Opioid Prescribing Patterns of Optometrists in the Medicare Part D Database.

SIGNIFICANCE: This study aimed to determine the prescription rates and prescribing trends of opioids by optometrists in the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) part D database from 2013 to 2017 and to assess opioid prescribing patterns of U.S. optometrists in the CMS part D database. METHODS: With internal review board approval, a retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on optometrists listed in the CMS part D database who prescribed opioids from 2013 to 2017. RESULTS: There was an average of 26,477 optometrists in the CMS database from 2013 to 2017, of which 5.9% prescribed opioids. Of those prescribing opioids, optometrists wrote an average of 5.9 opioid prescriptions per year. Those writing greater than 10 opioid prescriptions averaged 24.2 annually. Overall, of opioid prescribing optometrists, opioid prescriptions comprised 7% of prescriptions written per year. CONCLUSIONS: Most optometrists do not prescribe opioids, and the vast majority of those who do write few opioid prescriptions. The total number of optometrists prescribing opioids and the total number of opioid prescriptions declined from 2013 to 2017. Further investigation into the opioid prescribing practices by optometrists will help better understand specific pain needs, as opioid prescribing patterns may differ depending on patient population.

Long-acting opioid prescribing patterns of ophthalmic plastic surgeons in the medicare Part D database.

PURPOSE: To assess extended release/long acting (ER/LA) opioid prescribing patterns among ophthalmic plastic surgeons in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Part D database. METHODS: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted on oculoplastic surgeons in the CMS Part D database who prescribed ER/LA opioids from 2013 to 2017. American Society of Ophthalmic Plastics and Reconstructive Surgery (ASOPRS) and non-ASOPRS surgeons were analyzed as groups. Prescribers were also analyzed based on gender and practice experience. RESULTS: Oculoplastic surgeons (64 ASOPRS and 78 non-ASOPRS) were responsible for 1,177 ER/LA opioid prescriptions from 2013 to 2017. ASOPRS members accounted for 4.6% and non-ASOPRS members accounted for 7.5% of all ER/LA opioids prescribed by ophthalmologists over the study period (p= .02). The total number of ASOPRS and non-ASOPRS members prescribing ER/LA opioids decreased by 52% (p= .10) and 58% (p= .07) from 2013 to 2017 respectively. CONCLUSION: ER/LA opioids are indicated for treatment of chronic pain and may be appropriately prescribed by the oculoplastic surgeon in certain circumstances, however due to the higher risk of overdose injury, those circumstances must be defined and justified. While a relatively small number of oculoplastic surgeons (10.6% ASOPRS and 19.6% non-ASOPRS) prescribed ER/LA opioids from 2013 to 2017, non-ASOPRS oculoplastic surgeons wrote 23.5% more ER/LA opioid prescriptions over the study period. Over the 5-year study period there was a general decline in the prescribing of ER/LA opioids by oculoplastic surgeons. Reviewing the prescribing practices of oculoplastic specialists, regardless of professional affiliation, is necessary to understand the role of ER/LA opioids for all of ophthalmology.