Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 15 de 15
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Emerg Med ; 77(2): 139-153, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33187749

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We evaluate the effect of implementing the out-of-hospital pediatric traumatic brain injury guidelines on outcomes in children with major traumatic brain injury. METHODS: The Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care for Children study is the preplanned secondary analysis of the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care study, a multisystem, intention-to-treat study using a before-after controlled design. This subanalysis included children younger than 18 years who were transported to Level I trauma centers by participating out-of-hospital agencies between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2015, throughout Arizona. The primary and secondary outcomes were survival to hospital discharge or admission for children with major traumatic brain injury and in 3 subgroups, defined a priori as those with moderate, severe, and critical traumatic brain injury. Outcomes in the preimplementation and postimplementation cohorts were compared with logistic regression, adjusting for risk factors and confounders. RESULTS: There were 2,801 subjects, 2,041 in preimplementation and 760 in postimplementation. The primary analysis (postimplementation versus preimplementation) yielded an adjusted odds ratio of 1.16 (95% confidence interval 0.70 to 1.92) for survival to hospital discharge and 2.41 (95% confidence interval 1.17 to 5.21) for survival to hospital admission. In the severe traumatic brain injury cohort (Regional Severity Score-Head 3 or 4), but not the moderate or critical subgroups, survival to discharge significantly improved after guideline implementation (adjusted odds ratio = 8.42; 95% confidence interval 1.01 to 100+). The improvement in survival to discharge among patients with severe traumatic brain injury who received positive-pressure ventilation did not reach significance (adjusted odds ratio = 9.13; 95% confidence interval 0.79 to 100+). CONCLUSION: Implementation of the pediatric out-of-hospital traumatic brain injury guidelines was not associated with improved survival when the entire spectrum of severity was analyzed as a whole (moderate, severe, and critical). However, both adjusted survival to hospital admission and discharge improved in children with severe traumatic brain injury, indicating a potential severity-based interventional opportunity for guideline effectiveness. These findings support the widespread implementation of the out-of-hospital pediatric traumatic brain injury guidelines.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Tratamiento de Urgencia/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Adolescente , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Masculino , Respiración con Presión Positiva , Factores de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Centros Traumatológicos
2.
J Emerg Med ; 60(6): e141-e145, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33583612

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has changed the way we practice medicine. Standards of care are evolving in an effort to diagnose, manage, and treat the cause of this global pandemic, as well as to protect the health care workforce. These practices can have unexpected and potentially dangerous consequences, particularly for patient populations with confounding factors that put them at increased risk for complications and poor outcomes. CASE REPORT: A 52-year-old previously healthy woman presented with 4 days of nasal pain and discharge after using a home collection kit in an attempt to obtain a nasopharyngeal viral sample for COVID-19 testing. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: With treatments, policies, and procedures that are rapidly evolving and often deviating from established, evidence-based, usual care in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, emergency physicians must be cognizant of and monitor for poor outcomes and potential downstream complications, especially in underserved patient populations.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Cuerpos Extraños , Nariz/patología , COVID-19/diagnóstico , Prueba de COVID-19 , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias
3.
Ann Emerg Med ; 69(1): 62-72, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27692683

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Survival is significantly reduced by either hypotension or hypoxia during the out-of-hospital management of major traumatic brain injury. However, only a handful of small studies have investigated the influence of the combination of both hypotension and hypoxia occurring together. In patients with major traumatic brain injury, we evaluate the associations between mortality and out-of-hospital hypotension and hypoxia separately and in combination. METHODS: All moderate or severe traumatic brain injury cases in the preimplementation cohort of the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care study (a statewide, before/after, controlled study of the effect of implementing the out-of-hospital traumatic brain injury treatment guidelines) from January 1, 2007, to March 31, 2014, were evaluated (exclusions: <10 years, out-of-hospital oxygen saturation ≤10%, and out-of-hospital systolic blood pressure <40 or >200 mm Hg). The relationship between mortality and hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) or hypoxia (saturation <90%) was assessed with multivariable logistic regression, controlling for Injury Severity Score, head region severity, injury type (blunt versus penetrating), age, sex, race, ethnicity, payer, interhospital transfer, and trauma center. RESULTS: Among the 13,151 patients who met inclusion criteria (median age 45 years; 68.6% men), 11,545 (87.8%) had neither hypotension nor hypoxia, 604 (4.6%) had hypotension only, 790 (6.0%) had hypoxia only, and 212 (1.6%) had both hypotension and hypoxia. Mortality for the 4 study cohorts was 5.6%, 20.7%, 28.1%, and 43.9%, respectively. The crude and adjusted odds ratios for death within the cohorts, using the patients with neither hypotension nor hypoxia as the reference, were 4.4 and 2.5, 6.6 and 3.0, and 13.2 and 6.1, respectively. Evaluation for an interaction between hypotension and hypoxia revealed that the effects were additive on the log odds of death. CONCLUSION: In this statewide analysis of major traumatic brain injury, combined out-of-hospital hypotension and hypoxia were associated with significantly increased mortality. This effect on survival persisted even after controlling for multiple potential confounders. In fact, the adjusted odds of death for patients with both hypotension and hypoxia were more than 2 times greater than for those with either hypotension or hypoxia alone. These findings seem supportive of the emphasis on aggressive prevention and treatment of hypotension and hypoxia reflected in the current emergency medical services traumatic brain injury treatment guidelines but clearly reveal the need for further study to determine their influence on outcome.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Hipotensión/complicaciones , Hipoxia/complicaciones , Adulto , Anciano , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotensión/mortalidad , Hipoxia/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad
4.
Ann Emerg Med ; 70(4): 522-530.e1, 2017 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28559036

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Out-of-hospital hypotension has been associated with increased mortality in traumatic brain injury. The association of traumatic brain injury mortality with the depth or duration of out-of-hospital hypotension is unknown. We evaluated the relationship between the depth and duration of out-of-hospital hypotension and mortality in major traumatic brain injury. METHODS: We evaluated adults and older children with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury in the preimplementation cohort of Arizona's statewide Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care study. We used logistic regression to determine the association between the depth-duration dose of hypotension (depth of systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg integrated over duration [minutes] of hypotension) and odds of inhospital death, controlling for significant confounders. RESULTS: There were 7,521 traumatic brain injury cases included (70.6% male patients; median age 40 years [interquartile range 24 to 58]). Mortality was 7.8% (95% confidence interval [CI] 7.2% to 8.5%) among the 6,982 patients without hypotension (systolic blood pressure ≥90 mm Hg) and 33.4% (95% CI 29.4% to 37.6%) among the 539 hypotensive patients (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg). Mortality was higher with increased hypotension dose: 0.01 to 14.99 mm Hg-minutes 16.3%; 15 to 49.99 mm Hg-minutes 28.1%; 50 to 141.99 mm Hg-minutes 38.8%; and greater than or equal to 142 mm Hg-minutes 50.4%. Log2 (the logarithm in base 2) of hypotension dose was associated with traumatic brain injury mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.19 [95% CI 1.14 to 1.25] per 2-fold increase of dose). CONCLUSION: In this study, the depth and duration of out-of-hospital hypotension were associated with increased traumatic brain injury mortality. Assessments linking out-of-hospital blood pressure with traumatic brain injury outcomes should consider both depth and duration of hypotension.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Hipotensión/mortalidad , Adulto , Arizona/epidemiología , Presión Sanguínea , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotensión/etiología , Hipotensión/fisiopatología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Estudios Prospectivos , Tiempo de Tratamiento
5.
Prehosp Emerg Care ; 21(5): 575-582, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28481163

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Low body temperatures following prehospital transport are associated with poor outcomes in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). However, a minimal amount is known about potential associations across a range of temperatures obtained immediately after prehospital transport. Furthermore, a minimal amount is known about the influence of body temperature on non-mortality outcomes. The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation between temperatures obtained immediately following prehospital transport and TBI outcomes across the entire range of temperatures. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included all moderate/severe TBI cases (CDC Barell Matrix Type 1) in the pre-implementation cohort of the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) TBI Study (NIH/NINDS: 1R01NS071049). Cases were compared across four cohorts of initial trauma center temperature (ITCT): <35.0°C [Very Low Temperature (VLT)]; 35.0-35.9°C [Low Temperature (LT)]; 36.0-37.9°C [Normal Temperature (NT)]; and ≥38.0°C [Elevated Temperature (ET)]. Multivariable analysis was performed adjusting for injury severity score, age, sex, race, ethnicity, blunt/penetrating trauma, and payment source. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for mortality were calculated. To evaluate non-mortality outcomes, deaths were excluded and the adjusted median increase in hospital length of stay (LOS), ICU LOS and total hospital charges were calculated for each ITCT group and compared to the NT group. RESULTS: 22,925 cases were identified and cases with interfacility transfer (7361, 32%), no EMS transport (1213, 5%), missing ITCT (2083, 9%), or missing demographic data (391, 2%) were excluded. Within this study cohort the aORs for death (compared to the NT group) were 2.41 (CI: 1.83-3.17) for VLT, 1.62 (CI: 1.37-1.93) for LT, and 1.86 (CI: 1.52-3.00) for ET. Similarly, trauma center (TC) LOS, ICU LOS, and total TC charges increased in all temperature groups when compared to NT. CONCLUSION: In this large, statewide study of major TBI, both ETs and LTs immediately following prehospital transport were independently associated with higher mortality and with increased TC LOS, ICU LOS, and total TC charges. Further study is needed to identify the causes of abnormal body temperature during the prehospital interval and if in-field measures to prevent temperature variations might improve outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Fiebre/complicaciones , Hipotermia/complicaciones , Adulto , Temperatura Corporal/fisiología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/economía , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Fiebre/economía , Fiebre/epidemiología , Precios de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Hipotermia/economía , Hipotermia/epidemiología , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Pronóstico , Sistema de Registros , Estudios Retrospectivos , Transporte de Pacientes , Centros Traumatológicos , Adulto Joven
6.
Clin Infect Dis ; 63(7): 878-888, 2016 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27358357

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: During 2009 and 2010, 2 clusters of organ transplant-transmitted Balamuthia mandrillaris, a free-living ameba, were detected by recognition of severe unexpected illness in multiple recipients from the same donor. METHODS: We investigated all recipients and the 2 donors through interview, medical record review, and testing of available specimens retrospectively. Surviving recipients were tested and treated prospectively. RESULTS: In the 2009 cluster of illness, 2 kidney recipients were infected and 1 died. The donor had Balamuthia encephalitis confirmed on autopsy. In the 2010 cluster, the liver and kidney-pancreas recipients developed Balamuthia encephalitis and died. The donor had a clinical syndrome consistent with Balamuthia infection and serologic evidence of infection. In both clusters, the 2 asymptomatic recipients were treated expectantly and survived; 1 asymptomatic recipient in each cluster had serologic evidence of exposure that decreased over time. Both donors had been presumptively diagnosed with other neurologic diseases prior to organ procurement. CONCLUSIONS: Balamuthia can be transmitted through organ transplantation with an observed incubation time of 17-24 days. Clinicians should be aware of Balamuthia as a cause of encephalitis with high rate of fatality, and should notify public health departments and evaluate transplant recipients from donors with signs of possible encephalitis to facilitate early diagnosis and targeted treatment. Organ procurement organizations and transplant centers should be aware of the potential for Balamuthia infection in donors with possible encephalitis and also assess donors carefully for signs of neurologic infection that may have been misdiagnosed as stroke or as noninfectious forms of encephalitis.


Asunto(s)
Amebiasis , Balamuthia mandrillaris , Encefalitis , Trasplante de Riñón/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Adulto , Amebiasis/diagnóstico por imagen , Amebiasis/patología , Amebiasis/transmisión , Encéfalo/diagnóstico por imagen , Encéfalo/parasitología , Encéfalo/patología , Niño , Preescolar , Encefalitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Encefalitis/patología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Donantes de Tejidos , Receptores de Trasplantes
7.
J Emerg Med ; 47(2): 216-22, 2014 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24930443

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A few studies suggest that an increasing clinical workload does not adversely affect quality of teaching in the Emergency Department (ED); however, the impact of clinical teaching on productivity is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this study was to determine whether there was a difference in relative value units (RVUs) billed by faculty members when an acting internship (AI) student is on shift. Secondary objectives include comparing RVUs billed by individual faculty members and in different locations. METHODS: A matched case-control study design was employed, comparing the RVUs generated during shifts with an Emergency Medicine (EM) AI (cases) to shifts without an AI (controls). Case shifts were matched with control shifts for individual faculty member, time (day, swing, night), location, and, whenever possible, day of the week. Outcome measures were gross, procedural, and critical care RVUs. RESULTS: There were 140 shifts worked by AI students during the study period; 18 were unmatchable, and 21 were night shifts that crossed two dates of service and were not included. There were 101 well-matched shift pairs retained for analysis. Gross, procedural, and critical care RVUs billed did not differ significantly in case vs. control shifts (53.60 vs. 53.47, p=0.95; 4.30 vs. 4.27, p=0.96; 3.36 vs. 3.41, respectively, p=0.94). This effect was consistent across sites and for all faculty members. CONCLUSIONS: An AI student had no adverse effect on overall, procedural, or critical care clinical billing in the academic ED. When matched with experienced educators, career-bound fourth-year students do not detract from clinical productivity.


Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Eficiencia Organizacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Eficiencia , Medicina de Emergencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Docentes Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Carga de Trabajo
8.
J Emerg Med ; 46(4): 544-50, 2014 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24113483

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Standardized Letter of Recommendation (SLOR) was developed in an attempt to standardize the evaluation of applicants to an emergency medicine (EM) residency. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine whether the Global Assessment Score (GAS) and Likelihood of Matching Assessment (LOMA) of the SLOR for applicants applying to an EM residency are affected by the experience of the letter writer. We describe the distribution of GAS and LOMA grades and compare the GAS and LOMA scores to length of time an applicant knew the letter writer and number of EM rotations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all SLORs written for all applicants applying to three EM residency programs for the 2012 match. Median number of letters written the previous year were compared across the four GAS and LOMA scores using an equality of medians test and test for trend to see if higher scores on the GAS and LOMA were associated with less experienced letter writers. Distributions of the scores were determined and length of time a letter writer knew an applicant and number of EM rotations were compared with GAS and LOMA scores. RESULTS: There were 917 applicants representing 27.6% of the total applicant pool for the 2012 United States EM residency match and 1253 SLORs for GAS and 1246 for LOMA were analyzed. The highest scores on the GAS and LOMA were associated with the lowest median number of letters written the previous year (equality of medians test across groups, p < 0.001; test for trend, p < 0.001). Less than 3% received the lowest score for GAS and LOMA. Among letter writers that knew an applicant for more than 1 year, 45.3% gave a GAS score of "Outstanding" and 53.4% gave a LOMA of "Very Competitive" compared with 31.7% and 39.6%, respectively, if the letter writer knew them 1 year or less (p = 0.002; p = 0.005). Number of EM rotations was not associated with GAS and LOMA scores. CONCLUSIONS: SLORs written by less experienced letter writers were more likely to have a GAS of "Outstanding" (p < 0.001) and a LOMA of "Very Competitive" (p < 0.001) than more experienced letter writers. The overall distribution of GAS and LOMA was heavily weighted to the highest scores. The length of time a letter writer knew an applicant was significantly associated with GAS and LOMA scores.


Asunto(s)
Correspondencia como Asunto , Evaluación Educacional/normas , Medicina de Emergencia/educación , Selección de Personal/normas , Competencia Profesional , Escritura , Prácticas Clínicas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo
9.
J Emerg Med ; 43(5): e343-8, 2012 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22464610

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medication errors are a leading cause of increased cost and iatrogenic injury in the pediatric population. In the academic setting, studies have suggested that these increased error rates are related primarily to resident inexperience, thus advocating a higher level of supervision. STUDY OBJECTIVE: We sought to identify the number of prescription errors in our institution's academic Emergency Department, how this varied between the beginning and end of the academic year and between practitioners at varying levels of training. METHODS: A retrospective review of computer-based outpatient prescriptions for children aged 0-12 years old was performed. Outpatient prescriptions were reviewed during a 2-week time block at the end of the academic year and beginning of the academic year (109 [June] and 111 [July] data sets, respectively). Prescriptions were retrieved electronically and reviewed for appropriate dosing. Errors were defined as those that varied>10% above or below recommended weight-based dosing. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (16.1%) of 180 written prescription orders were determined to be incorrectly written. Error rates were not significantly different between the beginning and end of the academic year. In both sampling periods, a higher percentage were found to be derived from senior level practitioners in both data sets (9/14 and 10/15; respectively), but few of these were considered high-grade prescription errors. CONCLUSIONS: Overall prescription error rates at our institution are comparable to nationally reported error rates in children. Error rates were not associated with newly matriculated residents. These findings dispute previously held opinion that physician level of training is a factor of prescription errors.


Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Competencia Clínica/normas , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Internado y Residencia , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos , Niño , Preescolar , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Femenino , Hospitales de Enseñanza , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
Cureus ; 14(5): e25107, 2022 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35733472

RESUMEN

Simultaneous bilateral spontaneous pneumothorax is a rare life-threatening condition that can cause severe respiratory distress, hypoxemia, and death. Spontaneous pneumothorax has been reported as an uncommon but severe complication in patients recovering from COVID-19 pneumonia. Even fewer cases of spontaneous bilateral tension pneumothorax have been reported as a result of infection. We present a patient with spontaneous bilateral tension pneumothorax 18 days after COVID-19 infection. The patient's symptoms began with a substernal tearing sensation and pain radiating to the back with dyspnea. Physical exam was significant for oxygen saturation of 75% on room air, tachycardia, and diminished breath sounds bilaterally. Imaging confirmed large bilateral pneumothoraces, and chest tubes were inserted emergently to restore lung volume. Pneumothorax is predominantly observed in those with severe infection but has been seen with mild symptoms as well. The development of pneumothorax is thought to result from diffuse lung injury that occurred from a cytokine storm during COVID infection. We speculate that our patient developed bulla as a result of infection, and the bulla spontaneously ruptured, inducing the bilateral collapse of the lungs. The mortality of such an event remains unknown, but without proper intervention, mortality increases significantly in these patients. As we continue to learn about the multitude of sequelae that can result from COVID-19 infection, pneumothorax should be considered in patients with a history of COVID pneumonia that presents with acute onset of dyspnea and chest pain. It is important to quickly recognize such cases as these patients have a narrow time frame for intervention, especially in the event of bilateral tension pneumothorax. Therefore, pneumothorax should be adequately assessed on initial examination, with the possibility of bilateral pneumothoraces in mind, to minimize morbidity and mortality.

11.
JAMA Surg ; 154(7): e191152, 2019 07 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31066879

RESUMEN

Importance: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a massive public health problem. While evidence-based guidelines directing the prehospital treatment of TBI have been promulgated, to our knowledge, no studies have assessed their association with survival. Objective: To evaluate the association of implementing the nationally vetted, evidence-based, prehospital treatment guidelines with outcomes in moderate, severe, and critical TBI. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) Study included more than 130 emergency medical services systems/agencies throughout Arizona. This was a statewide, multisystem, intention-to-treat study using a before/after controlled design with patients with moderate to critically severe TBI (US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Barell Matrix-Type 1 and/or Abbreviated Injury Scale Head region severity ≥3) transported to trauma centers between January 1, 2007, and June 30, 2015. Data were analyzed between October 25, 2017, and February 22, 2019. Interventions: Implementation of the prehospital TBI guidelines emphasizing avoidance/treatment of hypoxia, prevention/correction of hyperventilation, and avoidance/treatment of hypotension. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary: survival to hospital discharge; secondary: survival to hospital admission. Results: Of the included patients, the median age was 45 years, 14 666 (67.1%) were men, 7181 (32.9%) were women; 16 408 (75.1% ) were white, 1400 (6.4%) were Native American, 743 (3.4% ) were Black, 237 (1.1%) were Asian, and 2791 (12.8%) were other race/ethnicity. Of the included patients, 21 852 met inclusion criteria for analysis (preimplementation phase [P1]: 15 228; postimplementation [P3]: 6624). The primary analysis (P3 vs P1) revealed an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of 1.06 (95% CI, 0.93-1.21; P = .40) for survival to hospital discharge. The aOR was 1.70 (95% CI, 1.38-2.09; P < .001) for survival to hospital admission. Among the severe injury cohorts (but not moderate or critical), guideline implementation was significantly associated with survival to discharge (Regional Severity Score-Head 3-4: aOR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.52-2.72; P < .001; Injury Severity Score 16-24: aOR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.07-2.48; P = .02). This was also true for survival to discharge among the severe, intubated subgroups (Regional Severity Score-Head 3-4: aOR, 3.14; 95% CI, 1.65-5.98; P < .001; Injury Severity Score 16-24: aOR, 3.28; 95% CI, 1.19-11.34; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: Statewide implementation of the prehospital TBI guidelines was not associated with significant improvement in overall survival to hospital discharge (across the entire, combined moderate to critical injury spectrum). However, adjusted survival doubled among patients with severe TBI and tripled in the severe, intubated cohort. Furthermore, guideline implementation was significantly associated with survival to hospital admission. These findings support the widespread implementation of the prehospital TBI treatment guidelines. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01339702.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/terapia , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Adhesión a Directriz , Adulto , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Femenino , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Adulto Joven
12.
Emerg Med Clin North Am ; 36(2): 387-400, 2018 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29622329

RESUMEN

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has emerged as a powerful tool for the pediatric emergency management of acute respiratory failure (ARF). This therapy is safe and well tolerated and seems to frequently prevent both the need for invasive mechanical ventilation and the associated risks/complications. Although NIV can be the primary treatment of ARF resulting from multiple respiratory disease states, it must be meticulously monitored and, when unsuccessful, may aid in preoxygenation for prompt endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation. The following article reviews the physiologic effects of NIV and its role in common respiratory diseases encountered in pediatric emergency medicine.


Asunto(s)
Ventilación no Invasiva/métodos , Medicina de Urgencia Pediátrica/métodos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Cateterismo/métodos , Niño , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua/métodos , Humanos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/diagnóstico
13.
JAMA Surg ; 152(4): 360-368, 2017 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27926759

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Current prehospital traumatic brain injury guidelines use a systolic blood pressure threshold of less than 90 mm Hg for treating hypotension for individuals 10 years and older based on studies showing higher mortality when blood pressure drops below this level. However, the guidelines also acknowledge the weakness of the supporting evidence. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether any statistically supportable threshold between systolic pressure and mortality emerges from the data a priori, without assuming that a cut point exists. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Observational evaluation of a large prehospital database established as a part of the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care Traumatic Brain Injury Study. Patients from the preimplementation cohort (January 2007 to March 2014) 10 years and older with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (Barell Matrix Type 1 classification, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision head region severity score of 3 or greater, and/or Abbreviated Injury Scale head-region severity score of 3 or greater) and a prehospital systolic pressure between 40 and 119 mm Hg were included. The generalized additive model and logistic regression were used to determine the association between systolic pressure and probability of death, adjusting for significant/important confounders. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among the 3844 included patients, 2565 (66.7%) were male, and the median (range) age was 35 (10-99) years. The model revealed a monotonically decreasing association between systolic pressure and adjusted probability of death across the entire range (ie, from 40 to 119 mm Hg). Each 10-point increase of systolic pressure was associated with a decrease in the adjusted odds of death of 18.8% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.812; 95% CI, 0.748-0.883). Thus, the adjusted odds of mortality increased as much for a drop from 110 to 100 mm Hg as for a drop from 90 to 80 mm Hg, and so on throughout the range. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We found a linear association between lowest prehospital systolic blood pressure and severity-adjusted probability of mortality across an exceptionally wide range. There is no identifiable threshold or inflection point between 40 and 119 mm Hg. Thus, in patients with traumatic brain injury, the concept that 90 mm Hg represents a unique or important physiological cut point may be wrong. Furthermore, clinically meaningful hypotension may not be as low as current guidelines suggest. Randomized trials evaluating treatment levels significantly above 90 mm Hg are needed.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/mortalidad , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Hipotensión/mortalidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Presión Sanguínea/fisiología , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo/complicaciones , Niño , Estudios de Cohortes , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia , Femenino , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Humanos , Hipotensión/etiología , Hipotensión/fisiopatología , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Adulto Joven
14.
Acad Emerg Med ; 21(7): 818-30, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25112451

RESUMEN

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) exacts a great toll on society. Fortunately, there is growing evidence that the management of TBI in the early minutes after injury may significantly reduce morbidity and mortality. In response, evidence-based prehospital and in-hospital TBI treatment guidelines have been established by authoritative bodies. However, no large studies have yet evaluated the effectiveness of implementing these guidelines in the prehospital setting. This article describes the background, design, implementation, emergency medical services (EMS) treatment protocols, and statistical analysis of a prospective, controlled (before/after), statewide study designed to evaluate the effect of implementing the EMS TBI guidelines-the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care (EPIC) study (NIH/NINDS R01NS071049, "EPIC"; and 3R01NS071049-S1, "EPIC4Kids"). The specific aim of the study is to test the hypothesis that statewide implementation of the international adult and pediatric EMS TBI guidelines will significantly reduce mortality and improve nonmortality outcomes in patients with moderate or severe TBI. Furthermore, it will specifically evaluate the effect of guideline implementation on outcomes in the subgroup of patients who are intubated in the field. Over the course of the entire study (~9 years), it is estimated that approximately 25,000 patients will be enrolled.


Asunto(s)
Lesiones Encefálicas/terapia , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/normas , Respiración con Presión Positiva/normas , Adolescente , Adulto , Arizona/epidemiología , Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones , Lesiones Encefálicas/mortalidad , Niño , Preescolar , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/métodos , Servicios Médicos de Urgencia/organización & administración , Femenino , Humanos , Hiperventilación/diagnóstico , Hiperventilación/etiología , Hiperventilación/terapia , Hipoventilación/diagnóstico , Hipoventilación/etiología , Hipoventilación/terapia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Estudios de Casos Organizacionales , Evaluación de Procesos y Resultados en Atención de Salud , Consumo de Oxígeno , Respiración con Presión Positiva/efectos adversos , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Prospectivos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/normas , Índices de Gravedad del Trauma , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA