Benchmarking Refined and Unrefined AlphaFold2 Structures for Hit Discovery.

The recently developed AlphaFold2 (AF2) algorithm predicts proteins' 3D structures from amino acid sequences. The open AlphaFold protein structure database covers the complete human proteome. Using an industry-leading molecular docking method (Glide), we investigated the virtual screening performance of 37 common drug targets, each with an AF2 structure and known holo and apo structures from the DUD-E data set. In a subset of 27 targets where the AF2 structures are suitable for refinement, the AF2 structures show comparable early enrichment of known active compounds (avg. EF 1%: 13.0) to apo structures (avg. EF 1%: 11.4) while falling behind early enrichment of the holo structures (avg. EF 1%: 24.2). With an induced-fit protocol (IFD-MD), we can refine the AF2 structures using an aligned known binding ligand as the template to improve the performance in structure-based virtual screening (avg. EF 1%: 18.9). Glide-generated docking poses of known binding ligands can also be used as templates for IFD-MD, achieving similar improvements (avg. EF 1% 18.0). Thus, with proper preparation and refinement, AF2 structures show considerable promise for in silico hit identification.

Controlling the selectivity of aminergic GPCR ligands from the extracellular vestibule.

In addition to the orthosteric binding pocket (OBP) of GPCRs, recent structural studies have revealed that there are several allosteric sites available for pharmacological intervention. The secondary binding pocket (SBP) of aminergic GPCRs is located in the extracellular vestibule of these receptors, and it has been suggested to be a potential selectivity pocket for bitopic ligands. Here, we applied a virtual screening protocol based on fragment docking to the SBP of the orthosteric ligand-receptor complex. This strategy was employed for a number of aminergic receptors. First, we designed dopamine D3 preferring bitopic compounds from a D2 selective orthosteric ligand. Next, we designed 5-HT2B selective bitopic compounds starting from the 5-HT1B preferring ergoline core of LSD. Comparing the serotonergic profiles of the new derivatives to that of LSD, we found that these derivatives became significantly biased towards the desired 5-HT2B receptor target. Finally, addressing the known limitations of H1 antihistamines, our protocol was successfully used to eliminate the well-known side effects related to the muscarinic M1 activity of amitriptyline while preserving H1 potency in some of the designed bitopic compounds. These applications highlight the usefulness of our new virtual screening protocol and offer a powerful strategy towards bitopic GPCR ligands with designed receptor profiles.

3D-e-Chem-VM: Structural Cheminformatics Research Infrastructure in a Freely Available Virtual Machine.

3D-e-Chem-VM is an open source, freely available Virtual Machine ( http://3d-e-chem.github.io/3D-e-Chem-VM/ ) that integrates cheminformatics and bioinformatics tools for the analysis of protein-ligand interaction data. 3D-e-Chem-VM consists of software libraries, and database and workflow tools that can analyze and combine small molecule and protein structural information in a graphical programming environment. New chemical and biological data analytics tools and workflows have been developed for the efficient exploitation of structural and pharmacological protein-ligand interaction data from proteomewide databases (e.g., ChEMBLdb and PDB), as well as customized information systems focused on, e.g., G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRdb) and protein kinases (KLIFS). The integrated structural cheminformatics research infrastructure compiled in the 3D-e-Chem-VM enables the design of new approaches in virtual ligand screening (Chemdb4VS), ligand-based metabolism prediction (SyGMa), and structure-based protein binding site comparison and bioisosteric replacement for ligand design (KRIPOdb).

Dynamics and structural determinants of ligand recognition of the 5-HT6 receptor.

In order to identify molecular models of the human 5-HT6 receptor suitable for virtual screening, homology modeling and membrane-embedded molecular dynamics simulations were performed. Structural requirements for robust enrichment were assessed by an unbiased chemometric analysis of enrichments from retrospective virtual screening studies. The two main structural features affecting enrichment are the outward movement of the second extracellular loop and the formation of a hydrophobic cavity deep in the binding site. These features appear transiently in the trajectories and furthermore the stretches of uniformly high enrichment may only last 4-10 ps. The formation of the inner hydrophobic cavity was also linked to the active-like to inactive-like transition of the receptor, especially the so-called connector region. The best structural models provided significant and robust enrichment over three independent ligand sets.

Cell-based and virtual fragment screening for adrenergic α2C receptor agonists.

