RESUMEN
Although oxytocin may provide a novel therapeutics for the core features of autism spectrum disorder (ASD), previous results regarding the efficacy of repeated or higher dose oxytocin are controversial, and the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The current study is aimed to clarify whether repeated oxytocin alter plasma cytokine levels in relation to clinical changes of autism social core feature. Here we analyzed cytokine concentrations using comprehensive proteomics of plasmas of 207 adult males with high-functioning ASD collected from two independent multi-center large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs): Testing effects of 4-week intranasal administrations of TTA-121 (A novel oxytocin spray with enhanced bioavailability: 3U, 6U, 10U, or 20U/day) and placebo in the crossover discovery RCT; 48U/day Syntocinon or placebo in the parallel-group verification RCT. Among the successfully quantified 17 cytokines, 4 weeks TTA-121 6U (the peak dose for clinical effects) significantly elevated IL-7 (9.74, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.59 to 15.90, False discovery rate corrected P (PFDR) < 0.001), IL-9 (56.64, 20.46 to 92.82, PFDR < 0.001) and MIP-1b (18.27, 4.96 to 31.57, PFDR < 0.001) compared with placebo. Inverted U-shape dose-response relationships peaking at TTA-121 6U were consistently observed for all these cytokines (IL-7: P < 0.001; IL-9: P < 0.001; MIP-1b: P = 0.002). Increased IL-7 and IL-9 in participants with ASD after 4 weeks TTA-121 6U administration compared with placebo was verified in the confirmatory analyses in the dataset before crossover (PFDR < 0.001). Furthermore, the changes in all these cytokines during 4 weeks of TTA-121 10U administration revealed associations with changes in reciprocity score, the original primary outcome, observed during the same period (IL-7: Coefficient = -0.05, -0.10 to 0.003, P = 0.067; IL-9: -0.01, -0.02 to -0.003, P = 0.005; MIP-1b: -0.02, -0.04 to -0.007, P = 0.005). These findings provide the first evidence for a role of interaction between oxytocin and neuroinflammation in the change of ASD core social features, and support the potential role of this interaction as a novel therapeutic seed. Trial registration: UMIN000015264, NCT03466671/UMIN000031412.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno del Espectro Autista , Trastorno Autístico , Adulto , Masculino , Humanos , Oxitocina , Trastorno Autístico/tratamiento farmacológico , Citocinas , Interleucina-7 , Interleucina-9/uso terapéutico , Método Doble Ciego , Trastorno del Espectro Autista/tratamiento farmacológico , Administración Intranasal , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to compare treatment satisfaction with two dosing regimens (two teriparatide [TPTD] self-injection systems) in osteoporosis patients at high risk of fracture. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this open-label crossover randomized trial comparing self-injected once-daily (1/D)-TPTD with self-injected twice-weekly (2/W)-TPTD, three satisfaction variables were evaluated by questionnaire for 2 years. The primary endpoint was overall satisfaction and secondary endpoints were satisfaction with treatment effectiveness and with utility of the self-injection device. Changes in quality of life (QOL) assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension, pain assessed by visual analogue scale (VAS), and anthropometric parameters were also analyzed. Safety was evaluated based on the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs). RESULTS: The 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups consisted of 180 (75.9 ± 7.3 years) and 179 (age: 75.5 ± 6.9 years) patients, respectively. After 26 weeks of treatment, no significant between-group difference in the persistence rate (79.4% vs 72.6% in the 1/D-TPTD and 2/W-TPTD groups, respectively), distributions of overall satisfaction scores, and satisfaction with treatment (p > 0.05) were observed. However, several items of satisfaction with the utility of the injection device were significantly higher in the 2/W-TPTD group (p < 0.05). Statistical improvements from baseline values were observed in QOL and pain VAS in both groups (p < 0.05). No serious AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: The between-group similarity of overall treatment satisfaction and effectiveness scores and between-group difference in satisfaction with the utility of the self-injection device was useful information for real-world treatment of osteoporosis. Both medication regimens were well tolerated.
RESUMEN
Background: Clinical data management (CDM) collects, integrates, and makes data available. It plays a vital role in clinical research. However, there are few opportunities for Japanese clinical data managers to learn about its systematic framework, particularly in academic research organizations. While Japanese-language CDM training exists, its effectiveness in a Japanese context requires clarification. Objectives: We aimed to develop an advanced program of instruction for professionals to understand CDM and to determine the effectiveness of the training program. Methods and results: We developed an advanced program including risk-based monitoring and the Clinical Data Interchange Standards Consortium on a trial basis for clinical data managers to provide them with a comprehensive understanding of CDM. Fifty-two people attended the program and reported that they were highly satisfied with it. Conclusions: To provide comprehensive CDM training in Japan, it is imperative to continue improving the content and develop an advanced program. Due to the recent tightening of clinical research regulations and the development and dissemination of various systems for conducting clinical research, the competency-based educational program requires further development.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While concomitant medications can affect the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), few studies have assessed associations of concomitant medications with the occurrence and profile of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). METHODS: This study assessed associations of concomitant medication (antibiotics/proton pump inhibitors (PPIs)/corticosteroids)-based risk model termed the "drug score" with survival and the occurrence and profile of irAEs in 851 patients with advanced cancer treated with ICIs (with or without other agents). The study also assessed the survival impact of the occurrence of irAEs, using a landmark analysis to minimize immortal time bias. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard analyses were conducted for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The drug score classified patients into three risk groups, with significantly different PFS and OS. Notably, the score's predictive capability was better in patients treated with ICIs only than in those treated with ICIs plus other agents. The landmark analysis showed that patients who developed irAEs had significantly longer PFS and OS than those without irAEs. Generally, concomitant medications were negatively associated with the occurrence of irAEs, especially endocrine irAEs, whereas PPI use was positively associated with gastrointestinal irAEs, as an exception. CONCLUSIONS: Using a large pan-cancer cohort, the prognostic ability of the drug score was validated, as well as that of the occurrence of irAEs. The negative association between concomitant medications and irAE occurrence could be an indirect measure of the detrimental effect on the immune system induced by one or more concomitant drugs.
Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias , Humanos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Antibacterianos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Inhibidores de la Bomba de ProtonesRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine prognostic factors of virus-associated pneumonia other than coronavirus disease 2019. METHODS: We retrospectively studied patients suffering from virus-associated community-acquired pneumonia, and who were admitted to Saitama Cardiovascular and Respiratory Center from 2002 to 2020. Prognostic factors were analyzed by univariable and multivariable regression analysis of patient demographics, laboratory data, chest imaging, severity on admission, and initial treatment. PATIENTS: HIV-positive patients, those with non-resected lung cancer or receiving chemotherapy, and those with COVID-19 were excluded. Included were 363 patients diagnosed by nucleic acid amplification method, paired sera, and rapid diagnostic tests. RESULTS: A CURB-65 score of ≥3 was significant by univariable analysis for 60-day mortality but was nonsignificant by multivariable analysis. The poor prognostic factors that were significant by multivariable analysis (p < 0.05) included immunosuppressive state due to systemic corticosteroid or immunosuppressant administration, acute kidney injury on admission, and corticosteroid administration initiated within 5 days or 5 days to 2 weeks from onset. CONCLUSION: A CURB-65 score of ≥3, which is considered to indicate severe pneumonia, was of limited value for predicting mortality of virus-associated pneumonia. We showed patients' underlying diseases and complications to be independent factors of poor prognosis for 60-day mortality. Timing of the initiation of corticosteroid administration remains to be elucidated.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones Comunitarias Adquiridas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Neumonía , Adulto , Humanos , COVID-19/complicaciones , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Recent advancements in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment have significantly improved primary therapy outcomes owing to the emergence of various molecular targeted therapies and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, for Kirsten rat sarcoma viral antigen (KRAS) mutations, molecular targeted drugs, such as sotorasib, are not applicable as first-line treatments, and the optimal primary treatment remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of ICI combination therapy as first-line treatment for KRAS-mutant NSCLC. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search for phase 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that presented data on KRAS mutation status in advanced NSCLC. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A random-effects network meta-analysis was conducted to perform direct and indirect comparisons among treatment groups. RESULTS: Six RCTs were eligible for inclusion. In the network meta-analysis for KRAS-mutant NSCLC, Chemo + bevacizumab (Bev) + ICI was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.38, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.22-0.64), followed by Chemo + ICI + ICI (HR 0.66, 95% CI 0.47-0.93) and Chemo + ICI (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49-0.91). The most beneficial effect on OS was observed with Chemo + Bev + ICI (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.34-0.73), followed by Chemo + ICI + ICI (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.87) and Chemo + ICI (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56-0.92). Regarding OS in wild-type KRAS, ICI + ICI (HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.50-1.07) produced the most favorable effects, followed by Chemo + ICI (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99). CONCLUSION: The efficacy of Chemo + Bev + ICI is potentially high for improving PFS and OS in KRAS-mutant NSCLC. In advanced NSCLC, the presence or absence of KRAS mutations may need to be considered when administering first-line treatment.
