Kidney and pancreas transplant candidacy.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Kidney and/or pancreas transplantation candidacy criteria have evolved significantly over time reflecting improved pre and post-transplant management. With improvement in medical care, potential candidates for transplant not only are older but also have complex medical issues. This review focuses on the latest trends regarding candidacy for kidney and/or pancreas transplantation along with advances in pretransplant cardiac testing. RECENT FINDINGS: More candidates are now eligible for kidney and/or pancreas transplantation owing to less stringent candidacy criteria especially in regards to age, obesity, frailty and history of prior malignancy. Pretransplant cardiovascular assessment has also come a long way with a focus on less invasive strategies to assess for coronary artery disease. SUMMARY: Criteria for kidney and/or pancreas transplantation are expanding. Patients who in the past might have been declined because of numerous factors are now finding that transplant centers are more open minded to their candidacy, which could lead to better access to organ transplant wait list.

IgG Endopeptidase in Highly Sensitized Patients Undergoing Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Donor-specific antibodies create an immunologic barrier to transplantation. Current therapies to modify donor-specific antibodies are limited and ineffective in the most highly HLA-sensitized patients. The IgG-degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes (IdeS), an endopeptidase, cleaves human IgG into F(ab')2 and Fc fragments inhibiting complement-dependent cytotoxicity and antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity, which suggests that IdeS might be useful for desensitization. We report on the combined experience of two independently performed open-label, phase 1-2 trials (conducted in Sweden and the United States) that assessed the efficacy of IdeS with regard to desensitization and transplantation of a kidney from an HLA-incompatible donor. METHODS: We administered IdeS to 25 highly HLA-sensitized patients (11 patients in Uppsala or Stockholm, Sweden, and 14 in Los Angeles) before the transplantation of a kidney from an HLA-incompatible donor. Frequent monitoring for adverse events, outcomes, donor-specific antibodies, and renal function was performed, as were renal biopsies. Immunosuppression after transplantation consisted of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and glucocorticoids. Patients in the U.S. study also received intravenous immune globulin and rituximab after transplantation to prevent antibody rebound. RESULTS: Recipients in the U.S. study had a significantly longer cold ischemia time (the time elapsed between procurement of the organ and transplantation), a significantly higher rate of delayed graft function, and significantly higher levels of class I donor-specific antibodies than those in the Swedish study. A total of 38 serious adverse events occurred in 15 patients (5 events were adjudicated as being possibly related to IdeS). At transplantation, total IgG and HLA antibodies were eliminated. A total of 24 of 25 patients had perfusion of allografts after transplantation. Antibody-mediated rejection occurred in 10 patients (7 patients in the U.S. study and 3 in the Swedish study) at 2 weeks to 5 months after transplantation; all these patients had a response to treatment. One graft loss, mediated by non-HLA IgM and IgA antibodies, occurred. CONCLUSIONS: IdeS reduced or eliminated donor-specific antibodies and permitted HLA-incompatible transplantation in 24 of 25 patients. (Funded by Hansa Medical; ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT02224820 , NCT02426684 , and NCT02475551 .).

Transplantation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody positive, nucleic acid test negative donor kidneys to HCV negative patients frequently results in seroconversion but not HCV viremia.

Anecdotal reports have suggested that transplantation of hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody positive (Ab+)/nucleic acid test negative (NAT-) donor kidneys into HCV negative recipients is not associated with HCV transmission. We reviewed our center's outcomes of 32 HCV negative patients who received kidney allografts from 25 donors who were HCV Ab+/NAT-. The mean recipient age was 56.9 ± 12.1 years and the mean donor age was 41.5 ± 14 years, with a median Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) of 68%. Twelve donors (48%) met Public Health Service (PHS) increased risk status. All patients received antithymocyte globulin induction followed by tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and steroid maintenance immunosuppression. With a mean follow-up posttransplant of 10 ± 2.7 months, 1- and 3- month serum creatinine levels were 1.7 ± 0.8 and 1.3 ± 0.4, respectively, and patient and graft survival rates were 100% and 97%, respectively. Fourteen patients (44%) seroconverted and became HCV Ab+ posttransplant. However, all 32 patients were HCV RNA negative at 1- and 3- months posttransplant, and 27 and 8 patients tested at 6- and 12-months posttransplant, respectively, remain HCV RNA negative. In conclusion, transplantation of HCV Ab+/NAT- kidneys to HCV negative recipients frequently causes HCV Ab seroconversion but not HCV viremia.

Differences in pathologic features and graft outcomes in antibody-mediated rejection of renal allografts due to persistent/recurrent versus de novo donor-specific antibodies.

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) of renal allografts occurs in two forms. Type 1 ABMR results from persistence and/or a rebound of preexisting donor-specific antibodies in sensitized patients and usually occurs early post-transplantation. Type 2 ABMR is associated with de novo donor-specific antibodies and usually occurs over one year post-transplantation. It is generally accepted that types 1 and 2 also differ with regard to certain pathologic features including the frequencies of C4d positivity and concurrent cell-mediated rejection. However, direct comparison of pathologic, serologic, and clinical features of types 1 and 2 ABMR is lacking. Here we compared these features in 80 cases of ABMR (37 type 1, 43 type 2) diagnosed at our center. Compared with type 1, type 2 ABMR occurred later post-transplantation, was more often associated with donor-specific antibodies against Class II HLA, and was associated with more interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and more frequent cell-mediated rejection, although these did not differ with respect to C4d positivity. By univariate analysis, graft survival was lower with type 2 than type 1 ABMR with borderline significance. Still, among these 80 patients, all but one treated for ABMR following diagnosis, the only two independent predictors of graft failure were at least moderate interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy and failure of the donor-specific antibody relative intensity scale score, a measure of the combined strength of all donor-specific antibodies present, to decrease in response to therapy.

Six-year outcomes in broadly HLA-sensitized living donor transplant recipients desensitized with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab.

Desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and rituximab can improve transplantation rates in broadly sensitized kidney transplant recipients. However, long-term outcomes are lacking. Here we analyze long-term outcomes in living donor kidney transplant recipients desensitized with this regimen and compare them to low-risk recipients. Living donor kidney transplants that took place between July 2006 and December 2010 were considered retrospectively. The primary end point of the study was death-censored allograft survival at last follow-up. Secondary end points included patient survival, incidence of rejection, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), and proteinuria. There were 66 sensitized and 111 low-risk patients included. Average follow-up was 68 months. There was no difference in long-term patient or graft survival. The rate of rejection was similar in the groups with more early rejection in the sensitized group and more late rejection in the low-risk group. There was more antibody-mediated rejection in the sensitized group. Estimated GFR was similar during the follow-up period. Risk factors for rejection included a positive cross-match (HR: 2.4 CI: 1.35-4.40) and age (HR: 0.97 CI: 0.95-0.99). Desensitization with IVIG and rituximab has good long-term results with graft outcomes similar to non-HLA-sensitized patients despite higher immunologic risk.

Histopathologic features of transplant glomerulopathy associated with response to therapy with intravenous immune globulin and rituximab.

Transplant glomerulopathy (TG) is associated with poor long-term allograft survival and is often accompanied by microcirculation inflammation. Histopathologic scoring may inform prognosis and help guide therapy. We retrospectively assessed 33 patients with biopsy-proven TG. All biopsies were given a glomerulitis (g) and peritubular capillaritis (ptc) score. We determined allograft survival and serum creatinine stability in three different score groups: g < 2 and ≥ 2, ptc < 2 and ≥ 2, and (g + ptc) < 4 and ≥ 4. We assessed the impact of treatment with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and rituximab on outcomes. Graft survival and serum creatinine stability did not differ in each of the histopathologic score groups. Higher-score groups were associated with the presence of concomitant antibody-mediated rejection and were more likely to receive IVIG and rituximab. Treatment with IVIG and rituximab resulted in stability of serum creatinine within the higher-score groups, but not in the lower-score groups. Stabilization of serum creatinine was associated with an improvement in donor-specific antibody. Histopathologic scoring in kidney allograft biopsies with TG may help guide treatment. The combination of IVIG and rituximab appears to be beneficial in patients whose biopsies have moderate or severe microvascular injury.

Rituximab and intravenous immune globulin for desensitization during renal transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Few options for transplantation currently exist for patients highly sensitized to HLA. This exploratory, open-label, phase 1-2, single-center study examined whether intravenous immune globulin plus rituximab could reduce anti-HLA antibody levels and improve transplantation rates. METHODS: Between September 2005 and May 2007, a total of 20 highly sensitized patients (with a mean [+/-SD] T-cell panel-reactive antibody level, determined by use of the complement-dependent cytotoxicity assay, of 77+/-19% or with donor-specific antibodies) were enrolled and received treatment with intravenous immune globulin and rituximab. We recorded rates of transplantation, panel-reactive antibody levels, cross-matching results at the time of transplantation, survival of patients and grafts, acute rejection episodes, serum creatinine values, adverse events and serious adverse events, and immunologic factors. RESULTS: The mean panel-reactive antibody level was 44+/-30% after the second infusion of intravenous immune globulin (P<0.001 for the comparison with the pretreatment level). At study entry, the mean time on dialysis among recipients of a transplant from a deceased donor was 144+/-89 months (range, 60 to 324). However, the time to transplantation after desensitization was 5+/-6 months (range, 2 to 18). Sixteen of the 20 patients (80%) received a transplant. At 12 months, the mean serum creatinine level was 1.5+/-1.1 mg per deciliter (133+/-97 micromol per liter), and the mean survival rates of patients and grafts were 100% and 94%, respectively. There were no infusion-related adverse events or serious adverse events during the study. Long-term monitoring for infectious complications and neurologic problems revealed no unanticipated events. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the combination of intravenous immune globulin and rituximab may prove effective as a desensitization regimen for patients awaiting a transplant from either a living donor or a deceased donor. Larger and longer trials are needed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of this approach. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00642655.)

Efficacy and Safety of Once-Daily LCP-Tacrolimus Versus Twice-Daily Immediate-Release Tacrolimus in Adult Hispanic Stable Kidney Transplant Recipients: Sub-Group Analysis from a Phase 3 Trial.

BACKGROUND The pharmacokinetics and metabolism of tacrolimus, an immunosuppressant commonly used to prevent transplant rejection, can differ in specific subpopulations. This analysis examined treatment outcomes and safety of immediate-release tacrolimus (IR-Tac) and LCP-tacrolimus (LCPT) in stable Hispanic kidney transplant recipients. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a post hoc analysis of clinical trial data from Hispanic adult stable kidney transplant recipients randomized to remain on IR-Tac or convert from IR-Tac to a reduced dose of LCPT (NCT00817206). Composite treatment failure was evaluated at 12 months. Estimated glomerular filtration rate and tacrolimus trough concentrations were evaluated over 12 months. RESULTS Fifty-five stable (LCPT n=26, IR-Tac n=29) kidney transplant recipients who self-identified as Hispanic or Latino were included in this analysis. Composite treatment failure occurred in 1 patient (4%) who converted to LCPT and 1 (3%) who remained on IR-Tac. The estimated glomerular filtration rate was stable over time and similar in the 2 treatment groups (P=0.08). Tacrolimus trough levels for both groups were similar over time in the 2 treatment groups (P=0.98). Treatment-emergent adverse events were similar in patients who converted to LCPT and in those who remained on IR-Tac. CONCLUSIONS Efficacy and safety were similar in Hispanic kidney transplant recipients who converted from IR-Tac to LCPT and in those remaining on IR-Tac.

Analysis of Post-Transplant Lymphoproliferative Disorder (PTLD) Outcomes with Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) Assessments-A Single Tertiary Referral Center Experience and Review of Literature.

Post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs) are lymphoid or plasmacytic proliferations ranging from polyclonal reactive proliferations to overt lymphomas that develop as consequence of immunosuppression in recipients of solid organ transplantation (SOT) or allogeneic bone marrow/hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Immunosuppression and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) infection are known risk factors for PTLD. Patients with documented histopathologic diagnosis of primary PTLD at our institution between January 2000 and October 2019 were studied. Sixty-six patients with PTLD following SOT were followed for a median of 9.0 years. The overall median time from transplant to PTLD diagnosis was 5.5 years, with infant transplants showing the longest time to diagnosis at 12.0 years, compared to pediatric and adolescent transplants at 4.0 years and adult transplants at 4.5 years. The median overall survival (OS) was 19.0 years. In the monomorphic diffuse large B-cell (M-DLBCL-PTLD) subtype, median OS was 10.7 years, while median OS for polymorphic subtype was not yet reached. There was no significant difference in OS in patients with M-DLBCL-PTLD stratified by quantitative EBV viral load over and under 100,000 copies/mL at time of diagnosis, although there was a trend towards worse prognosis in those with higher copies.

Advances in diagnosing and managing antibody-mediated rejection.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a unique, significant, and often severe form of allograft rejection that is not amenable to treatment with standard immunosuppressive medications. Significant advances have occurred in our ability to predict patients at risk for, and to diagnose, AMR. These advances include the development of newer anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-antibody detection techniques and assays for non-HLA antibodies associated with AMR. The pathophysiology of AMR suggests a prime role for antibodies, B cells and plasma cells, but other effector molecules, especially the complement system, point to potential targets that could modify the AMR process. An emerging and potentially larger problem is the development of chronic AMR (CAMR) resulting from de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) that emerge more than 100 days posttransplantation. Therapeutic options include: (1) High-dose intravenously administered immunoglobulin (IVIG), which has many potential benefits. (2) The use of IVIG+rituximab (anti-CD20, anti-B cell). (3) The combination of plasmapheresis (PP)+low-dose IVIG with or without rituximab. Data support the efficacy of all of the above approaches. Newer approaches to treating AMR include using the proteosome inhibitor (bortezomib), which induces apoptosis in plasma cells, and eculizumab (anti-C5, anticomplement monoclonal antibody).

Therapeutic plasma exchange for desensitization prior to transplantation in ABO-incompatible renal allografts.

BACKGROUND: Although there have been desensitization protocols used for ABO-incompatible (ABOi) renal transplants, there are a lack of studied protocols. Our center developed a preconditioning protocol that involved mycophenolic acid, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) that allowed for ABOi renal transplantation. METHODS: Ten patients in our institution with end-stage renal disease who were unable to procure ABO-compatible donor kidneys underwent treatment with this protocol (which included a uniform 5 TPE sessions) prior to an ABOi renal transplant. A retrospective chart review was performed on these patients and clinical endpoints including ABO antibody titers, serum creatinine, clinical complications, and graft performance were analyzed. RESULTS: The median ABO antibody titers at presentation, after completion of the protocol, and after transplant for the patients were 32 (range, 2-128), 8 (range, 1-64), and 4 (range, 2-32), respectively. The mean serum creatinine at study conclusion was 1.45 +/- 1.04 mg/dl at an average of 262.20 days from transplant. There were four incidents of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and two incidents of delayed graft function (DGF). There was one incident of graft failure and no patient deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The desensitization protocol used by our institution allowed for successful ABOi renal transplantation. Although there were incidents of AMR and DGF, the majority of the transplants resulted in viable grafts. A larger patient study group may be needed to fully evaluate the efficacy and safety of this protocol.

Should donors who have used marijuana be considered candidates for living kidney donation?

BACKGROUND: The use of marijuana in the USA has been steadily increasing over the last 10 years. This study is the first to investigate the effect of marijuana use by live kidney donors upon outcomes in both donors and recipients. METHODS: Living kidney donor transplants performed between January 2000 and May 2016 in a single academic institution were retrospectively reviewed. Donor and recipient groups were each divided into two groups by donor marijuana usage. Outcomes in donor and recipient groups were compared using t-test, Chi-square and mixed linear analysis (P < 0.05 considered significant). RESULTS: This was 294 living renal donor medical records were reviewed including 31 marijuana-using donors (MUD) and 263 non-MUDs (NMUD). It was 230 living kidney recipient records were reviewed including 27 marijuana kidney recipients (MKRs) and 203 non-MKRs (NMKR). There was no difference in donor or recipient perioperative characteristics or postoperative outcomes based upon donor marijuana use (P > 0.05 for all comparisons). There was no difference in renal function between NMUD and MUD groups and no long-term difference in kidney allograft function between NMKR and MKR groups. CONCLUSIONS: Considering individuals with a history of marijuana use for living kidney donation could increase the donor pool and yield acceptable outcomes.

Renal response after high-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation is a favorable marker in patients with primary systemic amyloidosis.