Fragment-based drug discovery has emerged as an alternative to conventional lead identification and optimization strategies generally supported by biophysical detection techniques. Membrane targets like G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), however, offer challenges in lack of generic immobilization or stabilization methods for the dynamic, membrane-bound supramolecular complexes. Also modeling of different functional states of GPCRs proved to be a challenging task. Here we report a functional cell-based high concentration screening campaign for the identification of adrenergic α2C receptor agonists compared with the virtual screening of the same ligand set against an active-like homology model of the α2C receptor. The conventional calcium mobilization-based assay identified active fragments with a similar incidence to several other reported fragment screens on GPCRs. 16 out of 3071 screened fragments turned out as specific ligands of α2C, two of which were identified by virtual screening as well and several of the hits possessed surprisingly high affinity and ligand efficiency. Our results indicate that in vitro biological assays can be utilized in the fragment hit identification process for GPCR targets.

Using AlphaFold and Experimental Structures for the Prediction of the Structure and Binding Affinities of GPCR Complexes via Induced Fit Docking and Free Energy Perturbation.

Free energy perturbation (FEP) remains an indispensable method for computationally assaying prospective compounds in advance of synthesis. However, before FEP can be deployed prospectively, it must demonstrate retrospective recapitulation of known experimental data where the subtle details of the atomic ligand-receptor model are consequential. An open question is whether AlphaFold models can serve as useful initial models for FEP in the regime where there exists a congeneric series of known chemical matter but where no experimental structures are available either of the target or of close homologues. As AlphaFold structures are provided without a bound ligand, we employ induced fit docking to refine the AlphaFold models in the presence of one or more congeneric ligands. In this work, we first validate the performance of our latest induced fit docking technology, IFD-MD, on a retrospective set of public experimental GPCR structures with 95% of cross-docks producing a pose with a ligand RMSD ≤ 2.5 Å in the top two predictions. We then apply IFD-MD and FEP on AlphaFold models of the somatostatin receptor family of GPCRs. We use AlphaFold models produced prior to the availability of any experimental structure from this family. We arrive at FEP-validated models for SSTR2, SSTR4, and SSTR5, with RMSE around 1 kcal/mol, and explore the challenges of model validation under scenarios of limited ligand data, ample ligand data, and categorical data.

The impact of molecular dynamics sampling on the performance of virtual screening against GPCRs.

The formation of ligand-protein complexes requires simultaneous adaptation of the binding partners. In structure based virtual screening, high throughput docking approaches typically consider the ligand flexibility, but the conformational freedom of the protein is usually taken into account in a limited way. The goal of this study is to elaborate a methodology for incorporating protein flexibility to improve the virtual screening enrichments on GPCRs. Explicit-solvated molecular dynamics simulations (MD) were carried out in lipid bilayers to generate an ensemble of protein conformations for the X-ray structures and homology models of both aminergic and peptidergic GPCRs including the chemokine CXCR4, dopamine D3, histamine H4, and serotonin 5HT6 holo receptor complexes. The quality of the receptor models was assessed by enrichment studies to compare X-ray structures, homology models, and snapshots from the MD trajectory. According to our results, selected frames from the MD trajectory can outperform X-ray structures and homology models in terms of enrichment factor and AUC values. Significant changes were observed considering EF1% values: comparing the original CXCR4, D3, and H4 targets and the additional 5HT6 initial models to that of the best MD frame resulted in 0 to 6.7, 0.32 to 3.5 (10×), 13.3 to 26.7 (2×), and 0 to 14.1 improvements, respectively. It is worth noting that rank-average based ensemble evaluation calculated for different ensemble sizes could not improve the results further. We propose here that MD simulation can capture protein conformations representing the key interacting points of the receptor but less biased toward one specific chemotype. These conformations are useful for the identification of a "consensus" binding site with improved performance in virtual screening.

Multiple ligand docking by Glide: implications for virtual second-site screening.

Performance of Glide was evaluated in a sequential multiple ligand docking paradigm predicting the binding modes of 129 protein-ligand complexes crystallized with clusters of 2-6 cooperative ligands. Three sampling protocols (single precision-SP, extra precision-XP, and SP without scaling ligand atom radii-SP hard) combined with three different scoring functions (GlideScore, Emodel and Glide Energy) were tested. The effects of ligand number, docking order and druglikeness of ligands and closeness of the binding site were investigated. On average 36% of all structures were reproduced with RMSDs lower than 2 Å. Correctly docked structures reached 50% when docking druglike ligands into closed binding sites by the SP hard protocol. Cooperative binding to metabolic and transport proteins can dramatically alter pharmacokinetic parameters of drugs. Analyzing the cytochrome P450 subset the SP hard protocol with Emodel ranking reproduced two-thirds of the structures well. Multiple ligand binding is also exploited by the fragment linking approach in lead discovery settings. The HSP90 subset from real life fragment optimization programs revealed that Glide is able to reproduce the positions of multiple bound fragments if conserved water molecules are considered. These case studies assess the utility of Glide in sequential multiple docking applications.

Discovery of Novel Allosteric Modulators Targeting an Extra-Helical Binding Site of GLP-1R Using Structure- and Ligand-Based Virtual Screening.

Allosteric modulators have emerged with many potential pharmacological advantages as they do not compete the binding of agonist or antagonist to the orthosteric sites but ultimately affect downstream signaling. To identify allosteric modulators targeting an extra-helical binding site of the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) within the membrane environment, the following two computational approaches were applied: structure-based virtual screening with consideration of lipid contacts and ligand-based virtual screening with the maintenance of specific allosteric pocket residue interactions. Verified by radiolabeled ligand binding and cAMP accumulation experiments, two negative allosteric modulators and seven positive allosteric modulators were discovered using structure-based and ligand-based virtual screening methods, respectively. The computational approach presented here could possibly be used to discover allosteric modulators of other G protein-coupled receptors.

Discovery of novel positive allosteric modulators of the α7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor: Scaffold hopping approach.

The paper focuses on the scaffold hopping-based discovery and characterization of novel nicotinic alpha 7 receptor positive modulator (α7 nAChR PAM) ligands around the reference molecule (A-867744). First, substantial efforts were carried out to assess the importance of the various pharmacophoric elements on the in vitro potency (SAR evaluation) by chemical modifications. Subsequently, several new derivatives with versatile, heteroaromatic central cores were synthesized and characterized. A promising, pyrazole-containing new chemotype with good physicochemical and in vitro parameters was identified. Retrospective analysis based on homology modeling was also carried out. Besides its favorable in vitro characteristics, the most advanced derivative 69 also showed in vivo efficacy in a rodent model of cognition (scopolamine-induced amnesia in the mouse place recognition test) and acceptable pharmacokinetic properties. Based on the in vivo data, the resulting molecule with advanced drug-like characteristics has the possibility to improve cognitive performance in a biologically relevant dose range, further strengthening the view of the supportive role of α7 nACh receptors in the cognitive processes.

Aminergic GPCR-Ligand Interactions: A Chemical and Structural Map of Receptor Mutation Data.

The aminergic family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) plays an important role in various diseases and represents a major drug discovery target class. Structure determination of all major aminergic subfamilies has enabled structure-based ligand design for these receptors. Site-directed mutagenesis data provides an invaluable complementary source of information for elucidating the structural determinants of binding of different ligand chemotypes. The current study provides a comparative analysis of 6692 mutation data points on 34 aminergic GPCR subtypes, covering the chemical space of 540 unique ligands from mutagenesis experiments and information from experimentally determined structures of 52 distinct aminergic receptor-ligand complexes. The integrated analysis enables detailed investigation of structural receptor-ligand interactions and assessment of the transferability of combined binding mode and mutation data across ligand chemotypes and receptor subtypes. An overview is provided of the possibilities and limitations of using mutation data to guide the design of novel aminergic receptor ligands.

A Structural Framework for GPCR Chemogenomics: What's In a Residue Number?

The recent surge of crystal structures of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), as well as comprehensive collections of sequence, structural, ligand bioactivity, and mutation data, has enabled the development of integrated chemogenomics workflows for this important target family. This chapter will focus on cross-family and cross-class studies of GPCRs that have pinpointed the need for, and the implementation of, a generic numbering scheme for referring to specific structural elements of GPCRs. Sequence- and structure-based numbering schemes for different receptor classes will be introduced and the remaining caveats will be discussed. The use of these numbering schemes has facilitated many chemogenomics studies such as consensus binding site definition, binding site comparison, ligand repurposing (e.g. for orphan receptors), sequence-based pharmacophore generation for homology modeling or virtual screening, and class-wide chemogenomics studies of GPCRs.

Chemical Diversity in the G Protein-Coupled Receptor Superfamily.

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell signaling transmembrane proteins that can be modulated by a plethora of chemical compounds. Systematic cheminformatics analysis of structurally and pharmacologically characterized GPCR ligands shows that cocrystallized GPCR ligands cover a significant part of chemical ligand space, despite their limited number. Many GPCR ligands and substructures interact with multiple receptors, providing a basis for polypharmacological ligand design. Experimentally determined GPCR structures represent a variety of binding sites and receptor-ligand interactions that can be translated to chemically similar ligands for which structural data are lacking. This integration of structural, pharmacological, and chemical information on GPCR-ligand interactions enables the extension of the structural GPCR-ligand interactome and the structure-based design of novel modulators of GPCR function.

