RESUMEN
Objectives: Diagnosing patients with ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV) can be challenging owing to its rarity and complexity. Diagnostic delay can have severe consequences, such as chronic organ damage or even death. Given that few studies have addressed diagnostic pathways to identify opportunities to improve, we performed a clinical audit to evaluate the diagnostic phase. Methods: This retrospective, observational study of electronic medical records data in hospitals focused on diagnostic procedures during the first assessment until diagnosis. Results: We included 230 AAV patients from nine hospitals. First assessments were mainly performed by a specialist in internal medicine (52%), pulmonology (14%), ENT (13%) or rheumatology (10%). The overall median time to diagnosis was 13 [interquartile range: 2-49] days, and in patients primarily examined by a specialist in internal medicine it was 6 [1-25] days, rheumatology 14 [4-45] days, pulmonology 15 [5-70] days and ENT 57 [16-176] days (P = 0.004). Twenty-two of 31 (71%) patients primarily assessed by a specialist in ENT had non-generalized disease, of whom 14 (64%) had ENT-limited activity. Two hundred and nineteen biopsies were performed in 187 patients (81%). Histopathological support for AAV was observed in 86% of kidney biopsies, 64% of lung biopsies and 34% of ENT biopsies. Conclusion: In The Netherlands, AAV is diagnosed and managed predominantly by internal medicine specialists. Diagnostic delay was associated with non-generalized disease and ENT involvement at presentation. Additionally, ENT biopsies had a low diagnostic yield, in contrast to kidney and lung biopsies. Awareness of this should lead to more frequent consideration of AAV and early referral for a multidisciplinary approach when AAV is suspected.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Managing complex and rare systemic autoimmune diseases such as antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (AAV) can be challenging and is often accompanied by undesirable variations in clinical practice. Adequate understanding of clinical practice can help identify essential issues to improve the care for AAV patients. Therefore, we studied the real-life management and outcomes of AAV patients in the Netherlands. METHODS: In this cohort study, we investigated clinical practice in university and nonuniversity teaching hospitals with respect to patients with a clinical diagnosis of AAV. We retrospectively collected clinical data encompassing clinical variables, medication details, and outcome parameters. RESULTS: Data of 230 AAV patients were collected in 9 Dutch hospitals. Of these, 167 patients (73%) were diagnosed with granulomatosis with polyangiitis, 54 (24%) with microscopic polyangiitis and 9 (4%) with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis. One hundred sixty-six patients (72%) had generalized disease. The median year of diagnosis was 2013 (range 1987-2018). Besides steroids, oral cyclophosphamide was the most used drug (50%) for induction therapy and azathioprine (68%) for maintenance therapy. Adverse outcomes were major infections in 35%, major relapses in 23%, malignancy in 10%, major cardiovascular events in 8%, and end-stage renal disease in 7%. CONCLUSION: Oral cyclophosphamide was the most frequently used induction therapy, azathioprine for maintenance therapy; over time, the use of rituximab is increasingly employed. Major infection and relapses are the most prevalent adverse outcomes. This audit resulted in important indicators for treatment of AAV patients that can be implemented for future, national audits to improve the outcomes of AAV patients.