Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 431
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Expert Opin Emerg Drugs ; 29(2): 103-112, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38410863

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Neuropathic pain (NP) conditions involve lesions to the somatosensory nervous system leading to chronic and debilitating pain. Many patients suffering from NP utilize pharmacological treatments with various drugs that seek to reduce pathologic neuronal states. However, many of these drugs show poor efficacy as well as cause significant adverse effects. Because of this, there is a major need for the development of safer and more efficacious drugs to treat NP. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we analyzed current treatments being developed for a variety of NP conditions. Specifically, we sought drugs in phase II/III clinical trials with indications for NP conditions. Various databases were searched including Google Scholar, PubMed, and clinicaltrials.gov. EXPERT OPINION: All the mentioned targets for treatments of NP seem to be promising alternatives for existing treatments that often possess poor side effect profiles for patients. However, gene therapy potentially offers the unique ability to inject a plasmid containing growth factors leading to nerve growth and repair. Because of this, gene therapy appears to be the most intriguing new treatment for NP.


Asunto(s)
Ensayos Clínicos Fase II como Asunto , Neuropatías Diabéticas , Terapia Genética , Neuralgia Posherpética , Neuralgia , Neuralgia del Trigémino , Humanos , Neuropatías Diabéticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/fisiopatología , Neuralgia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuralgia/terapia , Neuralgia Posherpética/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Genética/métodos , Animales , Neuralgia del Trigémino/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuralgia del Trigémino/fisiopatología , Neuralgia del Trigémino/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Desarrollo de Medicamentos
2.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 28(1): 1-9, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37855944

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Spinal cord stimulation has been increasing in influence as an option to regulate pain, especially in the chronic pain patient population. However, even with the numerous changes made to this technology since its inception, it is still prone to various complications such as hardware issues, neurological injury/epidural hematoma, infections, and other biological concerns. The purpose of this article is to thoroughly review and evaluate literature pertaining to the complications associated with percutaneous spinal cord stimulation. RECENT FINDINGS: Lead migration is generally the most common complication of percutaneous spinal cord stimulation; however, recent utilization of various anchoring techniques has been discussed and experienced clinical success in decreasing the prevalence of lead migration and lead fractures. With newer high-frequency systems gaining traction to improve pain management and decrease complications as compared to traditional systems, rechargeable implantable pulse generators have been the preferred power source. However, recent findings may suggest that these rechargeable implantable pulse generators do not significantly increase battery life as much as was proposed. Intraoperative neuromonitoring has seen success in mitigating neurological injury postoperatively and may see more usage in the future through more testing. Though the occurrence of infection and biological complications, including dural puncture and skin erosion, has been less frequent over time, they should still be treated in accordance with established protocols. While many complications can arise following percutaneous spinal cord stimulator implantation, the procedure is less invasive than open implantation and has seen largely positive patient feedback. Hardware complications, the more common issues that can occur, rarely indicate a serious risk and can generally be remedied through reoperation. However, less common cases such as neurological injury, infections, and biological complications require prompt diagnosis to improve the condition of the patient and prevent significant damage.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación de la Médula Espinal , Humanos , Electrodos Implantados/efectos adversos , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal/efectos adversos , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos/métodos , Médula Espinal
3.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39052182

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a frequent complication of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents; its incidence largely varies, depending on type, dose, agent and preexisting risk factors. Oral-and-perioral-CIPN (OCIPN) is underreported. Neurotoxic agents can cause jaw pain or numbness. This review aims to present available data on OCIPN RECENT FINDINGS: A narrative literature review, following SANRA guidelines was conducted. PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched until September 2023. Articles referring to neuropathy or neuropathic pain due to head and neck cancer, head and neck radiotherapy, oropharyngeal mucositis, infection or post-surgical pain were excluded. Platinum-based chemotherapeutics, taxanes, vinca alkaloids, immunomodulatory and alkylating agents can cause OCIPN. Platinum-based chemotherapeutics can cause orofacial cold sensitivity, orofacial and jaw pain, oral cavity tingling and teeth hypersensitivity. Taxanes may induce oral cavity and tongue numbness and tingling as well as hot hypersensitivity. Vinca alkaloids may cause jaw, teeth and lips pain and oral mucosa hyperalgesia. Immunomodulatory drugs can cause lips, tongue and perioral numbness, while alkylating agents induce tongue and lips tingling and teeth cold-hypersensitivity. Chemotherapy may cause OCIPN due to changes in cellular structure and function, like alterations in membrane receptors and neurotransmission. OCIPN should be documented and physicians, dentists and health care providers should be alerted.

4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38935243

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to summarize current knowledge on the pathophysiology of pain and the role of neuro-immune crosstalk in the development of acute and chronic pain (CP). Specifically, the review focuses on the role of immune cells involved in the innate and acquired immune response, emphasizing their bidirectional interactions with the nervous systems and discussing the implications of this crosstalk on acute and CP management. RECENT FINDINGS: In the last two decades, multiple studies have uncovered the important role of the immune system in initiating, maintaining, and resolving pain stimuli. Furthermore, researchers discovered that the immune system interacts tightly with the nervous system, creating a bidirectional crosstalk in which immune cells influence the response of peripheral and central nerve fibers while neurotransmitters and neuropeptides released by nociceptors directly and indirectly modulate the immune response. The neuro-immune crosstalk in acute and CP is a complex and not fully understood process that comprise the interactions of multiple diverse molecules, bidirectional interferences, and numerous redundant processes. Despite the complexity, important steps have been taken in recent years toward explaining the specific roles of each immune cell type and molecule in the initiation, maintenance and resolution of pain. These findings may set the basis for innovative therapeutic options that target the immune system, overcoming the limitations of current treatments in providing pain relief and the disadvantages associated with opioid therapy.

5.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38850491

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an increasingly utilized therapy for the treatment of neuropathic pain conditions. Though minimally invasive and reversable, there are several important device-related complications that physicians should be aware of before offering this therapy to patients. The aim of this review is to synthesize recent studies in device-related SCS complications pertaining to cylindrical lead implantation and to discuss etiologies, symptoms and presentations, diagnostic evaluation, clinical implications, and treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS: Device-related complications are more common than biologic complications. Device-related complications covered in this review include lead migration, lead fracture, lead disconnection, generator failure, loss of charge, generator flipping, hardware related pain, and paresthesia intolerance. The use of SCS continues to be an effective option for neuropathic pain conditions. Consideration of complications prior to moving forward with SCS trials and implantation is a vital part of patient management and device selection. Knowledge of these complications can provide physicians and other healthcare professionals the ability to maximize patient outcomes.

6.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 28(5): 321-333, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38386244

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This manuscript summarizes novel clinical and interventional approaches in the management of chronic, nociceptive, and neuropathic pain. RECENT FINDINGS: Pain can be defined as a feeling of physical or emotional distress caused by an external stimulus. Pain can be grouped into distinct types according to characteristics including neuropathic pain, which is a pain caused by disease or lesion in the sensory nervous system; nociceptive pain, which is pain that can be sharp, aching, or throbbing and is caused by injury to bodily tissues; and chronic pain, which is long lasting or persisting beyond 6 months. With improved understanding of different signaling systems for pain in recent years, there has been an upscale of methods of analgesia to counteract these pathological processes. Novel treatment methods such as use of cannabinoids, stem cells, gene therapy, nanoparticles, monoclonal antibodies, and platelet-rich plasma have played a significant role in improved strategies for therapeutic interventions. Although many management options appear to be promising, extensive additional clinical research is warranted to determine best practice strategies in the future for clinicians.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico , Terapia Genética , Nanomedicina , Neuralgia , Trasplante de Células Madre , Humanos , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Neuralgia/terapia , Terapia Genética/métodos , Nanomedicina/métodos , Nanomedicina/tendencias , Trasplante de Células Madre/métodos , Trasplante de Células Madre/tendencias , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Nociceptivo/terapia , Dolor Nociceptivo/fisiopatología
7.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 28(1): 11-25, 2024 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38060102