RESUMEN
AIMS: The utilization of long-term effect of internet of things (IoT) on glycemic control is controversial. This trial aimed to examine the effect of an IoT-based approach for type 2 diabetes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled trial enrolled 1,159 adults aged 20-74 years with type 2 diabetes with a HbA1c of 6.0-8.9% (42-74 mmol/mol), who were using a smartphone on a daily basis were randomly assigned to either the IoT-based approach group (ITG) or the control group (CTG). The ITG were supervised to utilize an IoT automated system that demonstrates a summary of lifelogging data (weight, blood pressure, and physical activities) and provides feedback messages that promote behavioral changes in both diet and exercise. The primary end point was a HbA1c change over 52 weeks. RESULTS: Among the patients, 581 were assigned to the ITG and 578 were in the CTG. The changes in HbA1c from baseline to the final measurement at 52 weeks [mean (standard deviation)] were -0.000 (0.6225)% in ITG and - 0.006 (0.6449)% in CTG, respectively (P = 0.8766). In the per protocol set, including ITG using the IoT system almost daily and CTG, excluding those using the application almost daily, the difference in HbA1c from baseline to 52 weeks were -0.098 (0.579)% and 0.027 (0.571)%, respectively (P = 0.0201). We observed no significant difference in the adverse event profile between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The IoT-based approach did not reduce HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes. IoT-based intervention using data on the daily glycemic control and HbA1c level may be required to improve glycemic control.
RESUMEN
With the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, there is growing interest in utilizing adaptive platform clinical trials (APTs), in which multiple drugs are compared with a single common control group, such as a placebo or standard-of-care group. APTs evaluate several drugs for one disease and accept additions or exclusions of drugs as the trials progress; however, little is known about the efficiency of APTs over multiple stand-alone trials. In this study, we simulated the total development period, total sample size, and statistical operating characteristics of APTs and multiple stand-alone trials in drug development settings for hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Simulation studies using selected scenarios reconfirmed several findings regarding the efficiency of APTs. The APTs without staggered addition of drugs showed a shorter total development period than stand-alone trials, but the difference rapidly diminished if patient's enrollment was accelerated during the trials owing to the spread of infection. APTs with staggered addition of drugs still have the possibility of reducing the total development period compared with multiple stand-alone trials in some cases. Our study demonstrated that APTs could improve efficiency relative to multiple stand-alone trials regarding the total development period and total sample size without undermining statistical validity; however, this improvement varies depending on the speed of patient enrollment, sample size, presence/absence of family-wise error rate adjustment, allocation ratio between drug and placebo groups, and interval of staggered addition of drugs. Given the complexity of planning and implementing APT, the decision to implement APT during a pandemic must be made carefully.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Simulación por Computador , Desarrollo de Medicamentos , Humanos , Desarrollo de Medicamentos/métodos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Tamaño de la Muestra , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Adaptativos como Asunto , Proyectos de InvestigaciónRESUMEN
Extracorporeal blood purification with polymyxin B immobilized fiber column direct hemoperfusion (PMX-DHP), is reported to be effective in treating COVID-19 pneumonitis with oxygen demand. This multicenter prospective study evaluated the efficacy and safety of PMX-DHP in oxygen-requiring patients with COVID-19 admitted between September 28, 2020, and March 31, 2022. The primary endpoint was the percentage of clinical improvement 15 days after treatment. The secondary endpoint was the percentage of worsened disease status. Data from the COVID-19 patient registry were used for the synthetic control group. The improvement rate on Day 15 did not differ between PMX-treated patients and controls; however, the deterioration rate was 0.38 times lower in the PMX-treated group, and the death rates on Day 29 were 0 and 11.1% in the PMX-treated and control groups, respectively. The PMX group showed a 0.73 times higher likelihood for reduced intensive care demand, as 16.7% of PMX-treated patients and 22.8% of controls worsened. After treatment blood oxygenation improved, urinary ß2-microglobulin and liver-type fatty acid-binding protein showed significant