RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Tumoral heterogeneity poses a challenge for personalized cancer treatments. Especially in metastasized cancer, it remains a major limitation for successful targeted therapy, often leading to drug resistance due to tumoral escape mechanisms. This work explores a non-invasive radiomics-based approach to capture textural heterogeneity in liver lesions and compare it between colorectal cancer (CRC) and pancreatic cancer (PDAC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this retrospective single-center study 73 subjects (42 CRC, 31 PDAC) with 1291 liver metastases (430 CRC, 861 PDAC) were segmented fully automated on contrast-enhanced CT images by a UNet for medical images. Radiomics features were extracted using the Python package Pyradiomics. The mean coefficient of variation (CV) was calculated patient-wise for each feature to quantify the heterogeneity. An unpaired t-test identified features with significant differences in feature variability between CRC and PDAC metastases. RESULTS: In both colorectal and pancreatic liver metastases, interlesional heterogeneity in imaging can be observed using quantitative imaging features. 75 second-order features were extracted to compare the varying textural characteristics. In total, 18 radiomics features showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in their expression between the two malignancies. Out of these, 16 features showed higher levels of variability within the cohort of pancreatic metastases, which, as illustrated in a radar plot, suggests greater textural heterogeneity for this entity. CONCLUSIONS: Radiomics has the potential to identify the interlesional heterogeneity of CT texture among individual liver metastases. In this proof-of-concept study for the quantification and comparison of imaging-related heterogeneity in liver metastases a variation in the extent of heterogeneity levels in CRC and PDAC liver metastases was shown.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study is to demonstrate the performance of radiomics and CNN-based classifiers in determining the primary origin of gastrointestinal liver metastases for visually indistinguishable lesions. METHODS: In this retrospective, IRB-approved study, 31 pancreatic cancer patients with 861 lesions (median age [IQR]: 65.39 [56.87, 75.08], 48.4% male) and 47 colorectal cancer patients with 435 lesions (median age [IQR]: 65.79 [56.99, 74.62], 63.8% male) were enrolled. A pretrained nnU-Net performed automated segmentation of 1296 liver lesions. Radiomics features for each lesion were extracted using pyradiomics. The performance of several radiomics-based machine-learning classifiers was investigated for the lesions and compared to an image-based deep-learning approach using a DenseNet-121. The performance was evaluated by AUC/ROC analysis. RESULTS: The radiomics-based K-nearest neighbor classifier showed the best performance on an independent test set with AUC values of 0.87 and an accuracy of 0.67. In comparison, the image-based DenseNet-121-classifier reached an AUC of 0.80 and an accuracy of 0.83. CONCLUSIONS: CT-based radiomics and deep learning can distinguish the etiology of liver metastases from gastrointestinal primary tumors. Compared to deep learning, radiomics based models showed a varying generalizability in distinguishing liver metastases from colorectal cancer and pancreatic adenocarcinoma.