BACKGROUND: Primary systemic (AL) amyloidosis is a rare plasma cell disorder characterized by soft-tissue deposition of monoclonal light chain fragments. High-dose melphalan followed by autologous stem cell transplantation currently has become the treatment of choice. Favorable outcome is ensured with achievement of hematologic response, but little is known about organ response. This study was undertaken to determine the prognostic importance of renal response after high-dose melphalan and stem cell transplantation. METHODS: All patients with AL amyloidosis who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation between 1996 and December 2002 were selected for study. Renal response is defined as a 50% or greater reduction in proteinuria with less than 25% decline in renal function. Exclusion criteria included pretransplantation dialysis therapy or dialysis dependence posttransplantation, treatment mortality, lack of proteinuria assessment posttransplantation, and baseline proteinuria with protein less than 1 g/d. RESULTS: Of 105 patients, 47 were excluded for stated reasons. Renal response was achieved in 60.3% of evaluated patients. Proteinuria was reduced by greater than 90% in 37.9% and returned to normal in 15.5%. Median response time was 12 months. Renal response was associated with a greater increase in serum albumin level (P = 0.001), maintenance of renal function (P < 0.001), and better survival (P = 0.0003). Renal responders had better survival regardless of hematologic response (P = 0.01 to 0.05). CONCLUSION: Currently, high-dose melphalan followed by stem cell transplantation is the most effective treatment for AL amyloidosis for those who are eligible. Our data show that renal response after high-dose melphalan followed by stem cell transplantation is associated with improved survival. Renal response is an independent marker of treatment success and can be used in cases in which determination of hematologic response is difficult.

A phase I/II placebo-controlled trial of C1-inhibitor for prevention of antibody-mediated rejection in HLA sensitized patients.

BACKGROUND: Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a severe form of rejection, mediated primarily by antibody-dependent complement (C) activation. C1 inhibitor (C1-INH, Berinert) inhibits the classical and lectin pathways of C activation. We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled study using C1-INH in highly sensitized renal transplant recipients for prevention of AMR. METHODS: Twenty highly sensitized patients desensitized with IVIG+rituximab±plasma exchange were enrolled and randomized 1:1 to receive plasma-derived human C1-INH (20 IU/kg/dose) versus placebo intraoperatively, then twice weekly for 7 doses. Renal function, adverse events (AEs)/serious AEs, C3, C4, and C1-INH levels were monitored and C1q+ HLA antibodies were also blindly assessed. RESULTS: One patient in the C1-INH group versus 2 patients in the placebo group developed serious AEs, but none were related to study drug. Delayed graft function developed in 1 C1-INH subject and 4 in the placebo. The C1-INH trough levels increased with C1-INH treatment. C3 and C4 levels also increased significantly in the C1-INH group compared to placebo. No C1-INH patient developed AMR during the study. Two patients developed AMR after the study. Three placebo patients developed AMR, one during the study. C1q+ donor specific antibodies were reduced in 2 C1-INH treated patients tested, while immunoglobulin G DSA levels showed decreased binding for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The C1-INH appears safe in the posttransplant period. The C1-INH treatment may reduce ischemia-reperfusion injury. The C1-INH also resulted in significant elevations of C1-INH levels, C3, C4, and reduced C1q+ HLA antibodies. Taken together, the combination of antibody reduction and C1-INH may prove useful in prevention of AMR. Further controlled studies are warranted.

Factors Predicting Risk for Antibody-mediated Rejection and Graft Loss in Highly Human Leukocyte Antigen Sensitized Patients Transplanted After Desensitization.

BACKGROUND: Desensitization with intravenous immunoglobulin and rituximab (I+R) significantly improves transplant rates in highly sensitized patients, but antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) remains a concern. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between July 2006 and December 2012, 226 highly sensitized patients received transplants after desensitization. Most received alemtuzumab induction and standard immunosuppression. Two groups were examined: ABMR (n = 181) and ABMR (n = 45, 20%). Risk factors for ABMR, pathology, and outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Significant risks for ABMR included previous transplants and pregnancies as sensitizing events, donor-specific antibody (DSA) relative intensity scores greater than 17, presence of both class I and II DSAs at transplant and time on waitlist. The ABMR showed a significant benefit for graft survival and glomerular filtration rate at 5 years (P < 0.0001). Banff pathology characteristics for ABMR patients with or without graft loss did not differ. C4d versus C4d ABMR did not predict graft loss (P = 0.086). Thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) significantly predicted graft failure (P = 0.045). The ABMR episodes were treated with I+R (n = 25), or, in more severe ABMR, plasma exchange (PLEX)+I+R (n = 20). Graft survival for patients treated with I+R was superior (P = 0.028). Increased mortality was seen in ABMR patients experiencing graft loss after ABMR treatment (P = 0.004). The PLEX + Eculizumab improved graft survival for TMA patients (P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Patients desensitized with I+R who remain ABMR have long-term graft and patient survival. The ABMR patients have significantly reduced graft survival and glomerular filtration rate at 5 years, especially TMA. Severe ABMR episodes benefit from treatment with PLEX + Eculizumab. The DSA-relative intensity scores at transplant was a strong predictor of ABMR. Donor-specific antibody avoidance and reduction strategies before transplantation are critical to avoiding ABMR and improving long-term outcomes.

A Phase I/II Trial of the Interleukin-6 Receptor-Specific Humanized Monoclonal (Tocilizumab) + Intravenous Immunoglobulin in Difficult to Desensitize Patients.

BACKGROUND: Current desensitization (DES) methods are not always effective. Thus, novel, more effective approaches are desirable. Interleukin (IL)-6 is an attractive target as it promotes B-cell differentiation to plasma cells, is important for immunoglobulin production, and induces Th17 cells. Here, we undertook a phase I/II pilot study of DES using a novel drug (anti-IL-6 receptor (IL-6R),Tocilizumab [TCZ]) + intravenous Ig (IVIg) to assess safety and limited efficacy. METHODS: From July 2012 to November 2013, 10 patients unresponsive to DES with IVIg + Rituximab were treated with IVIg + TCZ. Patients received IVIg on days 0 and 30 at 2 g/kg and TCZ 8 mg/kg on day 15 then monthly for 6 months. If transplanted, patients received IVIg once and TCZ monthly for 6 months. RESULTS: No differences in baseline characteristics were seen in patients not transplanted versus transplanted. Two patients in each group developed serious adverse events: not transplanted- pulmonary congestion with epilepticus (likely not related) versus transplanted infective colitis with colonic perforation and Bell Palsy (both possibly related). Five of 10 patients were transplanted. Mean time to transplant from first DES was 25 +/- 10.5 months but after TCZ was 8.1 +/- 5.4 months. Six-month protocol biopsies showed no antibody-mediated rejection. Donor-specific antibody strength and number were reduced by TCZ treatment. Renal function at 12 months was 60 +/- 25 mL/min. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab and IVIg appear to be safe. From this pilot trial, we are cautiously optimistic that targeting the IL-6/IL-6R pathway could offer a novel alternative for difficult to desensitize patients. Larger controlled studies are essential to prove efficacy

Benefits of rituximab combined with intravenous immunoglobulin for desensitization in kidney transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Highly HLA-sensitized (HS) patients have difficulty accessing compatible donors, especially deceased donor (DD) transplants. Desensitization protocols (DES) have evolved, but rigorous evaluation is lacking. Here, we examined the efficacy of rituximab as a DES agent in a placebo-controlled trial. METHODS: Candidates were randomized to IVIG+placebo versus IVIG+rituximab. End points included rates of transplantation, antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), and renal function. Protocol biopsies were performed at 1 year and analysis of patient and graft survival and donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) were performed. RESULTS: Initially, 15 HS DDs were randomized with 13 receiving transplants. However, we discontinued study entry after five serious adverse events were observed. The study was un-blinded and attribution of patients was noted (IVIG+placebo N=7, IVIG+rituximab N=6). No significant differences were seen in DSA levels at transplant. All ABMR episodes occurred in the IVIG+placebo arm and required intense therapy (P=0.06). The two graft losses were in the placebo group. DSA rebound associated with severe ABMR was seen in three patients in the IVIG+placebo group. No rebound was seen in the IVIG+rituximab group. Renal function at 6 and 12 months showed a significant benefit for IVIG+rituximab (P=0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Based on limited assessment with acknowledged limitations, both protocols appear effective in achieving levels of DSA allowable for transplantation. However, IVIG+rituximab appeared more effective in preventing DSA rebound and, more importantly, preventing ABMR and development of transplant glomerulopathy.

Polyomavirus BK viremia in kidney transplant recipients after desensitization with IVIG and rituximab.

BACKGROUND: Desensitization with intravenous immune globulin (IVIG) and rituximab improves transplantation rates. It is unclear if desensitization increases the risk of polyomavirus BK (BKV) viremia. Here, BKV viremia in HLA-sensitized patients after desensitization with IVIG and rituximab was analyzed. METHODS: Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared in the desensitized group (N=187) and the non-desensitized group (N=284). Surveillance for BKV viremia was done at 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months posttransplant. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed. RESULTS: BKV viremia was observed in 20% of the desensitized and 10% of the non-desensitized (P<0.001) groups by 2 years posttransplant. The desensitized group had more lymphocyte depleting induction and more rejection. They also had a greater degree of viremia with more patients having a peak viral load greater than 10,000 copies per milliliter (P<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in BKV-associated nephropathy or graft loss in the two groups. There was an association of BKV viremia with desensitization and lymphocyte induction. Only desensitization remained a significant predictor in the multivariable model with an adjusted HR of 2.13 (95% CI 1.21-3.77, P=0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Desensitization with IVIG and rituximab is associated with a higher incidence of BKV viremia with high viral copies and was the major predictor of BKV viremia in the multivariable model. More frequent surveillance for BKV viremia and an early, aggressive treatment strategy are essential for preventing high BKV viral loads in this patient population.

Efficacy, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of desensitization using IVIG and rituximab.

BACKGROUND: Transplantation rates are very low for the broadly sensitized patient (panel reactive antibody [PRA]>80%; HS). Here, we examine the efficacy, outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of desensitization using high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) and rituximab to improve transplantation rates in HS patients. METHODS: From July 2006 to December 2011, 207 HS (56 living donors/151 deceased donors) patients (donor-specific antibody positive, PRA>80%) were desensitized using IVIG and rituximab. After desensitization, responsive patients proceeded to transplantation with an acceptable crossmatch. Cost and outcomes of desensitization were compared with dialysis. RESULTS: Of the 207 treated patients, 146 (71%) were transplanted. At 48 months, patient and graft survival by Kaplan-Meier were 95% and 87.5%, respectively. The total 3-year cost for patients treated in the desensitization arm was $219,914 per patient compared with $238,667 per patient treated in the dialysis arm. Thus, each patient treated with desensitization is estimated to save the U.S. healthcare system $18,753 in 2011 USD. Overall, estimated patient survival at the end of 3 years was 96.6% for patients in the desensitization arm of the model (based on Cedars-Sinai survival rate) compared with 79.0% for an age, end-stage renal disease etiology, and PRA matched group of patients remaining on dialysis during the study period. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that desensitization with IVIG+rituximab is clinically and cost-effective, with both financial savings and an estimated 17.6% greater probability of 3-year survival associated with desensitization versus dialysis alone. However, the benefits of desensitization and transplantation are limited by organ availability and allocation policies.

Infectious complications in kidney-transplant recipients desensitized with rituximab and intravenous immunoglobulin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Rituximab and intravenous Ig (IVIG) are commonly used for desensitization of HLA and blood group-incompatible (ABOi) transplants. However, serious infections have been noted in association with rituximab administration. In this study, we retrospectively compared infectious outcomes in those who received rituximab plus IVIG for HLA or ABOi transplants (RIT group) with a group of nonsensitized, ABO-compatible transplant recipients (non-RIT group). DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: Patients undergoing kidney transplantation at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center were included in the analysis. A total of 361 patients were identified. All received antimicrobial prophylaxis and viral surveillance. The primary outcome was infection. RESULTS: Overall patient survival was 97 and 96%, and graft survival was 91 and 89% in the RIT and non-RIT groups, respectively, after an average follow-up of 18 months. There were equal rates of bacterial (34.7% versus 39.1%), viral (21.8% versus 25.1%), fungal (5.9% versus 5.2%), and serious infections (22.9% versus 25.5%) in the RIT and non-RIT groups respectively. Urinary tract infection was the most common infection, accounting for 50% of all bacterial infections. Cytomegalovirus viremia was nonsignificantly more common in the nonrituximab-treated group (15.2% versus 10%), whereas BK viremia was marginally more frequent in the rituximab-treated group (10.6% versus 5.8%). There were no graft losses caused by BK-associated nephropathy. There were two deaths in each group related to infection (1%). CONCLUSION: Rituximab does not increase infection risk when used with intravenous Ig for desensitization.