BalanCI: Head-Referenced Cochlear Implant Stimulation Improves Balance in Children with Bilateral Cochleovestibular Loss.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the impact of a head-referenced cochlear implant (CI) stimulation system, BalanCI, on balance and postural control in children with bilateral cochleovestibular loss (BCVL) who use bilateral CI. METHODS: Prospective, blinded case-control study. Balance and postural control testing occurred in two settings: (1) quiet clinical setting and (2) immersive realistic virtual environment (Challenging Environment Assessment Laboratory [CEAL], Toronto Rehabilitation Institute). Postural control was assessed in 16 and balance in 10 children with BCVL who use bilateral CI, along with 10 typically developing children. Children with neuromotor, cognitive, or visual deficits that would prevent them from performing the tests were excluded. Children wore the BalanCI, which is a head-mounted device that couples with their CIs through the audio port and provides head-referenced spatial information delivered via the intracochlear electrode array. Postural control was measured by center of pressure (COP) and time to fall using the WiiTM (Nintendo, WA, USA) Balance Board for feet and the BalanCI for head, during the administration of the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction in Balance (CTSIB-M). The COP of the head and feet were assessed for change by deviation, measured as root mean square around the COP (COP-RMS), rate of deviation (COP-RMS/duration), and rate of path length change from center (COP-velocity). Balance was assessed by the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency 2, balance subtest (BOT-2), specifically, BOT-2 score as well as time to fall/fault. RESULTS: In the virtual environment, children demonstrated more stable balance when using BalanCI as measured by an improvement in BOT-2 scores. In a quiet clinical setting, the use of BalanCI led to improved postural control as demonstrated by significant reductions in COP-RMS and COP-velocity. With the use of BalanCI, the number of falls/faults was significantly reduced and time to fall increased. CONCLUSIONS: BalanCI is a simple and effective means of improving postural control and balance in children with BCVL who use bilateral CI. BalanCI could potentially improve the safety of these children, reduce the effort they expend maintaining balance and allow them to take part in more complex balance tasks where sensory information may be limited and/or noisy.

Predicting Maximal Costal Cartilage Graft Size for Laryngotracheal Reconstruction.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Current methods of assessing rib cartilage dimensions for laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR) are inexact, making surgical planning difficult. The purpose of this study was to determine the most appropriate rib for costal cartilage graft LTR to minimize the number of ribs harvested and improve surgical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Computed tomography imaging of chest scans in 25 children aged 1 to 18 years was evaluated. The lengths and widths of medial and lateral cartilaginous segments of ribs 4 to 7 were measured bilaterally. Right and left cartilaginous rib dimensions were compared using a two-sample t-test. Linear mixed-effect regression was performed to develop models quantifying the relationship between rib size and patient height, rib side, and rib number. RESULTS: Regression analysis established strong models for medial rib length (R2  = 0.89) and for medial and lateral rib width (R2  = 0.71, 0.77, respectively). There was no difference in rib dimensions across chest sides. Rib length and width increased with child height. Total cartilaginous rib length increased from superiorly to inferiorly, primarily due to an increase in the dimensions of the medial portion of each rib. CONCLUSION: Cartilaginous rib lengths and widths were associated with patient height, with taller children having longer ribs. Inferior ribs were longer than superior ribs, suggesting that inferior ribs may be preferred for LTR. There was no difference in cartilaginous rib length across chest side. Results may help surgeons with preoperative planning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 132:1682-1686, 2022.

Impact of the sensory environment on balance in children with bilateral cochleovestibular loss.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to determine the role of auditory and visual sensory input on balance in children with bilateral cochlevestibular loss. The prevalence of vestibular impairment, and specifically bilateral vestibular loss (BVL) in children with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) is high and children with profound cochleovestibular loss (SNHL-BVL) have impaired balance (Suarez et al., 2007; Suarez et al., 2019). Given that both hearing and vestibular impairments are often congenital or acquired in early life, it remains difficult to tease out the individual developmental impact of either one on balance and spatial awareness in children who experience both of these sensory deficits. While cochlear implants (CI) can provide or restore access to sound in children with SNHL-BVL, there is currently no vestibular prosthetic available for clinical use in this population. These children may also use their intact sensory inputs (i.e. vision) to a greater extent to support balance. Alternately, restoring or providing access to sound may, on its own, help these children to balance better. We hypothesized that balance in children with SNHL-BVL who use bilateral CIs is: 1) improved in the presence of directional sound and 2) impaired when visual cues are dynamic (moving) rather than static. METHODS: Balance was assessed in 18 children with SNHL-BVL and 34 typically developing children with intact vestibular function and normal hearing by performing the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-2 (BOT-2) balance subtest in a virtual-reality simulator under 4 sensory conditions of graded complexity. Randomized conditions combined 2 auditory (moving directional street sounds vs. directionless static white noise) and 2 visual (dynamic street scene vs. stationary street scene) stimuli designed to recreate a "real-world" busy downtown street. Balance ability in children with SNHL-BVL was also compared with CI on and off. RESULTS: As expected and similar to previous work, balance was significantly worse in the children with SNHL-BVL compared to typically developing children in all sensory conditions (p<0.0001). As a group, the mean balance skills of the children with SNHL-BVL were equivalent to that of a 4.4-year-old child despite being much older (mean age =13.8 years). Balance ability improved slightly but significantly when children with SNHL-BVL had access to any sound through their CI (p=0.047) and was positively correlated with duration of implant use (p=0.02). Balance ability did not change further in the presence of moving directional sounds compared to static white noise (p=0.42), or when coupled to a moving visual environment (p=0.32) in children with SNHL-BVL, however opposite to what was hypothesized, in the typically developing group, there was a decrement in performance that occurred in the presence of moving directional sound compared to directionless, static white noise (p=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Balance ability in children with SNHL-BVL who use bilateral CI was, as expected, poorer than their typically developing peers in all sensory conditions but improved slightly when they had access to any sound through their implants, with this benefit increasing as duration of implant use increased. This suggests that providing sound inputs through bilateral CIs positively affects balance in children with SNHL-BVL where vestibular and/or auditory inputs are compromised. This benefit was achieved even with auditory inputs that were devoid of moving directional cues (i.e. directionless static white noise) and is consistent with poor spatial hearing in children using bilateral CI.

Children with unilateral cochlear nerve canal stenosis have bilateral cochleovestibular anomalies.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the cochleovestibular apparatus bilaterally in children with isolated unilateral bony cochlear nerve canal (bCNC) stenosis. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review. METHODS: Imaging studies of children with unilateral bCNC stenosis (<1.0 mm) on computed tomography imaging (N = 36) were compared with controls imaged due to trauma without temporal bone injury (N = 32). Twenty-six measurements were obtained in each ear, assessing the bony internal auditory canal (IAC), cochlea, and vestibular end-organs, and were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance for intersubject comparisons and paired t tests for intrasubject comparisons with a Bonferroni adjustment for multiple comparisons (P = .0006). RESULTS: Patients with bCNC stenosis had a smaller IAC (P < .000) and cochlea (P < .000) on the stenotic side as compared with controls. Although the vestibular end-organ was also smaller in bCNC ears, this difference was not significant. The contralateral ear also had a smaller bCNC (P < .000) and cochlea (P < .000) as compared with controls, although to a lesser degree than the stenotic side. CONCLUSIONS: Children with unilateral bCNC stenosis have abnormal biometry of both the cochlea and the vestibular end-organ in the affected and the normal contralateral ear as compared with controls. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3b Laryngoscope, 129:2403-2408, 2019.

Unilateral Hearing Loss Is Associated With Impaired Balance in Children: A Pilot Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if children with unilateral sensorineural hearing loss (UHL) demonstrate impaired balance compared with their normal hearing (NH) peers. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, case-control study. METHODS: Balance was assessed in14 UHL and 14 NH children using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test-2 (BOT-2) and time to fall (TTF) in an immersive, virtual-reality laboratory. Postural control was quantified by center of pressure (COP) using force plates. The effect of vision on balance was assessed by comparing scores and COP characteristics on BOT-2 tasks performed with eyes open and closed. RESULTS: Balance ability as measured by the BOT-2 score was significantly worse in children with UHL compared with NH children (p = 0.004). TTF was shorter in children with UHL compared with NH children in the most difficult tasks when visual and somatosensory inputs were limited (p < 0.01). Visual input improved postural control (reduced COP variability) in both groups in all tasks (p < 0.05) but postural control as measured by COP variability was more affected in children with UHL when visual input was removed while performing moderately difficult tasks (i.e., standing on one foot) (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, children with UHL show poorer balance skills than NH children. Significant differences in TTF between the two groups were only seen in the most difficult tasks and therefore may be missed on routine clinical assessment. Children with UHL appear to rely more on vision for maintaining postural control than their NH peers. These findings may point to deficits not only in the hearing but also the vestibular portion of the inner ear.