Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 57(1): 47-55, 2014 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24316945

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A multimodality approach to patients with locally recurrent rectal cancer that includes surgery is associated with a significant survival advantage when tumor-free margins are achieved. Patients with advanced tumors will require extended sacropelvic resection to optimize oncologic outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the safety, feasibility, and oncologic outcomes of extended sacropelvic resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer at our institution. DESIGN: A retrospective review identified 406 patients who had surgery for locally recurrent rectal cancer between 1997 and 2007. From this group, all patients who underwent a curative-intent sacropelvic resection were analyzed. SETTINGS: This investigation was conducted at an academic tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Thirty patients (24 male) were identified. Median age was 59 years (range, 25-84). Operations were performed for a first local recurrence (n = 24), a second recurrence (n = 5) and for a third recurrence (n = 1). INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-six patients underwent neoadjuvant radiation, and 20 received intraoperative radiation therapy. All patients underwent extended sacropelvic resection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcomes measured were early (<30 days) and late (>30 days) surgical complications. Overall and disease-free survivals were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier technique. RESULTS: Margin-negative resection was achieved in 93%. The most proximal level of spinal transection was the fourth lumbar space, and 4 patients underwent lower extremity amputation. There was no mortality, and early morbidity was seen in 76%. Median follow-up was 2.7 years (range, 2 months to 10.8 years). Overall survival at 2 and 5 years was 86% and 46%. Disease-free survival at 2 and 5 years was 79% and 43%. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature and the limited number of patients. CONCLUSIONS: We found extended sacropelvic resection for locally recurrent rectal cancer to be feasible and safe with overall and disease-free survival rates in comparison with survival rates seen in patients undergoing nonsacropelvic resections for locally recurrent rectal cancer.


Asunto(s)
Hemipelvectomía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/cirugía , Exenteración Pélvica , Neoplasias del Recto/cirugía , Sacro/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/radioterapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias del Recto/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Recto/radioterapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
2.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 18(2): 363-8, 2014 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24165871

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Early small bowel obstruction following abdominal surgery presents a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Abdominal imaging using Gastrografin has been shown to have diagnostic and therapeutic properties when used in the setting of small bowel obstruction outside the early postoperative period (>6 weeks). We hypothesize that a GG challenge will reduce need for re-exploration. METHODS: Patients with early small bowel obstruction who underwent a Gastrografin challenge between 2010 and 2012 were case controlled, based on age ±5 years, sex, and operative approach to an equal number of patients that did not receive the challenge. RESULTS: One hundred sixteen patients received a Gastrografin challenge. There were 87 males in each group with an average age of 62 years. A laparoscopic approach in the index operation was done equally between groups (18 vs. 18 %). There was no difference between groups in operative re-exploration rates (14 vs. 10 %); however, hospital duration of stay was greater in patients who received Gastrografin challenge (17 vs. 13 days). Two in hospital deaths occurred, one in each group, both of infectious complications. CONCLUSION: Use of the Gastrografin challenge in the immediate postoperative period appeared to be safe. There was no difference, however, in the rate of re-exploration between groups.


Asunto(s)
Medios de Contraste , Diatrizoato de Meglumina , Obstrucción Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Anciano , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Humanos , Obstrucción Intestinal/etiología , Obstrucción Intestinal/cirugía , Intestino Delgado , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Radiografía , Reoperación , Factores de Tiempo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA