Long-term outcome in patients with ST segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease treated with culprit-only, immediate, or staged multivessel percutaneous revascularization strategies: Insights from the REAL registry.

OBJECTIVES: To examine the differences in cardiac outcomes for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) as a function of whether they underwent culprit-only primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) or multivessel PCI, either during PPCI or as a staged procedure. BACKGROUND: MVD occurs in about 40% of patients presenting with STEMI, and it has been associated with a worse outcome compared to single-vessel disease. The most favorable PCI strategy for dealing with significant nonculprit lesions has to be established. METHODS: A total of 2061 STEMI patients with MVD undergoing PPCI, prospectively enrolled in the REAL Registry between July 2002 and December 2010, were considered: 706 underwent culprit-only PPCI; 367 multivessel PCI during the index procedure; 988 had a staged PCI within 60 days. Mortality and outcomes were calculated at 30 days and 2 years. RESULTS: At multivariate analysis, culprit-only PPCI was associated with higher rates of cardiac outcomes as compared to staged multivessel PCI, taken as reference [Hazard Ratio (HR): 2.81, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.34-5.89, P = 0.006 for 30-day mortality, and HR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.35-2.74, P = 0.0002 for 2-year mortality, respectively]. Short-term mortality rates were higher in multivessel PCI group as compared to staged PCI group (HR: 2.58, 95% CI: 1.06-6.26, P = 0.03); no differences were observed at 2-year follow-up (HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.64-1.82, P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the current guidelines recommendation to perform culprit-only PPCI in STEMI patients with MVD without hemodynamic compromise, followed by a staged PCI of noninfarct-related significant lesions.

[Transcatheter closure of ventricular septal defect: how and when?] / Chiusura percutanea di difetto interventricolare post-infartuale: come e quando?

Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is a rare but clinically severe complication of acute myocardial infarction. Although cardiac surgery is the gold standard to correct post-infarction VSD, transcatheter closure represents an effective therapeutic alternative in selected cases. However, the correct timing for VSD correction is a matter of debate. Herein, we report the case of a patient who underwent transcatheter closure of post-infarction VSD, focusing the discussion on the pros and cons of an early VSD correction.

[Periprocedural management of anticoagulation therapy and in-hospital outcomes in patients with warfarin indication undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Data from the WAR-STENT registry]. / Gestione periprocedurale della terapia anticoagulante ed esiti intraospedalieri nei pazienti con indicazione a warfarin sottoposti ad angioplastica coronarica. Informazioni dal registro WAR-STENT.

BACKGROUND: In patients with an indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC) with warfarin, the management of OAC peri-procedure of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is still not fully defined. To investigate clinical practice and outcomes associated with continuation vs interruption of OAC, with or without bridging with low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH), we examined the database of the observational, prospective, multicenter Italian WAR-STENT registry. METHODS: The WAR-STENT registry was conducted in 2008-2010 in 37 Italian centers and included 411 consecutive patients in 157 of whom the peri-procedural international normalized ratio (INR) value was available. In relation to the continuation vs interruption of OAC, patients were divided into group 1 (n = 106) and group 2 (n = 51) respectively, and compared. RESULTS: The basal characteristics of the two groups were similar. The most frequent indication for OAC was atrial fibrillation and for PCI acute coronary syndromes, respectively. The pre-procedural mean value of INR was significantly different in group 1 vs group 2 (2.3 ± 0.4 vs 1.5 ± 0.2; p <0.001), while the use of antithrombotic drugs did not differ, except for LMWH which, albeit limited to only 14% of cases, was used significantly more frequently in group 2 (14% vs 2%; p=0.006). The radial approach was used significantly more often in group 1 vs group 2 (72% vs 45%; p=0.002). The in-hospital incidence of major bleeding complications was similar in groups 1 and 2 (4% vs 8%; p=0.27), as well as the occurrence of major adverse cardio-cerebrovascular events, including cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, re-revascularization of the treated vessel, stent thrombosis, stroke and venous thromboembolism (6% vs 6%; p=0.95). There was a tendency towards a higher incidence of minor access-site bleeding complications in group 1 patients treated by the femoral route. CONCLUSIONS: In unselected patients with an indication for OAC with warfarin and undergoing PCI, the continuation vs interruption of OAC (essentially without LMWH bridging) strategies appears similar in terms of efficacy and safety. In consideration of the superior convenience, peri-procedural continuation of OAC should therefore generally be preferred, with the possible exception of patients in whom the femoral approach is required for the procedure.

Impact of history of depression on 1-year outcomes in patients with chronic coronary syndromes: An analysis of a contemporary, prospective, nationwide registry.

BACKGROUND: Depression is common in patients with acute cardiovascular conditions and it is associated with adverse clinical events. METHODS: Using the data from a nationwide, prospective registry on patients with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), we assessed the impact of depression on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death and hospitalization for myocardial infarction, revascularization, heart failure or stroke, and quality of life (QoL) at 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: From the 5070 consecutive CCS patients enrolled in the registry, 531 (10.5%) presented a history of depression and the remaining 4539 (89.5%) did not. At 1 year (median 369; IQR 362-378 days) from enrolment, the incidence of the primary composite outcome was 9.8% for patients with a history of depression and 7.2% for non-depressed patients (p = 0.03). Patients with history of depression had a significantly higher rate of all-cause mortality (3.0% vs 1.4%; p = 0.004) and hospital admission for heart failure (3.4% vs 1.3%; p = 0.0002) compared to the group without depression. However, history of depression did not result as an independent predictor of MACE at multivariable analysis [hazard ratio 1.17, 95% confidence interval (0.87-1.58), p = 0.31]. Depressed patients had worse QoL according to all domains of the EQ. 5D-5L questionnaire as compared to non-depressed patients (all p < 0.001), at both enrolment and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary, large cohort of consecutive patients with CCS, patients with a history of depression experienced a two-fold rate of mortality, a higher incidence of MACE and a worse QoL at 1-year follow-up, compared to non-depressed patients.

Percutaneous coronary interventions in octogenarians: Acute and 12 month results in a large single-centre experience.

OBJECTIVES: To review the results of PCI in patients aged >or=80 years. BACKGROUND: Octogenarians represent a growing proportion of patients treated with PCI; in this subset of high-risk patients, the role of complete revascularization is still controversial. METHODS: We examined in-hospital, 30 days, and 12-month events in 356 patients aged >or=80 years submitted to PCI from 2004 to 2006 and 754 patients aged <80 years treated in 2006. RESULTS: Octogenarians had a higher risk profile. A complete revascularization was obtained in 48% of them and in 65% of younger patients (P < 0.001); glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) use was common in both groups (43 vs. 46.5%). In-hospital mortality was higher in octogenarians (3.9 vs. 1.3%, P = 0.01) as well as vascular complications (2.8 vs. 1%, P = 0.058). Mortality resulted 5.9 vs. 1.2% at 30 days (P < 0.001), and 16.3 vs. 3.9% at 12 months (P <0.001) in the two groups whereas repeat revascularization procedures did not differ (9.3 vs. 8.4%, respectively). In patients aged >or=80, there was no difference in 12 months total events (20 vs. 28%, P = 0.07) and repeat revascularizations (8 vs. 10%, P = 0.498) in completely or uncompletely revascularized subjects. At multivariate analysis age (P = 0.002), diabetes (P = 0.002), three vessel disease (P = 0.020) and procedural success (P = 0.002) were independent predictors of total events at 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, frequent GPI use and multivessel PCI in 41% of >or=80 years-old patients resulted in good immediate and mid-term clinical outcomes, irrespective of the completeness of revascularization achieved.

Clinical impact of an inter-hospital transfer strategy in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty: the Emilia-Romagna ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction network.

AIMS: This study sought to evaluate the impact of an inter-hospital transfer strategy on treatment times and in-hospital and 1 year cardiac mortality of patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing primary percutaneous intervention (p-PCI) in the Italian region of Emilia-Romagna, where an efficient region-wide system for reperfusion has been established. METHODS AND RESULTS: 3296 patients with STEMI, undergoing on-site p-PCI (2444 patients) (OS group) or p-PCI after inter-hospital transfer (852 patients) (T group) between 1 January 2004 and 30 June 2006 in the Italian region of Emilia-Romagna, were considered. During the study period, the number of patients undergoing p-PCI increased both for patients admitted to interventional centres and for those admitted to peripheral hospitals. At the same time, the proportion of patients with STEMI initially admitted to peripheral hospitals and not transferred and the door-to-balloon time delays of transfer patients decreased. In spite of longer door-to-balloon delay in the transfer group [112 min (86-147) vs. 71 min (46-104)], in-hospital cardiac mortality (OS 7.0 vs. T 5.4%, P = 0.10) did not significantly differ between the two groups. After multivariable adjustment, the transfer strategy was not associated with increased risk of in-hospital [odds ratio 0.956; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.633-1.442] and 1 year (hazard ratio 0.817; 95% CI 0.617-1.085) cardiac mortality. CONCLUSION: This study, concerning an established STEMI regional network, suggests that a strategy of inter-hospital transfer for p-PCI, when supported by an organized system of care, may be applied with rapid reperfusion times and favourable short- and long-term clinical outcomes.

Long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents: two-year results of the REAL (REgistro AngiopLastiche dell'Emilia Romagna) multicenter registry.

BACKGROUND: The long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) have been questioned recently. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between July 2002 and June 2005, 10,629 patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention with either DES (n=3064) or bare-metal stents (BMS, n=7565) were enrolled in a prospective registry comprising 13 hospitals. We assessed the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events (death, acute myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) and angiographic stent thrombosis during 2-year follow-up. A propensity score analysis to adjust for different baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural characteristics was performed. The 2-year unadjusted cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac events was 17.8% in the DES group and 21.0% in the BMS group (P=0.003 by log-rank test). Angiographic stent thrombosis was 1.0% in the DES group and 0.6% in the BMS group (P=0.09). After adjustment, the 2-year cumulative incidence of death was 6.8% in the DES group and 7.4% in the BMS group (P=0.35), whereas the rates were 5.3% in DES and 5.8% in BMS for acute myocardial infarction (P=0.46), 9.1% in DES and 12.9% in BMS for target-vessel revascularization (P<0.00001), and 16.9% in DES and 21.8% in BMS for major adverse cardiac events (P<0.0001). Independent predictors of target-vessel revascularization in the DES group were diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio 1.36, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 1.76), renal failure (hazard ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.06 to 2.69), and reference vessel diameter (hazard ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.45 to 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: In this large real-world population, the beneficial effect of DES in reducing the need for new revascularization compared with BMS extends to 2 years without evidence of a worse safety profile.

Comparison of effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with diabetes mellitus (from the Italian Multicenter Randomized DESSERT Study).

Few studies directly compared drug-eluting stents and bare-metal stents (BMSs) in diabetic patients. DESSERT was an Italian multicenter randomized trial to show the efficacy of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) compared with BMSs in de novo lesions of diabetic patients treated with insulin and/or oral antidiabetics for > or =3 months on top of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors. The primary end point was in-stent late lumen loss, assessed using centralized quantitative coronary angiography at 8-month follow-up. Centrally adjudicated composite major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) and target-vessel failure (TVF; death, treated vessel-related acute myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization) at 30 days and 9 and 12 months were secondary end points. Seventy-five patients were randomly assigned to an SES (109 lesions), and 75 (109 lesions), to a BMS. The 2 groups were well balanced for clinical, anatomic, and procedural characteristics. In-stent late lumen loss decreased from 0.96 +/- 0.61 mm for BMSs to 0.14 +/- 0.33 for SESs (p <0.001), and in-segment binary restenosis was 38.8% versus 3.6%, respectively (p <0.001). Twelve-month clinical events were significantly lower in the sirolimus group: MACEs 22.1% versus 40% (p = 0.023), target-lesion revascularization 5.9% versus 30% (p <0.001), and TVF 14.7% versus 34.3% (p = 0.008). At multivariate analysis, stent type was confirmed as an independent predictor of in-segment late loss (p <0.001), binary restenosis (p <0.001), 12-month TVF (p = 0.010), and 12-month MACEs (p = 0.037). In conclusion, the randomized DESSERT showed SESs to be safe and effective in decreasing both angiographic parameters of restenosis and incidence of MACEs compared with BMSs in diabetic patients with de novo 1- or 2-vessel coronary stenoses.

Long-term outcomes with drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in the treatment of saphenous vein graft disease (results from the REgistro Regionale AngiopLastiche Emilia-Romagna registry).

Percutaneous revascularization of saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) remains a challenging task. Drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been shown to decrease the incidence of restenosis in de novo native coronary artery lesions. However, their clinical value in SVGs remains to be established. We compared long-term clinical outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention with DESs and bare metal stents (BMSs) for de novo lesions in SVGs. In a large prospective, multicenter registry, 360 patients underwent stenting of a de novo lesion in SVGs using BMSs (288 patients) or DESs (72 patients). Incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), including all-cause mortality, reinfarction, and target vessel revascularization, was recorded at a 12-month follow-up. Compared with the DES group, patients receiving BMSs were more likely to be men, to have chronic renal insufficiency or higher Charlson scores, but less likely to have undergone previous percutaneous coronary intervention. Incidence of MACEs at 12-month follow-up was similar in the 2 groups (17.8% in DES group vs 20.3% in BMS group, respectively, p = 0.460). Cox regression analysis identified age, chronic renal failure, cardiogenic shock at presentation, and ostial location of stenosis as independent predictors of long-term MACEs. In conclusion, our data suggest that rates of 12-month MACEs associated with the use of DESs and BMSs are similar in patients undergoing treatment of de novo lesions in SVGs.

Single or multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical results of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in patients with multivessel disease (MVD), in relation to single or multivessel (MV)-PCI and to patients with single vessel disease (SVD). METHODS: Patients treated with PCI in the setting of <24 hr STEMI in the years 2004-2007 were considered. RESULTS: Seven hundred forty-five primary PCI, 346 (46%) in patients with SVD and 399 (54%) in patients with MVD were performed. Among MVD patients, 156 (39%) had infarct related artery (IRA)-only treatment and 243 had MV-PCI: 147 (37%) in a single session, 48 (12%) within 24 hr, and 48 (12%) predischarge. Revascularization was complete in 46% of MVD patients. At a median follow-up of 597 days, mortality was 6.3% in SVD and 12% in MVD (P = 0.007), new revascularization 2.9% and 9%, respectively (P < 0.001). Thirty-day mortality was 2.4% in SVD and 6.7% in MVD (P = 0.006). After exclusion of patients with cardiogenic shock or pulmonary oedema, more frequent in the MV-PCI in single session group (P = 0.006), 30-day mortality was SVD 1.3%, IRA-only 6.3%, MV-PCI 2.8% (P = 0.023), without differences if in a single (3.3%) or in staged session (2.2%). By multivariate analysis, female sex, anterior STEMI, cardiogenic shock, MVD, and procedural failure were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: STEMI patients with MVD have a worse prognosis than those with SVD. MV-PCI in patients without hemodynamic compromise yields good short-term results, even if performed very early, with a 30-day mortality in between that of SVD patients and that of MVD patients with IRA-only treatment.

Left main percutaneous coronary intervention in ACS or stable coronary artery disease: acute and long-term results.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess in-hospital and long-term results of the novo unprotected left main (UPLM) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or stable coronary artery disease (CAD), in an unselected population admitted to a single high- volume cath-lab without on-site cardiac surgery. METHODS: From 2008 to 2011, among 317 PCI performed in patients with the novo UPLM stenosis, 49 patients presented ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), 152 non ST-elevation MI/unstable angina (NSTEMI/UA), 116 stable CAD. RESULTS: In-hospital mortality was 20% in STEMI, 5.3% in NSTEMI/UA and 1.7% in stable CAD patients (P<0.001). Two-year total mortality was 24.5%, 25.6% and 6% in the 3 groups, and cardiac death was 20%, 13.8% and 3.4% (P=0.002). Left main target lesion revascularization (TLR) was similar in the 3 groups, as the clinically-driven TLR (10% vs. 11% vs. 7.7%, P=0.642), with neither definite nor probable stent thrombosis. Multivariate analysis showed the following independent predictors of 2-year mortality: bare-metal stent use (OR 4.53, P<0.001), Syntax Score >32 (OR 3.53, P=0.012), ACS as the indication (OR 3.24, P=0.012), peripheral artery disease (OR 2.20, P=0.042), and age >75 years (OR 2.09, P=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience showed acceptable results of UPLM PCI in STEMI patients, where short-term prognosis was related to hemodynamic conditions, good results in NSTEMI/UA patients where mortality increased in the follow-up due to comorbidities, and very good results in patients with stable CAD.

Risk of Adverse Cardiac and Bleeding Events Following Cardiac and Noncardiac Surgery in Patients With Coronary Stent: How Important Is the Interplay Between Stent Type and Time From Stenting to Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Epidemiology and consequences of surgery in patients with coronary stents are not clearly defined, as well as the impact of different stent types in relationship with timing of surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among 39 362 patients with previous coronary stenting enrolled in a multicenter prospective registry and followed for 5 years, 13 128 patients underwent 17 226 surgical procedures. The cumulative incidence of surgery at 30 days, 6 months, 1 year, and 5 years was 3.6%, 9.4%, 14.3%, and 40.0%, respectively, and of cardiac and noncardiac surgery was 0.8%, 2.1%, 2.6%, and 4.0% and 1.3%, 5.1%, 9.1%, and 31.7%, respectively. We assessed the incidence and the predictors of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and serious bleeding event within 30 days from surgery. Cardiac death occurred in 438 patients (2.5%), myocardial infarction in 256 (1.5%), and serious bleeding event in 1099 (6.4%). Surgery increased 1.58× the risk of cardiac death during follow-up. Along with other risk factors, the interplay between stent type and time from percutaneous coronary intervention to surgery was independently associated with cardiac death/myocardial infarction. In comparison with bare-metal stent implanted >12 months before surgery, old-generation drug-eluting stent was associated with higher risk of events at any time point. Conversely, new-generation drug-eluting stent showed similar safety as bare-metal stent >12 months and between 6 and 12 months and appeared trendly safer between 0 and 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Surgery is frequent in patients with coronary stents and carries a considerable risk of ischemic and bleeding events. Ischemic risk is inversely related with time from percutaneous coronary intervention to surgery and is influenced by stent type.

Comparison of effectiveness of sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare metal stents for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients at high risk for coronary restenosis or clinical adverse events.

We evaluated the clinical effect of selective use of sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs) in real-world, high-risk patients. A total of 4,237 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (SES, n = 872, bare metal stents [BMSs], n = 3,365) was enrolled in a prospective regional survey. A prespecified high-risk subset of patients was selected on the basis of clinical and angiographic characteristics. A propensity score analysis was performed to compare patients who received SESs with those who received BMSs. Patients in the SES group more often had diabetes and more frequently had previous myocardial infarction or coronary revascularization, type C lesions, and multivessel procedures. Patients who presented with acute myocardial infarction were treated more often with BMSs. At 9 months, the use of SESs was associated with fewer major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization; hazard ratio 0.56, 95% confidence interval 0.37 to 0.85) and target lesion revascularizations (hazard ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.20 to 0.91). This decrease was more evident in a prespecified high-risk subgroup of patients (major adverse cardiac events, 8.0% SES vs 15.6% BMS, hazard ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.72). We conclude that selective SES use in real-world patients who have high-risk clinical and angiographic characteristics is associated with significant decreases in major adverse cardiac events and repeat revascularizations compared with BMS use.

Cost of single-vessel and multivessel coronary drug-eluting stenting: comparison to the DRG funding level.

BACKGROUND: Large-scale utilization of drug-eluting stents (DES) presents significant economic limitations, related to the current high cost of the device and the absence of adequate reimbursement from the health care system. The aim of the study was to evaluate the cost of single-vessel and multivessel drug-eluting stenting and to compare it with the DRG funding level. METHODS: Between November 2003 and May 2004, we studied 100 consecutive patients who underwent a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DES, 50 single-vessel and 50 multivessel procedures, in order to evaluate the real procedure costs of DES. The cost fields calculated in the analysis included: costs for the materials and drugs used in each procedure, costs related to medical personnel and staff, costs for equipment depreciations, and costs for total hospitalization based on the length of stay in the coronary care unit and/or in the cardiology ward. RESULTS: With regard to the 50 patients with single-vessel disease, 63 lesions were treated with 58 DES. With regard to the 50 patients with multivessel disease, the average number of treated vessels was 2.3 and of lesions 2.8. An average of 2.7 DES per patient was implanted; glycoprotein Ilb/IIIa inhibitors were used in 70% of cases. The multivessel procedure necessitated an average of 1.62 guide catheters, 1.86 guides, 1.36 balloons, and 475 +/- 124 ml of contrast medium; the average endoscopy time was 16 +/- 8 min while the total procedural time was 106 +/- 37 min. The procedural success rate was 100% for both groups. The post-PCI hospital stay was 2.1 +/- 1.7 days for patients with single-vessel disease and 2.8 +/- 2.6 days for patients with multivessel disease; the total was 4.7 +/- 2.8 and 6 +/- 3.2 days respectively. The mean total cost of hospital stay for PCI and DES was 6390 +/- 2274 Euro for single-vessel PCI and 9828 +/- 3026 Euro for multivessel PCI, split as follows: materials 2915 +/- 963 Euro and 5294 +/- 1177 Euro, procedural costs 404 +/- 55 and 446 +/- 99 Euro, costs of hospital stay 3070 +/- 2024 Euro and 4089 +/- 2517 Euro respectively for single-vessel and multivessel PCI. CONCLUSIONS: The mean total cost of a single-vessel PCI with DES falls within the DRG 112 reimbursement level for coronary angioplasty of 7006 Euro, while that of multivessel PCI with multiple DES is about 40% above the same reimbursement level. Interestingly, the multivessel PCI cost with multiple DES does fall within the reimbursement amount related to DRG 107 for bypass surgery procedures (14,322 Euro).

Prevention of postcoronary angioplasty restenosis by omega-3 fatty acids: main results of the Esapent for Prevention of Restenosis ITalian Study (ESPRIT).

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Previous trials of omega-3 fatty acids (omega-3 FA) for restenosis prevention after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) have yielded conflicting results. We tested the hypothesis that long-term administration of omega-3 FA before PTCA may have significant effects on restenosis. METHODS: We randomized 339 patients in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study of omega-3 FA (as an ethyl ester preparation given as 6 1-g capsules providing 3 g eicosapentaenoic acid and 2.1 g docosahexaenoic acid/d started 1 month before PTCA and given for 1 month thereafter, then continued at half-dose for 6 months) versus an olive oil placebo. Of these, 257 patients (125 on omega-3 FA, 132 on placebo) well matched for risk factors underwent successful balloon-only PTCA (280 total lesions) and were evaluable at 6 months with repeat angiography. Restenosis was defined at quantitative angiography as a recurrence of >50% diameter stenosis in the dilated vessel (Definition I) and as >50% loss of the short-term gain immediately after PTCA (Definition II). RESULTS: Restenosis rates per vessel were 29.4% and 31.6% in the omega-3 FA group, and 39.6% and 35.4% in the placebo group according to Definitions I (P =.04) and II (P = not significant), respectively. Restenosis rates per patient were 31.2% and 33.6% in the omega-3 FA group, and 40.9% and 37.1% in the placebo group according to Definitions I (P =.05) and II (P = not significant), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: With a long treatment before PTCA, omega-3 FA produced a small but significant decrease in the restenosis rate compared with placebo.

Spontaneous coronary dissection of all three coronary arteries: a case description with medium-term angiographic follow-up.

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection is a rare cause of ischemic heart disease, often related with a poor prognosis. We report the case of a 38-year-old woman without cardiovascular risk factors, admitted to our coronary care unit for unstable angina with ECG findings of inferior ischemia. The day after, an acute anterior myocardial infarction occurred and was treated with intravenous thrombolysis. Again, there were ECG signs of transient inferior ischemia. Coronary angiography showed widespread spontaneous coronary dissection involving the terminal left main stem, both the left anterior descending and circumflex artery, and the right coronary artery even peripherally, rendering any type of revascularization procedure inappropriate. The patient was placed on beta-blockers, acetylsalicylic acid and nitrates and her symptoms resolved; the 17-month angiographic follow-up showed almost complete healing of spontaneous coronary artery dissection. The peculiarities of the case are discussed and a review of the literature is provided.

[Ad-hoc coronary angioplasty: organizational model, clinical results and costs]. / L'angioplastica coronarica ad hoc: modello organizzativo, risultati clinici e costi.

BACKGROUND: Our center routinely employs the strategy of ad hoc percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) after diagnostic catheterization in previously informed and prepared patients with anatomical and clinical indications for some years. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical results and resource consumption of the ad hoc PCI strategy in our center. METHODS: We evaluated the results and resource consumption of 783 PCIs performed between January 1, 1999 and June 30, 2001, divided into 642 (82%) ad hoc and 141 (18%) deferred PCIs. We analyzed the patients' in-hospital clinical and procedural characteristics, the 1 and 6-month outcomes and resource consumption (costs of materials, quantity of contrast medium, fluoroscopic time and duration of procedures) in the two groups. RESULTS: Patients in the ad hoc group had more frequently previous PCI, hypertension, diabetes, acute coronary syndrome, single vessel disease, single lesion and single vessel PCI, stent use and direct stenting, use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and hemostatic devices; those in the deferred PCI group had more frequently previous myocardial infarction, stable angina, elective programmed hospital admission for PCI and multilesion single vessel PCI. The clinical results were good: clinical success in 97% of cases, in-hospital major adverse clinical events occurred in 2%, non-Q wave myocardial infarction in 3.4% (creatine-kinase-MB > 3 times higher than the upper normal limit in serial routine controls), major vascular complications in 0.4%, 1-month and 6-month major adverse clinical events in 4 and 9% respectively, without any difference between the two groups. Ad hoc PCI resulted in less contrast medium use, a shorter procedure duration, lower costs and shorter fluoroscopy times with respect to deferred PCI plus diagnostic catheterization, although not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, ad hoc PCI was safe and effective. Costs were lower and less resources were required. Patients were satisfactorily assisted and the logistics and organization of the procedure were optimal.

Coronary thrombus in patients undergoing primary PCI for STEMI: Prognostic significance and management.

Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) usually results from coronary atherosclerotic plaque disruption with superimposed thrombus formation. Detection of coronary thrombi is a poor prognostic indicator, which is mostly proportional to their size and composition. Particularly, intracoronary thrombi impair both epicardial blood flow and myocardial perfusion, by occluding major coronary arteries and causing distal embolization, respectively. Thus, although primary percutaneous coronary intervention is the preferred treatement strategy in STEMI setting, the associated use of adjunctive antithrombotic drugs and/or percutaneous thrombectomy is crucial to optimize therapy of STEMI patients, by improving either angiographical and clinical outcomes. This review article will focus on the prognostic significance of intracoronary thrombi and on current antithrombotic pharmacological and interventional strategies used in the setting of STEMI to manage thrombotic lesions.

Impact of COPD on long-term outcome after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: There are limited data describing the long-term outcome of patients with concomitant COPD who develop ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS: A total of 11,118 consecutive patients with STEMI enrolled in the web-based Registro Regionale Angioplastiche Emilia-Romagna (REAL) registry were followed-up and stratified according to COPD presence or not. At 3-year follow-up, mortality and hospital readmissions due to myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), coronary revascularization (CR), serious bleeding, and COPD were assessed. RESULTS: According to our criteria, 2,032 patients (18.2%) had a diagnosis of COPD. Overall, 1,829 patients (16.5%) died. COPD was an independent predictor of mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6). Hospital readmissions for recurrent MI (10% vs 6.9%, P < .01), CR (22% vs 19%, P < .01), HF (10% vs 6.9%, P < .01), and SB (10% vs 6%, P < .01) were significantly more frequent in patients with COPD as compared with those without. Also, hospital readmissions for COPD were more frequent in patients with a previous history of COPD as compared with those without (19% vs 3%; P < .01, respectively). Patients with a hospital readmission for COPD showed a fourfold increased risk of death (HR, 4.2; 95% CI, 3.4-5.2). Finally, hospital readmissions for COPD emerged as a strong independent risk factor for recurrence of MI (HR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.4-3.3), HF (HR, 5.8; 95% CI, 4.6-7.5), and SB (HR, 3; 95% CI, 2.1-4.4). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with STEMI and concomitant COPD are at greater risk for death and hospital readmissions due to cardiovascular causes (eg, recurrent MI, HF, bleedings) than patients without COPD.

Incidence and outcome of high on-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (from the VIP [VerifyNow and Inhibition of Platelet Reactivity] study).

High residual platelet reactivity (RPR) on clopidogrel treatment has been associated with increased risk for ischemic events during follow-up in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The aim of this study was to assess the incidence, predictors, and clinical consequences of high RPR in a large population of patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting. Overall, 833 patients received point-of-care testing of platelet inhibition 30 days after percutaneous coronary intervention. High RPR was diagnosed on the basis of P2Y12 reaction units >230. The incidence and predictors of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, and serious bleeding events were assessed up to 1 year from the day of testing. P2Y12 reaction units were normally distributed, and 264 patients were classified as poor responders (31.7%). Independent predictors of response to clopidogrel were male gender (odds ratio [OR] 1.51), age (OR 0.96), diabetes mellitus (OR 0.51), and use of proton pump inhibitors (OR 0.59). At 1 year, poor responders showed higher rates of death (4.6% vs 1.9%, p = 0.032) and serious bleeding events (4.9% vs 1.8%, p = 0.009) compared with good responders. After adjustment for confounders, high RPR did not emerge as an independent predictor of mortality (OR 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23 to 1.42, p = 0.23) or serious bleeding events (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.52, p = 0.29). The results did not change using the a cut-off value for P2Y12 reaction units of 208. In conclusion, 1/3 of patients with acute coronary syndromes who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention and stenting showed high on-treatment RPR on bedside monitoring. They had a worse prognosis, but the level of platelet inhibition was not independently associated with the incidence of ischemic or bleeding events.