, were less likely to have ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and VA storm and were more likely to have idiopathic VA and premature ventricular complexes as the indication for ablation (P < 0.05 for all). Amongst idiopathic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) subgroups, baseline characteristics were similar; amongst ICM, women were younger and had higher numbers of drug failure pre-ablation (P = 0.05). Women were similar to men in all procedural characteristics, acute procedural success and complications, regardless of underlying heart disease. At median follow-up of 666 days, VA-free survival, overall mortality and survival free of death or transplant were comparable in both groups. Sex was not a predictor of these outcomes, after accounting for clinical and procedural characteristics. CONCLUSION: Women represented 36% of the real-world population at our centre referred for CA of VA. There are key differences in clinical features of women versus men referred for VA ablation. Despite these differences, VA ablation in women can be accomplished with similar success and complication rates to men, regardless of underlying heart disease.