decreases, and IL-6 decreased once during treatment but did not persist. In this study, PMX treatment effectively prevented the worsening of COVID-19 pathology, accompanied by improved oxygenation. PMX treatment to remove activated cells may effectively improve patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hemoperfusión , Polimixina B , Humanos , COVID-19/terapia , Polimixina B/administración & dosificación , Polimixina B/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Hemoperfusión/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Oxígeno , Terapia por Inhalación de Oxígeno/métodos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificaciónRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate if combining low muscle mass with additional body composition abnormalities, such as myosteatosis or adiposity, could improve survival prediction accuracy in a large cohort of gastrointestinal and genitourinary malignancies. METHODS: In total, 2015 patients with surgically-treated gastrointestinal or genitourinary cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Skeletal muscle index, skeletal muscle radiodensity, and visceral/subcutaneous adipose tissue index were determined. The primary outcome was overall survival determined by hospital records. Multivariate Cox hazard models were used to identify independent predictors for poor survival. C-statistics were assessed to quantify the prognostic capability of the models with or without incorporating body composition parameters. RESULTS: Survival curves were significantly demarcated by all 4 measures. Skeletal muscle radiodensity was associated with non-cancer-related deaths but not with cancer-specific survival. The survival outcome of patients with low skeletal muscle index was poor (5-year OS; 65.2%), especially when present in combination with low skeletal muscle radiodensity (5-year overall survival; 50.2%). All examined body composition parameters were independent predictors of lower overall survival. The model for predicting overall survival without incorporating body composition parameters had a c-index of 0.68 but increased to 0.71 with the inclusion of low skeletal muscle index and 0.72 when incorporating both low skeletal muscle index and low skeletal muscle radiodensity/visceral adipose tissue index/subcutaneous adipose tissue index. CONCLUSION: Patients exhibiting both low skeletal muscle index and other body composition abnormalities, particularly low skeletal muscle radiodensity, had poorer overall survival. Models incorporating multiple body composition prove valuable for mortality prediction in oncology settings.
Asunto(s)
Composición Corporal , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Músculo Esquelético , Neoplasias Urogenitales , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Neoplasias Urogenitales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/mortalidad , Estudios de Cohortes , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Análisis de Supervivencia , Grasa Intraabdominal , AdultoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vaccination against mpox (formerly known as monkeypox), an infectious disease caused by the monkeypox virus (MPXV), is needed to prevent outbreaks and consequent public health concerns. The LC16m8 vaccine, a dried cell-cultured proliferative live attenuated vaccinia virusbased vaccine, was approved in Japan against smallpox and mpox. However, its immunogenicity and efficacy against MPXV have not been fully assessed. We assessed the safety and immunogenicity of LC16m8 against MPXV in healthy adults. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm study that included 50 participants who were followed up for 168 days postvaccination. The primary end point was the neutralizing antibody seroconversion rate against MPXVs, including the Zr599 and Liberia strains, on day 28. The secondary end points included the vaccine "take" (major cutaneous reaction) rate, neutralizing titer kinetics against MPXV and vaccinia virus (LC16m8) strains, and safety outcomes. RESULTS: Seroconversion rates on day 28 were 72% (36 of 50), 70% (35 of 50), and 88% (44 of 50) against the Zr599 strain, the Liberia strain, and LC16m8, respectively. On day 168, seroconversion rates decreased to 30% (15 of 50) against the Zr599 and Liberia strains and to 76% (38 of 50) against LC16m8. The vaccine "take" (broad definition) rate on day 14 was 94% (46 of 49). Adverse events (AEs), including common solicited cutaneous reactions, occurred in 98% (45 of 48) of participants; grade 3 severity AEs occurred in 16% (8 of 50). No deaths, serious AEs, or mpox onset incidences were observed up to day 168. CONCLUSIONS: The LC16m8 vaccine generated neutralizing antibody responses against MPXV in healthy adults. No serious safety concerns occurred with LC16m8 use. (Funded by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan; Japan Registry of Clinical Trials number, jRCTs031220171.)
