RESUMEN
An implementation and effectiveness evaluation of the Community Scholars Program was conducted at the University of Pennsylvania to enhance community capacity to collaborate with academics in mutually beneficial, equitable, and transformative research. Mixed methods were employed using administrative data, surveys, and key informant interviews. Participants expressed high satisfaction, valued interactive learning, and identified areas for improvement. The program increased knowledge and self-confidence in research-related skills and trust in the research process. The program serves as an institutional model to create long-term, mutually beneficial community-academic partnerships. (Am J Public Health. 2024;114(3):284-288. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2023.307549).
Asunto(s)
Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad , Relaciones Comunidad-Institución , Humanos , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Investigación Participativa Basada en la Comunidad/métodos , Curriculum , ConfianzaRESUMEN
Phenomenon: The number of women who enter medical school has been on par with the number of men for almost 20 years, but parity in training has not translated to equity in professional life. To capitalize on the perspective of women faculty with established careers in academic medicine and to bring theory to the largely descriptive research on gender inequity in academic medicine, the authors used the Theory of Gendered Organizations to demonstrate how academic medical centers function as inherently gendered organizations. Approach: The authors recruited women faculty with established careers at one academic medical center based on purposeful and snowball sampling and interviewed 30 participants in Summer/Fall 2018. They coded and analyzed data inductively. In later stages of analysis they used sensitizing concepts from the Theory of Gendered Organizations to guide our focus on formal expectations of, and informal interactions in, the academic medical center. Findings: The disjuncture, i.e., "lip service", between formal expectations intended to be gender-neutral and informal interactions that advantaged men demonstrated how the academic medical center functioned as a gendered organization. Participants experienced these interactions as being treated differently than men and/or being stereotyped. As their careers progressed, participants recognized gender inequity as embedded in the organization, or as they said, "the way things were stacked". Subsequent to this recognition, they navigated this gendered organization by advocating for themselves and younger women faculty. Insights: Women with established careers in academic medicine experienced gender inequity as embedded in the organization but navigate gendered interactions by advocating for themselves and for younger women. Using the Theory of Gendered Organizations as an analytic lens demonstrates how academic medical centers function as gendered organizations; these findings can inform both theory-based research and pragmatic change strategies.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos , Docentes Médicos , Cultura Organizacional , Médicos Mujeres , Adulto , Anciano , Movilidad Laboral , Femenino , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Teóricos , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Health professions educators are continuing to develop training programs for future health care professionals to understand social determinants of health and address practical needs of their training institutions via service-oriented learning. Although individual U.S. programs have piloted different models, evaluations of programs that have demonstrated longitudinal growth and sustainability in the community are lacking, which is important because these programs can have long-term impacts not only on students but also on the communities they serve. In this article, the authors describe the long-term impacts of the Bridging the Gaps (BTG) program. First established in 1991 as an academic health institution and community organization collaborative, by 2019, the BTG program encompassed 9 academic health institution-based programs, partnering with 96 community organizations and employing 187 health professions students across 15 disciplines. By 2019, the program had 5,648 alumni. Of 3,104 alumni, 2,848 (91.8%) felt that the program broadened their understanding of health issues encountered by vulnerable and/or economically disadvantaged populations, and 2,767 of 3,101 (89.2%) felt that the program increased their interest in working with these populations. A total of 142 of 156 (91.0%) reported an effect on their clinical practice, 169 of 180 (93.9%) reported an effect on their professional role, and 64 of 109 (58.7%) reported an effect on their research careers. Of the community partners, 1,401 of 1,441 (97.2%) felt that the partnership between their organization and the BTG program was beneficial, 955 of 1,423 (67.1%) felt that BTG students brought resources to their organization that had previously been unavailable, and 1,095 of 1,421 (77.1%) felt that the linkages between their agency and other organizations were strengthened. The BTG program demonstrates growth and sustainability in its ongoing efforts to integrate training on social determinants of health via service-oriented learning into health professions education.
Asunto(s)
Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Empleos en Salud/educación , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Conducta Cooperativa , CurriculumRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Awards given to medical school faculty are one important mechanism for recognizing what is valued in academic medicine. There have been concerns expressed about the gender distribution of awards, and there is also a growing appreciation for the evolving accomplishments and talents that define academic excellence in the 21st century and that should be considered worthy of award recognition. OBJECTIVE: Examine faculty awards at our institution for gender equity and evolving values. METHODS: Recipient data were collected on awards from 1996 to 2007 inclusively at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (SOM). Descriptions of each award also were collected. The female-to-male ratio of award recipients over the time span was reviewed for changes and trends. The title and text of each award announcement were reviewed to determine if the award represented a traditional or a newer concept of excellence in academic medicine. MAIN RESULTS: There were 21 annual awards given to a total of 59 clinical award recipients, 60 research award recipients, and 154 teaching award recipients. Women received 28% of research awards, 29% of teaching awards and 10% of clinical awards. Gender distribution of total awards was similar to that of SOM full-time faculty except in the clinical awards category. Only one award reflected a shift in the culture of individual achievement to one of collaboration and team performance. CONCLUSION: Examining both the recipients and content of awards is important to assure they reflect the current composition of diverse faculty and the evolving ideals of leadership and excellence in academic medicine.
Asunto(s)
Distinciones y Premios , Docentes Médicos/normas , Relaciones Interpersonales , Valores Sociales , Desarrollo de Personal/normas , Movilidad Laboral , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Desarrollo de Personal/tendenciasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Given the persistent disparity in the advancement of women compared with men faculty in academic medicine, it is critical to develop effective interventions to enhance women's careers. We carried out a cluster-randomized, multifaceted intervention to improve the success of women assistant professors at a research-intensive medical school. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-seven departments/divisions were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups. The three-tiered intervention included components that were aimed at (1) the professional development of women assistant professors, (2) changes at the department/division level through faculty-led task forces, and (3) engagement of institutional leaders. Generalized linear models were used to test associations between assignment and outcomes, adjusting for correlations induced by the clustered design. RESULTS: Academic productivity and work self-efficacy improved significantly over the 3-year trial in both intervention and control groups, but the improvements did not differ between the groups. Average hours worked per week declined significantly more for faculty in the intervention group as compared with the control group (-3.82 vs. -1.39 hours, respectively, p = 0.006). The PhD faculty in the intervention group published significantly more than PhD controls; however, no differences were observed between MDs in the intervention group and MDs in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Significant improvements in academic productivity and work self-efficacy occurred in both intervention and control groups, potentially due to school-wide intervention effects. A greater decline in work hours in the intervention group despite similar increases in academic productivity may reflect learning to "work smarter" or reveal efficiencies brought about as a result of the multifaceted intervention. The intervention appeared to benefit the academic productivity of faculty with PhDs, but not MDs, suggesting that interventions should be more intense or tailored to specific faculty groups.
Asunto(s)
Logro , Movilidad Laboral , Docentes Médicos , Liderazgo , Médicos Mujeres/psicología , Eficiencia , Docentes Médicos/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Grupos Minoritarios/psicología , Grupos Minoritarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Pennsylvania , Facultades de Medicina/organización & administración , Autoeficacia , Estados Unidos , Equilibrio entre Vida Personal y LaboralRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Women in academic medicine are not achieving the same career advancement as men, and face unique challenges in managing work and family alongside intense work demands. The purpose of this study was to investigate how a supportive department/division culture buffered women from the impact of work demands on work-to-family conflict. METHOD: As part of a larger intervention trial, the authors collected baseline survey data from 133 women assistant professors at the University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine in 2010. Validated measures of work demands, work-to-family conflict, and a department/division culture were employed. Pearson correlations and general linear mixed modeling were used to analyze the data. Authors investigated whether work culture moderated the association between work demands and work-to-family conflict. RESULTS: Heavy work demands were associated with increased levels of work-to-family conflict. There were significant interactions between work demands, work-to-family conflict, and department/division culture. A culture conducive to women's academic success significantly moderated the effect of work hours on time-based work-to-family conflict and significantly moderated the effect of work overload on strain-based work-to-family conflict. At equivalent levels of work demands, women in more supportive cultures experienced lower levels of work-to-family conflict. CONCLUSIONS: The culture of the department/division plays a crucial role in women's work-to-family conflict and can exacerbate or alleviate the impact of extremely high work demands. This finding leads to important insights about strategies for more effectively supporting the careers of women assistant professors.
Asunto(s)
Logro , Movilidad Laboral , Docentes Médicos/organización & administración , Médicos Mujeres/organización & administración , Facultades de Medicina/organización & administración , Selección de Profesión , Femenino , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Masculino , Cultura Organizacional , Satisfacción Personal , Relaciones Profesional-Familia , Apoyo Social , Estados Unidos , Carga de TrabajoRESUMEN
Traditional performance expectations and career advancement paths for academic physicians persist despite dramatic transformations in the academic workflow, workload, and workforce over the past 20 years. Although the academic physician's triple role as clinician, researcher, and educator has been lauded as the ideal by academic health centers, current standards of excellence for promotion and tenure are based on outdated models. These models fail to reward collaboration and center around rigid career advancement plans that do little to accommodate the changing needs of individuals and organizations. The authors describe an innovative, comprehensive, multipronged initiative at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania to initiate change in the culture of academic medicine and improve academic productivity, job satisfaction, and overall quality of life for junior faculty. As a key part of this intervention, task forces from each of the 13 participating departments/divisions met five times between September 2010 and January 2011 to produce recommendations for institutional change. The authors discuss how this initiative, using principles adopted from business transformation, generated themes and techniques that can potentially guide workforce environment innovation in academic health centers across the United States. Recommendations include embracing a promotion/tenure/evaluation system that supports and rewards tailored individual academic career plans; ensuring leadership, decision-making roles, and recognition for junior faculty; deepening administrative and team supports for junior faculty; and solidifying and rewarding mentorship for junior faculty. By doing so, academic health centers can ensure the retention and commitment of faculty throughout all stages of their careers.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Educación Médica/organización & administración , Docentes Médicos/organización & administración , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Pennsylvania , Administración de Personal , Rol ProfesionalRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The work environment culture inhibits women's career success in academic medicine. The lack of clarity and consistency in the definition, measurement, and analysis of culture constrains current research on the topic. The authors addressed this gap by defining the construct of a culture conducive to women's academic success (CCWAS) and creating a measure (i.e., tool) to evaluate it. METHOD: First, the authors conducted a review of published literature, held focus groups, and consulted with subject matter experts to develop a measure of academic workplace culture for women. Then they developed and pilot-tested the measure with a convenience sample of women assistant professors. After refining the measure, they administered it, along with additional scales for validation, to 133 women assistant professors at the University of Pennsylvania. Finally, they conducted statistical analyses to explore the measure's nature and validity. RESULTS: A CCWAS consists of four distinct, but related, dimensions: equal access, work-life balance, freedom from gender biases, and supportive leadership. The authors found evidence that women within departments/divisions agree on the supportiveness of their units but that substantial differences among units exist. The analyses provided strong evidence for the reliability and validity of their measure. CONCLUSIONS: This report contributes to a growing understanding of women's academic medicine careers and provides a measure that researchers can use to assess the supportiveness of the culture for women assistant professors and that leaders can use to evaluate the effectiveness of interventions designed to increase the supportiveness of the environment for women faculty.
Asunto(s)
Logro , Movilidad Laboral , Docentes Médicos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Médicos Mujeres , Facultades de Medicina , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Cultura , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cultura Organizacional , Pennsylvania , Proyectos Piloto , Sexismo , Medio Social , Apoyo SocialRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High rates of attrition have been documented nationally in assistant professor faculty of U.S. medical schools. Our objective was to investigate the association of individual level risk factors, track of academic appointment, and use of institutional leave policies with departure in junior faculty of a research-intensive school of medicine. METHODS: Participants included 901 faculty newly hired as assistant professors from July 1, 1999, through December 30, 2007, at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania. The faculty affairs database was used to determine demographics, hiring date, track of appointment, track changes, time to departure, and use of work-life policies for an extension of the probationary period for mandatory review, reduction in duties, and leave of absence. RESULTS: Over one quarter (26.7%) of faculty departed during follow-up. Faculty appointed on the clinician educator or research tracks were at increased risk of departure compared to the tenure track (hazard ratio [HR] 1.87, confidence interval, [CI] 1.28-2.71; HR 4.50, CI 2.91-6.96; respectively). Women appointed on the clinician educator track were at increased risk of departure compared to men (HR 1.46, CI 1.04-2.05). Faculty who took an extension of the probationary period were at decreased risk of departure (HR 0.36, CI 0.25-0.52). CONCLUSIONS: At this institution, junior faculty on the tenure track were least likely to depart before their mandatory review compared to faculty on the clinician educator or research tracks. Female assistant professors on the clinician educator track are of significant risk for departure. Taking advantage of the work-life policy for an extension of the probationary period protects against attrition.
Asunto(s)
Docentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Política Organizacional , Reorganización del Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Facultades de Medicina , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Movilidad Laboral , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Humanos , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Masculino , Pennsylvania , Médicos/psicología , Estudios Prospectivos , Salarios y Beneficios , Recursos HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many patients use emergency departments (EDs) for primary care. Previous studies have found that patient characteristics affect ED utilization. However, such studies have led to few policy changes. OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether Medicaid patients' ED use is associated with characteristics of their primary care practices. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a cohort study. SUBJECTS: A total of 57,850 patients, assigned to 353 primary care practices affiliated with a Medicaid HMO, were included. MEASURES: Predictor variables were characteristics of primary care practices, which were measured by visiting each practice. The outcome variable was ED use adjusted for patient characteristics. RESULTS: On average, patients made 0.80 ED visits/person/yr. Patients from practices with more than 12 evening hours/wk used the ED 20% less than patients from practices without evening hours. A higher ratio of the number of active patients per clinician-hour of practice time was associated with more ED use. When more Medicaid patients were in a practice, these patients used the ED more frequently. Other factors associated with ED use included equipment for the care of asthma and presence of nurse practitioners and physician assistants. DISCUSSION: Modifiable characteristics of primary care practices were associated with ED use. Because the observational design of this study does not allow definitive conclusions about causality, future studies should include intervention trials to determine whether changing practice characteristics can reduce ED use. CONCLUSIONS: Improving primary care access and scope of services may reduce ED use. Focusing on systems issues rather than patient characteristics may be a more productive strategy to improve appropriate use of emergency medical care.