3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE versus standard 2D TSE for routine knee MRI: a large-scale interchangeability study.

OBJECTIVE: To perform a large-scale interchangeability study comparing 3D controlled aliasing in parallel imaging results in higher acceleration (CAIPIRINHA) sampling perfection with application optimized contrast using different flip angle evolutions (SPACE) TSE with standard 2D TSE for knee MRI. METHODS: In this prospective study, 250 patients underwent 3 T knee MRI, including a multicontrast 3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE (9:26 min) and a standard 2D TSE protocol (12:14 min). Thirty-three (13%) patients had previous anterior cruciate ligament and/or meniscus surgery. Two radiologists assessed MRIs for image quality and identified pathologies of menisci, ligaments, and cartilage by using a 4-point Likert scale according to the level of diagnostic confidence. Interchangeability of the protocols was tested under the same-reader scenario using a bootstrap percentile confidence interval. Interreader reliability and intermethod concordance were also evaluated. RESULTS: Despite higher image quality and diagnostic confidence for standard 2D TSE compared to 3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE, the protocols were found interchangeable for diagnosing knee abnormalities, except for patellar (6.8% difference; 95% CI: 4.0, 9.6) and trochlear (3.6% difference; 95% CI: 0.8, 6.6) cartilage defects. The interreader reliability was substantial to almost perfect for 2D and 3D MRI (range κ, 0.785-1 and κ, 0.725-0.964, respectively). Intermethod concordance was almost perfect for all diagnoses (range κ, 0.817-0.986). CONCLUSION: Multicontrast 3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE and standard 2D TSE protocols perform interchangeably for diagnosing knee abnormalities, except for patellofemoral cartilage defects. Despite the radiologist's preference for 2D TSE imaging, a pursuit towards time-saving 3D TSE knee MRI is justified for routine practice. KEY POINTS: • Multicontrast 3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE and standard 2D TSE protocols perform interchangeably for diagnosing knee abnormalities, except for patellofemoral cartilage defects. • Radiologists are more confident in diagnosing knee abnormalities on 2D TSE than on 3D CAIPIRINHA SPACE TSE MRI. • Despite the radiologist's preference for 2D TSE, a pursuit towards accelerated 3D TSE knee MRI is justified for routine practice.

Suture tape augmentation ACL repair, stable knee, and favorable PROMs, but a re-rupture rate of 11% within 2 years.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to investigate clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair using the suture tape augmentation (STA) technique. METHODS: This prospective interventional case series included 35 patients who underwent STA ACL repair and were all followed up for 2 years. The ACL rupture was between 4 and 12 weeks old and per-operatively confirmed repairable. The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Lysholm and Tegner scores were collected together with return to work (RTW), return to sport (RTS), re-rupture, and re-intervention rate. Lachman testing was performed and ACL healing was evaluated on MRI using a grading scale based on the ACL's morphology and signal intensity with grade 1 representing good ACL healing and grade 3 representing poor ACL healing. RESULTS: The number of patients who returned to their pre-rupture level for IKDC, Lysholm, and Tegner scores at 2 years of follow-up are 17/26 (65.4%), 13/25 (52.0%), and 18/27 (66.7%) patients, respectively. Median RTW and RTS periods were 5.5 weeks (range 0-32 weeks) and 6 months (range 2-22 months), respectively. The Lachman side-to-side difference decreased significantly (P < 0.001) to less than 3 mm after surgery and remained stable. Four patients [11.4%, 95% CI (3.2, 26.7)] suffered from a re-rupture and three other patients [8.6%, 95% CI (1.8, 23.1)] needed a re-intervention for another reason than re-rupture. MRI follow-up of 31 patients showed overall grade 1 ACL healing in 14 (45.2%) patients, grade 2 ACL healing in 11 (35.5%) patients, and grade 3 ACL healing in 6 (19.4%) patients. A higher risk of re-rupture was associated with grade 3 ACL healing at 6 months post-operatively and a pre-operative Tegner score of ≥ 7. CONCLUSION: This study shows that treatment of the acute, repairable ACL with the STA technique leads to a stable knee and favorable patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). However, the re-rupture rate of 11.4% within the 2-year follow-up is a concern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Diffusion tensor imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament graft following reconstruction: a longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE: To longitudinally monitor remodeling of human autograft following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with DTI. METHODS: Twenty-eight patients underwent DTI follow-up at 3, 8, and 14 months after clinically successful ACL reconstruction with tendon autograft. Among these, 18 patients had a concomitant lateral extra-articular procedure (LET). DTI data from 7 healthy volunteers was also obtained. Diffusion parameters (fractional anisotropy, FA; mean diffusivity, MD; axial diffusivity, AD; and radial diffusivity, RD) were evaluated within the fiber tractography volumes of the ACL graft and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in all patients. Data were analyzed using a linear mixed-effects model with post hoc testing using Bonferroni-Holm correction for multiple testing. The effect of additional LET was studied. RESULTS: The ACL graft showed a significant decrease of FA over time (F = 4.00, p = 0.025), while the diffusivities did not significantly change over time. For PCL there were no significant DTI changes over time. A different evolution over time between patients with and without LET was noted for all diffusivity values of the ACL graft with reduced AD values in patients with LET at 8 months postoperatively (p = 0.048; adjusted p = 0.387). DTI metrics of the ACL graft differed largely from both native ACL and tendon at 14 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: Our study has shown the potential of DTI to longitudinally monitor the remodeling process in human ACL reconstruction. DTI analysis indicates that graft remodeling is incomplete at 14 months postoperatively. KEY POINTS: • DTI can be used to longitudinally monitor the remodeling process in human ACL reconstruction. • DTI analysis indicates that autograft remodeling is incomplete at 14 months postoperatively. • DTI may be helpful for evaluating new ACL treatments.

Tips and Tricks to Optimize Surgical Outcomes After ACL Repair Using Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization.

PURPOSE: This paper describes technical difficulties and outcomes for the first 15 patients treated with Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization (DIS) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) repair. METHODS: The first 15 patients treated with DIS were included. To optimize the inclusion process, a new pre-operative pathway was developed. All intra-operative technical problems were recorded. During the 2-year follow-up period, patient-related outcome measures, return to work, anterior-posterior knee laxity using a Rolimeter and ACL healing as revealed by MRI follow-up scans were recorded. RESULTS: During 11 DIS procedures, 15 technical problems were encountered. Six were surgeon-related and 9 were material-related. All problems were resolved intra-operatively. Repeat surgery was performed in 4 patients due to arthrofibrosis and in 1 due to a cyclops lesion. The DIS implant was removed in all 5 patients. According to the Tegner score, 7 of 10 (70%) patients returned to the pre-injury level of sporting activity within 6 months. The mean return to work time was 5.4 (SD 3.6) weeks. On MRI, 10 patients showed normal ACL healing (Grade 1) and 3 showed a high repair signal intensity (Grade 2). Although 2 patients showed no signs of ACL healing on MRI (Grade 3), no instability was reported or measured post-operatively or after the DIS implant was removed. CONCLUSION: All intra-operative technical problems were resolved and did not lead to conversion to ACL reconstruction. We share tips and tricks that could assist surgeons who are just starting to use the DIS technique.

Study protocol: a single-blind, multi-center, randomized controlled trial comparing dynamic intraligamentary stabilization, internal brace ligament augmentation and reconstruction in individuals with an acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture: LIBRƎ study.

BACKGROUND: The current gold standard for the treatment of an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture is reconstruction with tendon graft. Recently, two surgical ACL repair techniques have been developed for treating an acute ACL rupture: Dynamic Intraligamentary Stabilization (DIS, Ligamys®) and Internal Brace Ligament Augmentation (IBLA, InternalBrace™). We will conduct a single-blind, multi-center, randomized controlled trial which compares DIS, IBLA and reconstruction for relative clinical efficacy and economic benefit. METHODS: Subjects, aged 18-50 years, with a proximal, primary and repairable ACL rupture will be included. DIS is preferably performed within 4 weeks post-rupture, IBLA within 12 weeks and reconstruction after 4 weeks post-rupture. Patients are included in study 1 if they present within 0-4 weeks post-rupture and surgery is feasible within 4 weeks post-rupture. Patients of study 1 will be randomized to either DIS or IBLA. Patients are included in study 2 if they present after 4 weeks post-rupture and surgery is feasible between 5 and 12 weeks post-rupture. Patients of study 2 will be randomized to either IBLA or reconstruction. A total of 96 patients will be included, with 48 patients per study and 24 patients per study arm. Patients will be followed-up for 2 years. The primary outcome is change from baseline (pre-rupture) in International Knee Documentation Committee score to 6 months post-operatively. The main secondary outcomes are the EQ-5D-5 L, Tegner score, Lysholm score, Lachman test, isokinetic and proprioceptive measurements, magnetic resonance imaging outcome, return to work and sports, and re-rupture/failure rates. The statistical analysis will be based on the intention-to-treat principle. The economic impact of the surgery techniques will be evaluated by the cost-utility analysis. The LIBRƎ study is to be conducted between 2018 and 2022. DISCUSSION: This LIBRƎ study protocol is the first study to compare DIS, IBLA and ACL reconstruction for relative clinical efficacy and economic benefit. The outcomes of this study will provide data which could aid orthopaedic surgeons to choose between the different treatment options for the surgical treatment of an acute ACL rupture. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT03441295. Date registered 13.02.2018.

Assessment of Anterolateral Complex Injuries by Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Acute Rupture of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament.

PURPOSE: To assess anterolateral complex (ALC) injuries in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS: Patients with acute ACL rupture who underwent ACL surgery between 2015 and 2017 and underwent MRI within 6 weeks of the initial trauma were included. Two radiologists assessed magnetic resonance images retrospectively for the status of the ALC, including the iliotibial band (ITB), Kaplan fibers, and anterolateral ligament (ALL), as follows: grade 0, normal; grade 1, periligamentous edema; grade 2, partial tear; and grade 3, complete tear. The findings were analyzed using the Friedman test and weighted κ values. RESULTS: Sixty-nine MRI scans were reviewed. Of the 69 patients, 51% had associated injuries to the ITB (grade 1, n = 31; grade 2, n = 4), 33% had associated injuries to the Kaplan fibers (grade 1, n = 21; grade 2, n = 2), and 57% had associated injuries to the ALL (grade 1, n = 12; grade 2, n = 22; grade 3, n = 5). We found a significant difference in the frequency and grading between ITB, Kaplan fiber, and ALL injuries (P ≤ .032). Inter-reader agreement for assessing the ALC on MRI was almost perfect (κ ≥ 0.922). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of MRI analysis, ALL injuries were found with varying degrees of severity and intensity with noted injuries to associated surrounding fibers in patients with acute ACL rupture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, case series.

Primary Posterior Cruciate Ligament Repair With The Novel Suture Tape Augmentation Technique.

BACKGROUND: A posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) rupture is less common than an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. PCL reconstruction remains controversial with variable outcomes and problems. The encouraging results of the novel ACL repair techniques led to renewed interest in PCL repair. Primary arthroscopic PCL repair has been rarely discussed and literature is scarce. To the best of our knowledge, no PCL repair patient outcome has been reported with one of the novel PCL repair techniques. We present the first case report of two patients who have been treated with the novel PCL repair technique, the suture tape augmentation technique. CASE DESCRIPTION: Two patients who underwent primary PCL repair after an acute PCL rupture with a two-year follow up are presented. Patients were evaluated according to the Lysholm scale, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and the Tegner activity scale. Follow up also included objective physical examinations-knee function and posterior drawer test using a rolimeter-and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Physical examinations were performed at three months, six months, one year, and two years after surgery. OUTCOMES: At two-year follow up, both patients had a full range of motion and experienced no pain, nor swelling. IKDC scores were 83% (good) and 100% (excellent), Lysholm scores were 99 and 100 two years after surgery. At three months postoperative, the Tegner activity scale equaled the preinjury Tegner activity scale. One patient was horseback riding within three months. There were some increased posterior translation differences after two years-+2 and +3mm-compared with six weeks postoperative. MRI showed a healed PCL in both cases. DISCUSSION: PCL repair could be a promising treatment option for acute PCL ruptures. Advantages of this technique are the retaining of the natural proprioceptive capacities due to preserving native PCL fibers, the surgical technique is less invasive compared to a reconstruction, and no donor graft morbidity is expected as no graft is needed. CONCLUSION: In these two cases, good subjective and objective results are demonstrated after PCL repair using the novel suture tape augmentation technique. MRI confirmed the healing of the PCL. Although this is a small case series, as PCL ruptures are less common compared to ACL ruptures, it is a stepping-stone for further PCL repair research.

Diffusion tensor imaging of the anterior cruciate ligament graft.

PURPOSE: A great need exists for objective biomarkers to assess graft healing following ACL reconstruction to guide the time of return to sports. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and reliability of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to delineate the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft and to investigate its diffusion properties using a clinical 3T scanner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DTI of the knee (b = 0, 400, and 800 s/mm2 , 10 diffusion directions, repeated 16 times for a total of 336 diffusion-weighted volumes) was performed at 3T in 17 patients between 3 and 7 months (mean, 4 months) following ACL reconstruction. Tractography was performed by two independent observers to delineate the ACL graft. Fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD), and radial diffusivity (RD) were calculated within the graft. Interrater reliability was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the scan-rescan reproducibility was evaluated based on the percentage coefficient of variance (%CV) across 20 repetition bootknife samples. RESULTS: In all subjects, tractography of the ACL graft was feasible. Quantitative evaluation of the diffusion properties of the ACL graft yielded the following mean ± SD values: FA = 0.23 ± 0.04; MD = 1.30 ± 0.11 × 10-3 mm2 /s; AD = 1.61 ± 0.12 × 10-3 mm2 /s, and RD = 1.15 ± 0.11 × 10-3 mm2 /s. Interrater reliability for the DTI parameters was excellent (ICC = 0.91-0.98). Mean %CVs for FA, MD, AD, and RD were 4.6%, 3.5%, 3.7%, and 4.4%, respectively. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the feasibility and reliability of DTI for the visualization and quantitative evaluation of the ACL graft at 3T. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;46:1423-1432.

Anterolateral ligament abnormalities in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture are associated with lateral meniscal and osseous injuries.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of anterolateral ligament (ALL) injury in patients with acute anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture and to analyse its associated injury patterns. METHODS: Ninety patients with acute ACL rupture for which MRI was obtained within 8 weeks after the initial trauma were retrospectively identified. Two radiologists assessed the status of the ALL on MRI by consensus. The presence or absence of an ALL abnormality was compared with the existence of medial and lateral meniscal tears diagnosed during arthroscopy. Associated collateral ligament and osseous injuries were documented with MRI. RESULTS: Forty-one of 90 knees (46 %) demonstrated ALL abnormalities on MRI. Of 49 knees with intact ALL, 15 (31 %) had a torn lateral meniscus as compared to 25 torn lateral menisci in 41 knees (61 %) with abnormal ALL (p = 0.008). Collateral ligament (p ≤ 0.05) and osseous injuries (p = 0.0037) were more frequent and severe in ALL-injured as compared with ALL-intact knees. CONCLUSION: ALL injuries are fairly common in patients with acute ACL rupture and are statistically significantly associated with lateral meniscal, collateral ligament and osseous injuries. KEY POINTS: • ALL injuries are fairly common in patients with acute ACL rupture. • ALL injuries are highly associated with lateral meniscal and osseous injuries. • MRI assessment of ACL-injured knees should include evaluation of the ALL.

The Anterolateral Ligament of the Knee: What the Radiologist Needs to Know.

The anterolateral ligament (ALL) was recently identified as a distinct component of the anterolateral capsule of the human knee joint with consistent origin and insertion sites. Biomechanical studies revealed that the current association between the pivot shift and an injured anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) should be loosened and that the rotational component of the pivot shift is significantly affected by the ALL. This may change the clinical approach toward ACL-injured patients presenting with anterolateral rotatory instability (ALRI), the most common instability pattern after ACL rupture. Radiologists should be aware of the importance of the ALL to ACL injuries. They should not overlook pathology of the anterolateral knee structures, including the ALL, when reviewing MR images of the ACL-deficient knee. In this article, the current knowledge regarding the anatomy, biomechanical function, and imaging appearance of the ALL of the knee is discussed with emphasis on the clinical implications of these findings.

Imaging of the Postoperative Anterior Cruciate Ligament: Emphasis on New Surgical and Imaging Methods.

The aim of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is to restore normal function of the knee, but unfortunately abnormal kinematics and a predisposition to knee osteoarthritis occur in a significant percentage of patients. So there is an ongoing need to improve treatment options and long-term outcome of patients with a ruptured ACL. With the recent advancements in the field of ACL tissue engineering, the focus of treatment for ACL injuries is changing from resection and reconstruction toward repair and regeneration. Several new ACL repair methods were recently introduced as an alternative to traditional ACL reconstructive procedures. Radiologists must become familiar with these new surgical methods to interpret their appearance correctly on postoperative imaging studies. This article provides an overview of the latest advancements in ACL surgical methods and discusses the role of imaging to assess the postoperative ACL including both standard and advanced imaging methods.

Comparison of 1.5- and 3-T MR imaging for evaluating the articular cartilage of the knee.

PURPOSE: The aim of this prospective study was to compare routine MRI scans of the knee at 1.5 and 3 T obtained in the same individuals in terms of their performance in the diagnosis of cartilage lesions. METHODS: One hundred patients underwent MRI of the knee at 1.5 and 3 T and subsequent knee arthroscopy. All MR examinations consisted of multiplanar 2D turbo spin-echo sequences. Three radiologists independently graded all articular surfaces of the knee joint seen at MRI. With arthroscopy as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 1.5- and 3-T MRI for detecting cartilage lesions and the proportion of correctly graded cartilage lesions within the knee joint were determined and compared using resampling statistics. RESULTS: For all readers and surfaces combined, the respective sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting all grades of cartilage lesions in the knee joint using MRI were 60, 96, and 87% at 1.5 T and 69, 96, and 90% at 3 T. There was a statistically significant improvement in sensitivity (p < 0.05), but not specificity or accuracy (n.s.) for the detection of cartilage lesions at 3 T. There was also a statistically significant (p < 0.05) improvement in the proportion of correctly graded cartilage lesions at 3 T as compared to 1.5 T. CONCLUSION: A 3-T MR protocol significantly improves diagnostic performance for the purpose of detecting cartilage lesions within the knee joint, when compared with a similar protocol performed at 1.5 T. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Imaging Findings in Acute Traumatic Brain Injury: a National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke Common Data Element-Based Pictorial Review and Analysis of Over 4000 Admission Brain Computed Tomography Scans from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) Study.

In 2010, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) created a set of common data elements (CDEs) to help standardize the assessment and reporting of imaging findings in traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, as opposed to other standardized radiology reporting systems, a visual overview and data to support the proposed standardized lexicon are lacking. We used over 4000 admission computed tomography (CT) scans of patients with TBI from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study to develop an extensive pictorial overview of the NINDS TBI CDEs, with visual examples and background information on individual pathoanatomical lesion types, up to the level of supplemental and emerging information (e.g., location and estimated volumes). We documented the frequency of lesion occurrence, aiming to quantify the relative importance of different CDEs for characterizing TBI, and performed a critical appraisal of our experience with the intent to inform updating of the CDEs. In addition, we investigated the co-occurrence and clustering of lesion types and the distribution of six CT classification systems. The median age of the 4087 patients in our dataset was 50 years (interquartile range, 29-66; range, 0-96), including 238 patients under 18 years old (5.8%). Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (45.3%), skull fractures (37.4%), contusions (31.3%), and acute subdural hematoma (28.9%) were the most frequently occurring CT findings in acute TBI. The ranking of these lesions was the same in patients with mild TBI (baseline Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score 13-15) compared with those with moderate-severe TBI (baseline GCS score 3-12), but the frequency of occurrence was up to three times higher in moderate-severe TBI. In most TBI patients with CT abnormalities, there was co-occurrence and clustering of different lesion types, with significant differences between mild and moderate-severe TBI patients. More specifically, lesion patterns were more complex in moderate-severe TBI patients, with more co-existing lesions and more frequent signs of mass effect. These patients also had higher and more heterogeneous CT score distributions, associated with worse predicted outcomes. The critical appraisal of the NINDS CDEs was highly positive, but revealed that full assessment can be time consuming, that some CDEs had very low frequencies, and identified a few redundancies and ambiguity in some definitions. Whilst primarily developed for research, implementation of CDE templates for use in clinical practice is advocated, but this will require development of an abbreviated version. In conclusion, with this study, we provide an educational resource for clinicians and researchers to help assess, characterize, and report the vast and complex spectrum of imaging findings in patients with TBI. Our data provides a comprehensive overview of the contemporary landscape of TBI imaging pathology in Europe, and the findings can serve as empirical evidence for updating the current NINDS radiologic CDEs to version 3.0.

Analysis of Discordant Findings between 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Arthroscopic Evaluation of the Knee Meniscus.

Numerous studies have assessed the performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting tears of the knee menisci using arthroscopy results as the gold standard, but few have concentrated on the nature of discordant findings. The purpose of this study was to analyze the discordances between 3T MRI and arthroscopic evaluation of the knee meniscus. Medical records of 112 patients who underwent 3T MRI and subsequent arthroscopy of the knee were retrospectively analyzed to determine the accuracy of diagnoses of meniscal tear. Compared with arthroscopy, there were 22 false-negative and 14 false-positive MR interpretations of meniscal tear occurring in 32 patients. Images with errors in diagnosis were retrospectively reviewed by two musculoskeletal radiologists in consensus and all errors were categorized as either unavoidable, equivocal or as interpretation error. Of 36 MR diagnostic errors, there were 16 (44%) unavoidable, 5 (14%) interpretation errors and 15 (42%) equivocal for meniscal tear. The largest categories of errors were unavoidable false-positive MRI diagnoses (71%) and equivocal false-negative MRI diagnoses (50%). All meniscal tears missed by MRI were treated with partial meniscectomy (n = 14) or meniscal repair (n = 8). Discordant findings between 3T MRI and arthroscopic evaluation of the knee meniscus remain a concern and primarily occur due to unavoidable and equivocal errors. Clinicians involved in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with meniscal tears should understand why and how the findings seen on knee MRI and arthroscopy may sometimes differ.

Posterior cruciate ligament repair seems safe with low failure rates but more high level evidence is needed: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To discuss recent literature on posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) repair and report on the clinical and radiological outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. In August 2022, three databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library) were searched for studies on PCL repair by two independent reviewers. Articles published between January 2000 and August 2022 focussing on the clinical and/or radiological outcomes, following PCL repair, were included. Patient demographic data, clinical evaluations, patient­reported outcome measures, post-operative complications and radiological outcomes were extracted. RESULTS: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, covering 226 patients with a mean age ranging from 22.4 to 38.8 years and mean follow-up periods ranging from 14 to 78.6 months. Seven studies (77.8%) were level IV and two studies (22.2%) were level III. Arthroscopic PCL repair was performed in four studies (44.4%) while the remaining five studies (55.6%) described open PCL repair. In four studies (44.4%) additional suture augmentation was applied. Arthrofibrosis affected a combined total of 24 patients (11.7%; range 0-21.0%) making it the most common complication and the overall failure rate was 5.6%, ranging from 0 to 15.8%. Two studies (22.2%) performed post-operative MRI and confirmed PCL healing. CONCLUSION: This systematic review indicates that PCL repair can be a safe procedure with an overall failure rate of 5.6%, ranging from 0% to 15.8%. However, more high quality research is necessary before widespread clinical implementation is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Use of Support Vector Machines Approach via ComBat Harmonized Diffusion Tensor Imaging for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: A CENTER-TBI Study.

The prediction of functional outcome after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is challenging. Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) does not do a good job of explaining the variance in outcome, as many patients with incomplete recovery will have normal-appearing clinical neuroimaging. More advanced quantitative techniques such as diffusion MRI (dMRI), can detect microstructural changes not otherwise visible, and so may offer a way to improve outcome prediction. In this study, we explore the potential of linear support vector classifiers (linearSVCs) to identify dMRI biomarkers that can predict recovery after mTBI. Simultaneously, the harmonization of fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD) via ComBat was evaluated and compared for the classification performances of the linearSVCs. We included dMRI scans of 179 mTBI patients and 85 controls from the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI), a multi-center prospective cohort study, up to 21 days post-injury. Patients were dichotomized according to their Extended Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOSE) scores at 6 months into complete (n = 92; GOSE = 8) and incomplete (n = 87; GOSE <8) recovery. FA and MD maps were registered to a common space and harmonized via the ComBat algorithm. LinearSVCs were applied to distinguish: (1) mTBI patients from controls and (2) mTBI patients with complete from those with incomplete recovery. The linearSVCs were trained on (1) age and sex only, (2) non-harmonized, (3) two-category-harmonized ComBat, and (4) three-category-harmonized ComBat FA and MD images combined with age and sex. White matter FA and MD voxels and regions of interest (ROIs) within the John Hopkins University (JHU) atlas were examined. Recursive feature elimination was used to identify the 10% most discriminative voxels or the 10 most discriminative ROIs for each implementation. mTBI patients displayed significantly higher MD and lower FA values than controls for the discriminative voxels and ROIs. For the analysis between mTBI patients and controls, the three-category-harmonized ComBat FA and MD voxel-wise linearSVC provided significantly higher classification scores (81.4% accuracy, 93.3% sensitivity, 80.3% F1-score, and 0.88 area under the curve [AUC], p < 0.05) compared with the classification based on age and sex only and the ROI approaches (accuracies: 59.8% and 64.8%, respectively). Similar to the analysis between mTBI patients and controls, the three-category-harmonized ComBat FA and MD maps voxelwise approach yields statistically significant prediction scores between mTBI patients with complete and those with incomplete recovery (71.8% specificity, 66.2% F1-score and 0.71 AUC, p < 0.05), which provided a modest increase in the classification score (accuracy: 66.4%) compared with the classification based on age and sex only and ROI-wise approaches (accuracy: 61.4% and 64.7%, respectively). This study showed that ComBat harmonized FA and MD may provide additional information for diagnosis and prognosis of mTBI in a multi-modal machine learning approach. These findings demonstrate that dMRI may assist in the early detection of patients at risk of incomplete recovery from mTBI.

Stable or unstable tear of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee: an MR diagnosis?

PURPOSE: To determine the usefulness of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to distinguish stable from unstable tears of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the knee. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MR images of 97 patients with surgically confirmed ACL tear were retrospectively reviewed. According to arthroscopic and clinical examination, these patients had 36 stable and 61 unstable (9 partial and 52 complete) ACL tears. MR images were interpreted by two blinded reviewers and scored with respect to previously reported primary and secondary MR signs of ACL injury. Based on a comprehensive assessment of all the MR findings, ACLs were categorized as being stable or unstable. MR accuracy was calculated considering only primary MR signs and considering both primary and secondary MR signs of ACL injury, separately. Accuracy of each individual primary and secondary MR sign was calculated. RESULTS: Considering only primary MR signs, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR were 77, 92, and 82%, respectively. Considering both primary and secondary MR signs, sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR were 59, 81, and 67%, respectively. Of all MR signs, discontinuity and abnormal orientation had highest test accuracy (79 and 87%, respectively). Anterior tibial translation, uncovering of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus, and hyperbuckled PCL were only seen in unstable ACLs (specificity 100%), but these secondary findings had low sensitivity (23%). Bone contusion around the lateral knee compartment was seen in both unstable and stable ACLs (accuracy 64%). CONCLUSION: Previously reported MR imaging signs do not allow accurate distinction between clinically stable and unstable ACL injuries. Anterior tibial translation, uncovering of the posterior horn of the lateral meniscus, and hyperbuckled PCL, if present, are helpful signs in the diagnosis of an unstable tear. The presence of bone marrow edema around the lateral knee compartment is not predictive of ACL insufficiency.

Experience with a frontal core biopsy device in soft tissue and bone lesions.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and cost of a new frontloading biopsy system, Spirotome® (system 1), in musculoskeletal lesions, and to compare the results with those obtained with commonly used biopsy devices. METHODS: System 1 was used in all soft tissue lesions (STL) and osteolytic bone lesions (OBL) of patients who presented at our department for CT-guided biopsy between January 2009 and June 2010. Accuracy and cost were compared to those of Bonopty® (system 2) and Tru-cut (system 3) procedures. RESULTS: The efficacy of system 1 was 85% in STL and 89% in OBL. The procedure was well tolerated and caused no complications. System 3 had an efficacy of 84% in STL and OBL combined. The efficacy of system 2 in OBL was 85%. The cost of single-use system 1 and system 2 was comparable, the cost of system 3 and multiuse system 1 compared to single-use system 1 was 25 and 7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of system 1 in biopsy of STL and OBL was better than that of system 3. In OBL, the efficacy of system 1 was better than that of system 2. In STL at hazardous locations and small OBL with a thin cortical shell, system 1 offers the advantage of variable length and controlled loading. In these cases, single-use system 1 was cost-effective when compared to surgical biopsy. The cost per procedure of multiuse system 1 was lower than of system 3.

Partial tear of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee: injury patterns on MR imaging.

PURPOSE: To describe rupture patterns of partial anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears on magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. METHODS: MR images of 51 patients with a surgically confirmed partial ACL tear were retrospectively and independently interpreted by 2 experienced, blinded radiologists. Using previously described MR criteria, ACLs were categorized as follows: complete tear, partial tear, isolated anteromedial or posterolateral bundle tear, mucoid degeneration or normal ACL. MR interpretations were compared with the arthroscopic results as the standard of reference. Inter- and intraobserver agreements were determined using kappa (к) coefficients. RESULTS: On MR imaging, ACL injuries were categorized as complete tears (16-23%), partial tears (20-47%), mucoid degeneration (12-27%) or normal ACLs (18-23%). Isolated ACL bundle tears were diagnosed on MR in 6% of our patients. Accuracy of MR for the diagnosis of partial ACL tears was 25-53%. Interobserver agreement was moderate (к = 0.48-0.56). Intraobserver agreement was good (к = 0.72-0.76). CONCLUSION: MR diagnosis of a partial ACL tear is difficult because various tear patterns may be seen. Many partial tears demonstrate MR features that are indistinguishable from complete ACL tear, mucoid ACL degeneration or normal ACL. An isolated ACL bundle tear is infrequently detected on MR images.