Structural insights into serotonin receptor ligands polypharmacology.

Identifying desired interactions with a target receptor is often the first step when designing new active compounds. However, attention should also be focused on contacts with other proteins that result in either selective or polypharmacological compounds. Here, the search for the structural determinants of selectivity between selected serotonin receptor subtypes was carried out. Special attention was focused on 5-HT7R and the cross-interactions between its ligands and the 5-HT1AR, 5-HT1BR, 5-HT2AR, 5-HT2BR, and 5-HT6R subtypes. Selective and non-selective compounds for each pair of 5-HT7/5-HTx receptors were docked to the respective 5-HTR homology models and 5-HT1B/5-HT2BR crystal structures. The contacts present in the ligand-receptor complexes obtained by docking were characterized by the structural interaction fingerprint and statistically analyzed in terms of their frequency. The results allowed for the identification of amino acids that discriminate between selective and non-selective compounds for each 5-HT7/5-HTx receptor pair, which was further compared with available mutagenesis data. Interaction pattern characteristics for compounds with particular activity profiles can constitute the basis for the coherent selectivity theory within a considered set of proteins, supporting the ongoing development of new ligands targeting these receptors. The in silico results were used to analyze prospective virtual screening results towards the 5-HT7 receptor in which compounds of different chemotypes to known 5-HT7R ligands, with micromolar level activities were identified. The findings in this study not only confirm the legitimacy of the approach but also constitute a great starting point for further studies on 5-HT7R ligands selectivity.

3D-e-Chem: Structural Cheminformatics Workflows for Computer-Aided Drug Discovery.

eScience technologies are needed to process the information available in many heterogeneous types of protein-ligand interaction data and to capture these data into models that enable the design of efficacious and safe medicines. Here we present scientific KNIME tools and workflows that enable the integration of chemical, pharmacological, and structural information for: i) structure-based bioactivity data mapping, ii) structure-based identification of scaffold replacement strategies for ligand design, iii) ligand-based target prediction, iv) protein sequence-based binding site identification and ligand repurposing, and v) structure-based pharmacophore comparison for ligand repurposing across protein families. The modular setup of the workflows and the use of well-established standards allows the re-use of these protocols and facilitates the design of customized computer-aided drug discovery workflows.

Molecular interaction fingerprint approaches for GPCR drug discovery.

Protein-ligand interaction fingerprints (IFPs) are binary 1D representations of the 3D structure of protein-ligand complexes encoding the presence or absence of specific interactions between the binding pocket amino acids and the ligand. Various implementations of IFPs have been developed and successfully applied for post-processing molecular docking results for G Protein-Coupled Receptor (GPCR) ligand binding mode prediction and virtual ligand screening. Novel interaction fingerprint methods enable structural chemogenomics and polypharmacology predictions by complementing the increasing amount of GPCR structural data. Machine learning methods are increasingly used to derive relationships between bioactivity data and fingerprint descriptors of chemical and structural information of binding sites, ligands, and protein-ligand interactions. Factors that influence the application of IFPs include structure preparation, binding site definition, fingerprint similarity assessment, and data processing and these factors pose challenges as well possibilities to optimize interaction fingerprint methods for GPCR drug discovery.

Multiple fragment docking and linking in primary and secondary pockets of dopamine receptors.

A sequential docking methodology was applied to computationally predict starting points for fragment linking using the human dopamine D3 receptor crystal structure and a human dopamine D2 receptor homology model. Two focused fragment libraries were docked in the primary and secondary binding sites, and best fragment combinations were enumerated. Similar top scoring fragments were found for the primary site, while secondary site fragments were predicted to convey selectivity. Three linked compounds were synthesized that had 9-, 39-, and 55-fold selectivity in favor of D3 and the subtype selectivity of the compounds was assessed on a structural basis.

Virtual fragment screening on GPCRs: a case study on dopamine D3 and histamine H4 receptors.

Prospective structure based virtual fragment screening methodologies on two GPCR targets namely the dopamine D3 and the histamine H4 receptors with a library of 12,905 fragments were evaluated. Fragments were docked to the X-ray structure and the homology model of the D3 and H4 receptors, respectively. Representative receptor conformations for ensemble docking were obtained from molecular dynamics trajectories. In vitro confirmed hit rates ranged from 16% to 32%. Hits had high ligand efficiency (LE) values in the range of 0.31-0.74 and also acceptable lipophilic efficiency. The X-ray structure, the homology model and structural ensembles were all found suitable for docking based virtual screening of fragments against these GPCRs. However, there was little overlap among different hit sets and methodologies were thus complementary to each other.