C-Reactive protein and SOFA scale: A simple score as early predictor of critical care requirement in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Spain. / Proteína C reactiva y escala SOFA: una simple escala como factor predictivo temprano de la necesidad de cuidados críticos en los pacientes con neumonía causada por COVID-19 en España.

OBJECTIVE: To identify potential markers at admission predicting the need for critical care in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An approved, observational, retrospective study was conducted between March 15 to April 15, 2020. 150 adult patients aged less than 75 with Charlson comorbidity index ≤6 diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia were included. Seventy-five patients were randomly selected from those admitted to the critical care units (critical care group [CG]) and seventy-five hospitalized patients who did not require critical care (non-critical care group [nCG]) represent the control group. One additional cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were used to validate the score. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital critical care associated with increased C-reactive protein (CRP) (odds ratio 1.052 [1.009-1.101]; P=.0043) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (1.968 [1.389-2.590]; P<.0001), both at the time of hospital admission. The AUC-ROC for the combined model was 0.83 (0.76-0.90) (vs AUC-ROC SOFA P<.05). The AUC-ROC for the validation cohort was 0.89 (0.82-0.95) (P>0.05 vs AUC-ROC development). CONCLUSION: Patients COVID-19 presenting at admission SOFA score ≥2 combined with CRP ≥9,1mg/mL could be at high risk to require critical care.

[C-Reactive protein and SOFA scale: A simple score as early predictor of critical care requirement in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Spain]. / Proteína C reactiva y escala SOFA: una simple escala como factor predictivo temprano de la necesidad de cuidados críticos en los pacientes con neumonía causada por COVID-19 en España.

OBJECTIVE: To identify potential markers at admission predicting the need for critical care in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An approved, observational, retrospective study was conducted between March 15 to April 15, 2020. 150 adult patients aged less than 75 with Charlson comorbidity index ≤ 6 diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia were included. Seventy-five patients were randomly selected from those admitted to the critical care units (critical care group [CG]) and seventy-five hospitalized patients who did not require critical care (non-critical care group [nCG]) represent the control group. One additional cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were used to validate the score. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital critical care associated with increased C-reactive protein (CRP) (odds ratio 1.052 [1.009-1.101]; P = .0043) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (1.968 [1.389-2.590]; P < .0001), both at the time of hospital admission. The AUC-ROC for the combined model was 0.83 (0.76-0.90) (vs AUC-ROC SOFA P < .05). The AUC-ROC for the validation cohort was 0.89 (0.82-0.95) (P > 0.05 vs AUC-ROC development). CONCLUSION: Patients COVID-19 presenting at admission SOFA score ≥ 2 combined with CRP ≥ 9,1 mg/mL could be at high risk to require critical care.

C-Reactive protein and SOFA scale: A simple score as early predictor of critical care requirement in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: To identify potential markers at admission predicting the need for critical care in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An approved, observational, retrospective study was conducted between March 15 to April 15, 2020. 150 adult patients aged less than 75 with Charlson comorbidity index ≤6 diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia were included. Seventy-five patients were randomly selected from those admitted to the critical care units (critical care group [CG]) and seventy-five hospitalized patients who did not require critical care (non-critical care group [nCG]) represent the control group. One additional cohort of hospitalized patients with COVID-19 were used to validate the score. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Multivariable regression showed increasing odds of in-hospital critical care associated with increased C-reactive protein (CRP) (odds ratio 1.052 [1.009-1.101]; P = 0.0043) and higher Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (1.968 [1.389-2.590]; P < 0.0001), both at the time of hospital admission. The AUC-ROC for the combined model was 0.83 (0.76-0.90) (vs AUC-ROC SOFA P < 0.05). The AUC-ROC for the validation cohort was 0.89 (0.82-0.95) (P > 0.05 vs AUC-ROC development). CONCLUSION: Patients COVID-19 presenting at admission SOFA score ≥ 2 combined with CRP ≥ 9.1 mg/mL could be at high risk to require critical care.

Endothelial dysfunction is an early indicator of sepsis and neutrophil degranulation of septic shock in surgical patients.

BACKGROUND: Stratification of the severity of infection is currently based on the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, which is difficult to calculate outside the ICU. Biomarkers could help to stratify the severity of infection in surgical patients. METHODS: Levels of ten biomarkers indicating endothelial dysfunction, 22 indicating emergency granulopoiesis, and six denoting neutrophil degranulation were compared in three groups of patients in the first 12 h after diagnosis at three Spanish hospitals. RESULTS: There were 100 patients with infection, 95 with sepsis and 57 with septic shock. Seven biomarkers indicating endothelial dysfunction (mid-regional proadrenomedullin (MR-ProADM), syndecan 1, thrombomodulin, angiopoietin 2, endothelial cell-specific molecule 1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 and E-selectin) had stronger associations with sepsis than infection alone. MR-ProADM had the highest odds ratio (OR) in multivariable analysis (OR 11·53, 95 per cent c.i. 4·15 to 32·08; P = 0·006) and the best area under the curve (AUC) for detecting sepsis (0·86, 95 per cent c.i. 0·80 to 0·91; P < 0·001). In a comparison of sepsis with septic shock, two biomarkers of neutrophil degranulation, proteinase 3 (OR 8·09, 1·34 to 48·91; P = 0·028) and lipocalin 2 (OR 6·62, 2·47 to 17·77; P = 0·002), had the strongest association with septic shock, but lipocalin 2 exhibited the highest AUC (0·81, 0·73 to 0·90; P < 0·001). CONCLUSION: MR-ProADM and lipocalin 2 could be alternatives to the SOFA score in the detection of sepsis and septic shock respectively in surgical patients with infection.

ANTECEDENTES: La estratificación de la gravedad de una infección se basa actualmente en la puntuación SOFA (Sequential Organ Failure Assessment), que es difícil de calcular fuera de la unidad de cuidados intensivos. Los biomarcadores podrían ayudar a estratificar la gravedad de la infección en pacientes quirúrgicos. MÉTODOS: Se compararon las concentraciones de 10 biomarcadores que denotan disfunción endotelial, 22 que indican granulopoyesis de emergencia y 6 que expresan la degranulación de neutrófilos en tres grupos de pacientes de tres hospitales españoles (100 con infección, 95 con sepsis y 57 con shock séptico) en las primeras doce horas después del diagnóstico. RESULTADOS: Siete biomarcadores que expresan disfunción endotelial (proadrenomedulina, sindecan-1, trombomodulina, angiopoyetina-2, endocan-1, molécula de adhesión endotelial 1 y E-selectina) mostraron una fuerte asociación con la sepsis en comparación con la infección aislada. La proadrenomedulina presentó el valor más alto de la razón de oportunidades (odds ratio, OR) en el análisis multivariable (OR 11,53, i.c. del 95% 4,15-32,08, P = 0,006) y la mejor área bajo la curva para detectar sepsis (AUC 0,86, i.c. del 95% 0,80-0,91, P < 0,001). En la comparación entre sepsis y shock séptico, los biomarcadores que mostraron la asociación más estrecha con el shock séptico fueron dos biomarcadores de degranulación de neutrófilos (proteinasa-3 y lipocalina-2) (OR 8,09, i.c. del 9% 1,34-48,91, P = 0,028; OR 6.62, i.c. del 95% 2,47-17,77, P = 0,002), pero la lipocalina-2 presentó la mejor AUC (0,81, i.c. del 95% 0,73-0,90, P < 0,001). CONCLUSIÓN: la proadrenomedulina y la lipocalina-2 podrían representar alternativas a la puntuación SOFA para detectar sepsis y shock séptico en pacientes quirúrgicos con infección.

Extremely prolonged neuromuscular blockade after rocuronium: a case report.

It is known that the duration of rocuronium action can be prolonged in elderly patients and that such action shows important interindividual variability. We report a case of prolonged neuromuscular block lasting 11 h, in a woman subjected to kidney transplantation. The possible causes of such prolonged action, inherent to the drug, or related to external factors, are commented.

[Ischemic stroke in childhood. A complication of tonsillectomy]. / Ictus isquémico en niño como complicación de adenoamigdalectomía.

Tonsillectomy is one of the most frequently performed otorhinolaryngological procedures on children. The postoperative complications are classified into primary or intermediate, which generally appear within 24h, and as secondary or delayed, after 48 h. We present the case of an ischemic stroke after performing a tonsillectomy on a 3 year-old boy, which was diagnosed in the immediate postoperative period. Using brain echo-doppler and angio-CT, an intraluminal clot was observed in the left internal carotid artery, probably as a result of direct vessel injury during arterial ligature for hemostasis.

[Bone mastocytosis. Diagnostic approach]. / Mastocitosis ósea. Aproximación al diagnóstico.

The mastocytosis form a group of complaints characterized by the accumulation of mast cell. Systemic mastocytosis is diagnoses when there are one or more organ or tissues affected, independent of their localization in the skin. Bone mastocytosis affects between 70-90% of the patients suffering from systemic mastocytosis and lacks common diagnostic criteria. The most characteristic finds of bone mastocytosis, collected from 213 cases published in the universal literature over the last 20 years will be discussed. The results which, were found in relation to clinical, analytical, radiological and anatomophatological variables, aimed at the diagnosis of systemic mastocytosis and indispensable for the diagnosis of bone mastocytosis will be commented upon. Compiling this data the publications about mastocytosis between 1977 and 1997 have been revised, choosing those in which complaints of radiologic bone could be found.

[Effectiveness of epidural administration of saline solutions to prevent or treat postdural puncture headache]. / Eficacia de la administración peridural de soluciones salinas isotónicas en la profilaxis y tratamiento de las cefaleas postpunción dural.

Epidural anesthesia is the most versatile and widely used of the techniques for regional anesthesia. The most common complication of epidural or spinal anesthesia is postdural puncture headache. The loss of cerebrospinal fluid through the hole can be an important causative factor of this cephalalgia. Of the many methods recommended for preventing and treating postdural puncture headache, one is bolus administration or infusion of saline solution into the epidural space, by which both epidural and subarachnoid pressures are increased. We have reviewed the literature evaluating the effectiveness of this technique from 1967 to 2004, using the following search terms: anesthesia, spinal; anesthesia, epidural; analgesia, epidural; headache; postdural puncture treatment or prophylaxis; epidural injection; epidural saline. Few articles were found. The studies had small samples and most did not include a control group. The doses and methods of epidural administration of saline solutions were highly variable and the results were often contradictory. We conclude that using this technique to prevent and/or treat postdural puncture headache is difficult to justify.

[Refractory hypotension during anesthesia in a patient treated with angiotensin receptor blockers]. / Hipotensión refractaria durante la anestesia a una paciente en tratamiento con antagonistas de los receptores de la angiotensina.

A 66-year-old woman treated with valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker, and diuretics was scheduled for surgery to remove a pelvic mass. Both drugs were withdrawn 24 hours before anesthetic induction. Combined general and epidural anesthesia was provided. When hypotension developed and was refractory to fluid replacement and phenylephrine administration, terlipressin, a vasopressin receptor antagonist, was infused and outcome was favorable. Anesthetized patients treated with angiotensin II receptor blockers to control hypertension may experience hypotensive events that are refractory to standard treatment but that respond to vasopressin receptor antagonists.