Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 57
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Lancet ; 400(10351): 493-501, 2022 08 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35964609

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-transfusion-dependent thalassaemia (NTDT), although they do not require regular blood transfusions for survival, can still accrue a heavy burden of comorbidities. No approved disease-modifying therapies exist for these patients. We aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of mitapivat (Agios Pharmaceuticals, Cambridge, MA, USA), a pyruvate kinase activator, in adults with non-transfusion-dependent (NTD) α-thalassaemia or NTD ß-thalassaemia. METHODS: In this open-label, multicentre, phase 2 study, patients were recruited from four academic clinical study sites in Oakland, CA, and Boston, MA, USA; Toronto, ON, Canada; and London, UK. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years or older, with NTDT (including ß-thalassaemia with or without α-globin gene mutations, haemoglobin E ß-thalassaemia, or α-thalassaemia), and a baseline haemoglobin concentration of 10·0 g/dL or lower. During a 24-week core period, mitapivat was administered orally at 50 mg twice daily for the first 6 weeks followed by an escalation to 100 mg twice daily for 18 weeks thereafter. The primary endpoint was haemoglobin response (a ≥1·0 g/dL increase in haemoglobin concentration from baseline at one or more assessments between weeks 4 and 12). Efficacy and safety were assessed in the full analysis set (ie, all patients who received at least one dose of study drug). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03692052, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Dec 28, 2018, and Feb 6, 2020, 27 patients were screened, of whom 20 were enrolled (15 [75%] with ß-thalassaemia and five [25%] with α-thalassaemia) and received mitapivat. The median age of patients was 44 years (IQR 35-56), 15 (75%) of 20 patients were female, five (25%) were male, and ten (50%) identified as Asian. 16 (80% [90% CI 60-93]) of 20 patients had a haemoglobin response (p<0·0001), five (100%) of five with α-thalassaemia and 11 (73%) of 15 with ß-thalassaemia. 17 (85%) patients had a treatment-emergent adverse event, and 13 had a treatment-emergent event that was considered to be treatment related. One serious treatment-emergent adverse event occurred (grade 3 renal impairment), which was considered unrelated to study drug, resulting in discontinuation of treatment. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were initial insomnia (ten [50%] patients), dizziness (six [30%]), and headache (five [25%]). No patients died during the 24-week core period. INTERPRETATION: These efficacy and safety results support the continued investigation of mitapivat for the treatment of both α-thalassaemia and ß-thalassaemia. FUNDING: Agios Pharmaceuticals.


Asunto(s)
Piperazinas , Quinolinas , Talasemia alfa , Talasemia beta , Adulto , Femenino , Hemoglobinas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Piperazinas/efectos adversos , Piruvato Quinasa , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Talasemia alfa/tratamiento farmacológico , Talasemia beta/tratamiento farmacológico
2.
Nephrol Dial Transplant ; 34(7): 1115-1124, 2019 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30380116

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Among patients with nondialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD) and iron-deficiency anemia (IDA), ferric citrate increases hemoglobin and iron parameters and reduces serum phosphate and fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23), a key phosphate-regulating hormone. We conducted post hoc analyses of a phase 3 trial to explore associations between iron replacement, serum phosphate changes and FGF23 regulation. METHODS: We employed multivariable regression and longitudinal mixed-effects models to identify and confirm, respectively, whether baseline demographic and laboratory variables were associated with ferric citrate-induced changes in serum phosphate or FGF23 concentrations. We employed path analyses to determine whether changes in FGF23 concentrations were mediated via changes in serum phosphate and/or transferrin saturation (TSAT). RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 117 and 115 ferric citrate-treated and placebo-treated patients, respectively. At 16 weeks, ferric citrate significantly reduced serum phosphate versus placebo (P = 0.006) only among patients with elevated baseline serum phosphate (≥4.5 mg/dL) and did not reduce serum phosphate among patients with baseline serum phosphate within the population reference range. Ferric citrate reduced intact FGF23 and C-terminal FGF23 partially via changes in TSAT (for C-terminal FGF23) and serum phosphate (for intact FGF23) and partially via unknown/unmeasured mechanisms. CONCLUSIONS: Ferric citrate reduced serum FGF23 concentrations (partially via effects on serum phosphate and iron balance) and did not reduce serum phosphate among patients with baseline serum phosphate concentrations within the population reference range.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Férricos/uso terapéutico , Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Anciano , Anemia Ferropénica/sangre , Anemia Ferropénica/etiología , Biomarcadores/sangre , Método Doble Ciego , Ensayo de Inmunoadsorción Enzimática , Femenino , Factor-23 de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos , Factores de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Fosfatos/sangre , Diálisis Renal , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre
3.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 28(6): 1851-1858, 2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28082519

RESUMEN

Iron deficiency anemia is common and consequential in nondialysis-dependent CKD (NDD-CKD). Efficacy and tolerability of conventional oral iron supplements are mixed; intravenous iron administration associates with finite but important risks. We conducted a randomized double-blind clinical trial in adults with NDD-CKD and iron deficiency anemia to compare the safety and efficacy of oral ferric citrate (n=117) and placebo (n=115). The primary end point was the proportion of patients who achieved a ≥1.0 g/dl increase in hemoglobin at any time during a 16-week randomized period. Patients who completed the 16-week period could also participate in an 8-week open-label extension period. Significantly more patients randomized to ferric citrate achieved the primary end point (61 [52.1%] versus 22 [19.1%] with placebo; P<0.001). All secondary end points reached statistical significance in the ferric citrate group, including the mean relative change in hemoglobin (0.84 g/dl; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 1.10 g/dl; P<0.001) and the proportion of patients who achieved a sustained increase in hemoglobin (≥0.75 g/dl over any 4-week period during the randomized trial; 57 [48.7%] versus 17 [14.8%] with placebo; P<0.001). Rates of serious adverse events were similar in the ferric citrate (12.0%) and placebo groups (11.2%). Gastrointestinal disorders were the most common adverse events, with diarrhea reported in 24 (20.5%) and 19 (16.4%) and constipation in 22 (18.8%) and 15 (12.9%) patients treated with ferric citrate and placebo, respectively. Overall, in patients with NDD-CKD, we found oral ferric citrate to be a safe and efficacious treatment for iron deficiency anemia.


Asunto(s)
Anemia Ferropénica/complicaciones , Anemia Ferropénica/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos Férricos/uso terapéutico , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Método Doble Ciego , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Kidney Int ; 89(4): 753-60, 2016 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26994574

RESUMEN

Updating rather than de novo guideline development now accounts for the majority of guideline activities for many guideline development organizations, including Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO), an international kidney disease guideline development entity that has produced guidelines on kidney diseases since 2008. Increasingly, guideline developers are moving away from updating at fixed intervals in favor of more flexible approaches that use periodic expert assessment of guideline currency (with or without an updated systematic review) to determine the need for updating. Determining the need for guideline updating in an efficient, transparent, and timely manner is challenging, and updating of systematic reviews and guidelines is labor intensive. Ideally, guidelines should be updated dynamically when new evidence indicates a need for a substantive change in the guideline based on a priori criteria. This dynamic updating (sometimes referred to as a living guideline model) can be facilitated with the use of integrated electronic platforms that allow updating of specific recommendations. This report summarizes consensus-based recommendations from a panel of guideline methodology professionals on how to keep KDIGO guidelines up to date.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Renales/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Humanos
5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (12): CD007746, 2015 Dec 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26633102

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Modern immunosuppressive regimens after kidney transplantation usually use a combination of two or three agents of different classes to prevent rejection and maintain graft function. Most frequently, calcineurin-inhibitors (CNI) are combined with corticosteroids and a proliferation-inhibitor, either azathioprine (AZA) or mycophenolic acid (MPA). MPA has largely replaced AZA as a first line agent in primary immunosuppression, as MPA is believed to be of stronger immunosuppressive potency than AZA. However, treatment with MPA is more costly, which calls for a comprehensive assessment of the comparative effects of the two drugs. OBJECTIVES: This review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to look at the benefits and harms of MPA versus AZA in primary immunosuppressive regimens after kidney transplantation. Both agents were compared regarding their efficacy for maintaining graft and patient survival, prevention of acute rejection, maintaining graft function, and their safety, including infections, malignancies and other adverse events. Furthermore, we investigated potential effect modifiers, such as transplantation era and the concomitant immunosuppressive regimen in detail. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Kidney and Transplant's Specialised Register (to 21 September 2015) through contact with the Trials' Search Co-ordinator using search terms relevant to this review. SELECTION CRITERIA: All RCTs about MPA versus AZA in primary immunosuppression after kidney transplantation were included, without restriction on language or publication type. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently determined study eligibility, assessed risk of bias and extracted data from each study. Statistical analyses were performed using the random-effects model and the results were expressed as risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% confidence intervals (CI). MAIN RESULTS: We included 23 studies (94 reports) that involved 3301 participants. All studies tested mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), an MPA, and 22 studies reported at least one outcome relevant for this review. Assessment of methodological quality indicated that important information on factors used to judge susceptibility for bias was infrequently and inconsistently reported.MMF treatment reduced the risk for graft loss including death (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.0) and for death-censored graft loss (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.62 to 0.99, P < 0.05). No statistically significant difference for MMF versus AZA treatment was found for all-cause mortality (16 studies, 2987 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.70 to 1.29). The risk for any acute rejection (22 studies, 3301 participants: RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.73, P < 0.01), biopsy-proven acute rejection (12 studies, 2696 participants: RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.68) and antibody-treated acute rejection (15 studies, 2914 participants: RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.65, P < 0.01) were reduced in MMF treated patients. Meta-regression analyses suggested that the magnitude of risk reduction of acute rejection may be dependent on the control rate (relative risk reduction (RRR) 0.34, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.09, P = 0.08), AZA dose (RRR 1.01, 95% CI 1.00 to 1.01, P = 0.10) and the use of cyclosporin A micro-emulsion (RRR 1.27, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.65, P = 0.07). Pooled analyses failed to show a significant and meaningful difference between MMF and AZA in kidney function measures.Data on malignancies and infections were sparse, except for cytomegalovirus (CMV) infections. The risk for CMV viraemia/syndrome (13 studies, 2880 participants: RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.32) was not statistically significantly different between MMF and AZA treated patients, whereas the likelihood of tissue-invasive CMV disease was greater with MMF therapy (7 studies, 1510 participants: RR 1.70, 95% CI 1.10 to 2.61). Adverse event profiles varied: gastrointestinal symptoms were more likely in MMF treated patients and thrombocytopenia and elevated liver enzymes were more common in AZA treatment. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: MMF was superior to AZA for improvement of graft survival and prevention of acute rejection after kidney transplantation. These benefits must be weighed against potential harms such as tissue-invasive CMV disease. However, assessment of the evidence on safety outcomes was limited due to rare events in the observation periods of the studies (e.g. malignancies) and inconsistent reporting and definitions (e.g. infections, adverse events). Thus, balancing benefits and harms of the two drugs remains a major task of the transplant physician to decide which agent the individual patient should be started on.


Asunto(s)
Azatioprina/uso terapéutico , Rechazo de Injerto/prevención & control , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Trasplante de Riñón , Ácido Micofenólico/análogos & derivados , Ciclosporina/uso terapéutico , Rechazo de Injerto/mortalidad , Humanos , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Ácido Micofenólico/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
6.
Ann Intern Med ; 160(2): 111-21, 2014 Jan 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24592496

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous systematic reviews of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) used for primary prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) concluded that ICDs are less effective in women and the elderly. PURPOSE: To examine ICD effectiveness for primary prevention of SCD across subgroups by sex, age, New York Heart Association class, left ventricular ejection fraction, heart failure, left bundle branch block, QRS interval, time since myocardial infarction, blood urea nitrogen level, and diabetes. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through 3 September 2013 with no language restriction. STUDY SELECTION: Researchers screened articles for studies comparing ICD versus no ICD for primary prevention. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted about study design, patients, interventions, mortality and SCD outcomes, subgroup characteristics, and subgroup effects. Quality of subgroup analyses was determined by consensus. Relative odds ratios comparing subgroup effects were calculated, and random-effects model meta-analyses were conducted on these ratios. DATA SYNTHESIS: Meta-analysis of 14 studies showed a decrease in deaths and SCDs due to ICD treatment. Ten studies provided subgroup analyses. Nine studies compared ICD versus no ICD, whereas one compared cardiac resynchronization therapy plus a defibrillator versus no ICD. Within-study interaction tests and across-study meta-analyses yielded weak evidence that did not show differences for all-cause mortality in subgroups by sex, age, and QRS interval. The evidence was indeterminate for other evaluated subgroups because of a paucity of data. LIMITATION: Many subgroup analyses were underpowered, which may have resulted in false-negative findings. CONCLUSION: Weak evidence fails to show differences for all-cause mortality in subgroups of sex, age, and QRS interval. Evidence is indeterminate for all-cause mortality in the other subgroups and for SCD. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Súbita Cardíaca/prevención & control , Desfibriladores Implantables , Prevención Primaria , Factores de Edad , Causas de Muerte , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Factores de Riesgo , Factores Sexuales
7.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 63(6): 1007-18, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24703720

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Accurate assessment of kidney function is important for the management of solid-organ transplant recipients. In other clinical populations, glomerular filtration rate (GFR) most commonly is estimated using the CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) creatinine or the 4-variable MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) Study equation. The accuracy of these equations compared with other GFR estimating equations in transplant recipients has not been carefully studied. STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic test study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: Solid-organ transplant recipients longer than 6 months posttransplantation from 5 clinical populations (N=3,622, including recipients of kidney [53%], liver [35%], and other or multiple organs [12%]). INDEX TEST: Estimated GFR (eGFR) using creatinine-based GFR estimating equations identified from a systematic review of the literature. Performance of the CKD-EPI creatinine and the MDRD Study equations was compared with alternative equations. REFERENCE TEST: Measured GFR (mGFR) from urinary clearance of iothalamate or plasma clearance of iohexol. MEASUREMENTS: Error (difference between mGFR and eGFR) expressed as P30 (proportion of absolute percent error <30%) and mean absolute error. RESULTS: We identified 26 GFR estimating equations. Mean mGFR was 55.1±22.7 (SD) mL/min/1.73 m(2). P30 and mean absolute error for the CKD-EPI and the MDRD Study equations were 78.9% (99.6% CI, 76.9%-80.8%) for both and 10.6 (99.6% CI, 10.1-11.1) versus 11.0 (99.6% CI, 10.5-11.5) mL/min/1.73 m(2), respectively; these equations were more accurate than any of the alternative equations (P <0.001 for all pairwise comparisons for both measures). They performed better than or as well as the alternative equations in most subgroups defined by demographic and clinical characteristics, including type of transplanted organ. LIMITATIONS: Study population included few nonwhites and people with solid-organ transplants other than liver and kidneys. CONCLUSIONS: The CKD-EPI creatinine and the MDRD Study equations perform better than the alternative creatinine-based estimating equations in solid-organ transplant recipients. They can be used for clinical management.


Asunto(s)
Tasa de Filtración Glomerular/fisiología , Enfermedades Renales/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Renal/métodos , Hepatopatías/fisiopatología , Trasplante de Órganos , Adulto , Anciano , Creatinina/sangre , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
8.
J Gen Intern Med ; 29(4): 670-9, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24442332

RESUMEN

Many patients of all ages have multiple conditions, yet clinicians often lack explicit guidance on how to approach clinical decision-making for such people. Most recommendations from clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) focus on the management of single diseases, and may be harmful or impractical for patients with multimorbidity. A major barrier to the development of guidance for people with multimorbidity stems from the fact that the evidence underlying CPGs derives from studies predominantly focused on the management of a single disease. In this paper, the investigators from the Improving Guidelines for Multimorbid Patients Study Group present consensus-based recommendations for guideline developers to make guidelines more useful for the care of people with multimorbidity. In an iterative process informed by review of key literature and experience, we drafted a list of issues and possible approaches for addressing important coexisting conditions in each step of the guideline development process, with a focus on considering relevant interactions between the conditions, their treatments and their outcomes. The recommended approaches address consideration of coexisting conditions at all major steps in CPG development, from nominating and scoping the topic, commissioning the work group, refining key questions, ranking importance of outcomes, conducting systematic reviews, assessing quality of evidence and applicability, summarizing benefits and harms, to formulating recommendations and grading their strength. The list of issues and recommendations was reviewed and refined iteratively by stakeholders. This framework acknowledges the challenges faced by CPG developers who must make complex judgments in the absence of high-quality or direct evidence. These recommendations require validation through implementation, evaluation and refinement.


Asunto(s)
Comorbilidad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/normas , Atención al Paciente/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Congresos como Asunto/normas , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Humanos , Atención al Paciente/métodos
9.
Ann Intern Med ; 159(3): 185-94, 2013 Aug 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23922064

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend that adults with hypertension self-monitor their blood pressure (BP). PURPOSE: To summarize evidence about the effectiveness of self-measured blood pressure (SMBP) monitoring in adults with hypertension. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE (inception to 8 February 2013) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (fourth quarter 2012). STUDY SELECTION: 52 prospective comparative studies of SMBP monitoring with or without additional support versus usual care or an alternative SMBP monitoring intervention in persons with hypertension. DATA EXTRACTION: Data on population, interventions, BP, other outcomes, and study method were extracted. Random-effects model meta-analyses were done. DATA SYNTHESIS: For SMBP monitoring alone versus usual care (26 comparisons), moderate-strength evidence supports a lower BP with SMBP monitoring at 6 months (summary net difference, -3.9 mm Hg and -2.4 mm Hg for systolic BP and diastolic BP) but not at 12 months. For SMBP monitoring plus additional support versus usual care (25 comparisons), high-strength evidence supports a lower BP with use of SMBP monitoring, ranging from -3.4 to -8.9 mm Hg for systolic BP and from -1.9 to -4.4 mm Hg for diastolic BP, at 12 months in good-quality studies. For SMBP monitoring plus additional support versus SMBP monitoring alone or with less intense additional support (13 comparisons), low-strength evidence fails to support a difference. Across all comparisons, evidence for clinical outcomes is insufficient. For other surrogate or intermediate outcomes, low-strength evidence fails to show differences. LIMITATION: Clinical heterogeneity in protocols for SMBP monitoring, additional support, BP targets, and management; follow-up of 1 year or less in most studies, with sparse clinical outcome data. CONCLUSION: Self-measured BP monitoring with or without additional support lowers BP compared with usual care, but the BP effect beyond 12 months and long-term benefits remain uncertain. Additional support enhances the BP-lowering effect. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality.


Asunto(s)
Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Hipertensión/diagnóstico , Hipertensión/terapia , Adulto , Presión Sanguínea , Investigación sobre la Eficacia Comparativa , Consejo , Humanos , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Apoyo Social
10.
Ann Intern Med ; 158(8): 596-603, 2013 Apr 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23588748

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk for kidney failure, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality. Accurate models are needed to predict the individual risk for these outcomes. PURPOSE: To systematically review risk prediction models for kidney failure, cardiovascular events, and death in patients with CKD. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE search of English-language articles published from 1966 to November 2012. STUDY SELECTION: Cohort studies that examined adults with any stage of CKD who were not receiving dialysis and had not had a transplant; had at least 1 year of follow-up; and reported on a model that predicted the risk for kidney failure, cardiovascular events, or all-cause mortality. DATA EXTRACTION: Reviewers extracted data on study design, population characteristics, modeling methods, metrics of model performance, risk of bias, and clinical usefulness. DATA SYNTHESIS: Thirteen studies describing 23 models were found. Eight studies (11 models) involved kidney failure, 5 studies (6 models) involved all-cause mortality, and 3 studies (6 models) involved cardiovascular events. Measures of estimated glomerular filtration rate or serum creatinine level were included in 10 studies (17 models), and measures of proteinuria were included in 9 studies (15 models). Only 2 studies (4 models) met the criteria for clinical usefulness, of which 1 study (3 models) presented reclassification indices with clinically useful risk categories. LIMITATION: A validated risk-of-bias tool and comparisons of the performance of different models in the same validation population were lacking. CONCLUSION: Accurate, externally validated models for predicting risk for kidney failure in patients with CKD are available and ready for clinical testing. Further development of models for cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality is needed. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: None.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/etiología , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Modelos Estadísticos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/mortalidad , Sesgo , Causas de Muerte , Humanos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo
11.
J Low Genit Tract Dis ; 18(3): 218-27, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24477173

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: We examined the diagnostic performance of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) tests on cervical cytology for precancerous lesions or cancer on cervical histology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A search was conducted in MEDLINE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Scopus through September 3, 2013. Eleven studies examined FISH tests for telomerase RNA component gene (TERC), myelocytomatosis oncogene (MYC), or human papillomavirus (HPV) type 16 or 18 in samples exhibiting atypical squamous cells of unknown significance (ASC-US) or low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL). None examined HPV-positive, cytologically normal samples. We extracted data on the sensitivity and specificity for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2+ or CIN 3+). RESULTS: Fluorescence in situ hybridization test probes and thresholds varied across studies. Included populations were convenience samples. Only 1 study testing for TERC specified HPV status. In meta-analysis, FISH for TERC in LSIL (9 studies, 1,082 cases) had a summary sensitivity of 0.76 (95% confidence interval = 0.63-0.85) and a summary specificity of 0.78 (95% confidence interval = 0.57-0.91) for CIN 2+. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for TERC in ASC-US (3 studies, 839 cases) showed sensitivities ranging from 0.75 to 1.00 and specificities from 0.87 to 0.93 for CIN 2+. For CIN 3+, sensitivity and specificity appeared similar, although a small number of studies preclude firm conclusions. For FISH tests for HPV, we found only few studies with small sample sizes. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence on FISH testing is limited given the small number of studies for each cytology subgroup and the lack of studies in well-defined screening contexts stratifying participants by HPV status.


Asunto(s)
Genes myc , Papillomavirus Humano 16/aislamiento & purificación , Papillomavirus Humano 18/aislamiento & purificación , Hibridación Fluorescente in Situ/métodos , ARN/análisis , Telomerasa/análisis , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Femenino , Papillomavirus Humano 16/genética , Papillomavirus Humano 18/genética , Humanos , ARN/genética , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Telomerasa/genética
12.
Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens ; 22(6): 599-606, 2013 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24076554

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review highlights recent developments in the management and monitoring of hypertension in adults with chronic kidney disease (CKD), not on dialysis. RECENT FINDINGS: Ambulatory blood pressure (BP) monitoring and self-measured BP monitoring can classify abnormal BP patterns better than clinic BP readings. Self-measured BP monitoring lowers BP and allows tailoring of antihypertensive treatment. Dosing of antihypertensive medication at night improves nocturnal hypertension. Recent guidelines recommend a BP target less than 140/90 mmHg for patients with CKD without proteinuria and less than 130/80 mmHg for those with proteinuria. Lower salt intake is associated with a greater effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockage in CKD. Lifestyle modification resulting in weight loss reduces BP in individuals with CKD. Of overweight or obese CKD patients, 8% report taking weight loss medication, which is a potential safety concern. Weight loss from intensive lifestyle modification in individuals with diabetes prevents CKD. SUMMARY: Although we have effective tools to monitor and lower BP, we still need clinical outcome studies to inform BP targets for specific age groups, types of CKD disease, and comorbidities. How to treat obesity to improve hypertension and other comorbidities in patients with CKD remains another important area of research.


Asunto(s)
Hipertensión/complicaciones , Hipertensión/terapia , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Adulto , Antihipertensivos/administración & dosificación , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Monitoreo Ambulatorio de la Presión Arterial , Espectroscopía Dieléctrica , Dieta Hiposódica , Cronoterapia de Medicamentos , Humanos , Hipertensión/fisiopatología , Programas de Reducción de Peso
14.
Ann Intern Med ; 156(11): 785-95, 2012 06 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22312131

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinical laboratories are increasingly reporting estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by using serum creatinine assays traceable to a standard reference material. PURPOSE: To review the performance of GFR estimating equations to inform the selection of a single equation by laboratories and the interpretation of estimated GFR by clinicians. DATA SOURCES: A systematic search of MEDLINE, without language restriction, between 1999 and 21 October 2011. STUDY SELECTION: Cross-sectional studies in adults that compared the performance of 2 or more creatinine-based GFR estimating equations with a reference GFR measurement. Eligible equations were derived or reexpressed and validated by using creatinine measurements traceable to the standard reference material. DATA EXTRACTION: Reviewers extracted data on study population characteristics, measured GFR, creatinine assay, and equation performance. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eligible studies compared the MDRD (Modification of Diet in Renal Disease) Study and CKD-EPI (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration) equations or modifications thereof. In 12 studies in North America, Europe, and Australia, the CKD-EPI equation performed better at higher GFRs (approximately >60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2)) and the MDRD Study equation performed better at lower GFRs. In 5 of 8 studies in Asia and Africa, the equations were modified to improve their performance by adding a coefficient derived in the local population or removing a coefficient. LIMITATION: Methods of GFR measurement and study populations were heterogeneous. CONCLUSION: Neither the CKD-EPI nor the MDRD Study equation is optimal for all populations and GFR ranges. Using a single equation for reporting requires a tradeoff to optimize performance at either higher or lower GFR ranges. A general practice and public health perspective favors the CKD-EPI equation. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Creatinina/sangre , Tasa de Filtración Glomerular , Australia , Biomarcadores/sangre , Estudios Transversales , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Matemática , América del Norte , Estándares de Referencia
15.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 18(8): 1101-1107, 2023 08 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37055225

RESUMEN

Like all sick children, children with CKD need access to safe and effective medicines that have been formulated and examined specifically for them. Despite legislation in the United States and the European Union that either mandates or incentivizes programs for children, conducting trials to advance the treatment of children continues to prove to be a challenge for drug developers. This is also the case for drug development in children with CKD, where trials face challenges in recruitment and completion and where there remains a substantial time lag between initial approval of a medicinal product for use in adults and completion of studies that result in the addition of pediatric-specific labeling for the same indication. The Kidney Health Initiative commissioned a workgroup of diverse stakeholders ( https://khi.asn-online.org/projects/project.aspx?ID=61 ), including participants from the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency, to think carefully through the challenges in drug development for children with CKD and how to overcome them. This article provides an overview of the regulatory frameworks in the United States and the European Union that govern pediatric drug development, the current landscape of drug development and approval for children with CKD, the challenges in conduct and execution of these drug trials, and the progress that has been made to facilitate drug development for children with CKD.


Asunto(s)
Industria Farmacéutica , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica , Adulto , Niño , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Desarrollo de Medicamentos , Unión Europea , United States Food and Drug Administration , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Aprobación de Drogas
16.
Curr Opin Cardiol ; 27(4): 370-3, 2012 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22525328

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Major guidelines recommend a blood pressure (BP) target of less than 130/80  mmHg for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) even though the optimal BP target in this population is unclear. This review summarizes the evidence on BP target in CKD and highlights recent pertinent publications. RECENT FINDINGS: Clinical trials in CKD have not definitively shown that setting a BP target that is lower than the standard target of less than 140/90  mmHg provides additional benefit for important clinical outcomes. However, subgroup analyses from the recently published posttrial cohort of the African-American Study of kidney disease and a systematic review of BP target trials in CKD suggest that lower than the standard BP target may be beneficial in patients with proteinuria level of more than 300 or 1000  mg/day. SUMMARY: Evidence supports a BP target of less than 140/90  mmHg in most patients with CKD. A lower target may be chosen in CKD patients with proteinuria after individualized risk-benefit assessment. Treatment to a lower target may require greater vigilance to monitor for and avoid possible symptoms and adverse events from hypotension.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Hipertensión/tratamiento farmacológico , Fallo Renal Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Proteinuria/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Hipertensión/complicaciones , Fallo Renal Crónico/etiología , Proteinuria/etiología
17.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 19(1): 81-8, 2012.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22078016

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To develop recommendations in selecting treatments for abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). DESIGN: Clinical practice guidelines. SETTING: Randomized clinical trials compared bleeding, quality of life, pain, sexual health, satisfaction, the need for subsequent surgery, and adverse events between hysterectomy and less-invasive treatment options. PATIENTS: Women with AUB, predominantly from ovulatory disorders and endometrial causes. INTERVENTIONS: On the basis of findings from a systematic review, clinical practice guidelines were developed. Rating the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations followed the Grades for Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: This paper identified few high-quality studies that directly compared uterus-preserving treatments (endometrial ablation, levonorgestrel intrauterine system and systemically administered medications) with hysterectomy. The evidence from these randomized clinical trials demonstrated that there are trade-offs between hysterectomy and uterus-preserving treatments in terms of efficacy and adverse events. CONCLUSION: Selecting an appropriate treatment for AUB requires identifying a woman's most burdensome symptoms and incorporating her values and preferences when weighing the relative benefits and harms of hysterectomy versus other treatment options.


Asunto(s)
Anticonceptivos Femeninos/uso terapéutico , Técnicas de Ablación Endometrial , Histerectomía , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados , Levonorgestrel/uso terapéutico , Hemorragia Uterina/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades del Ovario/complicaciones , Prioridad del Paciente , Enfermedades Uterinas/complicaciones , Hemorragia Uterina/etiología
18.
Ann Intern Med ; 154(8): 541-8, 2011 Apr 19.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21403055

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The optimal blood pressure target in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is unclear. PURPOSE: To summarize trials comparing lower versus higher blood pressure targets in adult patients with CKD and focus on proteinuria as an effect modifier. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (July 2001 through January 2011) were searched for reports from randomized, controlled trials with no language restriction. STUDY SELECTION: Authors screened abstracts to identify reports from trials comparing blood pressure targets in adults with CKD that had more than 50 participants per group; at least 1-year follow-up; and outcomes of death, kidney failure, cardiovascular events, change in kidney function, number of antihypertensive agents, and adverse events. DATA EXTRACTION: Reviewers extracted data on study design, methods, sample characteristics, interventions, comparators, outcomes, number of medications, and adverse events and rated study quality and quality of analyses for proteinuria subgroups. DATA SYNTHESIS: Three trials with a total of 2272 participants were included. Overall, trials did not show that a blood pressure target of less than 125/75 to 130/80 mm Hg is more beneficial than a target of less than 140/90 mm Hg. Lower-quality evidence suggests that a low target may be beneficial in subgroups with proteinuria greater than 300 to 1000 mg/d. Participants in the low target groups needed more antihypertensive medications and had a slightly higher rate of adverse events. LIMITATIONS: No study included patients with diabetes. Trial duration may have been too short to detect differences in clinically important outcomes, such as death and kidney failure. Ascertainment and reporting of adverse events was not uniform. CONCLUSION: Available evidence is inconclusive but does not prove that a blood pressure target of less than 130/80 mm Hg improves clinical outcomes more than a target of less than 140/90 mm Hg in adults with CKD. Whether a lower target benefits patients with proteinuria greater than 300 to 1000 mg/d requires further study.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Presión Sanguínea , Fallo Renal Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Fallo Renal Crónico/fisiopatología , Proteinuria , Adulto , Antihipertensivos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/orina , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Resultado del Tratamiento
19.
Food Chem X ; 13: 100221, 2022 Mar 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35498977

RESUMEN

The BfR MEAL Study aims to provide representative levels of chemical substances in foods consumed by the population in Germany for dietary exposure assessment. Calcium, potassium and phosphorus (Ca, K, P) are essential to obtain physiological functions in humans. Levels were investigated in 356 foods. Foods were purchased representatively, prepared as typically consumed and pooled before analysis. High mean levels were found in milk, dairy products, legumes, nuts, oilseeds and spices as well as chia seeds (Ca, K, P), chewing gum (Ca) and cocoa powder (K). Different levels comparing organically and conventionally produced foods were determined among others in cereal cracker (puffed), olives and tofu. Higher K levels were found in fried compared to boiled potatoes. Similar P levels were mainly found in regionally and seasonally sampled foods. These data provide a substantially improved basis to address dietary exposure assessment of the population in Germany for Ca, K and P.

20.
Kidney Int ; 90(3): 708, 2016 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27521119
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA