Time- and Species-Dependent Bacterial Adhesion to Titanium over Short Exposure Periods: An In Vitro Study.

A considerable percentage of dental implant patients experience biofilm-mediated peri-implant disease following transmucosal abutment application. Bacterial adhesion is an early step in biofilm development. Our purpose was to assess adhesion of specific bacterial species to titanium over short exposure periods. Eight bacterial species were selected for this analysis: Streptococcus oralis, Streptococcus mitis, Gemella haemolysans, Streptococcus gordonii, Streptococcus sanguinis, Neisseria flavescens, Streptococcus salivarius, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We cultured each species with appropriate media and exposed titanium foil discs to the bacteria for 60, 15, 5, 1, or 0.25 minutes. Optical density at 600-nm wavelength (OD600) was assessed for the baseline inoculum and each species/exposure combination. The proportion of bacteria adherent to titanium was determined for each experimental condition. Striking titanium adhesion was noted for all evaluated species even when exposure time was limited to 15 seconds. Strategies to limit bacterial adhesion at dental implant surfaces may offer potential for improved treatment outcomes and preservation of peri-implant health.

Utilizing the Regional Acceleratory Phenomenon and Dental Implant Anchorage for Distalization and Intrusion of a Mesially Tipped Mandibular Molar: A Case Report.

INTRODUCTION: Introduction of a surgical insult in conjunction with orthodontic therapy has been shown to accelerate treatment in minor tooth movement and comprehensive orthodontic cases by induction of the regional acceleratory phenomenon (RAP). When applying this concept to a molar tipped into an adjacent edentulous site, a dental implant can be planned to anchor the movement. CASE PRESENTATION: A generally and periodontally healthy 25-year-old patient presented missing tooth #19, with tooth #18 mesially tipped into the first molar crown space. A dental implant was placed in the #19 position. Following osseointegration, the implant anchored orthodontic movement of the adjacent tooth, which was initiated in conjunction with third molar extraction. CONCLUSION: Favorable biomechanics for molar uprighting can be achieved using an osseointegrated implant and a customized orthodontic device. The presented technique facilitates implant site development without delaying placement of the fixture and simplifies fabrication of a harmonious and anatomic implant-supported restoration. Induction of the RAP may hasten treatment completion.