Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 284(2): 421-5, 2011 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20878173

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to analyze the perioperative outcomes of laparotomy with conventional midline incision and minilaparotomy in patients with large myomas, in a prospective and randomized manner. STUDY DESIGN: From January 2005 to January 2009, 205 consecutive hysterectomies for large symptomatic myomas had been performed by abdominal approach. Patients were randomly assigned to minilaparotomy or midline incision. RESULTS: Groups were compared and found to be similar in terms of age, gravida, parity, body mass index, uterine size, operative time and intraoperative hemorrhage volume. Length of hospital stay, rate of surgical site infection and postoperative fever were significantly higher in the conventional laparotomy group with midline incision. CONCLUSION: Minilaparotomy is an applicable procedure in hysterectomy for large myomas in the majority of women, resulting in decreased length of hospital stay and complication rates.


Asunto(s)
Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Mioma/cirugía , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía , Adulto , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Femenino , Fiebre/etiología , Humanos , Histerectomía/métodos , Tiempo de Internación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Mioma/patología , Estudios Prospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/etiología , Factores de Tiempo , Neoplasias Uterinas/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA