Intra-articular Knee Injection Is Less Painful Than Expected.

BACKGROUND: Intra-articular knee injections (IAKI) are commonly used for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes but may induce anxiety and fear. While existing literature has identified the variance between expected and actual pain levels in various medical procedures, this phenomenon remains unexplored in the context of IAKI. OBJECTIVES: To describe the differences between anticipated and experienced pain recorded during IAKI. METHODS: The study cohort included 50 patients who underwent IAKI by an orthopedic specialist in an outpatient clinic. Patients recruited to the study recorded the anticipated and experienced pain, anxiety index, and factors influencing injection related fear. RESULTS: The study population (n=50) demonstrated a significant difference between the pain expected before the injection (mean Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] score 6.19) and the actual experienced (mean VAS score 2.07, P-value < 0.001). Significant differences between anticipated and experienced VAS scores were demonstrated for both females and males. There was a significant difference between males and females in terms of estimated VAS score. There was no significant difference between males and females in term of the experienced VAS score. The difference (delta) between expected and experienced pain differed significantly between sexes. CONCLUSIONS: These findings emphasize the importance of educating patients about expected pain levels during IAKI. Presenting this quantified information may reassure patients that the procedure is not as painful as expected, which can potentially increase the compliance.

Violation of expectations is correlated with satisfaction following hip arthroscopy.

PURPOSE: The mechanism by which preoperative expectations may be associated with patient satisfaction and procedural outcomes following hip preservation surgery (HPS) is far from simple or linear. The purpose of this study is to better understand patient expectations regarding HPS and their relationship with patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and satisfaction using machine learning (ML) algorithms. METHODS: Patients scheduled for hip arthroscopy completed the Hip Preservation Surgery Expectations Survey (HPSES) and the pre- and a minimum 2 year postoperative International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33). Patient demographics, including age, gender, occupation, and body mass index (BMI), were also collected. At the latest follow-up, patients were evaluated for subjective satisfaction and postoperative complications. ML algorithms and standard statistics were used. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients were included in this study (mean age 33.7 ± 13.1 years, 62.3% males). The mean follow-up period was 27 months. The mean HPSES score, patient satisfaction, preoperative, and postoperative iHOT-33 were 83.8 ± 16.5, 75.9 ± 26.9, 31.6 ± 15.8, and 73 ± 25.9, respectively. Fifty-nine patients (86%) reported that they would undergo the surgery again, with no significant difference with regards to expectations. A significant difference was found with regards to expectation violation (p < 0.001). Expectation violation scores were also found to be significantly correlated with satisfaction. CONCLUSION: ML algorithms utilized in this study demonstrate that violation of expectations plays an important predictive role in postoperative outcomes and patient satisfaction and is associated with patients' willingness to undergo surgery again. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Bone filling decreases donor site morbidity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts.

PURPOSE: Bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft remains the most widely used graft source for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The drawback associated with BTB is increased donor-site morbidity, such as anterior knee pain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare anterior knee pain after refilling the patella bony defect with bone substitute. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent BTB ACLR at a single institution between January 2015 and December 2020. The cohort was divided into two groups; one in which the patellar bony defect was refilled with bone substitute (Bone Graft group) and another in which this the bony defects were not treated (No Bone Graft group). Demographic variables, reported anterior knee pain, visual analog scale (VAS) score, complications, re-operation, and patient reported outcome measures, such as the IKDC, LYSHOLM and SF-12 scores, were compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 286 patients who underwent BTB ACLR were included. The No Bone Graft group included 88 (30.7%) patients and the Bone Graft group included 198 (69.3%) patients. The Bone Graft group had less anterior knee pain at last clinic follow up (33.3% vs. 51.1% p = 0.004) as well as lower VAS anterior knee pain scores (2.18 vs. 3.13, p = 0.004). The Bone Graft group had lower complications rates (21.7% vs 34.1, p = 0.027). No differences were found in the LYSHOLM, IKDC, and SF-12 scores. CONCLUSION: Bone refilling in BTB ACLR significantly reduces prevalence and severity of anterior knee pain. Larger randomized trials are needed to confirm the benefits of bone refilling in ACLR patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Retrospective study-III.

Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair in fibromyalgia patients had comparable outcomes to a matched control group.

BACKGROUND: Although fibromyalgia is associated with poor outcomes following orthopedic surgeries, several studies show some benefit from surgical intervention and nevertheless recommend operative treatment when indicated. There is sparse evidence of the effect of fibromyalgia on the outcomes of shoulder surgery. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of fibromyalgia on patient-reported outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). METHODS: All patients with a confirmed diagnosis of fibromyalgia who underwent ARCR in one institution between 2010 and 2021 were included. Data retrieved from medical records included demographics, characteristics of the cuff tear and the surgical procedure, and preoperative and last follow-up (minimum 1 year) postoperative Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Subjective Shoulder score (SSV), and Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). A matched controlled group of patients without fibromyalgia who had undergone ARCR was selected according to age, sex, and preoperative DASH, SSV, and NPRS scores. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographics, cuff tear and surgical procedure characteristics, and preoperative scores between the fibromyalgia and control groups. The fibromyalgia patients' postoperative scores for all 3 measurements showed significant improvement: SSV by 32.1 (P = 0.004), DASH by 20.3 (P = 0.016), and NPRS by 2.33 (P = 0.017). There were no significant differences in the postoperative DASH, SSV, and NPRS between the fibromyalgia and control groups. CONCLUSION: Fibromyalgia patients with rotator cuff tears who undergo ARCR do not have inferior patient-reported outcomes compared with non-fibromyalgia controls. Fibromyalgia should not be a considered a contraindication for ARCR. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Preoperative Expectations Do Not Correlate With Postoperative iHOT-33 Scores and Patient Satisfaction Following Hip Arthroscopy for the Treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

PURPOSE: To examine the correlation between preoperative patient expectation and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33) score and postoperative satisfaction of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. METHODS: Patients scheduled for surgery completed the Hip Preservation Surgery Expectations Survey (HPSES), as well as the preoperative and a minimum 2-year postoperative iHOT-33. Patient demographics that were collected included gender, age, occupation, and body mass index (BMI). At the latest follow-up, patients were evaluated for their subjective satisfaction and postoperative complications. An in-depth analysis was performed to assess the correlation between HPSES, iHOT-33, and patient satisfaction. RESULTS: Sixty-nine patients (62.3% males; mean age: 33.7 ± 13.1 years; BMI: 23.9 ± 3.5 kg/m2) were included in this study. The mean HPSES score was 83.8 ± 16.5. The mean iHOT-33 improved from 31.6 ± 15.8 preoperatively to 73 ± 25.9 postoperatively (95% CI = 35.2,47.8; P < .01), and the mean patient satisfaction was 75.9 ± 26.9. There were no statistically significant differences in mean HPSES score between males and females (95% CI = 79.9,87.8; P = .35) nor between different occupational groups (95% CI = 79.4,87.6, P = .095). No correlation was found between age and HPSES score (r = .036; P =.76). There was a negligible correlation between HPSES score and postoperative iHOT-33 score (r = -.117; P = .34) and patient satisfaction (r = -.042; P = .73). Postoperative iHOT-33 score had a significant high correlation with patient satisfaction (r = .8; P < .001). CONCLUSION: Preoperative expectations do not correlate with postoperative iHOT-33 scores and patient satisfaction with surgery at 2 years after surgery. Gender and occupation did not differ significantly with regard to preoperative expectations, and there was no correlation between age and HPSES score. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case series.

Postoperative Weightbearing Protocols After Arthroscopic Surgery for Femoroacetabular Impingement Does Not Affect Patient Outcome: A Comparative Study With Minimum 2-Year Follow-up.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of immediate postoperative weightbearing protocols after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) with minimum 2-year follow-up, as measured by patient-reported outcome measures and satisfaction rates. METHODS: Between January 2011 and June 2016, patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI and labral tears were reviewed. Exclusion criteria was previous hip pathology or arthroscopy, active Workers' Compensation claims, and concomitant pathologies impeding weightbearing. Patients who were operated on before September 2013 were treated with 3 weeks of postoperative non-weightbearing (NWB), with weightbearing as tolerated (WBAT) thereafter. From October 2013, patients were allowed immediate postoperative WBAT. RESULTS: A total of 351 hip arthroscopic surgeries were performed; 133 of these patients met the inclusion criteria. Of the 133 included patients, 69 were in the NWB group and 64 were in the WBAT group. No differences were found in terms of sex (P = .603) or age (P = .241). No differences were found in postoperative scores (the Modified Harris Hip Score was 84.5 [range 79-89] for NWB vs 86.7 [78-89] for WBAT [P = .0.523], and the Hip Outcome Score was 83.1 [78-88] vs 88.4 [80-90], respectively; P = .130). Subjective rates of improvement, satisfaction score and the will to undergo surgery again did not differ between the groups (P = .674, P = .882, P = .730). The rate of subjects who met or exceeded the MCID in the NWB and WBAT groups was 82.6% and 81.2% for the Modified Harris Hip Score (P = .838) and 79.7% and 82.8% for the Hip Outcome Score (P = .647). There were no reported complications. Limitations include the possibility of the study being underpowered. CONCLUSIONS: After a 2-year minimum follow-up, patient-reported outcome measures and satisfactory rates with immediate weightbearing after hip arthroscopy for isolated FAI syndrome and labral tears do not differ significantly from results after strict NWB rehabilitation protocols. Revising weightbearing restrictions may allow for a more comfortable rehabilitation process after arthroscopic hip surgery for FAI and labral repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 3 - case-control study.

Comparison of Platelet-Rich Plasma Treatment and Partial Plantar Fasciotomy Surgery in Patients with Chronic Plantar Fasciitis: A Randomized, Prospective Study.

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) injection has become a desirable alternative to Partial Plantar Fasciotomy (PPF) surgery and steroid injection for patients with chronic plantar fasciitis (CPF) due to its potential for shorter recovery times, reduced complications, and similar activity scores. As such, we compared PRP treatment to PPF surgery in patients with CPF. Between January 2015 and January 2017, patients were randomly divided into two groups, a PRP treatment group, and a PPF group. All procedures were performed by a single foot and ankle fellowship-trained specialist surgeon. Visual Analog Score (VAS) and Roles-Maudsley Scale (RM) were collected during the preoperative visit and 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. The patients were also closely followed by a physiotherapist. There were 16 patients in each group after four patients refused to participate. Patients in the PPF had low Roles-Maudsley Scale (RM) scores compared to the PRP group one-year after treatment (3.77 vs. 2.72, p < 0.0001). Both procedures showed a reduction in RM scores during the follow-up year (9 to 1.62 for PPF and 8.7 to 2.4 for PRP). There was no significant change in VAS pain between the two groups (p = 0.366). Patients treated with PRP injection reported a significant increase in their activity scores, shorter recovery time, and lower complication rates compared to PPF treatment. Moreover, with respect to existing literature, PRP may be as efficient as steroid injection with lower complication rates, including response to physical therapy. Therefore, PRP treatment may be a viable option before surgery as an earlier line treatment for CPF. Level of Clinical Evidence: II.

Combined endoscopic and mini-open repair of chronic complete proximal hamstring tendon avulsion: a novel approach and short-term outcomes.

To evaluate the outcome of a novel, combined endoscopic and mini-open repair (CEMR) of a chronic complete retracted proximal hamstring tendon avulsion (PHA). A retrospective case series of a single-surgeon database for all patients, with a minimum of 1-year follow-up, who underwent CEMR between July 2015 and September 2019 was performed. Patients were evaluated for their functional outcome using the Perth Hamstring Assessment Tool (PHAT). At the latest follow-up, patients were evaluated for their muscle strength, subjective satisfaction and post-operative complications. Twelve patients who underwent endoscopic surgery for chronic PHA were identified, of which seven patients underwent CEMR. After exclusion of one patient from the study due to an open claim for health insurance, six patients (five males) with a mean age of 48 years (range 20-61 years) were evaluated. The mean time from injury to surgery was 12 months (range 2-43 months). At a mean follow-up of 28 months (range 12-55 months), the average PHAT score was 73 (range 70-80). The mean subjective activity level percentage improved from 34 (range 20-50) pre-surgery to 81 (range 75-90) post-surgery. The mean strength of the quadriceps, hamstring at 30°, and hamstring at 90° of the operated leg compared to the uninjured leg did not differ significantly. One patient underwent adhesiolysis 1 year after the index procedure for treatment of subcutaneous adhesions. CEMR is a viable and safe option for the treatment of chronic complete proximal hamstring tears, with good to excellent short-term functional outcome. Level of evidence: IV.

Preoperative planning and surgical technique for optimizing internal fixation of posterior malleolar fractures: CT versus standard radiographs.

BACKGROUND: A proper reduction and internal fixation of posterior malleolar fractures can be challenging, as intraoperative fluoroscopy often underestimates the extent of the fracture. Our aim was to assess the value of a modified classification system for posterior malleolar fractures, which is based on computed tomography (CT) images, optimizing screw trajectory during fluoroscopic-guided surgery, and to compare it to the Lauge-Hansen classification system to the CT-based classification. METHODS: A retrospective review of all ankle fracture operations from January 2014 to December 2016 was performed. Fractures were included if a CT scan was performed within 1 week of the surgery, and the posterior malleolar fragment occupied one third or more of the antero-posterior talar surface or jeopardize the ankle stability. Eighty-five adult ankle fractures with posterior malleolar fragments were included in this study. Fractures were categorized into one of three types, namely "postero-lateral," "postero-medial," or "postero-central," according to the location of the fracture fragment on axial CT image. An optimal trajectory angle for a single-lag screw fixation was measured on the CT cut between a central antero-posterior line and the line intersecting the posterior fragment perpendicular to the major fracture line. Mean trajectory angles were calculated for each fracture type. Fractures were also categorized according to the Lauge-Hansen system. RESULTS: The mean trajectory angle was 21° lateral for "postero-lateral" fragments, 7° lateral for "postero-central" fragments, and 28° medial for "postero-medial" fragments (p < 0.01 for comparisons among the groups). The range of trajectory angles within each group was about 10°, as compared to about 20° within each Lauge-Hansen type. There were no differences in trajectory angle among the Lauge-Hansen groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). CONCLUSIONS: There are 3 distinct anatomic subgroups of posterior malleolar fragments, each with an ideal screw trajectory that needs to be used in order to achieve an optimal reduction and fixation.

The covid-19 pandemic did not affect rehabilitation following acl reconstruction / La pandemia de covid-19 no afectó a la rehabilitación tras la reconstrucción del lca / A pandemia de covid-19 não afetou a reabilitação depois de reconstrução do lca

ABSTRACT Objective: To assess postoperative rehabilitation patterns in patients who underwent Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: A retrospective study of patients who underwent primary isolated ACLR between February 2019 and July 2020. Two different periods were evaluated. The "COVID group" represents the period from February 1st to July 1st of 2020 and the "non-COVID group" represents the equivalent period in 2019. Rehabilitation features and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on rehabilitation habits were assessed. Patient outcome scores were assessed using the Lysholm, Tegner, and International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) questionnaires. Subjective satisfaction, post-operative complications, and subsequent surgeries were recorded. Results: The groups did not differ significantly in demographics, functional outcome scores, or subjective satisfaction. There was no significant difference in rehabilitation patterns between the groups. In the COVID group, only one patient (4%) reported participation in online physiotherapy. Conclusions: There were no differences in the post-operative rehabilitation patterns, including duration, length, and environment of the training, between patients who underwent primary isolated ACLR during the COVID-19 pandemic and those who underwent the treatment in the preceding non-COVID year. Patient outcome scores, subjective satisfaction, and subsequent surgery rates did not differ between the groups. Level of evidence IV; Therapeutic studies - investigation of treatment results.

RESUMEN Objetivo: Evaluar los patrones de rehabilitación postoperatoria en pacientes sometidos a una reconstrucción del ligamento cruzado anterior (RLCA) durante la pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo de pacientes sometidos a RLCA aislada primaria entre febrero de 2019 y julio de 2020 evaluados en dos períodos distintos. El "grupo COVID" representa el período comprendido entre el 1de febrero y el 1 de julio de 2020 y el "grupo pre-COVID" representa el período equivalente en 2019. Se evaluaron los recursos de rehabilitación y el efecto de la pandemia de COVID-19 en los patrones de rehabilitación. Las puntuaciones de los resultados de los pacientes se evaluaron mediante los cuestionarios de Lysholm, Tegner y del International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC). Se informaron datos de satisfacción subjetiva, complicaciones postoperatorias y cirugías posteriores. Resultados: En ambos grupos no se identificaron diferencias significativas en los datos demográficos, las puntuaciones funcionales y la satisfacción subjetiva, así como en los patrones de rehabilitación. En el "grupo COVID", sólo un paciente (4%) declaró haber participado en fisioterapia "online". Conclusiones: Los pacientes sometidos a RLCA aislada primaria durante la pandemia de COVID-19 no presentaron diferencias en los patrones de rehabilitación postoperatoria, incluida la duración, el alcance y el entorno del entrenamiento en comparación con los pacientes del grupo pre-COVID. Las puntuaciones de los resultados de los pacientes, la satisfacción subjetiva y las tasas de cirugía posterior no difirieron entre los grupos. Nivel de Evidencia IV; Estudios terapéuticos - Investigación de los resultados del tratamiento.

RESUMO Objetivos: Avaliar os padrões de reabilitação pós-operatória em pacientes submetidos à reconstrução do ligamento cruzado anterior (RLCA) durante a pandemia de COVID-19. Métodos: Foi realizado um estudo retrospectivo dos pacientes submetidos a RLCA isolada primária no período de fevereiro de 2019 a julho de 2020 avaliados em dois períodos distintos. O "grupo COVID" representa o período de 1 de fevereiro a 1 de julho 2020, e o "grupo pré-COVID" representa o período equivalente em 2019. Os recursos de reabilitação e o efeito da pandemia de COVID-19 sobre os padrões de reabilitação foram avaliados. Os escores dos resultados dos pacientes foram avaliados com os questionários Lysholm, Tegnes e pelo International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC). Foram relatados os dados de satisfação subjetiva, complicações pós-operatórias e cirurgias subsequentes. Resultados: Em ambos os grupos não foram identificadas diferenças significativas nos dados demográficos, escores funcionais e na satisfação subjetiva, assim como nos padrões de reabilitação. No "grupo COVID", somente um paciente (4%) reportou participação em fisioterapia "on-line". Conclusões: Os pacientes submetidos à RLCA isolada primária durante a pandemia COVID-19 não apresentaram diferença nos padrões de reabilitação pós-operatória, incluindo duração, extensão e ambiente de treinamento em comparação com pacientes do grupo pré-COVID no ano anterior. Os escores dos resultados dos pacientes, a satisfação subjetiva e as taxas de cirurgia subsequentes não diferiram entre os grupos. Nível de Evidência IV; Estudos terapêuticos - Investigação dos resultados do tratamento.