Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Asunto de la revista
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur Radiol ; 24(10): 2467-75, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24939670

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a new ablation technique that relies on high-voltage electrical pulses. This clinical study evaluates the pathological response of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) treated with IRE and the clinical safety and feasibility. METHODS: Ten patients with resectable CRLM were included. During laparotomy, the metastases were treated with IRE and resected 60 min later. Safety and feasibility were assessed based on adverse events, laboratory values, technical success and intra-operative ultrasound findings. Tissue response was assessed using triphenyl tetrazolium chloride (TTC) vitality staining and (immuno)histochemical stainings (HE, complement-3d and caspase-3). RESULTS: Ten lesions with a mean diameter of 2.4 cm were successfully electroporated and resected, on average, 84 min later (range 51-153 min). One minor transient cardiac arrhythmia occurred during IRE. Ultrasound showed a sharply demarcated hypoechoic ablation zone around the tumour. TTC showed avitality of all lesions, covering the complete tumour in 8/10 lesions. Although immunohistochemistry proved heterogeneous and difficult to interpret within the tumours, it confirmed irreversible cell damage in the tumour-free margin of all specimens. CONCLUSIONS: This ablate-and-resect study demonstrated avitality caused by IRE of CRLM in humans. Further characterisation of tissue- and tumour-specific electrical properties is warranted to improve ablation protocols for maximised tissue ablation. KEY POINTS: • Irreversible electroporation induces cell death in colorectal liver metastases within 1 h. • The ablation zone shows a sharp demarcation between avital and vital tissue. • Apoptosis is involved in cell death of colorectal liver metastases after IRE. • Effects of IRE can be monitored real-time using intraoperative ultrasound. • Local electrical heterogeneities of tumour tissue may require tumour-specific ablation protocols.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación/métodos , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Electroporación/métodos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/métodos , Anciano , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Humanos , Laparotomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X
2.
Br J Anaesth ; 113(6): 985-92, 2014 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25173767

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel tumour ablation technique involving repetitive application of electrical energy around a tumour. The use of pulsed electrical gradients carries a risk of cardiac arrhythmias, severe muscle contractions, and seizures. We aimed to identify IRE-related risks and the appropriate precautions for anaesthetic management. METHODS: All patients who were treated with IRE were prospectively included. Exclusion criteria were arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, active coronary artery disease, and epilepsy. All procedures were performed under general anaesthesia with complete muscle relaxation during ECG-synchronized pulsing. Adverse events, cardiovascular effects, blood samples, cerebral activity, and post-procedural pain were analysed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients underwent 30 IRE sessions for tumours in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and lesser pelvis. No major adverse events occurred during IRE. Median systolic and diastolic blood pressure increased by 44 mm Hg (range -7 to 108 mm Hg) and 19 mm Hg (range 1-50 mm Hg), respectively. Two transient minor cardiac arrhythmias without haemodynamic consequences were observed. Muscle contractions were mild and IRE caused no reactive brain activity on a simplified EEG. Pain in the first 24 h after percutaneous IRE was generally mild, but higher pain scores were reported after pancreatic treatment (mean VAS score 3; range 0-9). CONCLUSIONS: Side-effects during IRE on tumours in the liver, pancreas, kidney, and lesser pelvis seem mild and manageable when current recommendations for anaesthesia management, including deep muscle relaxation and ECG synchronized pulsing, are followed. Electrical pulses do not seem to cause reactive cerebral activity and evidence for pre-existing atrial fibrillation as an absolute contra-indication for IRE is questionable.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Ablación/métodos , Anestesia General/métodos , Electroporación/métodos , Neoplasias/cirugía , Técnicas de Ablación/efectos adversos , Anciano , Arritmias Cardíacas/etiología , Contraindicaciones , Electrocardiografía , Electroencefalografía , Femenino , Humanos , Hipertensión/etiología , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundario , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Monitoreo Intraoperatorio/métodos , Contracción Muscular , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Postoperatorio/etiología , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Pélvicas/cirugía , Atención Perioperativa/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA