Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Int Orthop ; 39(8): 1615-22, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25947902

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Third generation autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is an established treatment for full thickness cartilage defects in the knee joint. However, little is known about cases when revision surgery is needed. The aim of the present study is to investigate the complication rates and the main reasons for revision surgery after third generation autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee joint. It is of particular interest to examine in which cases revision surgery is needed and in which cases a "wait and see" strategy should be used. METHODS: A total of 143 consecutive patients with 171 cartilage defects were included in this study with a minimum follow-up of two years. All defects were treated with third generation ACI (NOVACART®3D). Clinical evaluation was carried out after six months, followed by an annual evaluation using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score and the visual analogue scale (VAS) for rest and during activity. Revision surgery was documented. RESULTS: The revision rate was 23.4 % (n = 36). The following major reasons for revision surgery were found in our study: symptomatic bone marrow edema (8.3 %, n = 3), arthrofibrosis (22.2 %, n = 8) and partial graft cartilage deficiency (47.2 %, n = 17). The following revision surgery was performed: retrograde drilling combined with Iloprost infusion therapy for bone marrow oedema (8.4 %, n = 3), arthroscopic arthrolysis of the suprapatellar recess (22.2 %, n = 8) and microfracturing/antegrade drilling (47.3 %, n = 17). Significant improvements of clinical scores after revision surgery were observed. CONCLUSION: Revision surgery after third generation autologous chondrocyte implantation is common and is needed primarily in cases with arthrofibrosis, partial graft cartilage deficiency and symptomatic bone marrow oedema resulting in a significantly better clinical outcome.


Asunto(s)
Cartílago Articular/lesiones , Cartílago Articular/cirugía , Condrocitos/trasplante , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Reoperación , Trasplante Autólogo , Espera Vigilante
3.
Am J Sports Med ; 43(5): 1172-9, 2015 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25784628

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Third-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) is an established method for treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects in the knee joint. Subchondral bone marrow edema (BME) is frequently observed after ACI, with unknown pathogenesis and clinical relevance. PURPOSE: To investigate the occurrence and clinical relevance of BME after third-generation ACI in the knee joint during the postoperative course of 36 months. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 38 circumscribed full-thickness cartilage defects in 30 patients were included in this study. All defects were treated with third-generation ACI (Novocart 3D). A standardized MRI examination was carried out after 1.5, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months. Bone marrow edema was observed in 78.9% of defects over the postoperative course, with initial occurrence in the first 12 months. The size of the BMEs were determined according to their maximum diameter and were classified as small (<1 cm), medium (<2 cm), large (<4 cm), and very large (diffuse; >4 cm). Clinical outcomes in patients were analyzed by use of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scoring system and a visual analog scale for pain. RESULTS: There were 5.3% (n=2) small, 28.9% (n=11) medium, 34.2% (n=13) large, and 10.5% (n=4) very large BMEs. In a subgroup analysis, cartilage defects of the medial femoral condyle showed significantly higher frequency of BME than did patellar defects. Clinical scores showed significant improvements throughout the entire study course (P<.05). Clinical patient outcome did not correlate with presence of BME at any time period (P>.05). CONCLUSION: Midterm clinical results of the matrix-based third-generation ACI showed a substantial amount of BME over a 36-month follow-up, but this did not correlate with worse clinical outcome. Patients with femoral cartilage defects were more often affected than were those with patellar cartilage defects.


Asunto(s)
Médula Ósea/patología , Cartílago Articular/cirugía , Condrocitos/trasplante , Articulación de la Rodilla/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Cartílago/trasplante , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Edema/patología , Edema/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Articulación de la Rodilla/patología , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/métodos , Dolor/etiología , Dimensión del Dolor , Trasplante Autólogo , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA