Use of a new endovenous laser device: results of the 1,500 nm laser.

BACKGROUND: A new endovenous laser wavelength (1,500 nm diode laser) in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) reflux was evaluated. We studied the occlusion rate at 6 months and noted possible side effects. METHODS: In 129 patients, 158 GSVs were treated using the 1,500 nm diode laser. An average linear endovenous energy density of 53.4 J/cm and an average endovenous fluence of 32.21 J/cm(2) were administrated to the vein. RESULTS: The occlusion rate at 6 months postoperative was 93.3%. Some of the nonoccluded veins closed spontaneously. A postoperative foam treatment was necessary in 3.4% of the treated veins. We found a marked shrinkage of the treated veins. There were limited side effects: moderate or severe ecchymosis in 19%, moderate pain in 1%, moderate periphlebitis in 8.2%, with no paresthesias. CONCLUSION: Endovenous laser treatment of the GSV using a 1,500 nm diode laser is effective and safe. The marked shrinkage of the treated veins can guarantee good long-term results.

The long road to recovery: at six months since the first COVID-19 wave, elective orthopedic care has still not fully recovered in Belgium.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of our study was to investigate elective orthopaedic care during the first wave government-imposed COVID-19 lockdown and at four weeks and 21 weeks after resuming elective care. The secondary aim of our study was to evaluate the implementation of the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) COVID-19 Guidelines and Recommendations for Resuming Elective Surgery in the clinical practice of Belgian knee surgeons. METHODS: We sent three anonymous online surveys to 102 Belgian Knee Society members (BKS) at times mentioned above. Addressed topics were: (1) participant demographics, (2) elective surgeries, (3) outpatient visits, (4) ESSKA Guidelines, (5) patient and surgeon safety. RESULTS: During the COVID-19 lockdown, there was a decrease of 97% in elective knee surgeries and 91% in outpatient visits. At four and 21 weeks after resuming elective care, volumes were respectively 67% and 89% for elective surgeries and 81% and 91% for outpatient visits. Regarding ESSKA guidelines, 91% of surgeons had no COVID-19 testing prior to resuming elective care. Ninety-two per cent reported preoperative (< 72 h) patient PCR testing, and 45% gave preference to young patients without comorbidities. Seventy-two per cent did not use additional personal protective equipment (PPE) if a patient PCR test was negative. Forty-nine per cent continued to give preference to general anaesthesia. CONCLUSION: Our study shows that elective surgeries and outpatient visits were almost completely interrupted during the COVID-19 lockdown and were still below normal at four and 21 weeks after resuming elective care. Regarding ESSKA COVID-19 guidelines, our study observes good compliance in preoperative patient COVID-19 testing, but lower compliance for preoperative health care personnel testing, patient selection, use of PPE, and locoregional anaesthesia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.