The value of point-of-care tests for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid.

BACKGROUND: Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from donor to recipient is a clinically relevant risk for developing severe COVID-19 after lung transplantation (LTx). This risk of iatrogenic transmission can be reduced by timely detection of viral RNA or antigen in samples of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid obtained at the time of lung procurement. We aimed to retrospectively evaluate the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen in BAL fluid samples using three point-of-care tests (POCTs). METHODS: BAL fluid samples came from patients hospitalized in an intensive care unit during the COVID-19 pandemic. These pandemic samples were scored as positive or negative for SARS-CoV-2 by a RT-qPCR comparator assay for orf1ab. Three commercially available POCTs were then evaluated: cobas SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B assay with the cobas Liat RT-qPCR system (Roche Diagnostics), ID NOW COVID-19 and COVID-19 2.0 (Abbott), and SARS-CoV-2 Rapid Antigen Test (RAT) (Roche Diagnostics). Samples from the pre-pandemic era served as negative controls. RESULTS: We analyzed a total of 98 BAL fluid samples, each from a different patient: 58 positive pandemic samples (orf1ab Ct<38), 20 putatively negative pandemic samples (orf1ab Ct≥38), and 20 pre-pandemic samples. Univariate logistic regression shows that the probability of detection was highest for cobas Liat, followed by ID NOW, and then RAT. Of clinical relevance, cobas Liat detected SARS-CoV-2 RNA in 30 of the 31 positive pandemic samples that were collected within 10 days after RT-qPCR diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection. None of the 20 pre-pandemic samples had a false-positive result for any POCT. CONCLUSIONS: POCTs enable the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA or antigen in BAL fluid samples and may provide additional information to decide if donor lungs are suitable for transplantation. Detection of respiratory pathogens with POCTs at the time of donor lung procurement is a potential strategy to increase safety in LTx by preventing iatrogenic transmission and severe postoperative infections.

Analytical performance and user-friendliness of four commercially available point-of-care devices for C-reactive protein.

INTRODUCTION: Proper implementation of Point-of-Care testing (POCT) for C-reactive protein (CRP) in primary care can decrease the inappropriate use of antibiotics, thereby tackling the problem of growing antimicrobial resistance. OBJECTIVE: The analytical performance and user-friendliness of four POCT-CRP assays were evaluated: QuikRead go easy, LumiraDx, cobas b 101 and Afinion 2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Imprecision was evaluated using plasma pools in addition to manufacturer-specific control material. Trueness was assessed by verification of traceability to ERM-DA474/IFCC in parallel to method comparison towards the central laboratory CRP method (cobas c 503) using i) retrospectively selected plasma samples (n = 100) and ii) prospectively collected capillary whole blood samples (n = 50). User-friendliness was examined using a questionnaire. RESULTS: Between-day imprecision on plasma pools varied from 4.5 % (LumiraDx) to 11.5 % (QuikRead). Traceability verification revealed no significant difference between cobas c 503 CRP results and the ERM-DA474/IFCC certified value. cobas b 101 and Afinion achieved the best agreement with the central laboratory method. LumiraDx and QuikRead revealed a negative mean difference, with LumiraDx violating the criterion of > 95 % of POCT-CRP-results within ± 20 % of the comparison method. Regarding user-friendliness, Afinion obtained the highest Likert-scores. CONCLUSION: The analytical performance and user-friendliness of POCT-CRP devices varies among manufacturers, emphasizing the need for quality assurance supervised by a central laboratory.

Organisation and quality monitoring for point-of-care testing (POCT) in Belgium: proposal for an expansion of the legal framework for POCT into primary health care.

BACKGROUND: There is a trend towards decentralisation of laboratory tests by means of Point-of-Care testing (POCT). Within hospitals, Belgian law requires a POCT policy, coordinated by the clinical laboratory. There is however no legal framework for POCT performed outside the hospital: no reimbursement, no compulsory quality monitoring and no limits nor control on the prices charged to the patient. Uncontrolled use of POCT can have negative consequences for individual and public health. PROPOSAL: We propose that POCT outside hospitals would only be reimbursed for tests carried out within a legal framework, requiring evidence-based testing and collaboration with a clinical laboratory, because clinical laboratories have procedures for test validation and quality monitoring, are equipped for electronic data transfer, are familiar with logistical processes, can provide support when technical issues arise and can organise and certify training. Under these conditions the government investment will be offset by health benefits, e.g. fall in antibiotic consumption with POCT for CRP in primary care, quick response to SARS-CoV2-positive cases in COVID-19 triage centres. PRIORITIES: 1° extension of the Belgian decree on certification of clinical laboratories to decentralised tests in primary care; 2° introduction of a separate reimbursement category for POCT; 3° introduction of reimbursement for a limited number of specified POCT; 4° setup of a Multidisciplinary POCT Advisory Council, the purpose of which is to draw up a model for reimbursement of POCT, to select tests eligible for reimbursement and to make proposals to the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (RIZIV/INAMI).

One year of laboratory-based COVID-19 surveillance system in Belgium: main indicators and performance of the laboratories (March 2020-21).

BACKGROUND: With the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), an existing national laboratory-based surveillance system was adapted to daily monitor the epidemiological situation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in the Belgium by following the number of confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, the number of performed tests and the positivity ratio. We present these main indicators of the surveillance over a one-year period as well as the impact of the performance of the laboratories, regarding speed of processing the samples and reporting results, for surveillance. METHODS: We describe the evolution of test capacity, testing strategy and the data collection methods during the first year of the epidemic in Belgium. RESULTS: Between the 1st of March 2020 and the 28th of February 2021, 9,487,470 tests and 773,078 COVID-19 laboratory confirmed cases were reported. Two epidemic waves occurred, with a peak in April and October 2020. The capacity and performance of the laboratories improved continuously during 2020 resulting in a high level performance. Since the end of November 2020 90 to 95% of the test results are reported at the latest the day after sampling was performed. CONCLUSIONS: Thanks to the effort of all laboratories a performant exhaustive national laboratory-based surveillance system to monitor the epidemiological situation of SARS-CoV-2 was set up in Belgium in 2020. On top of expanding the number of laboratories performing diagnostics and significantly increasing the test capacity in Belgium, turnaround times between sampling and testing as well as reporting were optimized over the first year of this pandemic.

Laboratory information system requirements to manage the COVID-19 pandemic: A report from the Belgian national reference testing center.

OBJECTIVE: The study sought to describe the development, implementation, and requirements of laboratory information system (LIS) functionality to manage test ordering, registration, sample flow, and result reporting during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our large (>12 000 000 tests/y) academic hospital laboratory is the Belgian National Reference Center for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) testing. We have performed a moving total of >25 000 SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction tests in parallel to standard routine testing since the start of the outbreak. A LIS implementation team dedicated to develop tools to remove the bottlenecks, primarily situated in the pre- and postanalytical phases, was established early in the crisis. RESULTS: We outline the design, implementation, and requirements of LIS functionality related to managing increased test demand during the COVID-19 crisis, including tools for test ordering, standardized order sets integrated into a computerized provider order entry module, notifications on shipping requirements, automated triaging based on digital metadata forms, and the establishment of databases with contact details of other laboratories and primary care physicians to enable automated reporting. We also describe our approach to data mining and reporting of actionable daily summary statistics to governing bodies and other policymakers. CONCLUSIONS: Rapidly developed, agile extendable LIS functionality and its meaningful use alleviates the administrative burden on laboratory personnel and improves turnaround time of SARS-CoV-2 testing. It will be important to maintain an environment that is conducive for the rapid adoption of meaningful LIS tools after the COVID-19 crisis.

Clostridium difficile infection in inflammatory bowel disease: epidemiology over two decades.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has been rising in the overall population as well as in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the incidence of CDI in IBD may be changing owing to alterations in medical therapies. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish the incidence of CDI in IBD over the past two decades and compare risk factors, disease characteristics and outcomes between IBD and non-IBD patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, the incidence of CDI in IBD was followed for 18 years. The electronic database of our centre was reviewed for all stool samples received from patients admitted to gastroenterology wards or visiting the outpatient clinic. Diagnosis of CDI was based on diagnostic criteria that evolved throughout the years. RESULTS: IBD patients (n=44) with CDI were found to be younger (P=0.0001), have less cardiovascular comorbidity (P=0.023), fewer prior hospitalizations (P=0.009) and fewer prior antibiotic use (P=0.005). More IBD patients were on biologic therapy (P=0.0001) or steroids (P=0.001) but less likely taking proton pump inhibitors (P=0.001). The number of stool testing per year increased as well as the median number of positive stool samples for CDI (2% in 2000-2008 to 3% in 2009-2017, P=0.032). Pseudomembranes were only seen in non-IBD patients (28%, P=0.048). There was no difference in the choice of antibiotics between IBD and non-IBD patients [metronidazole (36 vs. 51%) and vancomycin (36 vs. 26%), P=0.090 and 0.190]. The 1-year mortality rate was lower in IBD patients compared with non-IBD patients (0 vs. 32%, P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: In the past two decades, the incidence of CDI in IBD and non-IBD patients has increased. However, the overall outcome of CDI in IBD patients was favourable compared with non-IBD patients.