RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Blindness from glaucoma is prevalent in parts of Africa. Lack of awareness, late diagnosis, poor acceptance and compliance to treatment as well as unorthodox care practices are among many contributing factors. Strategies that improve glaucoma awareness and treatment acceptance are required to resolve this trend. PURPOSE: To evaluate the influence of counselling on glaucoma awareness, willingness to accept glaucoma surgery and eye care practices among primary open-angle glaucoma patients on medical treatment. METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional interviewer-administered questionnaire-based study evaluating the demographics, glaucoma awareness, acceptance of operative care and use of traditional eye medications among patients with primary open-angle glaucoma on medical treatment followed up over a 12-month period. RESULTS: A total of 120 eligible participants were recruited. Glaucoma awareness and basic knowledge were 93.3 and 12%, respectively. Educational attainment and positive family history were associated with glaucoma awareness (p = 0.027 and p = 0.042, respectively). Seventy-five (62.5%) participants accepted glaucoma surgery as a treatment option. However, the duration of medical treatment was inversely related to the acceptance of glaucoma surgery (odds ratio = - 0.390, p = 0.009). Twelve (10.5%) participants use traditional eye medication for their current eye problem. CONCLUSION: Glaucoma counselling should be performed with a content template that delivers all relevant information to patients and caregivers. This will bridge gaps in knowledge and improve the early presentation, acceptance of glaucoma surgery and eye care practices.
Asunto(s)
Concienciación , Cirugía Filtrante/métodos , Glaucoma/cirugía , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Presión Intraocular/fisiología , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Cooperación del Paciente , Adulto , África del Sur del Sahara/epidemiología , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Glaucoma/epidemiología , Glaucoma/fisiopatología , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the concordance between the diagnostic tests for dry eye disease (DED) in a Nigerian hospital population. METHODS: The study was a hospital-based cross-sectional survey of adults (≥18 years) presenting at the eye clinic of the University of Nigeria Teaching Hospital (UNTH), Enugu; September-December, 2011. Participants' socio-demographic data were collected. Each subject was assessed for DED using the "Ocular Surface Disease Index" (OSDI) questionnaire, tear-film breakup time (TBUT), and Schirmer test. The intertest concordance was assessed using kappa statistic, correlation, and regression coefficients. RESULTS: The participants (n=402; men: 193) were aged 50.1±19.1 standard deviation years (range: 18-94 years). Dry eye disease was diagnosed in 203 by TBUT, 170 by Schirmer test, and 295 by OSDI; the concordance between the tests were OSDI versus TBUT (Kappa, κ=-0.194); OSDI versus Schirmer (κ=-0.276); and TBUT versus Schirmer (κ=0.082). Ocular Surface Disease Index was inversely correlated with Schirmer test (Spearman ρ=-0.231, P<0.001) and TBUT (ρ=-0.237, P<0.001). In the linear regression model, OSDI was poorly predicted by TBUT (ß=-0.09; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.26 to -0.03, P=0.14) and Schirmer test (ß=-0.35, 95% CI: -0.53 to -0.18, P=0.18). CONCLUSION: At UNTH, there is poor agreement, and almost equal correlation, between the subjective and objective tests for DED. Therefore, the selection of diagnostic test for DED should be informed by cost-effectiveness and diagnostic resource availability, not diagnostic efficiency or utility.
Asunto(s)
Población Negra , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Oftalmológico/normas , Síndromes de Ojo Seco/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nigeria , Análisis de Regresión , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Lágrimas , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The appropriateness of the initial pathway to care, especially eye care, is critical for timeliness and outcomes of care. Individual-dependent and health system-determined factors influence the preferred initial pathway to care. This study aimed to map the initial pathways to eye care in a rural population in south-east Nigeria and identify the associated factors. METHODS: This study was a population-based, cross-sectional descriptive survey conducted in Abagana, a rural south-east Nigeria community, in September 2011. Using a researcher-administered questionnaire, data on participants' sociodemographics, preferred initial eyecare pathway when confronted with an eye disorder and their reason(s) for the choice of pathway were collected. Descriptive and analytical statistics were performed. Regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of visiting an ophthalmologist when confronted with an eye disorder. In all comparisons, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The participants (n = 501: 263 men; 238 women) were aged 48.9±16.3 years (range 18-93 years). The majority of the participants were married (339; 67.7%) and possessed formal education (415; 82.8%). The participants' frequently preferred initial pathways to eye care were to consult a patent medicine dealer (178; 35.0%), to consult an ophthalmologist (165; 33.0%), and to self-medicate (125; 25.0%). Possession of formal education (odds ratio 0.3; 95% confidence interval 0.1-0.5; p < 0.001) was the only significant sociodemographic predictor of consulting an ophthalmologist when confronted with an eye disorder The participants' main reasons for not consulting an ophthalmologist were ignorance (190; 56.5%), cost (199; 59.2%), and restricted spatial access (228; 67.9%). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the respondents chose an inappropriate eyecare pathway in the event of an eye disorder. The reported barriers to appropriate pathway selection are amenable to community-based eye health education, enhanced affordability, and even distribution of eyecare services. Integrating other alternative care pathways into orthodox eye care should be considered.