Rehabilitation Improves Persistent Symptoms of COVID-19: A Nonrandomized, Controlled, Open Study in Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the effects of an 8-wk face-to-face rehabilitation program on subjects with persistent symptoms of COVID-19 compared with a remote monitoring group. DESIGN: This is clinical, nonrandomized, controlled, and open study. The face-to-face supervised rehabilitation lasted eight consecutive weeks, twice a week. The remote monitoring group received health guidance. The allocation was carried out by preference because of the emergency period without vaccination during the pandemic. Fatigue, dyspnea (Pulmonary Functional Status and Dyspnea Questionnaire), and exercise capacity (Incremental Shuttle Walk Test) were the primary outcome measures. Lung function, functional status (Post-COVID-19 Functional Status), symptoms of anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale), attention (d2-R), memory (Rey's Auditory-Verbal Learning Test), handgrip strength, and knee extensor strength were secondary outcome measures. RESULTS: Thirty-seven subjects (24.3% hospitalized) completed the baseline and final assessment, rehabilitation ( n = 22, 40.8 [SD, 10.0] yrs, 54.5% female), or remote guidance ( n = 15, 45.4 [SD, 10.5] yrs, 40% female). Both groups showed improved fatigue and exercise capacity. Exercise rehabilitation improved dyspnea, anxiety, attention, and short-term memory. CONCLUSIONS: Rehabilitation is essential for dyspnea in subjects with persistent symptoms of COVID-19 while fatigue naturally reverses.

Comparison of different analysis techniques for the determination of muscle onset in individuals with patellofemoral pain syndrome.

To understand patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), recent studies have focused on assessing the onset in the vastus medialis and vastus lateralis to determine whether there is a delay between these muscles' activation. However, the results of these studies are not in agreement, as some research shows that there is a delay in the VMO, while others do not show delay. It has been suggested that this discrepancies may be due to differences in the signal processing and analysis. For this reason, this study aimed to compare the three techniques used for onset determination - automatic detection, visual inspection and cross-correlation - and to verify whether these methods are able to detect PFPS. The surface electromyography evaluation procedure was conducted in 22 pain-free control individuals and 11 with PFPS diagnoses, during a stair climbing. The standard error of measurement (SEM) showed that cross-correlation presents the lower variation (2.56/3.27, control/PFPS) in relation to visual (3.77/10.19, control/PFPS) and automatic detection (43.23/51.98, control/PFPS, respectively). But when using the cross-correlation technique, we were not able to distinguish the groups (-6.56/-9.74ms, control/PFPS, p=0.15). Therefore, use of muscle onset may not be the best way to distinguish individuals with PFPS.