Can the sonication of polystyrene nanoparticles alter the acute toxicity and swimming behavior results for Daphnia magna?

The seemingly ubiquitous presence of plastic debris led to a greater focus on micro- and nanoplastics research derived from the degradation process of macroplastics. The ingestion and consequent accumulation of plastics on the biota are the main concerns. Researchers strive to make assay conditions as close as possible to those of the environment. In this regard, sonication can be applied to de-agglomerate the plastic particles, but this may alter significantly their toxicity. The aim of this study was to understand the effects of the sonication process on the acute toxicity and swimming behavior of polystyrene nanoparticles using Daphnia magna as the test organism. The results show a 2-fold reduction in the acute toxicity after the sonication process; the EC50 of the PSNP-NS was 1.28 ± 0.17 mmol while for PSNP-S the EC50 was 2.77 ± 0.32 mmol, possibly through the formation of an eco-corona on the nanoplastic surface, formed from the ions dispersed in the medium or proteins secreted by the test organisms. The mean swimming distance was reduced when compared to the control group for both the PSNP-S and PSNP-NS. This is the first research stating the toxicological differences between sonicated and non-sonicated polystyrene nanoparticle samples using Daphnia magna as test organism.

Reporting Guidelines to Increase the Reproducibility and Comparability of Research on Microplastics.

The ubiquitous pollution of the environment with microplastics, a diverse suite of contaminants, is of growing concern for science and currently receives considerable public, political, and academic attention. The potential impact of microplastics in the environment has prompted a great deal of research in recent years. Many diverse methods have been developed to answer different questions about microplastic pollution, from sources, transport, and fate in the environment, and about effects on humans and wildlife. These methods are often insufficiently described, making studies neither comparable nor reproducible. The proliferation of new microplastic investigations and cross-study syntheses to answer larger scale questions are hampered. This diverse group of 23 researchers think these issues can begin to be overcome through the adoption of a set of reporting guidelines. This collaboration was created using an open science framework that we detail for future use. Here, we suggest harmonized reporting guidelines for microplastic studies in environmental and laboratory settings through all steps of a typical study, including best practices for reporting materials, quality assurance/quality control, data, field sampling, sample preparation, microplastic identification, microplastic categorization, microplastic quantification, and considerations for toxicology studies. We developed three easy to use documents, a detailed document, a checklist, and a mind map, that can be used to reference the reporting guidelines quickly. We intend that these reporting guidelines support the annotation, dissemination, interpretation, reviewing, and synthesis of microplastic research. Through open access licensing (CC BY 4.0), these documents aim to increase the validity, reproducibility, and comparability of studies in this field for the benefit of the global community.