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: It is essential to have validated and reliable pain measurement tools that cover a wide range of areas and are tailored to individual patients to ensure effective pain management. The main objective of this review is to provide comprehensive information on commonly used pain scales and questionnaires, including their usefulness, intended purpose, applicability to different patient populations, and associated advantages and disadvantages. RECENT FINDINGS: Acute pain questionnaires typically focus on measuring the severity of pain and the extent of relief achieved through interventions. Chronic pain questionnaires evaluate additional aspects such as pain-related functional limitations, psychological distress, and psychological well-being. The selection of an appropriate pain scale depends on the specific assessment objectives. Additionally, each pain scale has its strengths and limitations. Understanding the differences among these pain scales is essential for selecting the most appropriate tool tailored to individual patient needs in different settings. CONCLUSION: Medical professionals encounter challenges in accurately assessing pain. Physicians must be familiar with the different pain scales and their applicability to specific patient population.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Dolor Crónico , Humanos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Manejo del Dolor , Evaluación de la Discapacidad
8.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 27(8): 259-267, 2023 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37395899

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The study sought to assess the prevalence of physician burnout among interventional pain physicians in 2022. RECENT FINDINGS: Physician burnout is major psychosocial and occupational health issue. Prior to the coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, over 60% of physicians reported emotional exhaustion and burnout. Physician burnout was reported to become more prevalent in multiple medical specialties during the COVID-19 pandemic. An 18-question survey was distributed electronically to all ASPN members (n = 7809) in the summer of 2022 to assess demographics, burnout characteristics (e.g., Have you felt burned out due to COVID?), and strategies to cope with burnout and stress (e.g., reached out for mental health assistance). Members were able to complete the survey once and were unable to make changes to their responses once submitted. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the prevalence and severity of physician burnout within the ASPN community. Chi-square tests were used to examine differences in burnout by provider characteristics (age, gender, years practicing, and practice type) with p-values less than 0.05 indicating statistical significance. There were 7809 ASPN members that received the survey email, 164 of those members completed the survey, a response rate of 2.1%. The majority of respondents were male (74.1%, n = 120), 94% were attending physicians (n = 152), and 26% (n = 43) have been in practice for twenty years or longer. Most respondents expressed having experienced burnout during the COVID pandemic (73.5%, n = 119), 21.6% of the sample reported reduced hours and responsibilities during the pandemic, and 6.2% of surveyed physicians quit or retired due to burnout. Nearly half of responders reported negative impacts to their family and social lives as well as personal physical and mental health. A variety of negative (e.g., changes in diet, smoking/vaping) and positive coping strategies (e.g., exercise and training, spiritual enrichment) were employed in response to stress and burnout; 33.5% felt they should or had reached out for mental health assistance and suicidal ideations were expressed in 6.2% due to burnout. A high percentage of interventional pain physicians continue to experience mental symptoms that may lead to risk for significant issues going forward. Our findings should be interpreted with caution based on the low response rate. Evaluation of burnout should be incorporated into annual assessments given issues of survey fatigue and low survey response rates. Interventions and strategies to address burnout are warranted.


Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , COVID-19 , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Estados Unidos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/diagnóstico , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Dolor/epidemiología
9.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 27(11): 747-755, 2023 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37747621

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Rib fractures are a common traumatic injury that has been traditionally treated with systemic opioids and non-opioid analgesics. Due to the adverse effects of opioid analgesics, regional anesthesia techniques have become an increasingly promising alternative. This review article aims to explore the efficacy, safety, and constraints of medical management and regional anesthesia techniques in alleviating pain related to rib fractures. RECENT FINDINGS: Recently, opioid analgesia, thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA), and paravertebral block (PVB) have been favored options in the pain management of rib fractures. TEA has positive analgesic effects, and many studies vouch for its efficacy; however, it is contraindicated for many patients. PVB is a viable alternative to those with contraindications to TEA and exhibits promising outcomes compared to other regional anesthesia techniques; however, a failure rate of up to 10% and adverse complications challenge its administration in trauma settings. Serratus anterior plane blocks (SAPB) and erector spinae blocks (ESPB) serve as practical alternatives to TEA or PVB with lower incidences of adverse effects while exhibiting similar levels of analgesia. ESPB can be performed by trained emergency physicians, making it a feasible procedure to perform that is low-risk and efficient in pain management. Compared to the other techniques, intercostal nerve block (ICNB) had less analgesic impact and required concurrent intravenous medication to achieve comparable outcomes to the other blocks. The regional anesthesia techniques showed great success in improving pain scores and expediting recovery in many patients. However, choosing the optimal technique may not be so clear and will depend on the patient's case and the team's preferences. The peripheral nerve blocks have impressive potential in the future and may very well surpass neuraxial techniques; however, further research is needed to prove their efficacy and weaknesses.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Nervioso , Fracturas de las Costillas , Humanos , Fracturas de las Costillas/complicaciones , Fracturas de las Costillas/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Bloqueo Nervioso/métodos , Dolor/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico
10.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 27(12): 811-820, 2023 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37897592

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this review is to educate healthcare professionals regarding buprenorphine for the use of opioid use disorder (OUD) as well as for chronic pain management. This review provides physicians and practitioners with updated information regarding the distinct characteristics and intricacies of prescribing buprenorphine. RECENT FINDINGS: Buprenorphine is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for acute pain, chronic pain, opioid use disorder (OUD), and opioid dependence. When compared to most other opioids, buprenorphine offers superior patient tolerability, an excellent half-life, and minimal respiratory depression. Buprenorphine does have notable side effects as well as pharmacokinetic properties that require special attention, especially if patients require future surgical interventions. Many physicians are not trained to initiate or manage patients on buprenorphine. However, buprenorphine offers a potentially safer alternative for medication management for patients who require chronic opioid therapy for pain or have OUD. This review provides updated information on buprenorphine for both chronic pain and OUD.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Agudo , Buprenorfina , Dolor Crónico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Humanos , Buprenorfina/uso terapéutico , Dolor Crónico/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Agudo/tratamiento farmacológico , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos
11.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 26(2): 145-149, 2022 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35076875

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sedation for pain medicine procedures provides a unique challenge for proceduralists. Many patients dealing with pain are on chronic opioids and require higher doses of sedation for adequate procedural comfort. Chronic pain patients have various comorbidities including depression, neuropsychiatric disorders, peripheral vascular disease, and renal impairment, among others [1]. These confounding variables make the overall treatment of their pain condition much more challenging. RECENT FINDINGS: For patients requiring intravenous (IV) sedation for their pain procedures, the constant need for access may render them a "difficult stick" over time. Another factor to consider is the increasing requirements by the hospital system needing IV sedatives and analgesics in the intensive care unit and operating rooms during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Sublingual sufentanil (SST) provides an excellent analgesic option for patients undergoing interventional pain procedures. The use of SST allows hospitals to preserve IV agents for more critical areas and mitigates the difficulty of obtaining IV access in patients.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Sufentanilo , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , SARS-CoV-2 , Sufentanilo/uso terapéutico , Comprimidos
12.
J Craniofac Surg ; 33(3): 779-783, 2022 May 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34753868

RESUMEN

ABSTRACT: This report intends to summarize the underlying pathophysiology, relevant symptoms, appropriate diagnostic workup, necessary imaging, and medical and surgical treatments of occipital neuralgia (ON). This was done through a comprehensive literature review of peer-reviewed literature throughout the most relevant databases. The current understanding of ON is that it causes neuropathic pain in the distribution of the greater occipital nerve, the lesser occipital nerve, the third occipital nerve or a combination of the 3. It is currently a subset of headaches although there is some debate if ON should be its own condition. Occipital neuralgia causes chronic, sharp, stabbing pain in the upper neck, back of the head, and behind the ears that can radiate to the front of the head. Diagnosis is typically clinical and patients present with intermittent, painful episodes associated with the occipital region and the nerves described above. Most cases are unilateral pain, however bilateral pain can be present and the pain can radiate to the frontal region and face. Physical examination is the first step in management of this disease and patients may demonstrate tenderness over the greater occipital and lesser occipital nerves. Anesthetics like 1% to 2% lidocaine or 0.25% to 0.5% bupivacaine can be used to block these nerves and antiinflammatory drugs like corticosteroids can be used in combination to prevent compressive symptoms. Other treatments like botulinum toxin and radiofrequency ablation have shown promise and require more research. Surgical decompression through resection of the obliquus capitis inferior is the definitive treatment however there are significant risks associated with this procedure.


Asunto(s)
Neuralgia/diagnóstico , Neuralgia/terapia , Nervios Espinales , Plexo Cervical , Cefalea , Humanos , Dolor de Cuello
13.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 25(4): 21, 2021 Mar 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33693989

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to provide relevant, aggregate information about a variety of disinfectants and antiseptics, along with potential utility and limitations. While not exhaustive, this review's goal is to add to the body of literature available on this topic and give interventional providers and practitioners an additional resource to consider when performing procedures. RECENT FINDINGS: In the current SARS-CoV2 epidemiological environment, infection control and costs associated with healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) are of paramount importance. Even before the onset of SARS-CoV2, HAIs affected nearly 2million patients a year in the USA and resulted in nearly 90,000 deaths, all of which resulted in a cost to hospitals ranging from US$28 billion to 45 billion. The onset SARS-CoV2, though not spread by an airborne route, has heightened infection control protocols in hospitals and, as such, cast a renewed focus on disinfectants and their utility across different settings and organisms. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of disinfectants used in the inpatient setting.


Asunto(s)
Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Desinfectantes , Compuestos de Cloro , Etanol , Formaldehído , Glutaral , Humanos , Peróxido de Hidrógeno , Yodóforos , Óxidos , Ácido Peracético , Fenol , Povidona Yodada , Compuestos de Amonio Cuaternario , Hipoclorito de Sodio , Triazinas
14.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 25(1): 2, 2021 Jan 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33443607

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This evidence-based systematic review will focus on the use of acupuncture and its role in the treatment of low back pain to help better guide physicians in their practice. It will cover the background and the burden of low back pain and present the current options for treatment and weigh the evidence that is available to support acupuncture as a treatment modality for low back pain. RECENT FINDINGS: Low back pain (LBP), defined as a disorder of the lumbosacral spine and categorized as acute, subacute, or chronic, can be a debilitating condition for many patients. Chronic LBP is more typically defined by its chronicity with pain persisting > 12 weeks in duration. Conventional treatment for chronic LBP includes both pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic options. First-line pharmacologic therapy involves the use of NSAIDs, then SNRI/TCA/skeletal muscle relaxants, and antiepileptics. Surgery is usually not recommended for chronic non-specific LBP patients. According to the 2016 CDC Guidelines for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain and the 2017 American College of Physicians (ACP) clinical practice guidelines for chronic pain, non-pharmacologic interventions, acupuncture can be a first-line treatment for patients suffering from chronic low back pain. Many studies have been done, and most show promising results for acupuncture as an alternative treatment for low back pain. Due to non-standardized methods for acupuncture with many variations, standardization remains a challenge.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Acupuntura/métodos , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/uso terapéutico , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Antidepresivos Tricíclicos/uso terapéutico , Electroacupuntura/métodos , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Inyecciones Epidurales , Fármacos Neuromusculares/uso terapéutico , Manejo del Dolor , Inhibidores de Captación de Serotonina y Norepinefrina/uso terapéutico
15.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 25(3): 13, 2021 Feb 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33630172

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This is a comprehensive review of the superior hypogastric block for the management of chronic pelvic pain. It reviews the background, including etiology, epidemiology, and current treatment available for chronic pelvic pain. It then presents the superior hypogastric block and reviews the seminal and most recent evidence about its use in chronic pelvic pain. RECENT FINDINGS: Several definitions exist for chronic pelvic pain (CPP), making the diagnosis more challenging for the clinician; however, they commonly describe continuous pain lasting 6 months in the pelvis, with an overwhelming majority of patients being reproductive-aged women. This pain is often one of mechanical, inflammatory, or neuropathic. It is generally underdiagnosed and affects anywhere between 5 and 26% of women. The diagnosis of chronic pelvic pain is clinical, consisting of mainly of a thorough history and physical and ruling out other causes. The pathophysiology is often endometriosis (70%) and also includes PID, adhesions, adenomyosis, uterine fibroids, chronic processes of the GI and urinary tracts, as well as pelvic-intrinsic musculoskeletal causes. Treatment includes physical therapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, and oral and parenteral opioids. Interventional techniques provide an added tier of treatment and may help to reduce the requirement for chronic opioid use. Superior hypogastric plexus block is one of the available interventional techniques; first described in 1990, it has been shown to provide long-lasting relief in 50-70% of patients who underwent the procedure. Two approaches described so far, both under fluoroscopy, have seen similar results. More recently, ultrasound and CT-guided procedures have also been described with similar success. The injectate includes local anesthetic, steroids, and neurolytic agents such as phenol or ethanol. CPP is a common debilitating condition. It is diagnosed clinically and is underdiagnosed globally. Current treatments can be helpful at times but may fall short of satisfactory pain relief. Interventional techniques provide an added layer of treatment as well as reduce the requirement for opioids. Superior hypogastric plexus block provides long-lasting relief in many patients, regardless of approach. Evidence level is limited, and further RCTs could help provide better tools for evaluation and patient selection.


Asunto(s)
Bloqueo Nervioso Autónomo/métodos , Dolor Crónico/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Plexo Hipogástrico/diagnóstico por imagen , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Pélvico/diagnóstico por imagen , Dolor Pélvico/terapia , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Dolor Crónico/metabolismo , Endometriosis/diagnóstico por imagen , Endometriosis/metabolismo , Endometriosis/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Mediadores de Inflamación/antagonistas & inhibidores , Mediadores de Inflamación/metabolismo , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dolor Pélvico/metabolismo
16.
Pain Pract ; 21(1): 75-82, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32654360

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) therapies are used in the management of patients with complex regional pain syndrome I (CRPS I) and failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). The purpose of this study was to investigate the racial and health insurance inequalities with SCS therapy in patients with chronic pain who had CRPS I and FBSS. METHODS: Patients with chronic pain who had a discharge diagnosis of FBSS and CRPS I were identified using the National Inpatient Sample database. Our primary outcome was defined as the history of SCS utilization by race/ethnicity, income quartile, and insurance status. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the variables associated with utilization of SCS therapy. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2015, 40,858 patients who were hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of FBSS and/or CRPS I were identified. Of these patients, 1,082 (2.7%) had a history of SCS therapy. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that compared to White patients, Black and Hispanic patients had higher odds of having SCS therapy (Black patients: odds ratio [OR] = 1.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.12 to 1.77; P = 0.003; Hispanic patients: OR = 1.41; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.81; P = 0.007). Patients with private insurance had significantly higher odds of having SCS therapy compared with those with Medicare (OR = 1.24; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.43; P = 0.003). Compared to patients with Medicare, Medicaid patients had lower odds of having SCS therapy (OR = 0.50; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.70; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that socioeconomic disparities may exist in the utilization of SCS among hospitalized patients with CRPS I and FBSS the United States. However, confirming these data from other administrative databases, in the outpatient setting, may shed more insight.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/terapia , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Estimulación de la Médula Espinal/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Síndrome de Fracaso de la Cirugía Espinal Lumbar/complicaciones , Síndrome de Fracaso de la Cirugía Espinal Lumbar/terapia , Femenino , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/economía , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid , Medicare , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/economía , Distrofia Simpática Refleja/complicaciones , Distrofia Simpática Refleja/terapia , Estados Unidos
17.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 24(11): 72, 2020 Oct 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33057883

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Social support is an important yet often overlooked aspect of chronic pain management. Understanding the impact of social support on patients with chronic pain and determining if a relationship exists between a patient's perceived social support and their perceived quality of life is a crucial component to completely treating a pain patient. We sought to develop an intervention for patients with chronic pain that addresses the different types of social support, barriers to using social support, and ways to improve the quality of their social support. RECENT FINDINGS: A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was utilized in an Outpatient Chronic Pain Rehabilitation Program with 23 patients with a chronic pain diagnosis who participated in a 3-week comprehensive pain rehabilitation program. Evaluation, intervention, and discharge were evaluated utilizing The American Chronic Pain Association's Quality of Life Scale and The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). The intervention phase comprised a 45-min group session. At discharge, the occupational therapist followed up with the patient regarding the results of their social survey. Overall, the results indicated an underutilization of social support among patients with chronic pain. Out of the four questions asked on the social support survey, patients scored their use of tangible support (Q2) as the lowest. No significant positive correlation (0.27) was found between social support and quality of life which can be attributed to the wide variety of patients seen at the PRC. Social support is an essential part of chronic pain treatment and should be addressed throughout all stages of pain management.


Asunto(s)
Dolor Crónico/psicología , Dolor Crónico/rehabilitación , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Apoyo Social , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos
18.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 24(5): 19, 2020 Mar 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32200435

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Migraine headaches are a neurologic disorder characterized by attacks of moderate to severe throbbing headache that are typically unilateral, exacerbated by physical activity, and associated with phonophobia, photophobia, nausea, and vomiting. In the USA, the overall age-adjusted prevalence of migraine in female and male adults is 22.3% and 10.8%, respectively. RECENT FINDINGS: Migraine is a disabling disease that ranks as the 8th most burdensome disease in the world and the 4th most in women. The overarching hypothesis of migraine pathophysiology describes migraine as a disorder of the pain modulating system, caused by disruptions of the normal neural networks of the head. The activation of these vascular networks results in meningeal vasodilation and inflammation, which is perceived as head pain. The primary goals of acute migraine therapy are to reduce attack duration and severity. Current evidence-based therapies for acute migraine attacks include acetaminophen, four nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), seven triptans, NSAID-triptan combinations, dihydroergotamine, non-opioid combination analgesics, and several anti-emetics. Over-the-counter medications are an important component of migraine therapy and are considered a first-line therapy for most migraineurs. These medications, such as acetaminophen, ibuprofen, naproxen, and aspirin, have shown strong efficacy when used as first-line treatments for mild-to-moderate migraine attacks. The lower cost of over-the-counter medications compared with prescription medications also makes them a preferred therapy for some patients. In addition to their efficacy and lower cost, over-the-counter medications generally have fewer and less severe adverse effects, have more favorable routes of administration (oral vs. subcutaneous injection), and reduced abuse potential. The purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive evidence-based update of over-the-counter pharmacologic options for chronic migraines.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Trastornos Migrañosos/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicamentos sin Prescripción/uso terapéutico , Humanos
19.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 24(5): 17, 2020 Mar 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32200490

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sickle cell disease (SCD) is a hematological disorder which leads to serious complications in multiple organ systems. While significant research has addressed many of the effects of acute pain episodes and end-organ damage connected to this disease, little has approached the chronic pain state associated with this condition. RECENT FINDINGS: Associated chronic pain represents a significant detractor from the quality of life experienced by these patients, affecting over half of those with SCD on more days than not. Current treatment typically is centered upon preventing and responding to acute vasoocclusive crises, presumably because this is the most common reason for hospitalization in these patients. The lack of management of chronic pain symptoms leaves many with SCD in a state of suffering. In this review, the treatment methodologies of SCD patients are examined including alternative treatments, both pharmaceutical and non-pharmaceutical, as well as procedural approaches specifically aimed at reducing chronic pain in these patients.


Asunto(s)
Anemia de Células Falciformes/complicaciones , Anemia de Células Falciformes/terapia , Dolor Crónico/etiología , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Humanos
20.
Curr Pain Headache Rep ; 24(9): 48, 2020 Jul 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32671495

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Post-stroke pain represents a complex condition with few standardized diagnostic criteria. As such, the array of symptoms is often difficult to categorize and diagnose. Central post-stroke pain (CPSP), also known as Dejerine-Roussy syndrome, presents as painful paresthesia in any part of the body that is usually coupled with sensory abnormalities. RECENT FINDINGS: In patients who had experienced a cerebrovascular accident, CPSP typically affects the same areas of the body that are also impacted by the general motor and sensory deficits that result from stroke. Though it is generally debated, CPSP is thought to result from a lesion in any part of the central nervous system. Pain usually presents in the range of 3-6 months after the occurrence of stroke, manifesting contralaterally to the lesion, and most commonly involving the upper extremities. For the most accurate diagnosis of CPSP, a thorough history and clinical examination should be supplemented with imaging. Infarcted areas of the brain can be visualized using either CT or MRI. First-line treatment of CPSP is pharmacologic and consists of a three-drug regimen. Despite this, CPSP is often refractory to medical management producing only modest pain reduction in a limited subset of patients. Adverse effects associated with pharmacologic management of CPSP and frequent recalcitrance to treatment have driven alternative minimally invasive methods of pain control which include transcranial stimulation, deep brain stimulation, and neuromodulation. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive update to recent advances in the understanding of the treatment and management of CPSP.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Charcot-Marie-Tooth/diagnóstico , Enfermedad de Charcot-Marie-Tooth/terapia , Enfermedades Talámicas/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Talámicas/terapia , Encéfalo/fisiopatología , Enfermedad de Charcot-Marie-Tooth/complicaciones , Humanos , Neuralgia/complicaciones , Neuralgia/diagnóstico , Neuralgia/terapia , Manejo del Dolor , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Enfermedades Talámicas/complicaciones
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA