RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The first case of novel SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19) in Pakistan was detected on 26 February 2020. Pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies have been tried to lessen the mortality and morbidity burden. Various vaccines have been approved. The Drug Regulatory Authority of Pakistan gave emergency approval for Sinopharm (BBIBP-CorV) COVID-19 vaccine in December 2021. The phase 3 trial of BBIBP-CorV included only 612 participants aged 60 years and above. The primary aim of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of BBIBPP-CorV (Sinopharm) vaccine within the Pakistani adult population aged 60 or above. The study was carried out in the Faisalabad district of Pakistan. METHODS: A test negative case-control study design was used to assess safety and efficacy of BBIBP-CorV in individuals aged 60 and above against symptomatic infection, hospitalisations and mortality due to SARS-CoV-2 among vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. ORs were calculated using logistic regression model at 95% CI. ORs were used to calculate the vaccine efficacy (VE) by using the following formula.VE= (1-OR) ×100. RESULTS: 3426 individuals with symptoms of COVID-19 were PCR tested between 5 May 2021 and 31 July 2021. The results showed that Sinopharm vaccine 14 days after the second dose was efficient in reducing the risk of symptomatic COVID-19 infection, hospitalisations and mortality by 94.3%, 60.5% and 98.6%, respectively, among vaccinated individuals with a significant p value of 0.001. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that BBIBP-CorV vaccine is highly effective in preventing infection, hospitalisations and mortality due to COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Vacunas , Anciano , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Pakistán/epidemiología , SARS-CoV-2 , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest that the prevalence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in patients with COVID-19 is around 13%, but its prognostic role remains unclear. Approximately 3% of patients develop chronic thrombo-embolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) following diagnosis of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). It is recommended that patients are screened for CTEPH if they remain symptomatic 3 months following diagnosis of PE. The primary aim of the study was to assess the chances of persistent PH following PE secondary to COVID-19. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at a District General Hospital (DGH) in the United Kingdom. All patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and PE between April 2020 and October 2021 were examined. Patients were divided into two groups:·COVID-19 and PE with comorbidities (excluding pre-existing PH) and·COVID-19 and PE without comorbidities. We compared the ECHO features suggestive of PH between the two groups at the time of diagnosis of PE and at 3 months following treatment. RESULTS: 80 patients were included in the study (49 with comorbidities and 31 with no comorbidities). Average age of comorbidities and no comorbidities groups were 73 years and 70 years, respectively. Average PaO2/FiO2 ratio for comorbidities and no comorbidities groups were 170 and 195, respectively. Fourteen patients (13 with comorbidities and 1 with no comorbidities) died in total. Results showed that risk of persistent PH and subsequent mortality following PE in COVID-19 is 4.17 times and 1.32 times more in comorbidity group as compared to no comorbidity group, respectively (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with comorbidities are at high risk of persistent PH and mortality due to PE secondary to COVID-19.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Hipertensión Pulmonar , Embolia Pulmonar , Humanos , Anciano , Hipertensión Pulmonar/etiología , Hipertensión Pulmonar/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hospitales Generales , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiología , Embolia Pulmonar/complicaciones , Embolia Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Enfermedad CrónicaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Pakistan has vaccinated over 122 million people. The two vaccines in widespread use are inactivated (BBIBP-CorV & Sinovac) and mRNA forms (BNT162b2 & mRNA-1273). The primary aim of this study was to compare these two forms of vaccines against unvaccinated individuals collectively and then to see which one is more efficacious. METHODS: Case-control study design was used to compare the efficacy of inactivated and mRNA vaccines against symptomatic infection, hospitalisations and mortality due to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 between vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. We derived recovery time from illness for both vaccines. Furthermore, we also compared the vaccines against similar parameters (symptomatic disease, hospitalisations and mortality). We calculated crude odds ratios for each dependent variable. p value of 0.05 or below was considered significant. RESULTS: Vaccinated individuals were significantly protected from hospitalisations and mortality compared to unvaccinated individuals (p < 0.001). There was no difference in protection from symptomatic disease (p = 0.28), hospitalisations (p = 0.59) and mortality (p = 0.53) between two forms of vaccines. mRNA vaccine had better recovery time than all other vaccines (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: Our study showed that vaccinated individuals are at low risk of hospitalisations and mortality even without a booster and both vaccine forms are equally effective at preventing hospitalisations and mortality.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , ARN Mensajero , Vacuna BNT162 , Pakistán/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Vacunas de ARNmRESUMEN
We present the case of an asthmatic patient who continued to present with breathlessness and received multiple courses of steroids for her presumed asthma exacerbations. After multiple investigations, we made the diagnosis of TBM secondary to relapsing polychondritis. https://bit.ly/3b8Uw1O.
RESUMEN
Extrapulmonary sarcoidosis accounts for only two percent of the total sarcoid cases. Sarcoidosis affecting the musculoskeletal system alone is even rarer. Diagnosis is based on suggestive history, clinical features, imaging followed by confirmation of non-caseating granulomas on a biopsy. Steroids form the first line of treatment for patients where musculoskeletal system is involved. We report the case of a 26-year-old gentleman who presented with right foot pain and unintentional weight loss. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan of feet confirmed bilateral stress fractures of both feet. After a battery of investigations and resultant myriad constellation of investigation findings, the diagnosis of sarcoidosis was confirmed on a tissue biopsy obtained via bronchoscopy. This case report discusses the complex journey from presentation to diagnosis and subsequent treatment while also exploring important differentials that need to be ruled out in such scenarios.