High-risk Opioid Prescribing Associated with Postoperative New Persistent Opioid Use in Adolescents and Young Adults.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we explored which postoperative opioid prescribing practices were associated with persistent opioid use among adolescents and young adults. BACKGROUND: Approximately 5% of adolescents and young adults develop postoperative new persistent opioid use. The impact of physician prescribing practices on persistent use among young patients is unknown. METHODS: We identified opioid-naïve patients aged 13 to 21 who underwent 1 of 13 procedures (2008-2016) and filled a perioperative opioid prescription using commercial insurance claims (Optum Deidentified Clinformatics Data Mart Database). Persistent use was defined as ≥ 1 opioid prescription fill 91 to 180 days after surgery. High-risk opioid prescribing included overlapping opioid prescriptions, co-prescribed benzodiazepines, high daily prescribed dosage, long-acting formulations, and multiple prescribers. Logistic regression modeled persistent use as a function of exposure to high-risk prescribing, adjusted for patient demographics, procedure, and comorbidities. RESULTS: High-risk opioid prescribing practices increased from 34.9% to 43.5% over the study period; the largest increase was in co-prescribed benzodiazepines (24.1%-33.4%). High-risk opioid prescribing was associated with persistent use (aOR 1.235 [1.12,1.36]). Receipt of prescriptions from multiple opioid prescribers was individually associated with persistent use (aOR 1.288 [1.16,1.44]). The majority of opioid prescriptions to patients with persistent use beyond the postoperative period were from nonsurgical prescribers (79.6%). CONCLUSIONS: High-risk opioid prescribing practices, particularly receiving prescriptions from multiple prescribers across specialties, were associated with a significant increase in adolescent and young adult patients' risk of persistent opioid use. Prescription drug monitoring programs may help identify young patients at risk of persistent opioid use.

The Road to Mastery: An Analysis of Goal Orientation in the Transition from Medical School to Surgical Residency.

PURPOSE: Goal orientation (GO) is a psychological construct which describes an individual's intrinsic motivation for learning in terms of mastery and performance goals. Mastery goals relate to the intrinsic drive to learn for the sake of learning, while performance goals are oriented toward validating one's own competence by seeking favorable judgments (Performance Approach; PAP) or avoiding negative judgments (Performance Avoid; PAV). Having a mastery GO has been shown to improve overall job satisfaction as well as optimize job performance. We therefore aimed to examine how GO changes during the transition to residency, which is a notoriously challenging period in medical education, and identify interventions that can increase mastery of GO. METHODS: The validated Goal Orientation in Surgical Trainees (GO-ST) instrument was administered to incoming surgical interns (n = 19) during orientation in a single, university-based program and again at 3 months into the internship. The perceived stress scale (PSS) was also administered at 3 months. Focus groups were used to assess resident perceptions and identify interventions at the end of the 3-month period. RESULTS: Eighteen interns (95%) completed a baseline GO-ST assessment and the 3-month follow-up, including the PSS. Mastery GO decreased from orientation to 3-month follow-up for the entire cohort, but this was not significant (3.89-3.63; p = 0.19). Preliminary interns showed a significant increase in PAV orientation after 3 months (3.28-3.67; p = 0.04) and had significantly lower mastery orientation scores at this time (4.07 vs 3.19; p = 0.02). PSS was significantly higher in preliminary interns at 3 months (18.56 vs 11.89; p = 0.04). Those who were predominantly mastery oriented had significantly lower perceived stress scores (11.64 vs 20.10; p = 0.002) compared with those that had performance goal orientations (PAP and PAV). Five interns (28%) participated in focus groups-identifying pertinent themes: 1) Perceptions of competence, 2) Training security; 3) Feedback approach, 4) Expectations of competence, and 5) Approaches to growth. CONCLUSION: Mastery GO declines during the transition to surgical residency. Maladaptive PAV orientation increases in preliminary interns due to different short-term priorities and assumptions of competence. Expectations and perceptions of intern competence by senior residents and attendings have a large impact on intern GO. Identifying interventions that optimize mastery goal orientation and minimize performance avoid orientation will potentially minimize intern stress, thereby improving both well-being and clinical performance.

Building an Equitable Surgical Training Pipeline: Leadership Exposure for the Advancement of Gender and Underrepresented Minority Equity in Surgery (LEAGUES).

OBJECTIVE: Underrepresented minority (URM) medical students face many educational challenges. Barriers include lack of equitable representation, scarce mentorship, and the effects of systemic racism. For students interested in diversity and health equity, perceptions of surgical culture may discourage pursuing surgical specialties. We describe a national pilot for a novel surgical pipeline program, Leadership Exposure for the Advancement of Gender and Underrepresented Minority Equity in Surgery (LEAGUES), which utilizes early exposure, mentorship, and community building to empower URM students in pursuit of academic surgical careers. DESIGN: A 4-week virtual program included pairing students with faculty research mentors, virtual skills sessions, and seminars on leadership, advocacy, and career development. Participants underwent semi-structured interviews before and after participation, assessing experiences with mentorship and research, interest in surgery, career aspirations, and perceived barriers to career goals. SETTING: Department of Surgery, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan. PARTICIPANTS: Rising second-year medical students. RESULTS: All 3 participants were Latinx; 2 were first-generation college students. Participants had no surgical mentorship and limited research exposure, citing a desire to learn research methodology, connect with mentors, and build towards a career working with underserved communities as motivating factors for participation. Perceived barriers to a surgical career included surgical culture, burnout, and lack of research expertise or academic network necessary for success. At completion of the program, participants described several themes: (1) new positive perspective on academic surgical culture, (2) interest and confidence in research, (3) hope for improving health disparities, (4) networking and longitudinal mentorship connections contributing to a sense of surgical community, and (5) eagerness to share resources with colleagues at their home institutions. CONCLUSIONS: LEAGUES program participants acquired tools and motivation to pursue careers in surgery, and established valuable longitudinal network and mentor relationships. LEAGUES is a novel model for national surgical pipeline programs.