Asunto(s)
Mpox , Vacuna contra Viruela , Vacunas , Adulto , Humanos , Anticuerpos Neutralizantes , Antígenos ViralesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Results from the double-blind phase 2 DESIRES trial showed that rituximab improves skin thickening in systemic sclerosis. Here, we present the findings of a subsequent 24-week open-label extension phase. METHODS: Patients with systemic sclerosis aged 20-79 years, who fulfilled the 2013 American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria, with a baseline modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) of 10 or greater were enrolled into the DESIRES trial, which was an investigator-initiated, phase 2, double-blind, randomised controlled trial of rituximab versus placebo conducted at four sites in Japan. After completion of 24 weeks of treatment with either rituximab or placebo, patients in both groups received a further 24 weeks of rituximab (375 mg/m2 intravenously, once per week for 4 consecutive weeks) in an open-label extension. The primary endpoint of the double-blind trial was mRSS at week 24, which was reassessed at week 48 in the open-label extension. All endpoints were exploratory. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; efficacy analyses included those who had received at least one dose and undergone efficacy assessment at 24 weeks in the double-blind phase and at 48 weeks in the extension phase. The DESIRES study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04274257, and UMIN-CTR, UMIN000030139. FINDINGS: Between Nov 28, 2017, and Nov 6, 2018, 56 patients were randomly assigned to either rituximab (n=28) or placebo (n=28) in a double-blind study. 26 patients initially assigned to rituximab and 20 assigned to placebo transitioned to the open-label extension and all received at least one dose of rituximab; 24 participants in the rituximab-rituximab group and 19 in the placebo-rituximab group completed the extension phase. In the rituximab-rituximab group, there was an improvement in mRSS from baseline at week 24 (-5·81 [SD 3·16]), with further improvement at week 48 (-8·88 [3·10]). In the placebo-rituximab group, mRSS worsened at week 24 (2·14 [SD 5·51]) but improved at the week 48 assessment (-6·05 [4·43]). One patient each in the rituximab-rituximab and placebo-rituximab groups experienced one serious adverse event during the open-label phase (cholangitis and pneumococcal pneumonia, respectively). There were no deaths during follow-up. INTERPRETATION: Two courses of rituximab is a safe treatment that can provide sustained improvement in systemic sclerosis for at least 48 weeks. FUNDING: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development. TRANSLATION: For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.
Asunto(s)
Esclerodermia Sistémica , Piel , Humanos , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Método Doble Ciego , Esclerodermia Sistémica/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Systemic sclerosis is a connective tissue disease characterised by multiorgan fibrosis with an autoimmune background and poor prognosis. Although a few drugs have shown some efficacy in treating the disease, there remains a great unmet medical need. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of rituximab in patients with systemic sclerosis. METHODS: We did a double-blind, investigator-initiated, randomised, placebo-controlled trial at four hospitals in Japan. Patients aged 20-79 years, who fulfilled the 2013 American College of Rheumatology and European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for systemic sclerosis, with a modified Rodnan Skin Score (mRSS) of 10 or greater, and an expected survival of at least 6 months were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous rituximab (375 mg/m2) or placebo once per week for 4 weeks. Patients and investigators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary endpoint was the absolute change in mRSS 24 weeks after initiation of study treatment, measured in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment and had one endpoint assessment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04274257, and UMIN-CTR, UMIN000030139. FINDINGS: Between Nov 28, 2017, and Nov 6, 2018, 80 individuals were screened and 56 (70%) were enrolled and randomly assigned; 51 (91%) were women and five (9%) were men. 27 (96%) of 28 patients in the rituximab group and 22 (79%) of 28 patients in the placebo group received at least one dose of their allocated treatment and completed 24 weeks of follow-up. The absolute change in mRSS 24 weeks after initiation of study treatment was lower in the rituximab group than in the placebo group (-6·30 in the rituximab group vs 2·14 in the placebo group; difference -8·44 [95% CI -11·00 to -5·88]; p<0·0001). Adverse events were similar in both groups and occurred in 28 (100%) of 28 patients in the rituximab group and 23 (88%) of 26 patients in the placebo group. One serious adverse event leading to treatment discontinuation occurred in one patient in each group (decreased serum albumin in the rituximab group and biliary enzyme increase in the placebo group). The most common adverse event was upper respiratory infection, which occurred in 11 patients (39%) in the rituximab group and ten patients (38%) in the placebo group. There were no deaths during follow-up. INTERPRETATION: Rituximab appears to be an effective and safe treatment for systemic sclerosis. Although this study has some limitations, this is the first clinical trial to show efficacy of rituximab with skin sclerosis as the primary endpoint. FUNDING: Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development (AMED), Zenyaku Kogyo. TRANSLATION: For the Japanese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.